Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre there any implicit, continuous, non-differentiable functions?Logical Relations Between Three Statements about Continuous FunctionsCombination of continuous and discontinuous functionsIs there only one continuous-everywhere non-differentiable function?Intuition behind uniformly continuous functionsWhy weren't continuous functions defined as Darboux functions?Examples of functions that do not belong to any Baire classFind all continuous functions that satisfy the Jensen inequality(?) $f(fracx+y2)=fracf(x)+f(y)2$Confused About Limit Points and Closed SetsConfusion About Differentiability of Function

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Inversion Puzzle

Extreme, unacceptable situation and I can't attend work tomorrow morning

aging parents with no investments

How to reverse every other sublist of a list?

How long do I have to send payment?

I see my dog run

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?

What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?

Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?

Why is it "Tumoren" and not "Tumore"?

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Inline version of a function returns different value then non-inline version

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Are USB sockets on wall outlets live all the time, even when the switch is off?

I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?

Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?



Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre there any implicit, continuous, non-differentiable functions?Logical Relations Between Three Statements about Continuous FunctionsCombination of continuous and discontinuous functionsIs there only one continuous-everywhere non-differentiable function?Intuition behind uniformly continuous functionsWhy weren't continuous functions defined as Darboux functions?Examples of functions that do not belong to any Baire classFind all continuous functions that satisfy the Jensen inequality(?) $f(fracx+y2)=fracf(x)+f(y)2$Confused About Limit Points and Closed SetsConfusion About Differentiability of Function










2












$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    56 mins ago
















2












$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    56 mins ago














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.







real-analysis functions derivatives continuity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









fazanfazan

537




537











  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    56 mins ago

















  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    56 mins ago
















$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
$endgroup$
– Robert Furber
56 mins ago





$begingroup$
@avs That is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. Being differentiable is strictly weaker (not requiring that the derivatives be continuous).
$endgroup$
– Robert Furber
56 mins ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    55 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    51 mins ago


















1












$begingroup$

As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
    $endgroup$
    – Haris Gusic
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
    $endgroup$
    – K.Power
    4 hours ago


















0












$begingroup$

Sounds like the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbbRtomathbb R$ like in your original post is continuous at every point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ wherever $$limlimits_xto a^-fleft(xright)=limlimits_xto a^+fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



    The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      55 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      51 mins ago















    4












    $begingroup$

    That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



    The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      55 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      51 mins ago













    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



    The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



    The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 4 hours ago

























    answered 4 hours ago









    Haris GusicHaris Gusic

    3,516627




    3,516627











    • $begingroup$
      It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      55 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      51 mins ago
















    • $begingroup$
      It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      55 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Furber
      51 mins ago















    $begingroup$
    It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    55 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    It is the definition of a continuously differentiable or $C^1$ function. This definition is important because $C^1$ functions on compact manifolds form Banach spaces, whereas differentiable functions do not.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    55 mins ago












    $begingroup$
    Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    51 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    Here is the relevant wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Furber
    51 mins ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      4 hours ago















    1












    $begingroup$

    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      4 hours ago













    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 3 hours ago

























    answered 4 hours ago









    K.PowerK.Power

    3,710926




    3,710926











    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      4 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      4 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
    $endgroup$
    – Haris Gusic
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
    $endgroup$
    – Haris Gusic
    4 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
    $endgroup$
    – K.Power
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
    $endgroup$
    – K.Power
    4 hours ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    Sounds like the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbbRtomathbb R$ like in your original post is continuous at every point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ wherever $$limlimits_xto a^-fleft(xright)=limlimits_xto a^+fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      Sounds like the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbbRtomathbb R$ like in your original post is continuous at every point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ wherever $$limlimits_xto a^-fleft(xright)=limlimits_xto a^+fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Sounds like the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbbRtomathbb R$ like in your original post is continuous at every point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ wherever $$limlimits_xto a^-fleft(xright)=limlimits_xto a^+fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly)






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Sounds like the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbbRtomathbb R$ like in your original post is continuous at every point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ wherever $$limlimits_xto a^-fleft(xright)=limlimits_xto a^+fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly)







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        ManRowManRow

        24618




        24618



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Log på Navigationsmenu

            Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

            Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse