Okay to merge included columns on otherwise identical indexes? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)SQL server indexing foreign keys, covering indexes included columnsdifference between having many non clustered index with single columns and with combination of many columnsTwo identical MySQL tables, one not using indexesAre these indexes redundant?Does Index Intersection work with Included Columns?Effect of an index on update statements where update column is not in an indexSQL Server : Included columns in an Index: is there something like “too many”?Any reason to have both an index with included columns and one without?Index creation with multiple columns - should I combine as many as possible?Table/Column Character Encoding and Indexes

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?

English words in a non-english sci-fi novel

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?

Book where humans were engineered with genes from animal species to survive hostile planets

Understanding Ceva's Theorem

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

When were vectors invented?

Error "illegal generic type for instanceof" when using local classes

What's the meaning of 間時肆拾貳 at a car parking sign

Dating a Former Employee

How do pianists reach extremely loud dynamics?

Gordon Ramsay Pudding Recipe

Why light coming from distant stars is not discrete?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

At the end of Thor: Ragnarok why don't the Asgardians turn and head for the Bifrost as per their original plan?

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

Apollo command module space walk?

How does the particle を relate to the verb 行く in the structure「A を + B に行く」?

First console to have temporary backward compatibility

The logistics of corpse disposal



Okay to merge included columns on otherwise identical indexes?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)SQL server indexing foreign keys, covering indexes included columnsdifference between having many non clustered index with single columns and with combination of many columnsTwo identical MySQL tables, one not using indexesAre these indexes redundant?Does Index Intersection work with Included Columns?Effect of an index on update statements where update column is not in an indexSQL Server : Included columns in an Index: is there something like “too many”?Any reason to have both an index with included columns and one without?Index creation with multiple columns - should I combine as many as possible?Table/Column Character Encoding and Indexes



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?










share|improve this question




























    3















    I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



    There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?










    share|improve this question
























      3












      3








      3








      I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



      There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?










      share|improve this question














      I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



      There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?







      sql-server index






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 7 hours ago









      BVernonBVernon

      218413




      218413




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234982%2fokay-to-merge-included-columns-on-otherwise-identical-indexes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago















          5














          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago













          5












          5








          5







          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer













          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          Erik DarlingErik Darling

          22.9k1269113




          22.9k1269113












          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago

















          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago
















          Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

          – BVernon
          5 hours ago





          Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

          – BVernon
          5 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234982%2fokay-to-merge-included-columns-on-otherwise-identical-indexes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Log på Navigationsmenu

          Creating second map without labels using QGIS?How to lock map labels for inset map in Print Composer?How to Force the Showing of Labels of a Vector File in QGISQGIS Valmiera, Labels only show for part of polygonsRemoving duplicate point labels in QGISLabeling every feature using QGIS?Show labels for point features outside map canvasAbbreviate Road Labels in QGIS only when requiredExporting map from composer in QGIS - text labels have moved in output?How to make sure labels in qgis turn up in layout map?Writing label expression with ArcMap and If then Statement?

          Nuuk Indholdsfortegnelse Etyomologi | Historie | Geografi | Transport og infrastruktur | Politik og administration | Uddannelsesinstitutioner | Kultur | Venskabsbyer | Noter | Eksterne henvisninger | Se også | Navigationsmenuwww.sermersooq.gl64°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.75064°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.750DMI - KlimanormalerSalmonsen, s. 850Grønlands Naturinstitut undersøger rensdyr i Akia og Maniitsoq foråret 2008Grønlands NaturinstitutNy vej til Qinngorput indviet i dagAntallet af biler i Nuuk må begrænsesNy taxacentral mødt med demonstrationKøreplan. Rute 1, 2 og 3SnescootersporNuukNord er for storSkoler i Kommuneqarfik SermersooqAtuarfik Samuel KleinschmidtKangillinguit AtuarfiatNuussuup AtuarfiaNuuk Internationale FriskoleIlinniarfissuaq, Grønlands SeminariumLedelseÅrsberetning for 2008Kunst og arkitekturÅrsberetning for 2008Julie om naturenNuuk KunstmuseumSilamiutGrønlands Nationalmuseum og ArkivStatistisk ÅrbogGrønlands LandsbibliotekStore koncerter på stribeVandhund nummer 1.000.000Kommuneqarfik Sermersooq – MalikForsidenVenskabsbyerLyngby-Taarbæk i GrønlandArctic Business NetworkWinter Cities 2008 i NuukDagligt opdaterede satellitbilleder fra NuukområdetKommuneqarfik Sermersooqs hjemmesideTurist i NuukGrønlands Statistiks databankGrønlands Hjemmestyres valgresultaterrrWorldCat124325457671310-5