Holes in ElementMesh with ToElementMesh of ImplicitRegion Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?ElementMesh from ImplicitRegion cuts corners of regionLong running ToElementMesh with very “large” domainsProblem with MeshOrderAlteration to create a 2nd order ElementMeshToElementMesh[]3D FEM with holesElementMesh (rendering?) issueMaking good meshesElementMesh from Tetrahedron subdivisionElementMesh from ImplicitRegion cuts corners of regionToElementMesh of Region with HoleUneven distribution of nodes by ToElementMesh[]

Can you stand up from being prone using Skirmisher outside of your turn?

Flattening the sub-lists

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

Is there any hidden 'W' sound after 'comment' in : Comment est-elle?

What is a 'Key' in computer science?

Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?

Is Bran literally the world's memory?

Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?

Prove the alternating sum of a decreasing sequence converging to 0 is Cauchy.

Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)

Multiple fireplaces in an apartment building?

Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?

Does Feeblemind produce an ongoing magical effect that can be dispelled?

Multiple options vs single option UI

How would this chord from "Rocket Man" be analyzed?

Putting Ant-Man on house arrest

Passing args from the bash script to the function in the script

What is the least dense liquid under normal conditions?

Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson binomial distribution?

Additive group of local rings

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

Would reducing the reference voltage of an ADC have any effect on accuracy?



Holes in ElementMesh with ToElementMesh of ImplicitRegion



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?ElementMesh from ImplicitRegion cuts corners of regionLong running ToElementMesh with very “large” domainsProblem with MeshOrderAlteration to create a 2nd order ElementMeshToElementMesh[]3D FEM with holesElementMesh (rendering?) issueMaking good meshesElementMesh from Tetrahedron subdivisionElementMesh from ImplicitRegion cuts corners of regionToElementMesh of Region with HoleUneven distribution of nodes by ToElementMesh[]










5












$begingroup$


I am trying to plot a function in a region below a level curve of the function and within a cell. I have been doing this by calculating an ElementMesh using ImplicitRegion and ToElementMesh, but the result has holes.



Here is the cell (it's just a square),



cell = Parallelogram[-0.5`, -0.5`, 1.`, 0.`, 0.`, 1.`];
Graphics[Transparent, EdgeForm[Thick], cell]


and the function,



f[kx_, ky_, n_] := 
Sort[Eigenvalues[(-1. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., -0.23,
0.12, 0., 0., 0.,
0., -0.23, (-1. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0.12, -0.23,
0.12, 0., 0., 0., 0., -0.23, (-1. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2, 0.,
0.12, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., -0.23, 0.12,
0., (0. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., -0.23, 0.12,
0., 0.12, -0.23,
0.12, -0.23, (0. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0.12, -0.23,
0.12, 0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., -0.23, (0. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2,
0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., -0.23, 0.12,
0., (1. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., 0.,
0.12, -0.23,
0.12, -0.23, (1. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., 0., 0.,
0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., -0.23, (1. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2]][[
n]];
Plot3D[f[x, y, 4], x, y [Element] cell, PlotPoints -> 50]


enter image description here



and what the region should look like,



isovalue = 1.29897233417072;
ContourPlot[f[x, y, 4], x, y [Element] cell,
Contours -> isovalue, ColorFunction -> GrayLevel,
PlotPoints -> 100]


enter image description here



This is what I have tried



reg = ToElementMesh[
ImplicitRegion[
f[x, y, 4] < isovalue && x, y [Element] cell, x, y],
"MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 0.01, MeshQualityGoal -> 1,
PerformanceGoal -> "Quality", MaxCellMeasure -> 0.01,
"BoundaryMeshGenerator" -> "Continuation"];
RegionPlot[reg]


enter image description here
The region is no more accurate when I decrease MaxCellMeasure or MaxBoundaryCellMeasure. I also tried the solution suggested here.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to plot a function in a region below a level curve of the function and within a cell. I have been doing this by calculating an ElementMesh using ImplicitRegion and ToElementMesh, but the result has holes.



    Here is the cell (it's just a square),



    cell = Parallelogram[-0.5`, -0.5`, 1.`, 0.`, 0.`, 1.`];
    Graphics[Transparent, EdgeForm[Thick], cell]


    and the function,



    f[kx_, ky_, n_] := 
    Sort[Eigenvalues[(-1. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., -0.23,
    0.12, 0., 0., 0.,
    0., -0.23, (-1. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0.12, -0.23,
    0.12, 0., 0., 0., 0., -0.23, (-1. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2, 0.,
    0.12, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., -0.23, 0.12,
    0., (0. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., -0.23, 0.12,
    0., 0.12, -0.23,
    0.12, -0.23, (0. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0.12, -0.23,
    0.12, 0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., -0.23, (0. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2,
    0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., -0.23, 0.12,
    0., (1. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., 0.,
    0.12, -0.23,
    0.12, -0.23, (1. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., 0., 0.,
    0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., -0.23, (1. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2]][[
    n]];
    Plot3D[f[x, y, 4], x, y [Element] cell, PlotPoints -> 50]


    enter image description here



    and what the region should look like,



    isovalue = 1.29897233417072;
    ContourPlot[f[x, y, 4], x, y [Element] cell,
    Contours -> isovalue, ColorFunction -> GrayLevel,
    PlotPoints -> 100]


    enter image description here



    This is what I have tried



    reg = ToElementMesh[
    ImplicitRegion[
    f[x, y, 4] < isovalue && x, y [Element] cell, x, y],
    "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 0.01, MeshQualityGoal -> 1,
    PerformanceGoal -> "Quality", MaxCellMeasure -> 0.01,
    "BoundaryMeshGenerator" -> "Continuation"];
    RegionPlot[reg]


    enter image description here
    The region is no more accurate when I decrease MaxCellMeasure or MaxBoundaryCellMeasure. I also tried the solution suggested here.










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      I am trying to plot a function in a region below a level curve of the function and within a cell. I have been doing this by calculating an ElementMesh using ImplicitRegion and ToElementMesh, but the result has holes.



      Here is the cell (it's just a square),



      cell = Parallelogram[-0.5`, -0.5`, 1.`, 0.`, 0.`, 1.`];
      Graphics[Transparent, EdgeForm[Thick], cell]


      and the function,



      f[kx_, ky_, n_] := 
      Sort[Eigenvalues[(-1. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., -0.23,
      0.12, 0., 0., 0.,
      0., -0.23, (-1. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0.12, -0.23,
      0.12, 0., 0., 0., 0., -0.23, (-1. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2, 0.,
      0.12, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., -0.23, 0.12,
      0., (0. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., -0.23, 0.12,
      0., 0.12, -0.23,
      0.12, -0.23, (0. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0.12, -0.23,
      0.12, 0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., -0.23, (0. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2,
      0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., -0.23, 0.12,
      0., (1. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., 0.,
      0.12, -0.23,
      0.12, -0.23, (1. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., 0., 0.,
      0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., -0.23, (1. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2]][[
      n]];
      Plot3D[f[x, y, 4], x, y [Element] cell, PlotPoints -> 50]


      enter image description here



      and what the region should look like,



      isovalue = 1.29897233417072;
      ContourPlot[f[x, y, 4], x, y [Element] cell,
      Contours -> isovalue, ColorFunction -> GrayLevel,
      PlotPoints -> 100]


      enter image description here



      This is what I have tried



      reg = ToElementMesh[
      ImplicitRegion[
      f[x, y, 4] < isovalue && x, y [Element] cell, x, y],
      "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 0.01, MeshQualityGoal -> 1,
      PerformanceGoal -> "Quality", MaxCellMeasure -> 0.01,
      "BoundaryMeshGenerator" -> "Continuation"];
      RegionPlot[reg]


      enter image description here
      The region is no more accurate when I decrease MaxCellMeasure or MaxBoundaryCellMeasure. I also tried the solution suggested here.










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am trying to plot a function in a region below a level curve of the function and within a cell. I have been doing this by calculating an ElementMesh using ImplicitRegion and ToElementMesh, but the result has holes.



      Here is the cell (it's just a square),



      cell = Parallelogram[-0.5`, -0.5`, 1.`, 0.`, 0.`, 1.`];
      Graphics[Transparent, EdgeForm[Thick], cell]


      and the function,



      f[kx_, ky_, n_] := 
      Sort[Eigenvalues[(-1. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., -0.23,
      0.12, 0., 0., 0.,
      0., -0.23, (-1. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0.12, -0.23,
      0.12, 0., 0., 0., 0., -0.23, (-1. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2, 0.,
      0.12, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., -0.23, 0.12,
      0., (0. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., -0.23, 0.12,
      0., 0.12, -0.23,
      0.12, -0.23, (0. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0.12, -0.23,
      0.12, 0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., -0.23, (0. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2,
      0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., -0.23, 0.12,
      0., (1. + kx)^2 + (-1. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., 0., 0., 0.,
      0.12, -0.23,
      0.12, -0.23, (1. + kx)^2 + (0. + ky)^2, -0.23, 0., 0., 0.,
      0., 0.12, -0.23, 0., -0.23, (1. + kx)^2 + (1. + ky)^2]][[
      n]];
      Plot3D[f[x, y, 4], x, y [Element] cell, PlotPoints -> 50]


      enter image description here



      and what the region should look like,



      isovalue = 1.29897233417072;
      ContourPlot[f[x, y, 4], x, y [Element] cell,
      Contours -> isovalue, ColorFunction -> GrayLevel,
      PlotPoints -> 100]


      enter image description here



      This is what I have tried



      reg = ToElementMesh[
      ImplicitRegion[
      f[x, y, 4] < isovalue && x, y [Element] cell, x, y],
      "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 0.01, MeshQualityGoal -> 1,
      PerformanceGoal -> "Quality", MaxCellMeasure -> 0.01,
      "BoundaryMeshGenerator" -> "Continuation"];
      RegionPlot[reg]


      enter image description here
      The region is no more accurate when I decrease MaxCellMeasure or MaxBoundaryCellMeasure. I also tried the solution suggested here.







      plotting finite-element-method mesh implicit






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      user21

      21.2k55999




      21.2k55999










      asked 9 hours ago









      jerjorgjerjorg

      974




      974




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          I hope I interpreted your question correctly that you want a more accurate ElementMesh representation of the region.



          First we create a high quality Graphics of the region of interest.



          isovalue = 1.29897233417072;
          (* Add some margins to plot range to get connected region. *)
          tolerance = 0.05;
          plot = ContourPlot[
          f[x, y, 4],
          x, y ∈ Cuboid[-0.5, -0.5 - tolerance, 0.5, 0.5 + tolerance],
          Contours -> isovalue,
          ColorFunction -> GrayLevel,
          (* We need high quality plot for ImageMesh later. *)
          PlotPoints -> 200,
          Frame -> None
          ]


          Create MeshRegion from Graphics object.



          mreg = ImageMesh[ColorNegate[plot]]


          And convert it to ElementMesh.



          Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
          mesh = ToElementMesh[mreg,"MeshOrder"->1]
          (* ElementMesh[7., 353., 7., 353., TriangleElement["<" 1057 ">"]] *)

          mesh["Wireframe"]


          mesh






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            5












            $begingroup$

            Another approach is:



            reg = ToElementMesh[
            ImplicitRegion[
            f[x, y, 4] < isovalue && x, y [Element] cell, x, y],
            "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 0.01, MeshQualityGoal -> 1,
            PerformanceGoal -> "Quality", MaxCellMeasure -> 0.01,
            "BoundaryMeshGenerator" -> "RegionPlot", "SamplePoints" -> 41];

            reg["Wireframe"]


            enter image description here



            One thing to be a bit careful about is the question if the holes intersect the boundary. From the mesh it does not look like it but the math might say it.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "387"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f196970%2fholes-in-elementmesh-with-toelementmesh-of-implicitregion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5












              $begingroup$

              I hope I interpreted your question correctly that you want a more accurate ElementMesh representation of the region.



              First we create a high quality Graphics of the region of interest.



              isovalue = 1.29897233417072;
              (* Add some margins to plot range to get connected region. *)
              tolerance = 0.05;
              plot = ContourPlot[
              f[x, y, 4],
              x, y ∈ Cuboid[-0.5, -0.5 - tolerance, 0.5, 0.5 + tolerance],
              Contours -> isovalue,
              ColorFunction -> GrayLevel,
              (* We need high quality plot for ImageMesh later. *)
              PlotPoints -> 200,
              Frame -> None
              ]


              Create MeshRegion from Graphics object.



              mreg = ImageMesh[ColorNegate[plot]]


              And convert it to ElementMesh.



              Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
              mesh = ToElementMesh[mreg,"MeshOrder"->1]
              (* ElementMesh[7., 353., 7., 353., TriangleElement["<" 1057 ">"]] *)

              mesh["Wireframe"]


              mesh






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                5












                $begingroup$

                I hope I interpreted your question correctly that you want a more accurate ElementMesh representation of the region.



                First we create a high quality Graphics of the region of interest.



                isovalue = 1.29897233417072;
                (* Add some margins to plot range to get connected region. *)
                tolerance = 0.05;
                plot = ContourPlot[
                f[x, y, 4],
                x, y ∈ Cuboid[-0.5, -0.5 - tolerance, 0.5, 0.5 + tolerance],
                Contours -> isovalue,
                ColorFunction -> GrayLevel,
                (* We need high quality plot for ImageMesh later. *)
                PlotPoints -> 200,
                Frame -> None
                ]


                Create MeshRegion from Graphics object.



                mreg = ImageMesh[ColorNegate[plot]]


                And convert it to ElementMesh.



                Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
                mesh = ToElementMesh[mreg,"MeshOrder"->1]
                (* ElementMesh[7., 353., 7., 353., TriangleElement["<" 1057 ">"]] *)

                mesh["Wireframe"]


                mesh






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  5












                  5








                  5





                  $begingroup$

                  I hope I interpreted your question correctly that you want a more accurate ElementMesh representation of the region.



                  First we create a high quality Graphics of the region of interest.



                  isovalue = 1.29897233417072;
                  (* Add some margins to plot range to get connected region. *)
                  tolerance = 0.05;
                  plot = ContourPlot[
                  f[x, y, 4],
                  x, y ∈ Cuboid[-0.5, -0.5 - tolerance, 0.5, 0.5 + tolerance],
                  Contours -> isovalue,
                  ColorFunction -> GrayLevel,
                  (* We need high quality plot for ImageMesh later. *)
                  PlotPoints -> 200,
                  Frame -> None
                  ]


                  Create MeshRegion from Graphics object.



                  mreg = ImageMesh[ColorNegate[plot]]


                  And convert it to ElementMesh.



                  Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
                  mesh = ToElementMesh[mreg,"MeshOrder"->1]
                  (* ElementMesh[7., 353., 7., 353., TriangleElement["<" 1057 ">"]] *)

                  mesh["Wireframe"]


                  mesh






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I hope I interpreted your question correctly that you want a more accurate ElementMesh representation of the region.



                  First we create a high quality Graphics of the region of interest.



                  isovalue = 1.29897233417072;
                  (* Add some margins to plot range to get connected region. *)
                  tolerance = 0.05;
                  plot = ContourPlot[
                  f[x, y, 4],
                  x, y ∈ Cuboid[-0.5, -0.5 - tolerance, 0.5, 0.5 + tolerance],
                  Contours -> isovalue,
                  ColorFunction -> GrayLevel,
                  (* We need high quality plot for ImageMesh later. *)
                  PlotPoints -> 200,
                  Frame -> None
                  ]


                  Create MeshRegion from Graphics object.



                  mreg = ImageMesh[ColorNegate[plot]]


                  And convert it to ElementMesh.



                  Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
                  mesh = ToElementMesh[mreg,"MeshOrder"->1]
                  (* ElementMesh[7., 353., 7., 353., TriangleElement["<" 1057 ">"]] *)

                  mesh["Wireframe"]


                  mesh







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  PintiPinti

                  3,97211037




                  3,97211037





















                      5












                      $begingroup$

                      Another approach is:



                      reg = ToElementMesh[
                      ImplicitRegion[
                      f[x, y, 4] < isovalue && x, y [Element] cell, x, y],
                      "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 0.01, MeshQualityGoal -> 1,
                      PerformanceGoal -> "Quality", MaxCellMeasure -> 0.01,
                      "BoundaryMeshGenerator" -> "RegionPlot", "SamplePoints" -> 41];

                      reg["Wireframe"]


                      enter image description here



                      One thing to be a bit careful about is the question if the holes intersect the boundary. From the mesh it does not look like it but the math might say it.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        5












                        $begingroup$

                        Another approach is:



                        reg = ToElementMesh[
                        ImplicitRegion[
                        f[x, y, 4] < isovalue && x, y [Element] cell, x, y],
                        "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 0.01, MeshQualityGoal -> 1,
                        PerformanceGoal -> "Quality", MaxCellMeasure -> 0.01,
                        "BoundaryMeshGenerator" -> "RegionPlot", "SamplePoints" -> 41];

                        reg["Wireframe"]


                        enter image description here



                        One thing to be a bit careful about is the question if the holes intersect the boundary. From the mesh it does not look like it but the math might say it.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          5












                          5








                          5





                          $begingroup$

                          Another approach is:



                          reg = ToElementMesh[
                          ImplicitRegion[
                          f[x, y, 4] < isovalue && x, y [Element] cell, x, y],
                          "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 0.01, MeshQualityGoal -> 1,
                          PerformanceGoal -> "Quality", MaxCellMeasure -> 0.01,
                          "BoundaryMeshGenerator" -> "RegionPlot", "SamplePoints" -> 41];

                          reg["Wireframe"]


                          enter image description here



                          One thing to be a bit careful about is the question if the holes intersect the boundary. From the mesh it does not look like it but the math might say it.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Another approach is:



                          reg = ToElementMesh[
                          ImplicitRegion[
                          f[x, y, 4] < isovalue && x, y [Element] cell, x, y],
                          "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 0.01, MeshQualityGoal -> 1,
                          PerformanceGoal -> "Quality", MaxCellMeasure -> 0.01,
                          "BoundaryMeshGenerator" -> "RegionPlot", "SamplePoints" -> 41];

                          reg["Wireframe"]


                          enter image description here



                          One thing to be a bit careful about is the question if the holes intersect the boundary. From the mesh it does not look like it but the math might say it.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 1 hour ago









                          user21user21

                          21.2k55999




                          21.2k55999



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f196970%2fholes-in-elementmesh-with-toelementmesh-of-implicitregion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Log på Navigationsmenu

                              Creating second map without labels using QGIS?How to lock map labels for inset map in Print Composer?How to Force the Showing of Labels of a Vector File in QGISQGIS Valmiera, Labels only show for part of polygonsRemoving duplicate point labels in QGISLabeling every feature using QGIS?Show labels for point features outside map canvasAbbreviate Road Labels in QGIS only when requiredExporting map from composer in QGIS - text labels have moved in output?How to make sure labels in qgis turn up in layout map?Writing label expression with ArcMap and If then Statement?

                              Nuuk Indholdsfortegnelse Etyomologi | Historie | Geografi | Transport og infrastruktur | Politik og administration | Uddannelsesinstitutioner | Kultur | Venskabsbyer | Noter | Eksterne henvisninger | Se også | Navigationsmenuwww.sermersooq.gl64°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.75064°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.750DMI - KlimanormalerSalmonsen, s. 850Grønlands Naturinstitut undersøger rensdyr i Akia og Maniitsoq foråret 2008Grønlands NaturinstitutNy vej til Qinngorput indviet i dagAntallet af biler i Nuuk må begrænsesNy taxacentral mødt med demonstrationKøreplan. Rute 1, 2 og 3SnescootersporNuukNord er for storSkoler i Kommuneqarfik SermersooqAtuarfik Samuel KleinschmidtKangillinguit AtuarfiatNuussuup AtuarfiaNuuk Internationale FriskoleIlinniarfissuaq, Grønlands SeminariumLedelseÅrsberetning for 2008Kunst og arkitekturÅrsberetning for 2008Julie om naturenNuuk KunstmuseumSilamiutGrønlands Nationalmuseum og ArkivStatistisk ÅrbogGrønlands LandsbibliotekStore koncerter på stribeVandhund nummer 1.000.000Kommuneqarfik Sermersooq – MalikForsidenVenskabsbyerLyngby-Taarbæk i GrønlandArctic Business NetworkWinter Cities 2008 i NuukDagligt opdaterede satellitbilleder fra NuukområdetKommuneqarfik Sermersooqs hjemmesideTurist i NuukGrønlands Statistiks databankGrønlands Hjemmestyres valgresultaterrrWorldCat124325457671310-5