How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to best defend against Targeted Attacks?How to prevent my website from getting malware injection attacks?CodeIgniter CSRF confusionHow to prevent XSS from urlHow do the Stack Exchange sites protect themselves from XSS?How to prevent data from Interception?Safely downloading user submitted contentShould we prevent this login XSS attack?How to prevent XSS in user-generated content (html) without disabling scripts and CSSa mysterious & pointless long-term hacking attempt?

Why do we say “un seul M” and not “une seule M” even though M is a “consonne”?

Incomplete cube

Why did the Drakh emissary look so blurred in S04:E11 "Lines of Communication"?

How does a dynamic QR code work?

Upgrading From a 9 Speed Sora Derailleur?

Is it possible to make a 9x9 table fit within the default margins?

Why can't we say "I have been having a dog"?

Can this transistor (2n2222) take 6V on emitter-base? Am I reading datasheet incorrectly?

Man transported from Alternate World into ours by a Neutrino Detector

What did the word "leisure" mean in late 18th Century usage?

Is the offspring between a demon and a celestial possible? If so what is it called and is it in a book somewhere?

Why does freezing point matter when picking cooler ice packs?

pgfplots: How to draw a tangent graph below two others?

How to implement Comparable so it is consistent with identity-equality

Salesforce opportunity stages

How can a day be of 24 hours?

My boss doesn't want me to have a side project

Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

The sum of any ten consecutive numbers from a fibonacci sequence is divisible by 11

Read/write a pipe-delimited file line by line with some simple text manipulation

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?

How do I keep Mac Emacs from trapping M-`?



How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to best defend against Targeted Attacks?How to prevent my website from getting malware injection attacks?CodeIgniter CSRF confusionHow to prevent XSS from urlHow do the Stack Exchange sites protect themselves from XSS?How to prevent data from Interception?Safely downloading user submitted contentShould we prevent this login XSS attack?How to prevent XSS in user-generated content (html) without disabling scripts and CSSa mysterious & pointless long-term hacking attempt?










2















Let's say a user can store some data in a web app. I'm now only talking about that sort of data the user can THEMSELVES view, not that is intended to be viewed by other users of the webapp. (Or if other users may view this data then it is handled to them in a more secure way.)



How horrible would it be to allow some XSS vulnerability in this data?



Of course, a purist's answer would clearly be: "No vulnerabilities are allowed". But honestly - why?



Everything that is allowed is the user XSSing THEMSELVES. What's the harm here? Other users are protected. And I can't see a reason why would someone mount an attack against themselves (except if it is a harmless one, in which case - again - no harm is done).



My gut feelings are that the above reasoning will raise some eyebrows... OK, then what am I failing to see?










share|improve this question






















  • How can you limit the scope of an XSS vuln to just some data? This is asking to open the door to everything getting compromised. Don't be lazy with it

    – Crumblez
    5 hours ago















2















Let's say a user can store some data in a web app. I'm now only talking about that sort of data the user can THEMSELVES view, not that is intended to be viewed by other users of the webapp. (Or if other users may view this data then it is handled to them in a more secure way.)



How horrible would it be to allow some XSS vulnerability in this data?



Of course, a purist's answer would clearly be: "No vulnerabilities are allowed". But honestly - why?



Everything that is allowed is the user XSSing THEMSELVES. What's the harm here? Other users are protected. And I can't see a reason why would someone mount an attack against themselves (except if it is a harmless one, in which case - again - no harm is done).



My gut feelings are that the above reasoning will raise some eyebrows... OK, then what am I failing to see?










share|improve this question






















  • How can you limit the scope of an XSS vuln to just some data? This is asking to open the door to everything getting compromised. Don't be lazy with it

    – Crumblez
    5 hours ago













2












2








2








Let's say a user can store some data in a web app. I'm now only talking about that sort of data the user can THEMSELVES view, not that is intended to be viewed by other users of the webapp. (Or if other users may view this data then it is handled to them in a more secure way.)



How horrible would it be to allow some XSS vulnerability in this data?



Of course, a purist's answer would clearly be: "No vulnerabilities are allowed". But honestly - why?



Everything that is allowed is the user XSSing THEMSELVES. What's the harm here? Other users are protected. And I can't see a reason why would someone mount an attack against themselves (except if it is a harmless one, in which case - again - no harm is done).



My gut feelings are that the above reasoning will raise some eyebrows... OK, then what am I failing to see?










share|improve this question














Let's say a user can store some data in a web app. I'm now only talking about that sort of data the user can THEMSELVES view, not that is intended to be viewed by other users of the webapp. (Or if other users may view this data then it is handled to them in a more secure way.)



How horrible would it be to allow some XSS vulnerability in this data?



Of course, a purist's answer would clearly be: "No vulnerabilities are allowed". But honestly - why?



Everything that is allowed is the user XSSing THEMSELVES. What's the harm here? Other users are protected. And I can't see a reason why would someone mount an attack against themselves (except if it is a harmless one, in which case - again - no harm is done).



My gut feelings are that the above reasoning will raise some eyebrows... OK, then what am I failing to see?







xss attacks






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









gaazkamgaazkam

1,3162819




1,3162819












  • How can you limit the scope of an XSS vuln to just some data? This is asking to open the door to everything getting compromised. Don't be lazy with it

    – Crumblez
    5 hours ago

















  • How can you limit the scope of an XSS vuln to just some data? This is asking to open the door to everything getting compromised. Don't be lazy with it

    – Crumblez
    5 hours ago
















How can you limit the scope of an XSS vuln to just some data? This is asking to open the door to everything getting compromised. Don't be lazy with it

– Crumblez
5 hours ago





How can you limit the scope of an XSS vuln to just some data? This is asking to open the door to everything getting compromised. Don't be lazy with it

– Crumblez
5 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














This is actually a real concept, "Self XSS" which is sufficiently common that if you open https://facebook.com and then open the developer tools, they warn you about it as shown here



Obviously Facebook is a specific type of target and whether this issue matters to you or not, would depend on the exact nature of your site, but you may not be able to discount the idea of one user using social engineering techniques to get another user to attack themselves.






share|improve this answer






























    0














    Although you are right in that it might not matter so much from an attack point of view. From a usability point of view, the user might come across some 'unexpected behavior'. A while ago I used to have to work with software that had an obvious SQL injection problem (contractors couldn't/wouldn't fix it). This meant that unexpecting users would enter in something seemingly harmless such as their name "O'Brien", which would trigger an SQL injection and for computer illiterate people it was unexpected behavior. It is probably less likely with XSS, however consider the following if a user uses <> instead of () the data might seem to disappear. A proof of concept is below:



    <html>
    <head><title>HI</title></head>
    <body>
    <h1>WEBSITE</h1>
    Hey my name is <travis>.
    </body>
    </html>


    Note that when this website is rendered, the word 'travis', is not rendered.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "162"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206579%2fhow-badly-should-i-try-to-prevent-a-user-from-xssing-themselves%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      This is actually a real concept, "Self XSS" which is sufficiently common that if you open https://facebook.com and then open the developer tools, they warn you about it as shown here



      Obviously Facebook is a specific type of target and whether this issue matters to you or not, would depend on the exact nature of your site, but you may not be able to discount the idea of one user using social engineering techniques to get another user to attack themselves.






      share|improve this answer



























        3














        This is actually a real concept, "Self XSS" which is sufficiently common that if you open https://facebook.com and then open the developer tools, they warn you about it as shown here



        Obviously Facebook is a specific type of target and whether this issue matters to you or not, would depend on the exact nature of your site, but you may not be able to discount the idea of one user using social engineering techniques to get another user to attack themselves.






        share|improve this answer

























          3












          3








          3







          This is actually a real concept, "Self XSS" which is sufficiently common that if you open https://facebook.com and then open the developer tools, they warn you about it as shown here



          Obviously Facebook is a specific type of target and whether this issue matters to you or not, would depend on the exact nature of your site, but you may not be able to discount the idea of one user using social engineering techniques to get another user to attack themselves.






          share|improve this answer













          This is actually a real concept, "Self XSS" which is sufficiently common that if you open https://facebook.com and then open the developer tools, they warn you about it as shown here



          Obviously Facebook is a specific type of target and whether this issue matters to you or not, would depend on the exact nature of your site, but you may not be able to discount the idea of one user using social engineering techniques to get another user to attack themselves.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 4 hours ago









          Rоry McCuneRоry McCune

          52.7k13113187




          52.7k13113187























              0














              Although you are right in that it might not matter so much from an attack point of view. From a usability point of view, the user might come across some 'unexpected behavior'. A while ago I used to have to work with software that had an obvious SQL injection problem (contractors couldn't/wouldn't fix it). This meant that unexpecting users would enter in something seemingly harmless such as their name "O'Brien", which would trigger an SQL injection and for computer illiterate people it was unexpected behavior. It is probably less likely with XSS, however consider the following if a user uses <> instead of () the data might seem to disappear. A proof of concept is below:



              <html>
              <head><title>HI</title></head>
              <body>
              <h1>WEBSITE</h1>
              Hey my name is <travis>.
              </body>
              </html>


              Note that when this website is rendered, the word 'travis', is not rendered.






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                Although you are right in that it might not matter so much from an attack point of view. From a usability point of view, the user might come across some 'unexpected behavior'. A while ago I used to have to work with software that had an obvious SQL injection problem (contractors couldn't/wouldn't fix it). This meant that unexpecting users would enter in something seemingly harmless such as their name "O'Brien", which would trigger an SQL injection and for computer illiterate people it was unexpected behavior. It is probably less likely with XSS, however consider the following if a user uses <> instead of () the data might seem to disappear. A proof of concept is below:



                <html>
                <head><title>HI</title></head>
                <body>
                <h1>WEBSITE</h1>
                Hey my name is <travis>.
                </body>
                </html>


                Note that when this website is rendered, the word 'travis', is not rendered.






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Although you are right in that it might not matter so much from an attack point of view. From a usability point of view, the user might come across some 'unexpected behavior'. A while ago I used to have to work with software that had an obvious SQL injection problem (contractors couldn't/wouldn't fix it). This meant that unexpecting users would enter in something seemingly harmless such as their name "O'Brien", which would trigger an SQL injection and for computer illiterate people it was unexpected behavior. It is probably less likely with XSS, however consider the following if a user uses <> instead of () the data might seem to disappear. A proof of concept is below:



                  <html>
                  <head><title>HI</title></head>
                  <body>
                  <h1>WEBSITE</h1>
                  Hey my name is <travis>.
                  </body>
                  </html>


                  Note that when this website is rendered, the word 'travis', is not rendered.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Although you are right in that it might not matter so much from an attack point of view. From a usability point of view, the user might come across some 'unexpected behavior'. A while ago I used to have to work with software that had an obvious SQL injection problem (contractors couldn't/wouldn't fix it). This meant that unexpecting users would enter in something seemingly harmless such as their name "O'Brien", which would trigger an SQL injection and for computer illiterate people it was unexpected behavior. It is probably less likely with XSS, however consider the following if a user uses <> instead of () the data might seem to disappear. A proof of concept is below:



                  <html>
                  <head><title>HI</title></head>
                  <body>
                  <h1>WEBSITE</h1>
                  Hey my name is <travis>.
                  </body>
                  </html>


                  Note that when this website is rendered, the word 'travis', is not rendered.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 4 hours ago









                  meowcatmeowcat

                  1644




                  1644



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Information Security Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206579%2fhow-badly-should-i-try-to-prevent-a-user-from-xssing-themselves%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Log på Navigationsmenu

                      Creating second map without labels using QGIS?How to lock map labels for inset map in Print Composer?How to Force the Showing of Labels of a Vector File in QGISQGIS Valmiera, Labels only show for part of polygonsRemoving duplicate point labels in QGISLabeling every feature using QGIS?Show labels for point features outside map canvasAbbreviate Road Labels in QGIS only when requiredExporting map from composer in QGIS - text labels have moved in output?How to make sure labels in qgis turn up in layout map?Writing label expression with ArcMap and If then Statement?

                      Nuuk Indholdsfortegnelse Etyomologi | Historie | Geografi | Transport og infrastruktur | Politik og administration | Uddannelsesinstitutioner | Kultur | Venskabsbyer | Noter | Eksterne henvisninger | Se også | Navigationsmenuwww.sermersooq.gl64°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.75064°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.750DMI - KlimanormalerSalmonsen, s. 850Grønlands Naturinstitut undersøger rensdyr i Akia og Maniitsoq foråret 2008Grønlands NaturinstitutNy vej til Qinngorput indviet i dagAntallet af biler i Nuuk må begrænsesNy taxacentral mødt med demonstrationKøreplan. Rute 1, 2 og 3SnescootersporNuukNord er for storSkoler i Kommuneqarfik SermersooqAtuarfik Samuel KleinschmidtKangillinguit AtuarfiatNuussuup AtuarfiaNuuk Internationale FriskoleIlinniarfissuaq, Grønlands SeminariumLedelseÅrsberetning for 2008Kunst og arkitekturÅrsberetning for 2008Julie om naturenNuuk KunstmuseumSilamiutGrønlands Nationalmuseum og ArkivStatistisk ÅrbogGrønlands LandsbibliotekStore koncerter på stribeVandhund nummer 1.000.000Kommuneqarfik Sermersooq – MalikForsidenVenskabsbyerLyngby-Taarbæk i GrønlandArctic Business NetworkWinter Cities 2008 i NuukDagligt opdaterede satellitbilleder fra NuukområdetKommuneqarfik Sermersooqs hjemmesideTurist i NuukGrønlands Statistiks databankGrønlands Hjemmestyres valgresultaterrrWorldCat124325457671310-5