Historically, were women trained for obligatory wars? Or did they serve some other military function?When and why did the black velvet yarmulke become the standard for some communities?How did Paro know that “…that they may serve Me” meant sacrifices and not some other form of service?Were some Jews transformed to monkeys for violating the sabbath?What did they do for shiurim before modern measurements?Source that Tisha B'av is the day of mourning for all tragedies, even if they did not fall out then?
Pawn Sacrifice Justification
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
Why does Bran Stark feel that Jon Snow "needs to know" about his lineage?
"ne paelici suspectaretur" (Tacitus)
Why do computer-science majors learn calculus?
What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?
What is the range of this combined function?
TikZ how to make supply and demand arrows for nodes?
Asahi Dry Black beer can
Why do TACANs not have a symbol for compulsory reporting?
Illegal assignment from SObject to Contact
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
Past Perfect Tense
Is it possible to Ready a spell to be cast just before the start of your next turn by having the trigger be an ally's attack?
Historically, were women trained for obligatory wars? Or did they serve some other military function?
Upright [...] in italics quotation
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
Is it possible to measure lightning discharges as Nikola Tesla?
Binary Numbers Magic Trick
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
Confused by notation of atomic number Z and mass number A on periodic table of elements
Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"
Sci-fi novel series with instant travel between planets through gates. A river runs through the gates
Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?
Historically, were women trained for obligatory wars? Or did they serve some other military function?
When and why did the black velvet yarmulke become the standard for some communities?How did Paro know that “…that they may serve Me” meant sacrifices and not some other form of service?Were some Jews transformed to monkeys for violating the sabbath?What did they do for shiurim before modern measurements?Source that Tisha B'av is the day of mourning for all tragedies, even if they did not fall out then?
Sotah 8:7 says that for obligatory wars all go out to fight, "even a bridegroom from his chamber and a bride from her canopy". Historically, was this in fact our practice? Did women participate in the conquest of the land (which Rabbi Yehudah says was an obligatory war) or in defending it before we were conquered and the temples destroyed? Did women fight alongside the men, or did they participate in ways that didn't involve fighting directly? If they fought, (how) were they trained?
history women army-military-war tractate-sotah
asked 1 hour ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
38.3k582268
add a comment |
Sotah 8:7 says that for obligatory wars all go out to fight, "even a bridegroom from his chamber and a bride from her canopy". Historically, was this in fact our practice? Did women participate in the conquest of the land (which Rabbi Yehudah says was an obligatory war) or in defending it before we were conquered and the temples destroyed? Did women fight alongside the men, or did they participate in ways that didn't involve fighting directly? If they fought, (how) were they trained?
history women army-military-war tractate-sotah
asked 1 hour ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
38.3k582268
Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.
– sam
38 mins ago
1
As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.
– DonielF
12 mins ago
add a comment |
Sotah 8:7 says that for obligatory wars all go out to fight, "even a bridegroom from his chamber and a bride from her canopy". Historically, was this in fact our practice? Did women participate in the conquest of the land (which Rabbi Yehudah says was an obligatory war) or in defending it before we were conquered and the temples destroyed? Did women fight alongside the men, or did they participate in ways that didn't involve fighting directly? If they fought, (how) were they trained?
history women army-military-war tractate-sotah
asked 1 hour ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
38.3k582268
Sotah 8:7 says that for obligatory wars all go out to fight, "even a bridegroom from his chamber and a bride from her canopy". Historically, was this in fact our practice? Did women participate in the conquest of the land (which Rabbi Yehudah says was an obligatory war) or in defending it before we were conquered and the temples destroyed? Did women fight alongside the men, or did they participate in ways that didn't involve fighting directly? If they fought, (how) were they trained?
history women army-military-war tractate-sotah
history women army-military-war tractate-sotah
asked 1 hour ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
38.3k582268
asked 1 hour ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
38.3k582268
asked 1 hour ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
38.3k582268
asked 1 hour ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
38.3k582268
asked 1 hour ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
38.3k582268
38.3k582268
Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.
– sam
38 mins ago
1
As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.
– DonielF
12 mins ago
add a comment |
Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.
– sam
38 mins ago
1
As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.
– DonielF
12 mins ago
Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.
– sam
38 mins ago
Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.
– sam
38 mins ago
1
1
As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.
– DonielF
12 mins ago
As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.
– DonielF
12 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
In his commentary to Rambam's codification of this law (Hilchot Melachim 7:5), R. David Ibn Zimra asks: Is it the way of women to wage war? And he cites the verse (Psalms 45:14) "All glorious is the king's daughter within the palace" in support of this. He then suggests that the women were (not actively fighting, but) supplying food and water to their husbands, and he notes that this is the current practice of the Arabs(?).
ברייתא כלשון רבינו אלא דקשה וכי דרך הנשים לעשות מלחמה דקתני וכלה מחופתה והא כתיב כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה וי"ל דה"ק כיון דחתן יוצא מחדרו כלה יוצאה מחופתה שאינה נוהגת ימי חופה ואפשר דבמלחמת מצוה הנשים היו מספקות מים ומזון לבעליהן וכן המנהג היום בערביות
answered 52 mins ago
AlexAlex
24.3k157136
You beat me to it,was about to type this
– sam
48 mins ago
@sam ברוך שכוונתי
– Alex
47 mins ago
It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus
– sam
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Yachin:
אשה לאו בת מלחמה. רק לספק מזון ולתקן הדרכים אף היא יוצאת.
A woman is not able to combat, she did only provide food and repair roads.
answered 39 mins ago
koutykouty
16.5k32048
Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?
– Monica Cellio♦
35 mins ago
1
it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions
– kouty
34 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In his commentary to Rambam's codification of this law (Hilchot Melachim 7:5), R. David Ibn Zimra asks: Is it the way of women to wage war? And he cites the verse (Psalms 45:14) "All glorious is the king's daughter within the palace" in support of this. He then suggests that the women were (not actively fighting, but) supplying food and water to their husbands, and he notes that this is the current practice of the Arabs(?).
ברייתא כלשון רבינו אלא דקשה וכי דרך הנשים לעשות מלחמה דקתני וכלה מחופתה והא כתיב כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה וי"ל דה"ק כיון דחתן יוצא מחדרו כלה יוצאה מחופתה שאינה נוהגת ימי חופה ואפשר דבמלחמת מצוה הנשים היו מספקות מים ומזון לבעליהן וכן המנהג היום בערביות
answered 52 mins ago
AlexAlex
24.3k157136
You beat me to it,was about to type this
– sam
48 mins ago
@sam ברוך שכוונתי
– Alex
47 mins ago
It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus
– sam
46 mins ago
add a comment |
In his commentary to Rambam's codification of this law (Hilchot Melachim 7:5), R. David Ibn Zimra asks: Is it the way of women to wage war? And he cites the verse (Psalms 45:14) "All glorious is the king's daughter within the palace" in support of this. He then suggests that the women were (not actively fighting, but) supplying food and water to their husbands, and he notes that this is the current practice of the Arabs(?).
ברייתא כלשון רבינו אלא דקשה וכי דרך הנשים לעשות מלחמה דקתני וכלה מחופתה והא כתיב כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה וי"ל דה"ק כיון דחתן יוצא מחדרו כלה יוצאה מחופתה שאינה נוהגת ימי חופה ואפשר דבמלחמת מצוה הנשים היו מספקות מים ומזון לבעליהן וכן המנהג היום בערביות
answered 52 mins ago
AlexAlex
24.3k157136
You beat me to it,was about to type this
– sam
48 mins ago
@sam ברוך שכוונתי
– Alex
47 mins ago
It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus
– sam
46 mins ago
add a comment |
In his commentary to Rambam's codification of this law (Hilchot Melachim 7:5), R. David Ibn Zimra asks: Is it the way of women to wage war? And he cites the verse (Psalms 45:14) "All glorious is the king's daughter within the palace" in support of this. He then suggests that the women were (not actively fighting, but) supplying food and water to their husbands, and he notes that this is the current practice of the Arabs(?).
ברייתא כלשון רבינו אלא דקשה וכי דרך הנשים לעשות מלחמה דקתני וכלה מחופתה והא כתיב כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה וי"ל דה"ק כיון דחתן יוצא מחדרו כלה יוצאה מחופתה שאינה נוהגת ימי חופה ואפשר דבמלחמת מצוה הנשים היו מספקות מים ומזון לבעליהן וכן המנהג היום בערביות
answered 52 mins ago
AlexAlex
24.3k157136
In his commentary to Rambam's codification of this law (Hilchot Melachim 7:5), R. David Ibn Zimra asks: Is it the way of women to wage war? And he cites the verse (Psalms 45:14) "All glorious is the king's daughter within the palace" in support of this. He then suggests that the women were (not actively fighting, but) supplying food and water to their husbands, and he notes that this is the current practice of the Arabs(?).
ברייתא כלשון רבינו אלא דקשה וכי דרך הנשים לעשות מלחמה דקתני וכלה מחופתה והא כתיב כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה וי"ל דה"ק כיון דחתן יוצא מחדרו כלה יוצאה מחופתה שאינה נוהגת ימי חופה ואפשר דבמלחמת מצוה הנשים היו מספקות מים ומזון לבעליהן וכן המנהג היום בערביות
answered 52 mins ago
AlexAlex
24.3k157136
answered 52 mins ago
AlexAlex
24.3k157136
answered 52 mins ago
AlexAlex
24.3k157136
answered 52 mins ago
AlexAlex
24.3k157136
24.3k157136
You beat me to it,was about to type this
– sam
48 mins ago
@sam ברוך שכוונתי
– Alex
47 mins ago
It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus
– sam
46 mins ago
add a comment |
You beat me to it,was about to type this
– sam
48 mins ago
@sam ברוך שכוונתי
– Alex
47 mins ago
It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus
– sam
46 mins ago
You beat me to it,was about to type this
– sam
48 mins ago
You beat me to it,was about to type this
– sam
48 mins ago
@sam ברוך שכוונתי
– Alex
47 mins ago
@sam ברוך שכוונתי
– Alex
47 mins ago
It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus
– sam
46 mins ago
It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus
– sam
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Yachin:
אשה לאו בת מלחמה. רק לספק מזון ולתקן הדרכים אף היא יוצאת.
A woman is not able to combat, she did only provide food and repair roads.
answered 39 mins ago
koutykouty
16.5k32048
Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?
– Monica Cellio♦
35 mins ago
1
it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions
– kouty
34 mins ago
add a comment |
Yachin:
אשה לאו בת מלחמה. רק לספק מזון ולתקן הדרכים אף היא יוצאת.
A woman is not able to combat, she did only provide food and repair roads.
answered 39 mins ago
koutykouty
16.5k32048
Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?
– Monica Cellio♦
35 mins ago
1
it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions
– kouty
34 mins ago
add a comment |
Yachin:
אשה לאו בת מלחמה. רק לספק מזון ולתקן הדרכים אף היא יוצאת.
A woman is not able to combat, she did only provide food and repair roads.
answered 39 mins ago
koutykouty
16.5k32048
Yachin:
אשה לאו בת מלחמה. רק לספק מזון ולתקן הדרכים אף היא יוצאת.
A woman is not able to combat, she did only provide food and repair roads.
answered 39 mins ago
koutykouty
16.5k32048
answered 39 mins ago
koutykouty
16.5k32048
answered 39 mins ago
koutykouty
16.5k32048
answered 39 mins ago
koutykouty
16.5k32048
16.5k32048
Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?
– Monica Cellio♦
35 mins ago
1
it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions
– kouty
34 mins ago
add a comment |
Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?
– Monica Cellio♦
35 mins ago
1
it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions
– kouty
34 mins ago
Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?
– Monica Cellio♦
35 mins ago
Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?
– Monica Cellio♦
35 mins ago
1
1
it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions
– kouty
34 mins ago
it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions
– kouty
34 mins ago
add a comment |
Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.
– sam
38 mins ago
1
As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.
– DonielF
12 mins ago