What's the difference between `auto x = vector()` and `vector x`? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience Should we burninate the [wrap] tag?What is the difference between #include <filename> and #include “filename”?Regular cast vs. static_cast vs. dynamic_castWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListDifference between private, public, and protected inheritanceWhat is the difference between const int*, const int * const, and int const *?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?Why are elementwise additions much faster in separate loops than in a combined loop?What is the difference between 'typedef' and 'using' in C++11?Why is it faster to process a sorted array than an unsorted array?

Is the address of a local variable a constexpr?

How can players work together to take actions that are otherwise impossible?

What is this single-engine low-wing propeller plane?

Does surprise arrest existing movement?

I am not a queen, who am I?

Does accepting a pardon have any bearing on trying that person for the same crime in a sovereign jurisdiction?

Single word antonym of "flightless"

Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?

Sorting numerically

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?

Is there a service that would inform me whenever a new direct route is scheduled from a given airport?

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

iPhone Wallpaper?

What do you call a phrase that's not an idiom yet?

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

Dominant seventh chord in the major scale contains diminished triad of the seventh?

Were Kohanim forbidden from serving in King David's army?

Should I call the interviewer directly, if HR aren't responding?

How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

Why did the IBM 650 use bi-quinary?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Why does Python start at index -1 when indexing a list from the end?



What's the difference between `auto x = vector()` and `vector x`?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
Should we burninate the [wrap] tag?What is the difference between #include <filename> and #include “filename”?Regular cast vs. static_cast vs. dynamic_castWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListDifference between private, public, and protected inheritanceWhat is the difference between const int*, const int * const, and int const *?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?Why are elementwise additions much faster in separate loops than in a combined loop?What is the difference between 'typedef' and 'using' in C++11?Why is it faster to process a sorted array than an unsorted array?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








8















I am writing some code and have a question.
What is the difference between auto x = vector<int>(); and vector<int> x;? Are they all the same or there's some difference with the complexity?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.

    – DeiDei
    1 hour ago

















8















I am writing some code and have a question.
What is the difference between auto x = vector<int>(); and vector<int> x;? Are they all the same or there's some difference with the complexity?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.

    – DeiDei
    1 hour ago













8












8








8


2






I am writing some code and have a question.
What is the difference between auto x = vector<int>(); and vector<int> x;? Are they all the same or there's some difference with the complexity?










share|improve this question
















I am writing some code and have a question.
What is the difference between auto x = vector<int>(); and vector<int> x;? Are they all the same or there's some difference with the complexity?







c++ vector stl initialization






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









songyuanyao

94.5k11182250




94.5k11182250










asked 2 hours ago









AutoratchAutoratch

555




555







  • 2





    The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.

    – DeiDei
    1 hour ago












  • 2





    The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.

    – DeiDei
    1 hour ago







2




2





The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.

– DeiDei
1 hour ago





The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.

– DeiDei
1 hour ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















10














They have the same effect since C++17. Both construct an object named x with type std::vector<int>, which is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.



Precisely the 1st one is copy initialization, x is copy-initialized from a value-initialized temporary. From C++17 this kind of copy elision is guaranteed, as the result x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector directly. Before C++17, copy elision is an optimization:




even when it takes place and the copy/move (since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:




The 2nd one is default initialization, as a class type x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55700049%2fwhats-the-difference-between-auto-x-vectorint-and-vectorint-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10














    They have the same effect since C++17. Both construct an object named x with type std::vector<int>, which is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.



    Precisely the 1st one is copy initialization, x is copy-initialized from a value-initialized temporary. From C++17 this kind of copy elision is guaranteed, as the result x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector directly. Before C++17, copy elision is an optimization:




    even when it takes place and the copy/move (since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:




    The 2nd one is default initialization, as a class type x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.






    share|improve this answer





























      10














      They have the same effect since C++17. Both construct an object named x with type std::vector<int>, which is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.



      Precisely the 1st one is copy initialization, x is copy-initialized from a value-initialized temporary. From C++17 this kind of copy elision is guaranteed, as the result x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector directly. Before C++17, copy elision is an optimization:




      even when it takes place and the copy/move (since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:




      The 2nd one is default initialization, as a class type x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.






      share|improve this answer



























        10












        10








        10







        They have the same effect since C++17. Both construct an object named x with type std::vector<int>, which is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.



        Precisely the 1st one is copy initialization, x is copy-initialized from a value-initialized temporary. From C++17 this kind of copy elision is guaranteed, as the result x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector directly. Before C++17, copy elision is an optimization:




        even when it takes place and the copy/move (since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:




        The 2nd one is default initialization, as a class type x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.






        share|improve this answer















        They have the same effect since C++17. Both construct an object named x with type std::vector<int>, which is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.



        Precisely the 1st one is copy initialization, x is copy-initialized from a value-initialized temporary. From C++17 this kind of copy elision is guaranteed, as the result x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector directly. Before C++17, copy elision is an optimization:




        even when it takes place and the copy/move (since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:




        The 2nd one is default initialization, as a class type x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        songyuanyaosongyuanyao

        94.5k11182250




        94.5k11182250





























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55700049%2fwhats-the-difference-between-auto-x-vectorint-and-vectorint-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Log på Navigationsmenu

            Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

            Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse