Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Can an abstract class have a constructor?Why do this() and super() have to be the first statement in a constructor?Why can't I change a private member of a class from a friend class in a different namespace?Passing a class as argument which has a private constructor that takes no parametersPrivate data members are inaccessible to friend functionFriend function is not accessing private members of another friend classDeclaring constructors as private shows errors. Is at least one public constructor mandatory?Cannot access private member declared in class, even declared friend classPrivate Data member is inaccessible in Friend FunctionPassing an object into the constructor of another class

VBA: Single line if statement with multiple actions

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

Where to find documentation for `whois` command options?

What does the black goddess statue do and what is it?

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

Variable does not exist: sObjectType (Task.sObjectType)

Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?

Cisco DHCP Router

France's Public Holidays' Puzzle

My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer

`FindRoot [ ]`::jsing: Encountered a singular Jacobian at a point...WHY

When I export an AI 300x60 art board it saves with bigger dimensions

Did war bonds have better investment alternatives during WWII?

Does a Draconic Bloodline sorcerer's doubled proficiency bonus for Charisma checks against dragons apply to all dragon types or only the chosen one?

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

When speaking, how do you change your mind mid-sentence?

Marquee sign letters

Was Objective-C really a hindrance to Apple software development?

Israeli soda type drink

Writing a T-SQL stored procedure to receive 4 numbers and insert them into a table

Was there ever a LEGO store in Miami International Airport?

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers

Why is arima in R one time step off?



Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Can an abstract class have a constructor?Why do this() and super() have to be the first statement in a constructor?Why can't I change a private member of a class from a friend class in a different namespace?Passing a class as argument which has a private constructor that takes no parametersPrivate data members are inaccessible to friend functionFriend function is not accessing private members of another friend classDeclaring constructors as private shows errors. Is at least one public constructor mandatory?Cannot access private member declared in class, even declared friend classPrivate Data member is inaccessible in Friend FunctionPassing an object into the constructor of another class



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








7















I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?









share|improve this question
























  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    13 mins ago

















7















I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?









share|improve this question
























  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    13 mins ago













7












7








7


6






I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?









share|improve this question
















I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?






c++ constructor friend-class






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 49 mins ago







Syfu_H

















asked 56 mins ago









Syfu_HSyfu_H

35518




35518












  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    13 mins ago

















  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    13 mins ago
















Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

– J. Antonio Perez
13 mins ago





Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

– J. Antonio Perez
13 mins ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7














Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



class Employee 
public:
Employee() = default;
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;





share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

    – wally
    20 mins ago












  • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

    – wally
    9 mins ago



















2














You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



class Employee 
public:
Employee() // add it
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;

int main()
Employee emp; // now this should compile







share|improve this answer






























    2














    You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



    eg:



    class Employee 
    public:
    Employee() : sal()
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;





    share|improve this answer
































      0














      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        I recommend explaining why.

        – user4581301
        47 mins ago











      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

        – Syfu_H
        45 mins ago











      • @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

        – user4581301
        37 mins ago











      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55819962%2fwhy-i-cannot-instantiate-a-class-whose-constructor-is-private-in-a-friend-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7














      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;





      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        20 mins ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        9 mins ago
















      7














      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;





      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        20 mins ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        9 mins ago














      7












      7








      7







      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;





      share|improve this answer















      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;






      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 21 mins ago

























      answered 37 mins ago









      zdanzdan

      22.1k34864




      22.1k34864







      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        20 mins ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        9 mins ago













      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        20 mins ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        9 mins ago








      1




      1





      I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

      – wally
      20 mins ago






      I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

      – wally
      20 mins ago














      GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

      – wally
      9 mins ago






      GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

      – wally
      9 mins ago














      2














      You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() // add it
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;

      int main()
      Employee emp; // now this should compile







      share|improve this answer



























        2














        You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



        class Employee 
        public:
        Employee() // add it
        std::string name_;
        Salary sal;
        ;

        int main()
        Employee emp; // now this should compile







        share|improve this answer

























          2












          2








          2







          You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



          class Employee 
          public:
          Employee() // add it
          std::string name_;
          Salary sal;
          ;

          int main()
          Employee emp; // now this should compile







          share|improve this answer













          You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



          class Employee 
          public:
          Employee() // add it
          std::string name_;
          Salary sal;
          ;

          int main()
          Employee emp; // now this should compile








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 39 mins ago









          Raindrop7Raindrop7

          3,74531224




          3,74531224





















              2














              You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



              eg:



              class Employee 
              public:
              Employee() : sal()
              public:
              std::string name_;
              Salary sal;
              ;





              share|improve this answer





























                2














                You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



                eg:



                class Employee 
                public:
                Employee() : sal()
                public:
                std::string name_;
                Salary sal;
                ;





                share|improve this answer



























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



                  eg:



                  class Employee 
                  public:
                  Employee() : sal()
                  public:
                  std::string name_;
                  Salary sal;
                  ;





                  share|improve this answer















                  You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



                  eg:



                  class Employee 
                  public:
                  Employee() : sal()
                  public:
                  std::string name_;
                  Salary sal;
                  ;






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 28 mins ago









                  Pavan Manjunath

                  20.1k1181108




                  20.1k1181108










                  answered 49 mins ago









                  schuessschuess

                  536416




                  536416





















                      0














                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        47 mins ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        45 mins ago











                      • @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        37 mins ago















                      0














                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        47 mins ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        45 mins ago











                      • @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        37 mins ago













                      0












                      0








                      0







                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






                      share|improve this answer













                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 49 mins ago









                      Eric SokolowskyEric Sokolowsky

                      514




                      514







                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        47 mins ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        45 mins ago











                      • @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        37 mins ago












                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        47 mins ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        45 mins ago











                      • @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        37 mins ago







                      1




                      1





                      I recommend explaining why.

                      – user4581301
                      47 mins ago





                      I recommend explaining why.

                      – user4581301
                      47 mins ago













                      Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                      – Syfu_H
                      45 mins ago





                      Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                      – Syfu_H
                      45 mins ago













                      @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                      – user4581301
                      37 mins ago





                      @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                      – user4581301
                      37 mins ago

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55819962%2fwhy-i-cannot-instantiate-a-class-whose-constructor-is-private-in-a-friend-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Siegen Nawigatsjuun

                      Log på Navigationsmenu

                      Log på Navigationsmenu