Why is “Reports” in sentence down without “The”Why “sensor fusion” is without “the”Why does the sentence have the indefinite article?superlative without “the”“Mechanism of toxicity involves…” - why without the definite article?The definite article before names of professions without earlier referencewhy “from childhood ” without any articles or possessive pronounsWhy is there two “the” before the “annual meeting” in the sentence “”?why do we need the in this sentenceWhat's the meaning of “get down” in this sentence?Which articulation is correct for natural things (cold, green, day, time) - A or The?
How do I create uniquely male characters?
Is the language p and n are natural numbers and there's no prime number in [p,p+n] belongs to NP class?
Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?
DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?
TGV timetables / schedules?
How can I hide my bitcoin transactions to protect anonymity from others?
Download, install and reboot computer at night if needed
What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?
Representing power series as a function - what to do with the constant after integration?
Why is an old chain unsafe?
Today is the Center
How is this relation reflexive?
Can I interfere when another PC is about to be attacked?
Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?
Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?
The magic money tree problem
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
Underlining section titles
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
Suffixes -unt and -ut-
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
Why is “Reports” in sentence down without “The”
Why “sensor fusion” is without “the”Why does the sentence have the indefinite article?superlative without “the”“Mechanism of toxicity involves…” - why without the definite article?The definite article before names of professions without earlier referencewhy “from childhood ” without any articles or possessive pronounsWhy is there two “the” before the “annual meeting” in the sentence “”?why do we need the in this sentenceWhat's the meaning of “get down” in this sentence?Which articulation is correct for natural things (cold, green, day, time) - A or The?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The":
Reports are coming in that a train has crashed near Birmingham.
This sentence is copied from the book How English Works by Michael Swam and Catherine Walter.
Why my question? Because I think that the plural "Reports" is a group of reports that have something together. It is new about "a train has crashed near Birmingham". For example, "The apples are red." Why not "Apples are red". I think because it is a group of red apples, not mix red, green, blue, etc.
articles american-english
add a comment |
Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The":
Reports are coming in that a train has crashed near Birmingham.
This sentence is copied from the book How English Works by Michael Swam and Catherine Walter.
Why my question? Because I think that the plural "Reports" is a group of reports that have something together. It is new about "a train has crashed near Birmingham". For example, "The apples are red." Why not "Apples are red". I think because it is a group of red apples, not mix red, green, blue, etc.
articles american-english
add a comment |
Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The":
Reports are coming in that a train has crashed near Birmingham.
This sentence is copied from the book How English Works by Michael Swam and Catherine Walter.
Why my question? Because I think that the plural "Reports" is a group of reports that have something together. It is new about "a train has crashed near Birmingham". For example, "The apples are red." Why not "Apples are red". I think because it is a group of red apples, not mix red, green, blue, etc.
articles american-english
Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The":
Reports are coming in that a train has crashed near Birmingham.
This sentence is copied from the book How English Works by Michael Swam and Catherine Walter.
Why my question? Because I think that the plural "Reports" is a group of reports that have something together. It is new about "a train has crashed near Birmingham". For example, "The apples are red." Why not "Apples are red". I think because it is a group of red apples, not mix red, green, blue, etc.
articles american-english
articles american-english
edited 1 hour ago
SamBC
17.5k2565
17.5k2565
asked 2 hours ago
b2okb2ok
336314
336314
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Plurals do not require articles. If you use an article, you have a different meaning.
There are apples in the bowl. The apples are red.
The previously identified apples are red. Just like when used with a singular, the use of the definite article, the, indicates that you are talking about specific apples.
Apples are red.
This is a claim that apples, in general, are red. This is clearly an incorrect statement, as some apples have no noticeable red pigmentation at all. They are green (or, sometimes, more like yellow).
Apples are falling on my house.
Now, this isn't a general statement. It's not claiming that all apples in the world are falling your house right now. That would be alarming. It is saying that there are apples falling on your house. Similarly, we might say:
Reports are coming in that StackExchange is going to shut down.
This says that some reports are coming in saying that. If there was just one such report, we'd say "a report is coming in...". If we don't want to be precise about numbers, we just say reports.
I haven't sat down and explored this thoroughly, but it seems to me that a plural without article as the subject of a linking verb (be, look, seem, feel) is a statement in general about that category of item, possibly limited by context, and I suspect the same is true of verbs of state (stative verbs) and generally of verbs of perception (though I don't imagine inanimate objects being subjects of those very often). I'm not sure if there's a general rule for other action verbs, though. That's probably dependent on context. And of course negation changes things. For example,
Trains aren't running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's a general statement. However,
Trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's not; not all trains are running on the West Coast Mainline, after all. However, this might be because the first could be rewritten:
No trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
Then there's an explicit determiner.
Essentially, you can consider most plural nouns as having a determiner - either explicit, or implicit. It's working out what the implicit determiner is that's the trick. In your example, it's clearly some. In others, it will be something else.
add a comment |
Not a native speaker. That being disclaimed, I would say that the reports in this context are general and not specifically known from previous situation. If it'd be only a single report, you'd say "a report is coming..." but since it's multiple instances of it, we can omit the.
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
1 hour ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
1 hour ago
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
54 mins ago
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
50 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204351%2fwhy-is-reports-in-sentence-down-without-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Plurals do not require articles. If you use an article, you have a different meaning.
There are apples in the bowl. The apples are red.
The previously identified apples are red. Just like when used with a singular, the use of the definite article, the, indicates that you are talking about specific apples.
Apples are red.
This is a claim that apples, in general, are red. This is clearly an incorrect statement, as some apples have no noticeable red pigmentation at all. They are green (or, sometimes, more like yellow).
Apples are falling on my house.
Now, this isn't a general statement. It's not claiming that all apples in the world are falling your house right now. That would be alarming. It is saying that there are apples falling on your house. Similarly, we might say:
Reports are coming in that StackExchange is going to shut down.
This says that some reports are coming in saying that. If there was just one such report, we'd say "a report is coming in...". If we don't want to be precise about numbers, we just say reports.
I haven't sat down and explored this thoroughly, but it seems to me that a plural without article as the subject of a linking verb (be, look, seem, feel) is a statement in general about that category of item, possibly limited by context, and I suspect the same is true of verbs of state (stative verbs) and generally of verbs of perception (though I don't imagine inanimate objects being subjects of those very often). I'm not sure if there's a general rule for other action verbs, though. That's probably dependent on context. And of course negation changes things. For example,
Trains aren't running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's a general statement. However,
Trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's not; not all trains are running on the West Coast Mainline, after all. However, this might be because the first could be rewritten:
No trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
Then there's an explicit determiner.
Essentially, you can consider most plural nouns as having a determiner - either explicit, or implicit. It's working out what the implicit determiner is that's the trick. In your example, it's clearly some. In others, it will be something else.
add a comment |
Plurals do not require articles. If you use an article, you have a different meaning.
There are apples in the bowl. The apples are red.
The previously identified apples are red. Just like when used with a singular, the use of the definite article, the, indicates that you are talking about specific apples.
Apples are red.
This is a claim that apples, in general, are red. This is clearly an incorrect statement, as some apples have no noticeable red pigmentation at all. They are green (or, sometimes, more like yellow).
Apples are falling on my house.
Now, this isn't a general statement. It's not claiming that all apples in the world are falling your house right now. That would be alarming. It is saying that there are apples falling on your house. Similarly, we might say:
Reports are coming in that StackExchange is going to shut down.
This says that some reports are coming in saying that. If there was just one such report, we'd say "a report is coming in...". If we don't want to be precise about numbers, we just say reports.
I haven't sat down and explored this thoroughly, but it seems to me that a plural without article as the subject of a linking verb (be, look, seem, feel) is a statement in general about that category of item, possibly limited by context, and I suspect the same is true of verbs of state (stative verbs) and generally of verbs of perception (though I don't imagine inanimate objects being subjects of those very often). I'm not sure if there's a general rule for other action verbs, though. That's probably dependent on context. And of course negation changes things. For example,
Trains aren't running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's a general statement. However,
Trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's not; not all trains are running on the West Coast Mainline, after all. However, this might be because the first could be rewritten:
No trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
Then there's an explicit determiner.
Essentially, you can consider most plural nouns as having a determiner - either explicit, or implicit. It's working out what the implicit determiner is that's the trick. In your example, it's clearly some. In others, it will be something else.
add a comment |
Plurals do not require articles. If you use an article, you have a different meaning.
There are apples in the bowl. The apples are red.
The previously identified apples are red. Just like when used with a singular, the use of the definite article, the, indicates that you are talking about specific apples.
Apples are red.
This is a claim that apples, in general, are red. This is clearly an incorrect statement, as some apples have no noticeable red pigmentation at all. They are green (or, sometimes, more like yellow).
Apples are falling on my house.
Now, this isn't a general statement. It's not claiming that all apples in the world are falling your house right now. That would be alarming. It is saying that there are apples falling on your house. Similarly, we might say:
Reports are coming in that StackExchange is going to shut down.
This says that some reports are coming in saying that. If there was just one such report, we'd say "a report is coming in...". If we don't want to be precise about numbers, we just say reports.
I haven't sat down and explored this thoroughly, but it seems to me that a plural without article as the subject of a linking verb (be, look, seem, feel) is a statement in general about that category of item, possibly limited by context, and I suspect the same is true of verbs of state (stative verbs) and generally of verbs of perception (though I don't imagine inanimate objects being subjects of those very often). I'm not sure if there's a general rule for other action verbs, though. That's probably dependent on context. And of course negation changes things. For example,
Trains aren't running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's a general statement. However,
Trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's not; not all trains are running on the West Coast Mainline, after all. However, this might be because the first could be rewritten:
No trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
Then there's an explicit determiner.
Essentially, you can consider most plural nouns as having a determiner - either explicit, or implicit. It's working out what the implicit determiner is that's the trick. In your example, it's clearly some. In others, it will be something else.
Plurals do not require articles. If you use an article, you have a different meaning.
There are apples in the bowl. The apples are red.
The previously identified apples are red. Just like when used with a singular, the use of the definite article, the, indicates that you are talking about specific apples.
Apples are red.
This is a claim that apples, in general, are red. This is clearly an incorrect statement, as some apples have no noticeable red pigmentation at all. They are green (or, sometimes, more like yellow).
Apples are falling on my house.
Now, this isn't a general statement. It's not claiming that all apples in the world are falling your house right now. That would be alarming. It is saying that there are apples falling on your house. Similarly, we might say:
Reports are coming in that StackExchange is going to shut down.
This says that some reports are coming in saying that. If there was just one such report, we'd say "a report is coming in...". If we don't want to be precise about numbers, we just say reports.
I haven't sat down and explored this thoroughly, but it seems to me that a plural without article as the subject of a linking verb (be, look, seem, feel) is a statement in general about that category of item, possibly limited by context, and I suspect the same is true of verbs of state (stative verbs) and generally of verbs of perception (though I don't imagine inanimate objects being subjects of those very often). I'm not sure if there's a general rule for other action verbs, though. That's probably dependent on context. And of course negation changes things. For example,
Trains aren't running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's a general statement. However,
Trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's not; not all trains are running on the West Coast Mainline, after all. However, this might be because the first could be rewritten:
No trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
Then there's an explicit determiner.
Essentially, you can consider most plural nouns as having a determiner - either explicit, or implicit. It's working out what the implicit determiner is that's the trick. In your example, it's clearly some. In others, it will be something else.
answered 1 hour ago
SamBCSamBC
17.5k2565
17.5k2565
add a comment |
add a comment |
Not a native speaker. That being disclaimed, I would say that the reports in this context are general and not specifically known from previous situation. If it'd be only a single report, you'd say "a report is coming..." but since it's multiple instances of it, we can omit the.
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
1 hour ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
1 hour ago
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
54 mins ago
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
50 mins ago
add a comment |
Not a native speaker. That being disclaimed, I would say that the reports in this context are general and not specifically known from previous situation. If it'd be only a single report, you'd say "a report is coming..." but since it's multiple instances of it, we can omit the.
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
1 hour ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
1 hour ago
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
54 mins ago
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
50 mins ago
add a comment |
Not a native speaker. That being disclaimed, I would say that the reports in this context are general and not specifically known from previous situation. If it'd be only a single report, you'd say "a report is coming..." but since it's multiple instances of it, we can omit the.
Not a native speaker. That being disclaimed, I would say that the reports in this context are general and not specifically known from previous situation. If it'd be only a single report, you'd say "a report is coming..." but since it's multiple instances of it, we can omit the.
answered 1 hour ago
Konrad VilterstenKonrad Viltersten
2,05722344
2,05722344
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
1 hour ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
1 hour ago
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
54 mins ago
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
50 mins ago
add a comment |
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
1 hour ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
1 hour ago
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
54 mins ago
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
50 mins ago
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
1 hour ago
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
1 hour ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
1 hour ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
1 hour ago
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
54 mins ago
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
54 mins ago
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
50 mins ago
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
50 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204351%2fwhy-is-reports-in-sentence-down-without-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown