Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

How to prove the emptiness of intersection of two context free languages is undecidable?

Can dirty bird feeders make birds sick?

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bit

Simple Arithmetic Puzzle 7. Or is it?

How to tease a romance without a cat and mouse chase?

Vehemently against code formatting

How could Dwarves prevent sand from filling up their settlements

Why use nominative in Coniugatio periphrastica passiva?

Does science define life as "beginning at conception"?

Why is this python script running in background consuming 100 % CPU?

Why was Houston selected as the location for the Manned Spacecraft Center?

Are CTRL+C and <esc> the same?

What to call a small, open stone or cement reservoir that supplies fresh water from a spring or other natural source?

Existence of a model of ZFC in which the natural numbers are really the natural numbers

Why was Harry at the Weasley's at the beginning of Goblet of Fire but at the Dursleys' after?

How to say "they didn't leave him a penny"?

What quantum phenomena violate the superposition principle in electromagnetism?

Was murdering a slave illegal in American slavery, and if so, what punishments were given for it?

Is my company merging branches wrong?

How did Arya and the Hound get into King's Landing so easily?

What is this dime sized black bug with white on the segments near Loveland Colorodao?

Why did Nick Fury not hesitate in blowing up the plane he thought was carrying a nuke?

Do seaplanes need to get clearance for takeoff?

What variables do I have to take into consideration when I homebrew armour?



Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bit


How are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    2












    $begingroup$


    Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



    Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



      Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



      Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



      enter image description here







      algorithm circuit-construction






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 7 mins ago









      Sanchayan Dutta

      7,12041658




      7,12041658










      asked 5 hours ago









      UpstartUpstart

      25919




      25919




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          I would use a circuit that looks like:



          enter image description here



          Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



          Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



          We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



          Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



          Please let me know if I can clarify further.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "694"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6188%2fcircuit-construction-for-execution-of-conditional-statements-using-least-signifi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            I would use a circuit that looks like:



            enter image description here



            Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



            Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



            We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



            Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



            Please let me know if I can clarify further.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              I would use a circuit that looks like:



              enter image description here



              Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



              Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



              We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



              Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



              Please let me know if I can clarify further.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                I would use a circuit that looks like:



                enter image description here



                Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



                Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



                We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



                Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



                Please let me know if I can clarify further.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                I would use a circuit that looks like:



                enter image description here



                Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



                Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



                We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



                Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



                Please let me know if I can clarify further.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 15 mins ago

























                answered 25 mins ago









                Arthur-1Arthur-1

                315




                315



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6188%2fcircuit-construction-for-execution-of-conditional-statements-using-least-signifi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Log på Navigationsmenu

                    Creating second map without labels using QGIS?How to lock map labels for inset map in Print Composer?How to Force the Showing of Labels of a Vector File in QGISQGIS Valmiera, Labels only show for part of polygonsRemoving duplicate point labels in QGISLabeling every feature using QGIS?Show labels for point features outside map canvasAbbreviate Road Labels in QGIS only when requiredExporting map from composer in QGIS - text labels have moved in output?How to make sure labels in qgis turn up in layout map?Writing label expression with ArcMap and If then Statement?

                    Nuuk Indholdsfortegnelse Etyomologi | Historie | Geografi | Transport og infrastruktur | Politik og administration | Uddannelsesinstitutioner | Kultur | Venskabsbyer | Noter | Eksterne henvisninger | Se også | Navigationsmenuwww.sermersooq.gl64°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.75064°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.750DMI - KlimanormalerSalmonsen, s. 850Grønlands Naturinstitut undersøger rensdyr i Akia og Maniitsoq foråret 2008Grønlands NaturinstitutNy vej til Qinngorput indviet i dagAntallet af biler i Nuuk må begrænsesNy taxacentral mødt med demonstrationKøreplan. Rute 1, 2 og 3SnescootersporNuukNord er for storSkoler i Kommuneqarfik SermersooqAtuarfik Samuel KleinschmidtKangillinguit AtuarfiatNuussuup AtuarfiaNuuk Internationale FriskoleIlinniarfissuaq, Grønlands SeminariumLedelseÅrsberetning for 2008Kunst og arkitekturÅrsberetning for 2008Julie om naturenNuuk KunstmuseumSilamiutGrønlands Nationalmuseum og ArkivStatistisk ÅrbogGrønlands LandsbibliotekStore koncerter på stribeVandhund nummer 1.000.000Kommuneqarfik Sermersooq – MalikForsidenVenskabsbyerLyngby-Taarbæk i GrønlandArctic Business NetworkWinter Cities 2008 i NuukDagligt opdaterede satellitbilleder fra NuukområdetKommuneqarfik Sermersooqs hjemmesideTurist i NuukGrønlands Statistiks databankGrønlands Hjemmestyres valgresultaterrrWorldCat124325457671310-5