Number of seconds in 6 weeks1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 = 100The game of SevensExpress the number $2015$ using only the digit $2$ twiceFill in the operators to make $7 circ 8 circ 7 circ 7 circ 8 circ 3 = 100$10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 = 2016Use a circuit to multiply two resistancesMake 11 from five identical digitsA (Simple) Arithmetic puzzle10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 = 2017Construct $sqrt3$ using every natural number

Airbnb - host wants to reduce rooms, can we get refund?

Unknowingly ran an infinite loop in terminal

How to reply this mail from potential PhD professor?

Upside-Down Pyramid Addition...REVERSED!

Father and Son and Grandsons

What was the state of the German rail system in 1944?

How can I get a job without pushing my family's income into a higher tax bracket?

A non-technological, repeating, phenomenon in the sky, holding its position in the sky for hours

FindInstance and cosine system of equations

For a benzene shown in a skeletal structure, what does a substituent to the center of the ring mean?

Can I get a paladin's steed by True Polymorphing into a monster that can cast Find Steed?

Has any spacecraft ever had the ability to directly communicate with civilian air traffic control?

How to get a substring from bash command

In a vacuum triode, what prevents the grid from acting as another anode?

Catholic vs Protestant Support for Nazism in Germany

In Endgame, why were these characters still around?

How do I tell my manager that his code review comment is wrong?

Why was the battle set up *outside* Winterfell?

Pressure inside an infinite ocean?

Selecting a secure PIN for building access

Are triangulations of compact manifolds PL homeomorphic?

Is there a legal ground for stripping the UK of its UN Veto if Scotland and/or N.Ireland split from the UK?

Manager is threatning to grade me poorly if I don't complete the project

What are the spoon bit of a spoon and fork bit of a fork called?



Number of seconds in 6 weeks


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 = 100The game of SevensExpress the number $2015$ using only the digit $2$ twiceFill in the operators to make $7 circ 8 circ 7 circ 7 circ 8 circ 3 = 100$10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 = 2016Use a circuit to multiply two resistancesMake 11 from five identical digitsA (Simple) Arithmetic puzzle10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 = 2017Construct $sqrt3$ using every natural number













2












$begingroup$


Using only 3 characters (any single digit or one of the following operators: $ +,, -,, times,, div,, ! $), construct an expression that evaluates to the number of seconds in 6 weeks.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Uvc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure it's not 6 weeks?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I second noedne's question.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry about that..it should be 6 weeks
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ^I added this information in to the original post. In the future, if you post questions like these, please make sure that all possible specifications are included. Thanks! :)
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for clarifying the question..I am a novice to the site and hopefully improve as I go along.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    2 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


Using only 3 characters (any single digit or one of the following operators: $ +,, -,, times,, div,, ! $), construct an expression that evaluates to the number of seconds in 6 weeks.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Uvc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure it's not 6 weeks?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I second noedne's question.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry about that..it should be 6 weeks
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ^I added this information in to the original post. In the future, if you post questions like these, please make sure that all possible specifications are included. Thanks! :)
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for clarifying the question..I am a novice to the site and hopefully improve as I go along.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    2 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Using only 3 characters (any single digit or one of the following operators: $ +,, -,, times,, div,, ! $), construct an expression that evaluates to the number of seconds in 6 weeks.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Uvc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Using only 3 characters (any single digit or one of the following operators: $ +,, -,, times,, div,, ! $), construct an expression that evaluates to the number of seconds in 6 weeks.







mathematics






share|improve this question









New contributor




Uvc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Uvc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









PiIsNot3

3,140643




3,140643






New contributor




Uvc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









UvcUvc

212




212




New contributor




Uvc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Uvc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Uvc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure it's not 6 weeks?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I second noedne's question.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry about that..it should be 6 weeks
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ^I added this information in to the original post. In the future, if you post questions like these, please make sure that all possible specifications are included. Thanks! :)
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for clarifying the question..I am a novice to the site and hopefully improve as I go along.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    2 hours ago












  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure it's not 6 weeks?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I second noedne's question.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry about that..it should be 6 weeks
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ^I added this information in to the original post. In the future, if you post questions like these, please make sure that all possible specifications are included. Thanks! :)
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for clarifying the question..I am a novice to the site and hopefully improve as I go along.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    2 hours ago







8




8




$begingroup$
Are you sure it's not 6 weeks?
$endgroup$
– noedne
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are you sure it's not 6 weeks?
$endgroup$
– noedne
3 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
I second noedne's question.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
I second noedne's question.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Sorry about that..it should be 6 weeks
$endgroup$
– Uvc
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Sorry about that..it should be 6 weeks
$endgroup$
– Uvc
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
^I added this information in to the original post. In the future, if you post questions like these, please make sure that all possible specifications are included. Thanks! :)
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
2 hours ago





$begingroup$
^I added this information in to the original post. In the future, if you post questions like these, please make sure that all possible specifications are included. Thanks! :)
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
2 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
Thanks for clarifying the question..I am a novice to the site and hopefully improve as I go along.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thanks for clarifying the question..I am a novice to the site and hopefully improve as I go along.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

One answer is:




'$10!$' = 3628800 = (60*60*24*7*6)




And for fun, the original question accidentally asked to solve for 3 weeks. An argument could be made that the following works:




'$9!5$' evaluates to (9! * 5) = 1814400 = (60*60*24*7*3)







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not entirely sure about your solution for 3 weeks, since it implicitly assumes that two numbers next to each other is multiplication, which is not always the case (concatenation is another possibility). But kudos for trying to find a way to do it!
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 When an operator is involved, concatenation is hardly an option. The real problem with this solution is that it could be $9$ times the subfactorial of $5$...
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ArnaudMortier sure, that's another possibility, but the main point still stands that putting those values next to each other is ambiguous (which is probably why the question got changed from 3 weeks to 6 weeks)
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Uvc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83417%2fnumber-of-seconds-in-6-weeks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

One answer is:




'$10!$' = 3628800 = (60*60*24*7*6)




And for fun, the original question accidentally asked to solve for 3 weeks. An argument could be made that the following works:




'$9!5$' evaluates to (9! * 5) = 1814400 = (60*60*24*7*3)







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not entirely sure about your solution for 3 weeks, since it implicitly assumes that two numbers next to each other is multiplication, which is not always the case (concatenation is another possibility). But kudos for trying to find a way to do it!
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 When an operator is involved, concatenation is hardly an option. The real problem with this solution is that it could be $9$ times the subfactorial of $5$...
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ArnaudMortier sure, that's another possibility, but the main point still stands that putting those values next to each other is ambiguous (which is probably why the question got changed from 3 weeks to 6 weeks)
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago















7












$begingroup$

One answer is:




'$10!$' = 3628800 = (60*60*24*7*6)




And for fun, the original question accidentally asked to solve for 3 weeks. An argument could be made that the following works:




'$9!5$' evaluates to (9! * 5) = 1814400 = (60*60*24*7*3)







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not entirely sure about your solution for 3 weeks, since it implicitly assumes that two numbers next to each other is multiplication, which is not always the case (concatenation is another possibility). But kudos for trying to find a way to do it!
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 When an operator is involved, concatenation is hardly an option. The real problem with this solution is that it could be $9$ times the subfactorial of $5$...
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ArnaudMortier sure, that's another possibility, but the main point still stands that putting those values next to each other is ambiguous (which is probably why the question got changed from 3 weeks to 6 weeks)
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago













7












7








7





$begingroup$

One answer is:




'$10!$' = 3628800 = (60*60*24*7*6)




And for fun, the original question accidentally asked to solve for 3 weeks. An argument could be made that the following works:




'$9!5$' evaluates to (9! * 5) = 1814400 = (60*60*24*7*3)







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



One answer is:




'$10!$' = 3628800 = (60*60*24*7*6)




And for fun, the original question accidentally asked to solve for 3 weeks. An argument could be made that the following works:




'$9!5$' evaluates to (9! * 5) = 1814400 = (60*60*24*7*3)








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 2 hours ago









TwoBitOperationTwoBitOperation

8,73411667




8,73411667











  • $begingroup$
    I'm not entirely sure about your solution for 3 weeks, since it implicitly assumes that two numbers next to each other is multiplication, which is not always the case (concatenation is another possibility). But kudos for trying to find a way to do it!
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 When an operator is involved, concatenation is hardly an option. The real problem with this solution is that it could be $9$ times the subfactorial of $5$...
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ArnaudMortier sure, that's another possibility, but the main point still stands that putting those values next to each other is ambiguous (which is probably why the question got changed from 3 weeks to 6 weeks)
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I'm not entirely sure about your solution for 3 weeks, since it implicitly assumes that two numbers next to each other is multiplication, which is not always the case (concatenation is another possibility). But kudos for trying to find a way to do it!
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 When an operator is involved, concatenation is hardly an option. The real problem with this solution is that it could be $9$ times the subfactorial of $5$...
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ArnaudMortier sure, that's another possibility, but the main point still stands that putting those values next to each other is ambiguous (which is probably why the question got changed from 3 weeks to 6 weeks)
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
I'm not entirely sure about your solution for 3 weeks, since it implicitly assumes that two numbers next to each other is multiplication, which is not always the case (concatenation is another possibility). But kudos for trying to find a way to do it!
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm not entirely sure about your solution for 3 weeks, since it implicitly assumes that two numbers next to each other is multiplication, which is not always the case (concatenation is another possibility). But kudos for trying to find a way to do it!
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 When an operator is involved, concatenation is hardly an option. The real problem with this solution is that it could be $9$ times the subfactorial of $5$...
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 When an operator is involved, concatenation is hardly an option. The real problem with this solution is that it could be $9$ times the subfactorial of $5$...
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@ArnaudMortier sure, that's another possibility, but the main point still stands that putting those values next to each other is ambiguous (which is probably why the question got changed from 3 weeks to 6 weeks)
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@ArnaudMortier sure, that's another possibility, but the main point still stands that putting those values next to each other is ambiguous (which is probably why the question got changed from 3 weeks to 6 weeks)
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago










Uvc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Uvc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Uvc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Uvc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83417%2fnumber-of-seconds-in-6-weeks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Siegen Nawigatsjuun

Log på Navigationsmenu

Log på Navigationsmenu