Did the IBM System/4 Pi computer have radiation-hardened versions for Skylab and Shuttle?What computer and software is used by the Falcon 9?Did the Surveyor missions measure secondary radiation?Mars and the radiation problemsHow was it possible for the Apollo 11 to film and take pictures with such radiation?How does methane and LOX compare to water for radiation shieldingDid Apollo-11 have any radiation shielding?How did Apollo missions solve the cosmic radiation problem?Bits per core for the different versions of the Apollo guidance computer core rope memory?Did the Apollo missions use the Earth's magnetotail to lessen cosmic radiation?How did the Apollo guidance computer handle parity bit errors?

Is it safe to keep the GPU on 100% utilization for a very long time?

What is a good way to allow only one non null field in an object

Not taking the bishop with the knight, why?

Pre-1993 comic in which Wolverine's claws were turned to rubber?

Gift for mentor after his thesis defense?

Are double contractions formal? Eg: "couldn't've" for "could not have"

A Latin text with dependency tree

Libertine font numbers have a different height than text

Is it a Munchausen Number?

How to avoid making self and former employee look bad when reporting on fixing former employee's work?

How to handle DM constantly stealing everything from sleeping characters?

Integral with DiracDelta. Can Mathematica be made to solve this?

Can a planet still function with a damaged moon?

Why are thrust reversers not used to slow down to taxi speeds?

Company stopped paying my salary. What are my options?

How can I make parentheses stick to formula?

Why do the Avengers care about returning these items in Endgame?

How does weapons training transfer to empty hand?

Ugin's Conjurant vs. un-preventable damage

resoldering copper waste pipe

Is there an idiom that means "revealing a secret unintentionally"?

How come mathematicians published in Annals of Eugenics?

Why is there a cap on 401k contributions?

Is there a need for better software for writers?



Did the IBM System/4 Pi computer have radiation-hardened versions for Skylab and Shuttle?


What computer and software is used by the Falcon 9?Did the Surveyor missions measure secondary radiation?Mars and the radiation problemsHow was it possible for the Apollo 11 to film and take pictures with such radiation?How does methane and LOX compare to water for radiation shieldingDid Apollo-11 have any radiation shielding?How did Apollo missions solve the cosmic radiation problem?Bits per core for the different versions of the Apollo guidance computer core rope memory?Did the Apollo missions use the Earth's magnetotail to lessen cosmic radiation?How did the Apollo guidance computer handle parity bit errors?













2












$begingroup$


Wikipedia's article on the IBM System/4 Pi says:




The IBM System/4 Pi is a family of avionics computers used, in various versions, on the F-15 Eagle fighter, E-3 Sentry, AWACS, Harpoon Missile, NASA's Skylab, MOL, and the Space Shuttle, as well as other aircraft. The name of the system refers to the number of steradians (4π) in a sphere. Development began in 1965, deliveries in 1967.



It descends from the approach used in the System/360 mainframe family of computers in that members of the family were intended for use in many varied user applications. Previously custom computers had been designed for each aerospace application, which was extremely costly.




It sounds like the idea of providing the System/4 Pi was to provide a bit of standardization, but spaceflight involves an elevated exposure to radiation.



Were there any aspects of the system that were further modified for radiation hardening in spaceflight applications, such as special chips or components or did the standard system already have sufficient hardening?



enter image description here



Source










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Wikipedia's article on the IBM System/4 Pi says:




    The IBM System/4 Pi is a family of avionics computers used, in various versions, on the F-15 Eagle fighter, E-3 Sentry, AWACS, Harpoon Missile, NASA's Skylab, MOL, and the Space Shuttle, as well as other aircraft. The name of the system refers to the number of steradians (4π) in a sphere. Development began in 1965, deliveries in 1967.



    It descends from the approach used in the System/360 mainframe family of computers in that members of the family were intended for use in many varied user applications. Previously custom computers had been designed for each aerospace application, which was extremely costly.




    It sounds like the idea of providing the System/4 Pi was to provide a bit of standardization, but spaceflight involves an elevated exposure to radiation.



    Were there any aspects of the system that were further modified for radiation hardening in spaceflight applications, such as special chips or components or did the standard system already have sufficient hardening?



    enter image description here



    Source










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Wikipedia's article on the IBM System/4 Pi says:




      The IBM System/4 Pi is a family of avionics computers used, in various versions, on the F-15 Eagle fighter, E-3 Sentry, AWACS, Harpoon Missile, NASA's Skylab, MOL, and the Space Shuttle, as well as other aircraft. The name of the system refers to the number of steradians (4π) in a sphere. Development began in 1965, deliveries in 1967.



      It descends from the approach used in the System/360 mainframe family of computers in that members of the family were intended for use in many varied user applications. Previously custom computers had been designed for each aerospace application, which was extremely costly.




      It sounds like the idea of providing the System/4 Pi was to provide a bit of standardization, but spaceflight involves an elevated exposure to radiation.



      Were there any aspects of the system that were further modified for radiation hardening in spaceflight applications, such as special chips or components or did the standard system already have sufficient hardening?



      enter image description here



      Source










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Wikipedia's article on the IBM System/4 Pi says:




      The IBM System/4 Pi is a family of avionics computers used, in various versions, on the F-15 Eagle fighter, E-3 Sentry, AWACS, Harpoon Missile, NASA's Skylab, MOL, and the Space Shuttle, as well as other aircraft. The name of the system refers to the number of steradians (4π) in a sphere. Development began in 1965, deliveries in 1967.



      It descends from the approach used in the System/360 mainframe family of computers in that members of the family were intended for use in many varied user applications. Previously custom computers had been designed for each aerospace application, which was extremely costly.




      It sounds like the idea of providing the System/4 Pi was to provide a bit of standardization, but spaceflight involves an elevated exposure to radiation.



      Were there any aspects of the system that were further modified for radiation hardening in spaceflight applications, such as special chips or components or did the standard system already have sufficient hardening?



      enter image description here



      Source







      radiation flight-computer computer






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      uhohuhoh

      42.3k19162532




      42.3k19162532




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          The IBM AP-101S used as the flight computer on the Space Shuttle in the latter part of the program was known to ops personnel as the General Purpose Computer (GPC). Each of the 5 GPCs in the Data Processing System (DPS) had 256k (yes k) of CMOS memory.



          This memory was volatile and prone to corruption by radiation (Single Event Upsets, SEUs). Thus there were additional bits of memory for each halfword used for Error Correcting Code (ECC), parity checking, and code overwrite protection. A separate microprocessor performed the error checking.



          Only the main memory was protected by ECC, CPU registers were not.



          The original shuttle GPC, the AP-101B, had non-volatile memory, but the S model was half the size and had greatly reduced power and cooling loads.



          Source:
          Sadly, personal notes. There is an old Shuttle DPS Overview Training manual available online here but this info likely came from the more detailed HW/SW training manual which I did not find online (but it may be available from Wichita State University or Texas Tech)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Wow thank you for the great and well backgrounded answer. It's great that you have and are such a deep library of information! Do you happen to know what kind of memory the non-volatile memory was? For example, was it SRAM, or FLASH, or magnetic Bubble memory, or something else?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            2 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I saw a bunch of GPCs in the Shuttle Avionics Integration Lab for the first time about a week ago. I hadn't realized SAIL is a location on the JSC tour, but it is! One of the only actual-size shuttle cockpits that I've seen (instead of overlarge ones for simulators).
            $endgroup$
            – Erin Anne
            38 mins ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "508"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36023%2fdid-the-ibm-system-4-pi-computer-have-radiation-hardened-versions-for-skylab-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          The IBM AP-101S used as the flight computer on the Space Shuttle in the latter part of the program was known to ops personnel as the General Purpose Computer (GPC). Each of the 5 GPCs in the Data Processing System (DPS) had 256k (yes k) of CMOS memory.



          This memory was volatile and prone to corruption by radiation (Single Event Upsets, SEUs). Thus there were additional bits of memory for each halfword used for Error Correcting Code (ECC), parity checking, and code overwrite protection. A separate microprocessor performed the error checking.



          Only the main memory was protected by ECC, CPU registers were not.



          The original shuttle GPC, the AP-101B, had non-volatile memory, but the S model was half the size and had greatly reduced power and cooling loads.



          Source:
          Sadly, personal notes. There is an old Shuttle DPS Overview Training manual available online here but this info likely came from the more detailed HW/SW training manual which I did not find online (but it may be available from Wichita State University or Texas Tech)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Wow thank you for the great and well backgrounded answer. It's great that you have and are such a deep library of information! Do you happen to know what kind of memory the non-volatile memory was? For example, was it SRAM, or FLASH, or magnetic Bubble memory, or something else?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            2 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I saw a bunch of GPCs in the Shuttle Avionics Integration Lab for the first time about a week ago. I hadn't realized SAIL is a location on the JSC tour, but it is! One of the only actual-size shuttle cockpits that I've seen (instead of overlarge ones for simulators).
            $endgroup$
            – Erin Anne
            38 mins ago
















          4












          $begingroup$

          The IBM AP-101S used as the flight computer on the Space Shuttle in the latter part of the program was known to ops personnel as the General Purpose Computer (GPC). Each of the 5 GPCs in the Data Processing System (DPS) had 256k (yes k) of CMOS memory.



          This memory was volatile and prone to corruption by radiation (Single Event Upsets, SEUs). Thus there were additional bits of memory for each halfword used for Error Correcting Code (ECC), parity checking, and code overwrite protection. A separate microprocessor performed the error checking.



          Only the main memory was protected by ECC, CPU registers were not.



          The original shuttle GPC, the AP-101B, had non-volatile memory, but the S model was half the size and had greatly reduced power and cooling loads.



          Source:
          Sadly, personal notes. There is an old Shuttle DPS Overview Training manual available online here but this info likely came from the more detailed HW/SW training manual which I did not find online (but it may be available from Wichita State University or Texas Tech)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Wow thank you for the great and well backgrounded answer. It's great that you have and are such a deep library of information! Do you happen to know what kind of memory the non-volatile memory was? For example, was it SRAM, or FLASH, or magnetic Bubble memory, or something else?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            2 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I saw a bunch of GPCs in the Shuttle Avionics Integration Lab for the first time about a week ago. I hadn't realized SAIL is a location on the JSC tour, but it is! One of the only actual-size shuttle cockpits that I've seen (instead of overlarge ones for simulators).
            $endgroup$
            – Erin Anne
            38 mins ago














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          The IBM AP-101S used as the flight computer on the Space Shuttle in the latter part of the program was known to ops personnel as the General Purpose Computer (GPC). Each of the 5 GPCs in the Data Processing System (DPS) had 256k (yes k) of CMOS memory.



          This memory was volatile and prone to corruption by radiation (Single Event Upsets, SEUs). Thus there were additional bits of memory for each halfword used for Error Correcting Code (ECC), parity checking, and code overwrite protection. A separate microprocessor performed the error checking.



          Only the main memory was protected by ECC, CPU registers were not.



          The original shuttle GPC, the AP-101B, had non-volatile memory, but the S model was half the size and had greatly reduced power and cooling loads.



          Source:
          Sadly, personal notes. There is an old Shuttle DPS Overview Training manual available online here but this info likely came from the more detailed HW/SW training manual which I did not find online (but it may be available from Wichita State University or Texas Tech)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The IBM AP-101S used as the flight computer on the Space Shuttle in the latter part of the program was known to ops personnel as the General Purpose Computer (GPC). Each of the 5 GPCs in the Data Processing System (DPS) had 256k (yes k) of CMOS memory.



          This memory was volatile and prone to corruption by radiation (Single Event Upsets, SEUs). Thus there were additional bits of memory for each halfword used for Error Correcting Code (ECC), parity checking, and code overwrite protection. A separate microprocessor performed the error checking.



          Only the main memory was protected by ECC, CPU registers were not.



          The original shuttle GPC, the AP-101B, had non-volatile memory, but the S model was half the size and had greatly reduced power and cooling loads.



          Source:
          Sadly, personal notes. There is an old Shuttle DPS Overview Training manual available online here but this info likely came from the more detailed HW/SW training manual which I did not find online (but it may be available from Wichita State University or Texas Tech)







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          Organic MarbleOrganic Marble

          62.6k4169264




          62.6k4169264







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Wow thank you for the great and well backgrounded answer. It's great that you have and are such a deep library of information! Do you happen to know what kind of memory the non-volatile memory was? For example, was it SRAM, or FLASH, or magnetic Bubble memory, or something else?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            2 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I saw a bunch of GPCs in the Shuttle Avionics Integration Lab for the first time about a week ago. I hadn't realized SAIL is a location on the JSC tour, but it is! One of the only actual-size shuttle cockpits that I've seen (instead of overlarge ones for simulators).
            $endgroup$
            – Erin Anne
            38 mins ago













          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Wow thank you for the great and well backgrounded answer. It's great that you have and are such a deep library of information! Do you happen to know what kind of memory the non-volatile memory was? For example, was it SRAM, or FLASH, or magnetic Bubble memory, or something else?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            2 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I saw a bunch of GPCs in the Shuttle Avionics Integration Lab for the first time about a week ago. I hadn't realized SAIL is a location on the JSC tour, but it is! One of the only actual-size shuttle cockpits that I've seen (instead of overlarge ones for simulators).
            $endgroup$
            – Erin Anne
            38 mins ago








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Wow thank you for the great and well backgrounded answer. It's great that you have and are such a deep library of information! Do you happen to know what kind of memory the non-volatile memory was? For example, was it SRAM, or FLASH, or magnetic Bubble memory, or something else?
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Wow thank you for the great and well backgrounded answer. It's great that you have and are such a deep library of information! Do you happen to know what kind of memory the non-volatile memory was? For example, was it SRAM, or FLASH, or magnetic Bubble memory, or something else?
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          2 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I saw a bunch of GPCs in the Shuttle Avionics Integration Lab for the first time about a week ago. I hadn't realized SAIL is a location on the JSC tour, but it is! One of the only actual-size shuttle cockpits that I've seen (instead of overlarge ones for simulators).
          $endgroup$
          – Erin Anne
          38 mins ago





          $begingroup$
          I saw a bunch of GPCs in the Shuttle Avionics Integration Lab for the first time about a week ago. I hadn't realized SAIL is a location on the JSC tour, but it is! One of the only actual-size shuttle cockpits that I've seen (instead of overlarge ones for simulators).
          $endgroup$
          – Erin Anne
          38 mins ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36023%2fdid-the-ibm-system-4-pi-computer-have-radiation-hardened-versions-for-skylab-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Log på Navigationsmenu

          Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

          Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse