Is the free group on two generators generated by two elements?Group isomorphism concerning free group generated by $3$ elements.Why is chosen for intersection instead of union?Finitely generated ordered monoids and noetherian subsetsInjectivity of Natural Homomorphism to GroupificationCommutator Subgroup of Free GroupHow can you use Green's relations to learn about a monoid?Subgroup of the free group on 3 generatorsFinitely Generated Free Group to Finitely Generated Free MonoidIs there a generalization of the free group that includes infinitely long words?Show that the free group on three generators is a subgroup of the free group on two generators

Why favour the standard WP loop over iterating over (new WP_Query())->get_posts()?

Can the word crowd refer to just 10 people?

If you attack a Tarrasque while swallowed, what AC do you need to beat to hit it?

Chain rule instead of product rule

Why could the Lunar Ascent Engine be used only once?

How to safely discharge oneself

Better than Rembrandt

Gambler's Fallacy Dice

Very serious stuff - Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"

Why did Nick Fury not hesitate in blowing up the plane he thought was carrying a nuke?

How to choose the correct exposure for flower photography?

Why are Marine Le Pen's possible connections with Steve Bannon something worth investigating?

What city and town structures are important in a low fantasy medieval world?

Does a windmilling propeller create more drag than a stopped propeller in an engine out scenario?

Cycling to work - 30 mile return

On a piano, are the effects of holding notes and the sustain pedal the same for a single chord?

Why didn't Daenerys' advisers suggest assassinating Cersei?

Will this series of events work to drown the Tarrasque?

Have I found a major security issue with login

Hotel booking: Why is Agoda much cheaper than booking.com?

What does it mean for a program to be 32 or 64 bit?

Can I have a delimited macro with a literal # in the parameter text?

What is the backup for a glass cockpit, if a plane loses power to the displays/controls?

Head-internal relative clauses



Is the free group on two generators generated by two elements?


Group isomorphism concerning free group generated by $3$ elements.Why is chosen for intersection instead of union?Finitely generated ordered monoids and noetherian subsetsInjectivity of Natural Homomorphism to GroupificationCommutator Subgroup of Free GroupHow can you use Green's relations to learn about a monoid?Subgroup of the free group on 3 generatorsFinitely Generated Free Group to Finitely Generated Free MonoidIs there a generalization of the free group that includes infinitely long words?Show that the free group on three generators is a subgroup of the free group on two generators













6












$begingroup$


...as a monoid?



I was musing about this today and couldn't come up with an answer. Obviously it can be generated as a monoid by the four elements $a$, $b$, $a^-1$, and $b^-1$. After some playing around I was able to come up with three elements that generate it as a monoid: $ab$, $ab^-1$, and $a^-1$.



But I haven't been able to come up with two generators, nor an argument as to why that should be impossible.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nice fake. You had me going there.
    $endgroup$
    – Shalop
    46 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    You might ask the same question about the free group on one generator.
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    38 mins ago















6












$begingroup$


...as a monoid?



I was musing about this today and couldn't come up with an answer. Obviously it can be generated as a monoid by the four elements $a$, $b$, $a^-1$, and $b^-1$. After some playing around I was able to come up with three elements that generate it as a monoid: $ab$, $ab^-1$, and $a^-1$.



But I haven't been able to come up with two generators, nor an argument as to why that should be impossible.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nice fake. You had me going there.
    $endgroup$
    – Shalop
    46 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    You might ask the same question about the free group on one generator.
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    38 mins ago













6












6








6


2



$begingroup$


...as a monoid?



I was musing about this today and couldn't come up with an answer. Obviously it can be generated as a monoid by the four elements $a$, $b$, $a^-1$, and $b^-1$. After some playing around I was able to come up with three elements that generate it as a monoid: $ab$, $ab^-1$, and $a^-1$.



But I haven't been able to come up with two generators, nor an argument as to why that should be impossible.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




...as a monoid?



I was musing about this today and couldn't come up with an answer. Obviously it can be generated as a monoid by the four elements $a$, $b$, $a^-1$, and $b^-1$. After some playing around I was able to come up with three elements that generate it as a monoid: $ab$, $ab^-1$, and $a^-1$.



But I haven't been able to come up with two generators, nor an argument as to why that should be impossible.







free-groups monoid






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









MartianInvaderMartianInvader

5,2631325




5,2631325







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nice fake. You had me going there.
    $endgroup$
    – Shalop
    46 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    You might ask the same question about the free group on one generator.
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    38 mins ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nice fake. You had me going there.
    $endgroup$
    – Shalop
    46 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    You might ask the same question about the free group on one generator.
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    38 mins ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Nice fake. You had me going there.
$endgroup$
– Shalop
46 mins ago





$begingroup$
Nice fake. You had me going there.
$endgroup$
– Shalop
46 mins ago













$begingroup$
You might ask the same question about the free group on one generator.
$endgroup$
– Somos
38 mins ago




$begingroup$
You might ask the same question about the free group on one generator.
$endgroup$
– Somos
38 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

The free group on two generators maps onto $Bbb Z^2$. (This is its Abelianisation). If it were generated by two elements as a monoid, then so
would $Bbb Z^2$. But that's not so.
If you have two elements $a$, $b$ of $Bbb Z^2$
generating it as a monoid, they certainly generate it as an Abelian group,
so they must be linearly independent as vectors. But in that case
$-a-b$ is not in the submonoid of $Bbb Z^2$ generated by $a$ and $b$.



Likewise, a free group on $n$ generators cannot be generated as a monoid
by $n$ elements.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nice proof and generalization! I had briefly considered the abelianization, but not carefully enough to see this reasoning.
    $endgroup$
    – MartianInvader
    20 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3230169%2fis-the-free-group-on-two-generators-generated-by-two-elements%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

The free group on two generators maps onto $Bbb Z^2$. (This is its Abelianisation). If it were generated by two elements as a monoid, then so
would $Bbb Z^2$. But that's not so.
If you have two elements $a$, $b$ of $Bbb Z^2$
generating it as a monoid, they certainly generate it as an Abelian group,
so they must be linearly independent as vectors. But in that case
$-a-b$ is not in the submonoid of $Bbb Z^2$ generated by $a$ and $b$.



Likewise, a free group on $n$ generators cannot be generated as a monoid
by $n$ elements.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nice proof and generalization! I had briefly considered the abelianization, but not carefully enough to see this reasoning.
    $endgroup$
    – MartianInvader
    20 mins ago















5












$begingroup$

The free group on two generators maps onto $Bbb Z^2$. (This is its Abelianisation). If it were generated by two elements as a monoid, then so
would $Bbb Z^2$. But that's not so.
If you have two elements $a$, $b$ of $Bbb Z^2$
generating it as a monoid, they certainly generate it as an Abelian group,
so they must be linearly independent as vectors. But in that case
$-a-b$ is not in the submonoid of $Bbb Z^2$ generated by $a$ and $b$.



Likewise, a free group on $n$ generators cannot be generated as a monoid
by $n$ elements.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nice proof and generalization! I had briefly considered the abelianization, but not carefully enough to see this reasoning.
    $endgroup$
    – MartianInvader
    20 mins ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$

The free group on two generators maps onto $Bbb Z^2$. (This is its Abelianisation). If it were generated by two elements as a monoid, then so
would $Bbb Z^2$. But that's not so.
If you have two elements $a$, $b$ of $Bbb Z^2$
generating it as a monoid, they certainly generate it as an Abelian group,
so they must be linearly independent as vectors. But in that case
$-a-b$ is not in the submonoid of $Bbb Z^2$ generated by $a$ and $b$.



Likewise, a free group on $n$ generators cannot be generated as a monoid
by $n$ elements.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The free group on two generators maps onto $Bbb Z^2$. (This is its Abelianisation). If it were generated by two elements as a monoid, then so
would $Bbb Z^2$. But that's not so.
If you have two elements $a$, $b$ of $Bbb Z^2$
generating it as a monoid, they certainly generate it as an Abelian group,
so they must be linearly independent as vectors. But in that case
$-a-b$ is not in the submonoid of $Bbb Z^2$ generated by $a$ and $b$.



Likewise, a free group on $n$ generators cannot be generated as a monoid
by $n$ elements.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 1 hour ago









Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown

111k1164139




111k1164139











  • $begingroup$
    Nice proof and generalization! I had briefly considered the abelianization, but not carefully enough to see this reasoning.
    $endgroup$
    – MartianInvader
    20 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Nice proof and generalization! I had briefly considered the abelianization, but not carefully enough to see this reasoning.
    $endgroup$
    – MartianInvader
    20 mins ago















$begingroup$
Nice proof and generalization! I had briefly considered the abelianization, but not carefully enough to see this reasoning.
$endgroup$
– MartianInvader
20 mins ago




$begingroup$
Nice proof and generalization! I had briefly considered the abelianization, but not carefully enough to see this reasoning.
$endgroup$
– MartianInvader
20 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3230169%2fis-the-free-group-on-two-generators-generated-by-two-elements%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Log på Navigationsmenu

Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse