Proof that the inverse image of a single element is a discrete spaceShow that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.Local homeomorphism and inverse imageHow do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?Why is the Long Line not a covering space for the CircleFibers and they being discrete spaceLocal homeomorphisms which are not covering map?Alternative definition of covering spaces.Construction of a covering space as a fibre bundleProve that exist bijection between inverse image of covering spaceCovering spaces as fiber bundlesProof that a discrete space (with more than 1 element) is not connectedUniqueness of possibly non-simply connected universal covering spaces.Surjectivity of a (covering?) map
Why is this int array not passed as an object vararg array?
How to use structured binding in an array passed as arg to some function?
Word for being out at night during curfew
Bishop Berkeley's ideas put to the test
Why was castling bad for white in this game, and engine strongly prefered trading queens?
What are the implications of the new alleged key recovery attack preprint on SIMON?
What is Plautus’s pun about frustum and frustrum?
Create a list of all possible Boolean configurations of three constraints
How to Access data returned from Apex class in JS controller using Lightning web component
Proof that the inverse image of a single element is a discrete space
How can a Lich look like a human without magic?
Make all the squares explode
How did Thanos not realise this had happened at the end of Endgame?
Can 'sudo apt-get remove [write]' destroy my Ubuntu?
Why can't RGB or bicolour LEDs produce a decent yellow?
Front derailleur hard to move due to gear cable angle
How to cope with regret and shame about not fully utilizing opportunities during PhD?
Was this character’s old age look CGI or make-up?
Why in a Ethernet LAN, a packet sniffer can obtain all packets sent over the LAN?
Reaction of borax with NaOH
How are Core iX names like Core i5, i7 related to Haswell, Ivy Bridge?
Exclude loop* snap devices from lsblk output?
How can this triangle figure be modeled/drawn with TikZ?
Speculative Biology of a Haplodiploid Humanoid Species
Proof that the inverse image of a single element is a discrete space
Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.Local homeomorphism and inverse imageHow do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?Why is the Long Line not a covering space for the CircleFibers and they being discrete spaceLocal homeomorphisms which are not covering map?Alternative definition of covering spaces.Construction of a covering space as a fibre bundleProve that exist bijection between inverse image of covering spaceCovering spaces as fiber bundlesProof that a discrete space (with more than 1 element) is not connectedUniqueness of possibly non-simply connected universal covering spaces.Surjectivity of a (covering?) map
$begingroup$
Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).
These are the posts I have read so far:
Local homeomorphism and inverse image
When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?
Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.
How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?
Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.
However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.
Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.
If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.
So, how can I prove this?
general-topology algebraic-topology metric-spaces topological-groups covering-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).
These are the posts I have read so far:
Local homeomorphism and inverse image
When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?
Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.
How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?
Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.
However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.
Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.
If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.
So, how can I prove this?
general-topology algebraic-topology metric-spaces topological-groups covering-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).
These are the posts I have read so far:
Local homeomorphism and inverse image
When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?
Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.
How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?
Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.
However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.
Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.
If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.
So, how can I prove this?
general-topology algebraic-topology metric-spaces topological-groups covering-spaces
$endgroup$
Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).
These are the posts I have read so far:
Local homeomorphism and inverse image
When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?
Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.
How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?
Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.
However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.
Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.
If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.
So, how can I prove this?
general-topology algebraic-topology metric-spaces topological-groups covering-spaces
general-topology algebraic-topology metric-spaces topological-groups covering-spaces
asked 2 hours ago
evaristegdevaristegd
15110
15110
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.
Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.
Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).
In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.
Note that local injectivity is all we need.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3222556%2fproof-that-the-inverse-image-of-a-single-element-is-a-discrete-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.
$endgroup$
Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.
answered 2 hours ago
kobekobe
35.2k22248
35.2k22248
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.
Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.
Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).
In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.
Note that local injectivity is all we need.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.
Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.
Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).
In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.
Note that local injectivity is all we need.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.
Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.
Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).
In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.
Note that local injectivity is all we need.
$endgroup$
Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.
Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.
Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).
In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.
Note that local injectivity is all we need.
answered 2 hours ago
Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma
119k351130
119k351130
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3222556%2fproof-that-the-inverse-image-of-a-single-element-is-a-discrete-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown