Proof that the inverse image of a single element is a discrete spaceShow that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.Local homeomorphism and inverse imageHow do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?Why is the Long Line not a covering space for the CircleFibers and they being discrete spaceLocal homeomorphisms which are not covering map?Alternative definition of covering spaces.Construction of a covering space as a fibre bundleProve that exist bijection between inverse image of covering spaceCovering spaces as fiber bundlesProof that a discrete space (with more than 1 element) is not connectedUniqueness of possibly non-simply connected universal covering spaces.Surjectivity of a (covering?) map

Why is this int array not passed as an object vararg array?

How to use structured binding in an array passed as arg to some function?

Word for being out at night during curfew

Bishop Berkeley's ideas put to the test

Why was castling bad for white in this game, and engine strongly prefered trading queens?

What are the implications of the new alleged key recovery attack preprint on SIMON?

What is Plautus’s pun about frustum and frustrum?

Create a list of all possible Boolean configurations of three constraints

How to Access data returned from Apex class in JS controller using Lightning web component

Proof that the inverse image of a single element is a discrete space

How can a Lich look like a human without magic?

Make all the squares explode

How did Thanos not realise this had happened at the end of Endgame?

Can 'sudo apt-get remove [write]' destroy my Ubuntu?

Why can't RGB or bicolour LEDs produce a decent yellow?

Front derailleur hard to move due to gear cable angle

How to cope with regret and shame about not fully utilizing opportunities during PhD?

Was this character’s old age look CGI or make-up?

Why in a Ethernet LAN, a packet sniffer can obtain all packets sent over the LAN?

Reaction of borax with NaOH

How are Core iX names like Core i5, i7 related to Haswell, Ivy Bridge?

Exclude loop* snap devices from lsblk output?

How can this triangle figure be modeled/drawn with TikZ?

Speculative Biology of a Haplodiploid Humanoid Species



Proof that the inverse image of a single element is a discrete space


Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.Local homeomorphism and inverse imageHow do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?Why is the Long Line not a covering space for the CircleFibers and they being discrete spaceLocal homeomorphisms which are not covering map?Alternative definition of covering spaces.Construction of a covering space as a fibre bundleProve that exist bijection between inverse image of covering spaceCovering spaces as fiber bundlesProof that a discrete space (with more than 1 element) is not connectedUniqueness of possibly non-simply connected universal covering spaces.Surjectivity of a (covering?) map













2












$begingroup$


Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).

These are the posts I have read so far:



Local homeomorphism and inverse image



When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?



Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.



How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?



Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.



However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.

Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.

If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.



So, how can I prove this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).

    These are the posts I have read so far:



    Local homeomorphism and inverse image



    When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?



    Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.



    How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?



    Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.



    However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.

    Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.

    If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.



    So, how can I prove this?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).

      These are the posts I have read so far:



      Local homeomorphism and inverse image



      When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?



      Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.



      How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?



      Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.



      However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.

      Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.

      If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.



      So, how can I prove this?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).

      These are the posts I have read so far:



      Local homeomorphism and inverse image



      When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?



      Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.



      How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?



      Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.



      However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.

      Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.

      If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.



      So, how can I prove this?







      general-topology algebraic-topology metric-spaces topological-groups covering-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      evaristegdevaristegd

      15110




      15110




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            3












            $begingroup$

            Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.



            Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.



            Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).



            In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.



            Note that local injectivity is all we need.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3222556%2fproof-that-the-inverse-image-of-a-single-element-is-a-discrete-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3












              $begingroup$

              Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  kobekobe

                  35.2k22248




                  35.2k22248





















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.



                      Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.



                      Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).



                      In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.



                      Note that local injectivity is all we need.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.



                        Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.



                        Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).



                        In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.



                        Note that local injectivity is all we need.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          3












                          3








                          3





                          $begingroup$

                          Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.



                          Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.



                          Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).



                          In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.



                          Note that local injectivity is all we need.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.



                          Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.



                          Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).



                          In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.



                          Note that local injectivity is all we need.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 2 hours ago









                          Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

                          119k351130




                          119k351130



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3222556%2fproof-that-the-inverse-image-of-a-single-element-is-a-discrete-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Log på Navigationsmenu

                              Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

                              Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse