Unit testing extension method adding view location expander Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Unit testing extension for equality testingCalculate the physical centreAre these the right type of unit tests to write?File validation and unit testingUnit Testing in VBAUnit testing a service to return items from a databaseValidation extensions v2Java REST-assured acceptance testsGenerate pieces of an SQL queryUnit testing a generic interface: proposal to avoid test duplication for different generic types

Semigroups with no morphisms between them

How does a spellshard spellbook work?

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?

What are the discoveries that have been possible with the rejection of positivism?

How could we fake a moon landing now?

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Electrolysis of water: Which equations to use? (IB Chem)

Most bit efficient text communication method?

How many time has Arya actually used Needle?

Central Vacuuming: Is it worth it, and how does it compare to normal vacuuming?

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

Draw 4 of the same figure in the same tikzpicture

Misunderstanding of Sylow theory

How to report t statistic from R

Can a Beast Master ranger change beast companions?

preposition before coffee

AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network

What is the difference between a "ranged attack" and a "ranged weapon attack"?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Induction Proof for Sequences

How to run automated tests after each commit?

Why we try to capture variability?



Unit testing extension method adding view location expander



Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Unit testing extension for equality testingCalculate the physical centreAre these the right type of unit tests to write?File validation and unit testingUnit Testing in VBAUnit testing a service to return items from a databaseValidation extensions v2Java REST-assured acceptance testsGenerate pieces of an SQL queryUnit testing a generic interface: proposal to avoid test duplication for different generic types



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


Introduction



I'm writing unit tests for an extension method I wrote. Its only purpose it is to wrap startup logic which extends ViewLocationExpanders list by an instance implementating IViewLocationExpander. ViewLocationExpanders is a property of RazorViewEngineOptions, which can be configured in application startup in ConfigureServices() method. I'm using XUnit 2.4.1.



Usage



Instead of:



services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>

options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(new ViewLocationExpander());
);


I can use:



services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());


ViewLocationExpander



public class ViewLocationExpander : IViewLocationExpander

public IEnumerable<string> ExpandViewLocations(
ViewLocationExpanderContext context,
IEnumerable<string> viewLocations)

if (context == null)

throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));


if (viewLocations == null)

throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocations));


/*
* Note:
* 0 = action name
* 1 = controller name
* 2 = area name
*/

var newViewLocations = new string[]

// Example: '/Views/Home/_Partials/FooBar.cshtml'
"/Views/1/_Partials/0.cshtml",
;

// Add new locations *AFTER* MVC default locations.
return viewLocations.Union(newViewLocations);


public void PopulateValues(ViewLocationExpanderContext context)

context.Values["customviewlocation"] = nameof(ViewLocationExpander);




Extension method



public static IServiceCollection AddViewLocationExpander(
this IServiceCollection services,
IViewLocationExpander viewLocationExpander)

if (services == null)

throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services));


if (viewLocationExpander == null)

throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocationExpander));


return services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>

options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(viewLocationExpander);
);



Unit tests



[Fact]
public void ExtensionMethodAddsNewViewLocationExpander()

// Arrange
var services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddMvc();

// These two are required to active the RazorViewEngineOptions.
services.AddSingleton<IHostingEnvironment, HostingEnvironment>();
services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, LoggerFactory>();

// Act
var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var oldOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var newOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;

// Assert
Assert.True(newOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count > oldOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count);



Questions



  1. Am I going beyond the scope of what unit testing should include? I'm afraid that my code is actually testing the basic functions of generic collections and/or aspects of ASP.NET Core.

  2. If my concern above is true, that should I write unit tests to this at all? How should it work?









share|improve this question









$endgroup$


















    4












    $begingroup$


    Introduction



    I'm writing unit tests for an extension method I wrote. Its only purpose it is to wrap startup logic which extends ViewLocationExpanders list by an instance implementating IViewLocationExpander. ViewLocationExpanders is a property of RazorViewEngineOptions, which can be configured in application startup in ConfigureServices() method. I'm using XUnit 2.4.1.



    Usage



    Instead of:



    services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>

    options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(new ViewLocationExpander());
    );


    I can use:



    services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());


    ViewLocationExpander



    public class ViewLocationExpander : IViewLocationExpander

    public IEnumerable<string> ExpandViewLocations(
    ViewLocationExpanderContext context,
    IEnumerable<string> viewLocations)

    if (context == null)

    throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));


    if (viewLocations == null)

    throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocations));


    /*
    * Note:
    * 0 = action name
    * 1 = controller name
    * 2 = area name
    */

    var newViewLocations = new string[]

    // Example: '/Views/Home/_Partials/FooBar.cshtml'
    "/Views/1/_Partials/0.cshtml",
    ;

    // Add new locations *AFTER* MVC default locations.
    return viewLocations.Union(newViewLocations);


    public void PopulateValues(ViewLocationExpanderContext context)

    context.Values["customviewlocation"] = nameof(ViewLocationExpander);




    Extension method



    public static IServiceCollection AddViewLocationExpander(
    this IServiceCollection services,
    IViewLocationExpander viewLocationExpander)

    if (services == null)

    throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services));


    if (viewLocationExpander == null)

    throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocationExpander));


    return services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>

    options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(viewLocationExpander);
    );



    Unit tests



    [Fact]
    public void ExtensionMethodAddsNewViewLocationExpander()

    // Arrange
    var services = new ServiceCollection();
    services.AddMvc();

    // These two are required to active the RazorViewEngineOptions.
    services.AddSingleton<IHostingEnvironment, HostingEnvironment>();
    services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, LoggerFactory>();

    // Act
    var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
    var oldOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
    services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
    serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
    var newOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;

    // Assert
    Assert.True(newOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count > oldOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count);



    Questions



    1. Am I going beyond the scope of what unit testing should include? I'm afraid that my code is actually testing the basic functions of generic collections and/or aspects of ASP.NET Core.

    2. If my concern above is true, that should I write unit tests to this at all? How should it work?









    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      Introduction



      I'm writing unit tests for an extension method I wrote. Its only purpose it is to wrap startup logic which extends ViewLocationExpanders list by an instance implementating IViewLocationExpander. ViewLocationExpanders is a property of RazorViewEngineOptions, which can be configured in application startup in ConfigureServices() method. I'm using XUnit 2.4.1.



      Usage



      Instead of:



      services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>

      options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(new ViewLocationExpander());
      );


      I can use:



      services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());


      ViewLocationExpander



      public class ViewLocationExpander : IViewLocationExpander

      public IEnumerable<string> ExpandViewLocations(
      ViewLocationExpanderContext context,
      IEnumerable<string> viewLocations)

      if (context == null)

      throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));


      if (viewLocations == null)

      throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocations));


      /*
      * Note:
      * 0 = action name
      * 1 = controller name
      * 2 = area name
      */

      var newViewLocations = new string[]

      // Example: '/Views/Home/_Partials/FooBar.cshtml'
      "/Views/1/_Partials/0.cshtml",
      ;

      // Add new locations *AFTER* MVC default locations.
      return viewLocations.Union(newViewLocations);


      public void PopulateValues(ViewLocationExpanderContext context)

      context.Values["customviewlocation"] = nameof(ViewLocationExpander);




      Extension method



      public static IServiceCollection AddViewLocationExpander(
      this IServiceCollection services,
      IViewLocationExpander viewLocationExpander)

      if (services == null)

      throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services));


      if (viewLocationExpander == null)

      throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocationExpander));


      return services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>

      options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(viewLocationExpander);
      );



      Unit tests



      [Fact]
      public void ExtensionMethodAddsNewViewLocationExpander()

      // Arrange
      var services = new ServiceCollection();
      services.AddMvc();

      // These two are required to active the RazorViewEngineOptions.
      services.AddSingleton<IHostingEnvironment, HostingEnvironment>();
      services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, LoggerFactory>();

      // Act
      var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
      var oldOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
      services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
      serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
      var newOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;

      // Assert
      Assert.True(newOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count > oldOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count);



      Questions



      1. Am I going beyond the scope of what unit testing should include? I'm afraid that my code is actually testing the basic functions of generic collections and/or aspects of ASP.NET Core.

      2. If my concern above is true, that should I write unit tests to this at all? How should it work?









      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Introduction



      I'm writing unit tests for an extension method I wrote. Its only purpose it is to wrap startup logic which extends ViewLocationExpanders list by an instance implementating IViewLocationExpander. ViewLocationExpanders is a property of RazorViewEngineOptions, which can be configured in application startup in ConfigureServices() method. I'm using XUnit 2.4.1.



      Usage



      Instead of:



      services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>

      options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(new ViewLocationExpander());
      );


      I can use:



      services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());


      ViewLocationExpander



      public class ViewLocationExpander : IViewLocationExpander

      public IEnumerable<string> ExpandViewLocations(
      ViewLocationExpanderContext context,
      IEnumerable<string> viewLocations)

      if (context == null)

      throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));


      if (viewLocations == null)

      throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocations));


      /*
      * Note:
      * 0 = action name
      * 1 = controller name
      * 2 = area name
      */

      var newViewLocations = new string[]

      // Example: '/Views/Home/_Partials/FooBar.cshtml'
      "/Views/1/_Partials/0.cshtml",
      ;

      // Add new locations *AFTER* MVC default locations.
      return viewLocations.Union(newViewLocations);


      public void PopulateValues(ViewLocationExpanderContext context)

      context.Values["customviewlocation"] = nameof(ViewLocationExpander);




      Extension method



      public static IServiceCollection AddViewLocationExpander(
      this IServiceCollection services,
      IViewLocationExpander viewLocationExpander)

      if (services == null)

      throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services));


      if (viewLocationExpander == null)

      throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(viewLocationExpander));


      return services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(options =>

      options.ViewLocationExpanders.Add(viewLocationExpander);
      );



      Unit tests



      [Fact]
      public void ExtensionMethodAddsNewViewLocationExpander()

      // Arrange
      var services = new ServiceCollection();
      services.AddMvc();

      // These two are required to active the RazorViewEngineOptions.
      services.AddSingleton<IHostingEnvironment, HostingEnvironment>();
      services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, LoggerFactory>();

      // Act
      var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
      var oldOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;
      services.AddViewLocationExpander(new ViewLocationExpander());
      serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
      var newOptions = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<RazorViewEngineOptions>>().Value;

      // Assert
      Assert.True(newOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count > oldOptions.ViewLocationExpanders.Count);



      Questions



      1. Am I going beyond the scope of what unit testing should include? I'm afraid that my code is actually testing the basic functions of generic collections and/or aspects of ASP.NET Core.

      2. If my concern above is true, that should I write unit tests to this at all? How should it work?






      c# unit-testing asp.net-core






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      PrologProlog

      468




      468




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          I find your test is excelent (and I'll borrow it from you). I would, however, make it a litte bit more exact and not only test the counts of generated locations but also whether they have the expected values.



          You are not testing basic functions of collections or ASP.NET-Core aspects because it doesn't matter how it's implemented. What you are testing is whether your application has all the view locations it needs to work correctly.



          This is a very important (integration) test and you should not remove it but improve it by asserting the actual locations too. If this breaks then your app wont't work anymore so it's a real lifesaver.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the new ViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
            $endgroup$
            – Prolog
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217748%2funit-testing-extension-method-adding-view-location-expander%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          I find your test is excelent (and I'll borrow it from you). I would, however, make it a litte bit more exact and not only test the counts of generated locations but also whether they have the expected values.



          You are not testing basic functions of collections or ASP.NET-Core aspects because it doesn't matter how it's implemented. What you are testing is whether your application has all the view locations it needs to work correctly.



          This is a very important (integration) test and you should not remove it but improve it by asserting the actual locations too. If this breaks then your app wont't work anymore so it's a real lifesaver.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the new ViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
            $endgroup$
            – Prolog
            1 hour ago















          3












          $begingroup$

          I find your test is excelent (and I'll borrow it from you). I would, however, make it a litte bit more exact and not only test the counts of generated locations but also whether they have the expected values.



          You are not testing basic functions of collections or ASP.NET-Core aspects because it doesn't matter how it's implemented. What you are testing is whether your application has all the view locations it needs to work correctly.



          This is a very important (integration) test and you should not remove it but improve it by asserting the actual locations too. If this breaks then your app wont't work anymore so it's a real lifesaver.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the new ViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
            $endgroup$
            – Prolog
            1 hour ago













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          I find your test is excelent (and I'll borrow it from you). I would, however, make it a litte bit more exact and not only test the counts of generated locations but also whether they have the expected values.



          You are not testing basic functions of collections or ASP.NET-Core aspects because it doesn't matter how it's implemented. What you are testing is whether your application has all the view locations it needs to work correctly.



          This is a very important (integration) test and you should not remove it but improve it by asserting the actual locations too. If this breaks then your app wont't work anymore so it's a real lifesaver.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I find your test is excelent (and I'll borrow it from you). I would, however, make it a litte bit more exact and not only test the counts of generated locations but also whether they have the expected values.



          You are not testing basic functions of collections or ASP.NET-Core aspects because it doesn't matter how it's implemented. What you are testing is whether your application has all the view locations it needs to work correctly.



          This is a very important (integration) test and you should not remove it but improve it by asserting the actual locations too. If this breaks then your app wont't work anymore so it's a real lifesaver.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          t3chb0tt3chb0t

          35.3k754127




          35.3k754127











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the new ViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
            $endgroup$
            – Prolog
            1 hour ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the new ViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
            $endgroup$
            – Prolog
            1 hour ago















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the new ViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
          $endgroup$
          – Prolog
          1 hour ago




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for answer. Maybe I should write further integration test checking if appropriate views are found with the new ViewLocationExpanderadded? But that would probably be outside the scope of unit testing and secondly inside that unit test method there is not much more to test (or at least I see it that way in debugger). And please, go ahead and borrow anything you want from my post. I'm happy it's useful.
          $endgroup$
          – Prolog
          1 hour ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217748%2funit-testing-extension-method-adding-view-location-expander%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Log på Navigationsmenu

          Creating second map without labels using QGIS?How to lock map labels for inset map in Print Composer?How to Force the Showing of Labels of a Vector File in QGISQGIS Valmiera, Labels only show for part of polygonsRemoving duplicate point labels in QGISLabeling every feature using QGIS?Show labels for point features outside map canvasAbbreviate Road Labels in QGIS only when requiredExporting map from composer in QGIS - text labels have moved in output?How to make sure labels in qgis turn up in layout map?Writing label expression with ArcMap and If then Statement?

          Nuuk Indholdsfortegnelse Etyomologi | Historie | Geografi | Transport og infrastruktur | Politik og administration | Uddannelsesinstitutioner | Kultur | Venskabsbyer | Noter | Eksterne henvisninger | Se også | Navigationsmenuwww.sermersooq.gl64°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.75064°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.750DMI - KlimanormalerSalmonsen, s. 850Grønlands Naturinstitut undersøger rensdyr i Akia og Maniitsoq foråret 2008Grønlands NaturinstitutNy vej til Qinngorput indviet i dagAntallet af biler i Nuuk må begrænsesNy taxacentral mødt med demonstrationKøreplan. Rute 1, 2 og 3SnescootersporNuukNord er for storSkoler i Kommuneqarfik SermersooqAtuarfik Samuel KleinschmidtKangillinguit AtuarfiatNuussuup AtuarfiaNuuk Internationale FriskoleIlinniarfissuaq, Grønlands SeminariumLedelseÅrsberetning for 2008Kunst og arkitekturÅrsberetning for 2008Julie om naturenNuuk KunstmuseumSilamiutGrønlands Nationalmuseum og ArkivStatistisk ÅrbogGrønlands LandsbibliotekStore koncerter på stribeVandhund nummer 1.000.000Kommuneqarfik Sermersooq – MalikForsidenVenskabsbyerLyngby-Taarbæk i GrønlandArctic Business NetworkWinter Cities 2008 i NuukDagligt opdaterede satellitbilleder fra NuukområdetKommuneqarfik Sermersooqs hjemmesideTurist i NuukGrønlands Statistiks databankGrønlands Hjemmestyres valgresultaterrrWorldCat124325457671310-5