Why we try to capture variability? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)What is a good way to measure how well a set of data fits to a set of functionsHow to transform factor scores of a PCA for a regression, in SPSS?Score Variance of supplementary individuals in PCAWhich variables should I transform, center, and/or standardize in my data for Principal Component Analysis?Where is the indeterminacy of factor values on this plot explaining factor analysis?Geometric understanding of PCA in the subject (dual) spacePairwise distance as measure of variabilityWhat is the fastest way to compute PC1 scores, without performing the whole PCA?Do the variables having high partial correlation also contributes to a high proportion of variance explained by the computed principal components?PCA: how to select eigen vectors corresponding to small eigenvalues for regression

How did Fremen produce and carry enough thumpers to use Sandworms as de facto Ubers?

Semigroups with no morphisms between them

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

How could we fake a moon landing now?

What to do with repeated rejections for phd position

How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?

Most bit efficient text communication method?

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

Why are vacuum tubes still used in amateur radios?

Dyck paths with extra diagonals from valleys (Laser construction)

How many time has Arya actually used Needle?

preposition before coffee

Central Vacuuming: Is it worth it, and how does it compare to normal vacuuming?

What's the point of the test set?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

Karn the great creator - 'card from outside the game' in sealed

A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Why does 14 CFR have skipped subparts in my ASA 2019 FAR/AIM book?

A letter with no particular backstory

How can I set the aperture on my DSLR when it's attached to a telescope instead of a lens?



Why we try to capture variability?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)What is a good way to measure how well a set of data fits to a set of functionsHow to transform factor scores of a PCA for a regression, in SPSS?Score Variance of supplementary individuals in PCAWhich variables should I transform, center, and/or standardize in my data for Principal Component Analysis?Where is the indeterminacy of factor values on this plot explaining factor analysis?Geometric understanding of PCA in the subject (dual) spacePairwise distance as measure of variabilityWhat is the fastest way to compute PC1 scores, without performing the whole PCA?Do the variables having high partial correlation also contributes to a high proportion of variance explained by the computed principal components?PCA: how to select eigen vectors corresponding to small eigenvalues for regression



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


I am new to Statistics and I have a Mathematics background. In Statistics, particularly in Linear Regression and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) so far what I have understood is that the main idea is to try to capture as much as possible variability present in the data. In linear regression, while calculating $ R^2 (R squared)$ measure we are checking the proportion of variability captured by our model and in PCA we are forming a new basis along which our data has the maximum possible variability. Is there any significant result behind this logic? I mean why we have to go after variability? Any help in this matter will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$


















    2












    $begingroup$


    I am new to Statistics and I have a Mathematics background. In Statistics, particularly in Linear Regression and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) so far what I have understood is that the main idea is to try to capture as much as possible variability present in the data. In linear regression, while calculating $ R^2 (R squared)$ measure we are checking the proportion of variability captured by our model and in PCA we are forming a new basis along which our data has the maximum possible variability. Is there any significant result behind this logic? I mean why we have to go after variability? Any help in this matter will be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I am new to Statistics and I have a Mathematics background. In Statistics, particularly in Linear Regression and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) so far what I have understood is that the main idea is to try to capture as much as possible variability present in the data. In linear regression, while calculating $ R^2 (R squared)$ measure we are checking the proportion of variability captured by our model and in PCA we are forming a new basis along which our data has the maximum possible variability. Is there any significant result behind this logic? I mean why we have to go after variability? Any help in this matter will be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I am new to Statistics and I have a Mathematics background. In Statistics, particularly in Linear Regression and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) so far what I have understood is that the main idea is to try to capture as much as possible variability present in the data. In linear regression, while calculating $ R^2 (R squared)$ measure we are checking the proportion of variability captured by our model and in PCA we are forming a new basis along which our data has the maximum possible variability. Is there any significant result behind this logic? I mean why we have to go after variability? Any help in this matter will be appreciated.







      regression pca variability






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      Karolis Koncevičius

      2,40341630




      2,40341630






      New contributor




      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 5 hours ago









      SatishSatish

      112




      112




      New contributor




      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          In many cases the reason we use regression is to explain variability. In that sense, how much variability is explained is one of the key measures of success.



          This may be more clear with an example. I recently worked on a project where we created a regression model to explain employee performance. We did this because our stakeholders (senior management) wanted to know why some employees were performing well and others weren't. That is, why do we see variance in employee performance?



          Phrased this way it should be clear that a key performance metric for our model is how much variability it anticipates.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "65"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            Satish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404014%2fwhy-we-try-to-capture-variability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            In many cases the reason we use regression is to explain variability. In that sense, how much variability is explained is one of the key measures of success.



            This may be more clear with an example. I recently worked on a project where we created a regression model to explain employee performance. We did this because our stakeholders (senior management) wanted to know why some employees were performing well and others weren't. That is, why do we see variance in employee performance?



            Phrased this way it should be clear that a key performance metric for our model is how much variability it anticipates.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              3












              $begingroup$

              In many cases the reason we use regression is to explain variability. In that sense, how much variability is explained is one of the key measures of success.



              This may be more clear with an example. I recently worked on a project where we created a regression model to explain employee performance. We did this because our stakeholders (senior management) wanted to know why some employees were performing well and others weren't. That is, why do we see variance in employee performance?



              Phrased this way it should be clear that a key performance metric for our model is how much variability it anticipates.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                In many cases the reason we use regression is to explain variability. In that sense, how much variability is explained is one of the key measures of success.



                This may be more clear with an example. I recently worked on a project where we created a regression model to explain employee performance. We did this because our stakeholders (senior management) wanted to know why some employees were performing well and others weren't. That is, why do we see variance in employee performance?



                Phrased this way it should be clear that a key performance metric for our model is how much variability it anticipates.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                In many cases the reason we use regression is to explain variability. In that sense, how much variability is explained is one of the key measures of success.



                This may be more clear with an example. I recently worked on a project where we created a regression model to explain employee performance. We did this because our stakeholders (senior management) wanted to know why some employees were performing well and others weren't. That is, why do we see variance in employee performance?



                Phrased this way it should be clear that a key performance metric for our model is how much variability it anticipates.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 4 hours ago









                indigochildindigochild

                1535




                1535




















                    Satish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Satish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Satish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    Satish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404014%2fwhy-we-try-to-capture-variability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Log på Navigationsmenu

                    Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

                    Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse