Can a multiclassed Kensei monk/Swashbuckler rogue use an offhand finesse weapon to trigger Sneak Attack, without using a bonus action?Rogue using Dual Wield and Sneak AttackCan a Rogue/Cleric multiclass doing sneak attack or using Rogue powers with an Radiant enchanted weapon?Can a Monk use/trigger Defensive Duelist while wielding a monk weapon (or unarmed)?Can a monk combine Martial Arts with Dual Wielding?Can a Swashbuckler use Sneak Attack every turn on an isolated target?Can an UA Monk Kensei use a kensei weapon and get the +2 AC bonus if they have Extra Attack?Can a ranged rogue effectively stand back and sneak attack opponents every turn with a ranged weapon while their allies fight on the front line?Can a shortsword-wielding monk/rogue use the Martial Arts damage die and still qualify for Sneak Attack?Can you use darts as improvised “light melee weapons” to trigger Two-Weapon Fighting?Can Sneak Attack be used when hitting with an improvised weapon?Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Storing voxels for a voxel Engine in C++

ifconfig shows UP while ip link shows DOWN

Why does the painters tape have to be blue?

How to escape dependency hell?

Is it normal to "extract a paper" from a master thesis?

Why do the i8080 I/O instructions take a byte-sized operand to determine the port?

Why is 'additive' EQ more difficult to use than 'subtractive'?

What could be my risk mitigation strategies if my client wants to contract UAT?

What is Orcus doing with Mind Flayers in the art on the last page of Volo's Guide to Monsters?

Is superuser the same as root?

Count all vowels in string

Are there historical examples of audiences drawn to a work that was "so bad it's good"?

How do you earn the reader's trust?

Why is this integration method not valid?

Why did it take so long for Germany to allow electric scooters / e-rollers on the roads?

Are there any German nonsense poems (Jabberwocky)?

"Official wife" or "Formal wife"?

What is the purpose of the yellow wired panels on the IBM 360 Model 20?

How to teach an undergraduate course without having taken that course formally before?

How would a developer who mostly fixed bugs for years at a company call out their contributions in their CV?

How to write numbers and percentage?

Merge pdfs sequentially

Can I render satellite deployment impossible, or at least impractical, by exploiting the Kessler syndrome?

Using too much dialogue?



Can a multiclassed Kensei monk/Swashbuckler rogue use an offhand finesse weapon to trigger Sneak Attack, without using a bonus action?


Rogue using Dual Wield and Sneak AttackCan a Rogue/Cleric multiclass doing sneak attack or using Rogue powers with an Radiant enchanted weapon?Can a Monk use/trigger Defensive Duelist while wielding a monk weapon (or unarmed)?Can a monk combine Martial Arts with Dual Wielding?Can a Swashbuckler use Sneak Attack every turn on an isolated target?Can an UA Monk Kensei use a kensei weapon and get the +2 AC bonus if they have Extra Attack?Can a ranged rogue effectively stand back and sneak attack opponents every turn with a ranged weapon while their allies fight on the front line?Can a shortsword-wielding monk/rogue use the Martial Arts damage die and still qualify for Sneak Attack?Can you use darts as improvised “light melee weapons” to trigger Two-Weapon Fighting?Can Sneak Attack be used when hitting with an improvised weapon?Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


Context



For a relatively new campaign I've built a kensei (monk). At level 7, 8 and 9 (we're level 4 now) I'm planning on taking three levels in swashbuckler (rogue). Now I'm exploring my options for triggering Sneak Attack with this character, in melee.



My character's Kensei Weapons are a longsword and longbow. So with this multiclass idea I won't be able to trigger Sneak Attack with the trusty longsword, or with my Unarmed Strikes, because Sneak Attack states:




Once per turn, you can deal an extra 1d6 damage to one creature you hit with an attack if you have advantage on the attack roll. The attack must use a finesse or a ranged weapon.



You don’t need advantage on the attack roll if another enemy of the target is within 5 feet of it, that enemy isn’t incapacitated, and you don’t have disadvantage on the attack roll.




Combat situation



When engaged in melee combat, my game plan is to wield a longsword in my main hand and a finesse weapon (dagger) in my off-hand, while still having the rest of my body ready for making Unarmed Strikes (knees, elbows, kicks, headbutts, etc). When the circumstances are right for making a Sneak Attack, I would like to strike with the dagger, without the need for swapping weapons and without taking a bonus action.



Question



My goal is to use my usual attack and damage roll for the dagger when I declare the off-hand weapon attack during my Attack action or Reaction. I would be wielding my longsword too, but not necessarily attack with it on the same turn. Would this work by RAW? Or would I be needing to have the dagger in my main hand for this?



I'm new to the workings of Two Weapon Fighting, so I might be overlooking something here.




Related:



  • Rogue using Dual Wield and Sneak Attack









share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    3












    $begingroup$


    Context



    For a relatively new campaign I've built a kensei (monk). At level 7, 8 and 9 (we're level 4 now) I'm planning on taking three levels in swashbuckler (rogue). Now I'm exploring my options for triggering Sneak Attack with this character, in melee.



    My character's Kensei Weapons are a longsword and longbow. So with this multiclass idea I won't be able to trigger Sneak Attack with the trusty longsword, or with my Unarmed Strikes, because Sneak Attack states:




    Once per turn, you can deal an extra 1d6 damage to one creature you hit with an attack if you have advantage on the attack roll. The attack must use a finesse or a ranged weapon.



    You don’t need advantage on the attack roll if another enemy of the target is within 5 feet of it, that enemy isn’t incapacitated, and you don’t have disadvantage on the attack roll.




    Combat situation



    When engaged in melee combat, my game plan is to wield a longsword in my main hand and a finesse weapon (dagger) in my off-hand, while still having the rest of my body ready for making Unarmed Strikes (knees, elbows, kicks, headbutts, etc). When the circumstances are right for making a Sneak Attack, I would like to strike with the dagger, without the need for swapping weapons and without taking a bonus action.



    Question



    My goal is to use my usual attack and damage roll for the dagger when I declare the off-hand weapon attack during my Attack action or Reaction. I would be wielding my longsword too, but not necessarily attack with it on the same turn. Would this work by RAW? Or would I be needing to have the dagger in my main hand for this?



    I'm new to the workings of Two Weapon Fighting, so I might be overlooking something here.




    Related:



    • Rogue using Dual Wield and Sneak Attack









    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Context



      For a relatively new campaign I've built a kensei (monk). At level 7, 8 and 9 (we're level 4 now) I'm planning on taking three levels in swashbuckler (rogue). Now I'm exploring my options for triggering Sneak Attack with this character, in melee.



      My character's Kensei Weapons are a longsword and longbow. So with this multiclass idea I won't be able to trigger Sneak Attack with the trusty longsword, or with my Unarmed Strikes, because Sneak Attack states:




      Once per turn, you can deal an extra 1d6 damage to one creature you hit with an attack if you have advantage on the attack roll. The attack must use a finesse or a ranged weapon.



      You don’t need advantage on the attack roll if another enemy of the target is within 5 feet of it, that enemy isn’t incapacitated, and you don’t have disadvantage on the attack roll.




      Combat situation



      When engaged in melee combat, my game plan is to wield a longsword in my main hand and a finesse weapon (dagger) in my off-hand, while still having the rest of my body ready for making Unarmed Strikes (knees, elbows, kicks, headbutts, etc). When the circumstances are right for making a Sneak Attack, I would like to strike with the dagger, without the need for swapping weapons and without taking a bonus action.



      Question



      My goal is to use my usual attack and damage roll for the dagger when I declare the off-hand weapon attack during my Attack action or Reaction. I would be wielding my longsword too, but not necessarily attack with it on the same turn. Would this work by RAW? Or would I be needing to have the dagger in my main hand for this?



      I'm new to the workings of Two Weapon Fighting, so I might be overlooking something here.




      Related:



      • Rogue using Dual Wield and Sneak Attack









      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Context



      For a relatively new campaign I've built a kensei (monk). At level 7, 8 and 9 (we're level 4 now) I'm planning on taking three levels in swashbuckler (rogue). Now I'm exploring my options for triggering Sneak Attack with this character, in melee.



      My character's Kensei Weapons are a longsword and longbow. So with this multiclass idea I won't be able to trigger Sneak Attack with the trusty longsword, or with my Unarmed Strikes, because Sneak Attack states:




      Once per turn, you can deal an extra 1d6 damage to one creature you hit with an attack if you have advantage on the attack roll. The attack must use a finesse or a ranged weapon.



      You don’t need advantage on the attack roll if another enemy of the target is within 5 feet of it, that enemy isn’t incapacitated, and you don’t have disadvantage on the attack roll.




      Combat situation



      When engaged in melee combat, my game plan is to wield a longsword in my main hand and a finesse weapon (dagger) in my off-hand, while still having the rest of my body ready for making Unarmed Strikes (knees, elbows, kicks, headbutts, etc). When the circumstances are right for making a Sneak Attack, I would like to strike with the dagger, without the need for swapping weapons and without taking a bonus action.



      Question



      My goal is to use my usual attack and damage roll for the dagger when I declare the off-hand weapon attack during my Attack action or Reaction. I would be wielding my longsword too, but not necessarily attack with it on the same turn. Would this work by RAW? Or would I be needing to have the dagger in my main hand for this?



      I'm new to the workings of Two Weapon Fighting, so I might be overlooking something here.




      Related:



      • Rogue using Dual Wield and Sneak Attack






      dnd-5e monk rogue sneak-attack two-weapon-fighting






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      V2Blast

      29.2k5105177




      29.2k5105177










      asked 8 hours ago









      VadrukVadruk

      3,67921980




      3,67921980




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$

          Yes. The character can use the dagger to make an attack.



          • When holding two weapons, a character can choose to attack with either.

          • If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for Two-Weapon Fighting come into play.

          • If the attack qualifies for Sneak Attack, then those rules apply.

          In the specific combat situation, the monk can choose to use their attack action to make a melee attack with the dagger.



          There is no main hand nor off-hand anymore.



          These are concepts that are from previous editions of D&D. The Two-Weapon Fighting rule only concerns itself that two weapons are being wielded simultaneously, and are both light:




          When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to atlack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            "If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for two weapon fighting come into play." - To clarify the phrasing here: you can still choose to attack with both if you have Extra Attack without involving the TWF rules. The TWF rules only apply if you want to make a bonus-action attack using a one-handed light melee weapon (and are wielding another one-handed light melee weapon in the other hand). In this case, it might be worth explaining that the proposed scenario doesn't interact with them at all.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            1 hour ago



















          6












          $begingroup$

          You can hold a Longsword and a dagger and choose which one you want to use*



          *However, you can not attack with both your longsword and dagger in the same turn.



          The rules around Two-Weapon Fighting require both weapons to have the light property:




          When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




          So in this build where your monk/rogue is wielding a longsword in one hand and a dagger in the other, they have the option of making a combo of longsword/unarmed in one turn or dagger/unarmed. They can not opt to use longsword/dagger.



          You also miss out on that sweet d10



          Because you are wielding a weapon in both hands, you aren't wielding that longsword for the versatile d10 damage. That's kind of a primary point for the Kensei (at least until the martial arts die gets equal to it.)



          You could just drop the dagger if you feel that you don't need it and go full versatile with the longsword, but then you might not have it when you need it. Unless you pick it up at the start of the next round. The action economy allows it, but it's a bit squirrely and a DM may take issue with it (or you may lose the dagger due to other circumstances either creature or environment related.



          Sneak Attack with the dagger is permitted



          As you've noted, the dagger does provide everything you need for sneak attack. When the opportunity arises for that damage, then you can choose to attack with it.



          There is no off-hand



          Since there is no penalty for 'off-hand', other than not adding your modifier to the bonus action attack for TWF (see above quote), this is a completely viable build option.



          In 5e, the idea of off-hand is a bit weird. They have transferred the idea of the 'off-hand' to the bonus action attack. Functionally, you are equally proficient with either hand when using your Attack action. It's when you use the bonus action for attacking with a second weapon that you lose your proficiency.



          You will still need to make an unarmed strike while holding your kensei weapon to get the Agile Parry



          Just a note (in case you were thinking of taking the Dual Wielder Feat to allow the use of non-light weapons) that you still need to make an unarmed strike in order to activate the AC boost.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
            $endgroup$
            – mxyzplk
            5 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148378%2fcan-a-multiclassed-kensei-monk-swashbuckler-rogue-use-an-offhand-finesse-weapon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7












          $begingroup$

          Yes. The character can use the dagger to make an attack.



          • When holding two weapons, a character can choose to attack with either.

          • If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for Two-Weapon Fighting come into play.

          • If the attack qualifies for Sneak Attack, then those rules apply.

          In the specific combat situation, the monk can choose to use their attack action to make a melee attack with the dagger.



          There is no main hand nor off-hand anymore.



          These are concepts that are from previous editions of D&D. The Two-Weapon Fighting rule only concerns itself that two weapons are being wielded simultaneously, and are both light:




          When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to atlack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            "If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for two weapon fighting come into play." - To clarify the phrasing here: you can still choose to attack with both if you have Extra Attack without involving the TWF rules. The TWF rules only apply if you want to make a bonus-action attack using a one-handed light melee weapon (and are wielding another one-handed light melee weapon in the other hand). In this case, it might be worth explaining that the proposed scenario doesn't interact with them at all.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            1 hour ago
















          7












          $begingroup$

          Yes. The character can use the dagger to make an attack.



          • When holding two weapons, a character can choose to attack with either.

          • If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for Two-Weapon Fighting come into play.

          • If the attack qualifies for Sneak Attack, then those rules apply.

          In the specific combat situation, the monk can choose to use their attack action to make a melee attack with the dagger.



          There is no main hand nor off-hand anymore.



          These are concepts that are from previous editions of D&D. The Two-Weapon Fighting rule only concerns itself that two weapons are being wielded simultaneously, and are both light:




          When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to atlack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            "If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for two weapon fighting come into play." - To clarify the phrasing here: you can still choose to attack with both if you have Extra Attack without involving the TWF rules. The TWF rules only apply if you want to make a bonus-action attack using a one-handed light melee weapon (and are wielding another one-handed light melee weapon in the other hand). In this case, it might be worth explaining that the proposed scenario doesn't interact with them at all.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            1 hour ago














          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          Yes. The character can use the dagger to make an attack.



          • When holding two weapons, a character can choose to attack with either.

          • If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for Two-Weapon Fighting come into play.

          • If the attack qualifies for Sneak Attack, then those rules apply.

          In the specific combat situation, the monk can choose to use their attack action to make a melee attack with the dagger.



          There is no main hand nor off-hand anymore.



          These are concepts that are from previous editions of D&D. The Two-Weapon Fighting rule only concerns itself that two weapons are being wielded simultaneously, and are both light:




          When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to atlack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Yes. The character can use the dagger to make an attack.



          • When holding two weapons, a character can choose to attack with either.

          • If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for Two-Weapon Fighting come into play.

          • If the attack qualifies for Sneak Attack, then those rules apply.

          In the specific combat situation, the monk can choose to use their attack action to make a melee attack with the dagger.



          There is no main hand nor off-hand anymore.



          These are concepts that are from previous editions of D&D. The Two-Weapon Fighting rule only concerns itself that two weapons are being wielded simultaneously, and are both light:




          When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to atlack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand.








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago









          V2Blast

          29.2k5105177




          29.2k5105177










          answered 8 hours ago









          GcLGcL

          13.9k13991




          13.9k13991











          • $begingroup$
            "If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for two weapon fighting come into play." - To clarify the phrasing here: you can still choose to attack with both if you have Extra Attack without involving the TWF rules. The TWF rules only apply if you want to make a bonus-action attack using a one-handed light melee weapon (and are wielding another one-handed light melee weapon in the other hand). In this case, it might be worth explaining that the proposed scenario doesn't interact with them at all.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            1 hour ago

















          • $begingroup$
            "If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for two weapon fighting come into play." - To clarify the phrasing here: you can still choose to attack with both if you have Extra Attack without involving the TWF rules. The TWF rules only apply if you want to make a bonus-action attack using a one-handed light melee weapon (and are wielding another one-handed light melee weapon in the other hand). In this case, it might be worth explaining that the proposed scenario doesn't interact with them at all.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            1 hour ago
















          $begingroup$
          "If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for two weapon fighting come into play." - To clarify the phrasing here: you can still choose to attack with both if you have Extra Attack without involving the TWF rules. The TWF rules only apply if you want to make a bonus-action attack using a one-handed light melee weapon (and are wielding another one-handed light melee weapon in the other hand). In this case, it might be worth explaining that the proposed scenario doesn't interact with them at all.
          $endgroup$
          – V2Blast
          1 hour ago





          $begingroup$
          "If the character opts to attack with both, the rules for two weapon fighting come into play." - To clarify the phrasing here: you can still choose to attack with both if you have Extra Attack without involving the TWF rules. The TWF rules only apply if you want to make a bonus-action attack using a one-handed light melee weapon (and are wielding another one-handed light melee weapon in the other hand). In this case, it might be worth explaining that the proposed scenario doesn't interact with them at all.
          $endgroup$
          – V2Blast
          1 hour ago














          6












          $begingroup$

          You can hold a Longsword and a dagger and choose which one you want to use*



          *However, you can not attack with both your longsword and dagger in the same turn.



          The rules around Two-Weapon Fighting require both weapons to have the light property:




          When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




          So in this build where your monk/rogue is wielding a longsword in one hand and a dagger in the other, they have the option of making a combo of longsword/unarmed in one turn or dagger/unarmed. They can not opt to use longsword/dagger.



          You also miss out on that sweet d10



          Because you are wielding a weapon in both hands, you aren't wielding that longsword for the versatile d10 damage. That's kind of a primary point for the Kensei (at least until the martial arts die gets equal to it.)



          You could just drop the dagger if you feel that you don't need it and go full versatile with the longsword, but then you might not have it when you need it. Unless you pick it up at the start of the next round. The action economy allows it, but it's a bit squirrely and a DM may take issue with it (or you may lose the dagger due to other circumstances either creature or environment related.



          Sneak Attack with the dagger is permitted



          As you've noted, the dagger does provide everything you need for sneak attack. When the opportunity arises for that damage, then you can choose to attack with it.



          There is no off-hand



          Since there is no penalty for 'off-hand', other than not adding your modifier to the bonus action attack for TWF (see above quote), this is a completely viable build option.



          In 5e, the idea of off-hand is a bit weird. They have transferred the idea of the 'off-hand' to the bonus action attack. Functionally, you are equally proficient with either hand when using your Attack action. It's when you use the bonus action for attacking with a second weapon that you lose your proficiency.



          You will still need to make an unarmed strike while holding your kensei weapon to get the Agile Parry



          Just a note (in case you were thinking of taking the Dual Wielder Feat to allow the use of non-light weapons) that you still need to make an unarmed strike in order to activate the AC boost.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
            $endgroup$
            – mxyzplk
            5 hours ago















          6












          $begingroup$

          You can hold a Longsword and a dagger and choose which one you want to use*



          *However, you can not attack with both your longsword and dagger in the same turn.



          The rules around Two-Weapon Fighting require both weapons to have the light property:




          When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




          So in this build where your monk/rogue is wielding a longsword in one hand and a dagger in the other, they have the option of making a combo of longsword/unarmed in one turn or dagger/unarmed. They can not opt to use longsword/dagger.



          You also miss out on that sweet d10



          Because you are wielding a weapon in both hands, you aren't wielding that longsword for the versatile d10 damage. That's kind of a primary point for the Kensei (at least until the martial arts die gets equal to it.)



          You could just drop the dagger if you feel that you don't need it and go full versatile with the longsword, but then you might not have it when you need it. Unless you pick it up at the start of the next round. The action economy allows it, but it's a bit squirrely and a DM may take issue with it (or you may lose the dagger due to other circumstances either creature or environment related.



          Sneak Attack with the dagger is permitted



          As you've noted, the dagger does provide everything you need for sneak attack. When the opportunity arises for that damage, then you can choose to attack with it.



          There is no off-hand



          Since there is no penalty for 'off-hand', other than not adding your modifier to the bonus action attack for TWF (see above quote), this is a completely viable build option.



          In 5e, the idea of off-hand is a bit weird. They have transferred the idea of the 'off-hand' to the bonus action attack. Functionally, you are equally proficient with either hand when using your Attack action. It's when you use the bonus action for attacking with a second weapon that you lose your proficiency.



          You will still need to make an unarmed strike while holding your kensei weapon to get the Agile Parry



          Just a note (in case you were thinking of taking the Dual Wielder Feat to allow the use of non-light weapons) that you still need to make an unarmed strike in order to activate the AC boost.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
            $endgroup$
            – mxyzplk
            5 hours ago













          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          You can hold a Longsword and a dagger and choose which one you want to use*



          *However, you can not attack with both your longsword and dagger in the same turn.



          The rules around Two-Weapon Fighting require both weapons to have the light property:




          When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




          So in this build where your monk/rogue is wielding a longsword in one hand and a dagger in the other, they have the option of making a combo of longsword/unarmed in one turn or dagger/unarmed. They can not opt to use longsword/dagger.



          You also miss out on that sweet d10



          Because you are wielding a weapon in both hands, you aren't wielding that longsword for the versatile d10 damage. That's kind of a primary point for the Kensei (at least until the martial arts die gets equal to it.)



          You could just drop the dagger if you feel that you don't need it and go full versatile with the longsword, but then you might not have it when you need it. Unless you pick it up at the start of the next round. The action economy allows it, but it's a bit squirrely and a DM may take issue with it (or you may lose the dagger due to other circumstances either creature or environment related.



          Sneak Attack with the dagger is permitted



          As you've noted, the dagger does provide everything you need for sneak attack. When the opportunity arises for that damage, then you can choose to attack with it.



          There is no off-hand



          Since there is no penalty for 'off-hand', other than not adding your modifier to the bonus action attack for TWF (see above quote), this is a completely viable build option.



          In 5e, the idea of off-hand is a bit weird. They have transferred the idea of the 'off-hand' to the bonus action attack. Functionally, you are equally proficient with either hand when using your Attack action. It's when you use the bonus action for attacking with a second weapon that you lose your proficiency.



          You will still need to make an unarmed strike while holding your kensei weapon to get the Agile Parry



          Just a note (in case you were thinking of taking the Dual Wielder Feat to allow the use of non-light weapons) that you still need to make an unarmed strike in order to activate the AC boost.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You can hold a Longsword and a dagger and choose which one you want to use*



          *However, you can not attack with both your longsword and dagger in the same turn.



          The rules around Two-Weapon Fighting require both weapons to have the light property:




          When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




          So in this build where your monk/rogue is wielding a longsword in one hand and a dagger in the other, they have the option of making a combo of longsword/unarmed in one turn or dagger/unarmed. They can not opt to use longsword/dagger.



          You also miss out on that sweet d10



          Because you are wielding a weapon in both hands, you aren't wielding that longsword for the versatile d10 damage. That's kind of a primary point for the Kensei (at least until the martial arts die gets equal to it.)



          You could just drop the dagger if you feel that you don't need it and go full versatile with the longsword, but then you might not have it when you need it. Unless you pick it up at the start of the next round. The action economy allows it, but it's a bit squirrely and a DM may take issue with it (or you may lose the dagger due to other circumstances either creature or environment related.



          Sneak Attack with the dagger is permitted



          As you've noted, the dagger does provide everything you need for sneak attack. When the opportunity arises for that damage, then you can choose to attack with it.



          There is no off-hand



          Since there is no penalty for 'off-hand', other than not adding your modifier to the bonus action attack for TWF (see above quote), this is a completely viable build option.



          In 5e, the idea of off-hand is a bit weird. They have transferred the idea of the 'off-hand' to the bonus action attack. Functionally, you are equally proficient with either hand when using your Attack action. It's when you use the bonus action for attacking with a second weapon that you lose your proficiency.



          You will still need to make an unarmed strike while holding your kensei weapon to get the Agile Parry



          Just a note (in case you were thinking of taking the Dual Wielder Feat to allow the use of non-light weapons) that you still need to make an unarmed strike in order to activate the AC boost.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 7 hours ago

























          answered 8 hours ago









          NautArchNautArch

          66.3k10247441




          66.3k10247441











          • $begingroup$
            Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
            $endgroup$
            – mxyzplk
            5 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
            $endgroup$
            – mxyzplk
            5 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
          $endgroup$
          – mxyzplk
          5 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
          $endgroup$
          – mxyzplk
          5 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148378%2fcan-a-multiclassed-kensei-monk-swashbuckler-rogue-use-an-offhand-finesse-weapon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Log på Navigationsmenu

          Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

          Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse