How can I minimize the damage of an unstable nuclear reactor to the surrounding area?How would you make an alien bomb to level a city?Which of these space colonizing civilizations has the advantage in a conflictUseful, dead-end scientific advancements for ancient civilizationsSiege technology for massive migratory fleets in a fantasy worldImmune resistance to biological colonisationWhat are the pros and cons of digitigrade walking in humans?Why would genocide not hasten the apocalypse?How can I prevent a human sacrifice from dying before a ritual is complete?How can a mortal woman successfully carry a demigod to term?Could someone reasonably clean off and return a child's toy retrieved from a radioactive fallout zone?

Why did OJ Simpson's trial take 9 months?

How to escape dependency hell?

Why this character is punished instead of being honoured?

Why do the i8080 I/O instructions take a byte-sized operand to determine the port?

Is it normal to "extract a paper" from a master thesis?

Why does FOO=bar; export the variable into my environment

Piping the output of comand columns

Using too much dialogue?

If I arrive in the UK, and then head to mainland Europe, does my Schengen visa 90 day limit start when I arrived in the UK, or mainland Europe?

What did the 'turbo' button actually do?

What is the function of は in the context?

Papers on ArXiv as main references

Is keeping the forking link on a true fork necessary (Github/GPL)?

Team has team lunch everyday, am I forced to go?

Is there an idiom that means "accepting a bad business deal out of desperation"?

Why did Drogon spare this character?

Why'd a rational buyer offer to buy with no conditions precedent?

Is a world with one country feeding everyone possible?

What is to the west of Westeros?

Why is std::ssize() introduced in C++20?

Visual Block Mode edit with sequential number

How do you earn the reader's trust?

Are there guidelines for finding good names for LaTeX 2e packages and control sequences defined in these packages?

Is superuser the same as root?



How can I minimize the damage of an unstable nuclear reactor to the surrounding area?


How would you make an alien bomb to level a city?Which of these space colonizing civilizations has the advantage in a conflictUseful, dead-end scientific advancements for ancient civilizationsSiege technology for massive migratory fleets in a fantasy worldImmune resistance to biological colonisationWhat are the pros and cons of digitigrade walking in humans?Why would genocide not hasten the apocalypse?How can I prevent a human sacrifice from dying before a ritual is complete?How can a mortal woman successfully carry a demigod to term?Could someone reasonably clean off and return a child's toy retrieved from a radioactive fallout zone?













4












$begingroup$


God's in this universe inhabit a higher plane of existence. Their spirits inhabit large, humanoid forms upwards of 30ft, and watch over humanity by protecting it from outside threats. On occassion, a god must enter the mortal plane for various reasons. However, there are certain conditions that must be met. A god cannot simply possess a human, for their divine essence would destroy it not long after. Therefore, special human bodies must be constructed from scratch to contain the godly essence within and allow gods to walk among mortals. These bodies are made using Godtech, highly advanced technology that only gods have access to.



These bodies are 8ft tall and look human on the outside, but inward they are heavily modified, possessing advanced organs that humans do not. Inside these bodies is an organ called the core, which contains the soul of a god. These cores operate similar to a miniature nuclear reactor that powers the body and contains the divine essence inside it, preventing it from leaking out into the environment. These bodies are powerful and highly durable, and provide for almost instant regeneration. However, gods can still be killed if they have taken enough damage, which leads to a problem.



When a god dies, the core containing it's spirit ceases to function and becomes unstable, causing a rupture. The explosion alone would destroy a significant part of the surrounding environment. The true danger, however, is the divine radiation which would spread to a larger area due to factors such as wind currents. This radiation would spread further and further, causing damage to lesser creatures unable to withstand the power, killing hundreds or even thousands of people. Lesser still would be the rampant mutations of those touched by divine power, which can lead to disastrous consequences for them.



I need a way to limit the effects of a failed nuclear reactor from blowing up a huge area so that only the body is destroyed, while prevent the spread of divine radiation from turning the surrounding environment from becoming holy cherobyl. How can I make this happen?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    God's in this universe inhabit a higher plane of existence. Their spirits inhabit large, humanoid forms upwards of 30ft, and watch over humanity by protecting it from outside threats. On occassion, a god must enter the mortal plane for various reasons. However, there are certain conditions that must be met. A god cannot simply possess a human, for their divine essence would destroy it not long after. Therefore, special human bodies must be constructed from scratch to contain the godly essence within and allow gods to walk among mortals. These bodies are made using Godtech, highly advanced technology that only gods have access to.



    These bodies are 8ft tall and look human on the outside, but inward they are heavily modified, possessing advanced organs that humans do not. Inside these bodies is an organ called the core, which contains the soul of a god. These cores operate similar to a miniature nuclear reactor that powers the body and contains the divine essence inside it, preventing it from leaking out into the environment. These bodies are powerful and highly durable, and provide for almost instant regeneration. However, gods can still be killed if they have taken enough damage, which leads to a problem.



    When a god dies, the core containing it's spirit ceases to function and becomes unstable, causing a rupture. The explosion alone would destroy a significant part of the surrounding environment. The true danger, however, is the divine radiation which would spread to a larger area due to factors such as wind currents. This radiation would spread further and further, causing damage to lesser creatures unable to withstand the power, killing hundreds or even thousands of people. Lesser still would be the rampant mutations of those touched by divine power, which can lead to disastrous consequences for them.



    I need a way to limit the effects of a failed nuclear reactor from blowing up a huge area so that only the body is destroyed, while prevent the spread of divine radiation from turning the surrounding environment from becoming holy cherobyl. How can I make this happen?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      God's in this universe inhabit a higher plane of existence. Their spirits inhabit large, humanoid forms upwards of 30ft, and watch over humanity by protecting it from outside threats. On occassion, a god must enter the mortal plane for various reasons. However, there are certain conditions that must be met. A god cannot simply possess a human, for their divine essence would destroy it not long after. Therefore, special human bodies must be constructed from scratch to contain the godly essence within and allow gods to walk among mortals. These bodies are made using Godtech, highly advanced technology that only gods have access to.



      These bodies are 8ft tall and look human on the outside, but inward they are heavily modified, possessing advanced organs that humans do not. Inside these bodies is an organ called the core, which contains the soul of a god. These cores operate similar to a miniature nuclear reactor that powers the body and contains the divine essence inside it, preventing it from leaking out into the environment. These bodies are powerful and highly durable, and provide for almost instant regeneration. However, gods can still be killed if they have taken enough damage, which leads to a problem.



      When a god dies, the core containing it's spirit ceases to function and becomes unstable, causing a rupture. The explosion alone would destroy a significant part of the surrounding environment. The true danger, however, is the divine radiation which would spread to a larger area due to factors such as wind currents. This radiation would spread further and further, causing damage to lesser creatures unable to withstand the power, killing hundreds or even thousands of people. Lesser still would be the rampant mutations of those touched by divine power, which can lead to disastrous consequences for them.



      I need a way to limit the effects of a failed nuclear reactor from blowing up a huge area so that only the body is destroyed, while prevent the spread of divine radiation from turning the surrounding environment from becoming holy cherobyl. How can I make this happen?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      God's in this universe inhabit a higher plane of existence. Their spirits inhabit large, humanoid forms upwards of 30ft, and watch over humanity by protecting it from outside threats. On occassion, a god must enter the mortal plane for various reasons. However, there are certain conditions that must be met. A god cannot simply possess a human, for their divine essence would destroy it not long after. Therefore, special human bodies must be constructed from scratch to contain the godly essence within and allow gods to walk among mortals. These bodies are made using Godtech, highly advanced technology that only gods have access to.



      These bodies are 8ft tall and look human on the outside, but inward they are heavily modified, possessing advanced organs that humans do not. Inside these bodies is an organ called the core, which contains the soul of a god. These cores operate similar to a miniature nuclear reactor that powers the body and contains the divine essence inside it, preventing it from leaking out into the environment. These bodies are powerful and highly durable, and provide for almost instant regeneration. However, gods can still be killed if they have taken enough damage, which leads to a problem.



      When a god dies, the core containing it's spirit ceases to function and becomes unstable, causing a rupture. The explosion alone would destroy a significant part of the surrounding environment. The true danger, however, is the divine radiation which would spread to a larger area due to factors such as wind currents. This radiation would spread further and further, causing damage to lesser creatures unable to withstand the power, killing hundreds or even thousands of people. Lesser still would be the rampant mutations of those touched by divine power, which can lead to disastrous consequences for them.



      I need a way to limit the effects of a failed nuclear reactor from blowing up a huge area so that only the body is destroyed, while prevent the spread of divine radiation from turning the surrounding environment from becoming holy cherobyl. How can I make this happen?







      biology technology






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 6 hours ago









      Renan

      56.2k15126280




      56.2k15126280










      asked 7 hours ago









      IncognitoIncognito

      8,501869120




      8,501869120




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$

          So this is difficult to answer, because these are your nuclear reactors and your rules so you may handwave as you see fit.



          That out of the way, you're effectively talking about a nuclear bomb, not a nuclear reactor:




          The explosion alone would destroy a significant part of the surrounding environment.




          This more or less implies that any attempts to confine or limit the spread of, uh, "theoactive" debris are doomed to failure because shielding and confinement devices in the original reactor will likely be shattered and flung far and wide.



          In a civil nuclear disaster, major explosions are pretty rare... even the chernobyl explosion wasn't really destructive to the surroundings (and it was a steam explosion, not a nuclear one), but rather was a problem because it damaged the containment structure. The issue is radioactive dust and ash and smoke caused by fires, minor explosions and structural collapses in and around the failing reactor being lofted high into the altiude and forming a fallout plume. There are all sorts of theories about how you might make civil reactors safer, many of them dubious, most of them probably won't get field-tested, but none of them apply here because you're following the classic sci-fi trope of nuclear-reactor-go-boom.



          So, to answer:




          I need a way to limit the effects of a failed nuclear reactor from blowing up a huge area




          A reactor won't. A bomb will. You need to choose which one you're dealing with here.



          Edit: I can think of one radiation-releasing nuclear reactor which might go bang when it failed: an antimatter reactor. That, however, will cause almost no fallout because the radiation it releases is prompt EM and light unstable particles that rapidly decay.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            A reactor won't, +1. Especially if you build the expensive kind that helps you build bombs (breeder reactors), which is why most aren't.
            $endgroup$
            – Mazura
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Nuclear bombs themselves are really hard to detonate. The normal mode of operation is for them to do nothing. That's how they're made. Even if you deliberately built a giant nuclear bomb instead of an actual reactor, you don't expect them to explode. They'll break and leak radiation, but not explode. Making things explode is difficult. Cars do not explode easily. Shooting things with bullets don't cause them to explode. Etc. Nuclear reactions certainly do not explode, and nuclear bombs are really difficult to explode. There's a reason the Manhatten project had teams of scientists.
            $endgroup$
            – Nelson
            20 mins ago



















          2












          $begingroup$

          Make the core a divine power receiver, like a radio receiver but receiving the energy needed for the god-tech bodies. Tesla was working on something like this at the Wardenclyffe Tower. Such a core would allow you to keep the divine soul (and the majority of its power) at a safe distance, in a heavenly or on an infernal plane.



          When the body falls, only the power that it is currently receiving gets unleashed. This is enough to incinerate the body, but is not enough to decimate/contaminate the area or mutate the indigenous life.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            For a fission reactor, you can mitigate their damage by cooling them, moderate or absorb the neutron flow, and reducing their mass below criticality.



            Cooling: Pour water or chemical salts to conduct heat away from the critical mass. Water keeps the temperature ~100 C on the surface in contact with water. But, Water boils to steam, but as long as the water is replaced this prevents a full-blown meltdown from burning its way down in the Earth.



            Moderating the Neutron Flow: Flood reactor with neutron absorbers like boron, water(again), titanium, molybdenum, or other more rare elements that absorb neutrons. This can starve the reactor and shut down the chain reaction. This works best while the nuclear core is still intact. If the fuel rods have melted down and are a puddle at the bottom of the reactor vessel this is harder to deal with. But, since you are likely cooling it, adding boric acid to the cooling water can reduce neutron flow.



            Reducing their mass: Separate the fissionable material into small pieces below its critical mass and the reaction will shut down.



            For a fusion reactor: Conceptually, adding iron or high atomic number atoms to the reactor would squelch the reactor, if one existed. Atoms like Iron and above are endothermic when they fuse, requiring more energy to fuse then they produce. Atoms below Iron on the periodic table are exothermic, producing more energy than required to fuse them.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Bear in mind that this is mounted in a 30ft tall humanoid thing. It probably won't be carrying a few million gallons of water, though perhaps requiring that it only ever operate whilst waste-deep in water might be a potential workaround...
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              6 hours ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @ Starfish Prime, I completely agree. I am unclear about the author's real needs so chose to answer the precise question put forward. I don't know if the author is looking for a design feature of the God-Body or for a mechanism the locals would need to save themselves from a Godly Melt Down
              $endgroup$
              – EDL
              5 hours ago


















            0












            $begingroup$

            So the way I see things is that you could basically have some Godtech that prevents the spreading of the radiation after the body explodes. Let's say for instance that when the body is created, some tech is included in the body such that when it is destroyed, molecules in the body, maybe an extra organ that contains a substance, binds to the God particles and renders them dormant. This could add a few extra layers to your world where non-God creatures could try to harness God particles in dormant form and make themselves Gods, etc.



            Another option could be a celestial force that is specialized and tasked with recapturing the God particles. You could make it such that the particles are more like large gems that a creature could consume to mutate and each God "body" releases X number of them upon explosion that must be tracked down.



            Really the world is your oyster here because there is no limit to how things can work for you. I personally like the idea of there being crystal like objects that are expelled on release because it introduces the chance for a black market that trades them, a task force to recover them, even a limit to the amount that exist that makes it so there are a finite number of God "bodies" that can be created at any one time.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "579"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147377%2fhow-can-i-minimize-the-damage-of-an-unstable-nuclear-reactor-to-the-surrounding%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              7












              $begingroup$

              So this is difficult to answer, because these are your nuclear reactors and your rules so you may handwave as you see fit.



              That out of the way, you're effectively talking about a nuclear bomb, not a nuclear reactor:




              The explosion alone would destroy a significant part of the surrounding environment.




              This more or less implies that any attempts to confine or limit the spread of, uh, "theoactive" debris are doomed to failure because shielding and confinement devices in the original reactor will likely be shattered and flung far and wide.



              In a civil nuclear disaster, major explosions are pretty rare... even the chernobyl explosion wasn't really destructive to the surroundings (and it was a steam explosion, not a nuclear one), but rather was a problem because it damaged the containment structure. The issue is radioactive dust and ash and smoke caused by fires, minor explosions and structural collapses in and around the failing reactor being lofted high into the altiude and forming a fallout plume. There are all sorts of theories about how you might make civil reactors safer, many of them dubious, most of them probably won't get field-tested, but none of them apply here because you're following the classic sci-fi trope of nuclear-reactor-go-boom.



              So, to answer:




              I need a way to limit the effects of a failed nuclear reactor from blowing up a huge area




              A reactor won't. A bomb will. You need to choose which one you're dealing with here.



              Edit: I can think of one radiation-releasing nuclear reactor which might go bang when it failed: an antimatter reactor. That, however, will cause almost no fallout because the radiation it releases is prompt EM and light unstable particles that rapidly decay.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                A reactor won't, +1. Especially if you build the expensive kind that helps you build bombs (breeder reactors), which is why most aren't.
                $endgroup$
                – Mazura
                4 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Nuclear bombs themselves are really hard to detonate. The normal mode of operation is for them to do nothing. That's how they're made. Even if you deliberately built a giant nuclear bomb instead of an actual reactor, you don't expect them to explode. They'll break and leak radiation, but not explode. Making things explode is difficult. Cars do not explode easily. Shooting things with bullets don't cause them to explode. Etc. Nuclear reactions certainly do not explode, and nuclear bombs are really difficult to explode. There's a reason the Manhatten project had teams of scientists.
                $endgroup$
                – Nelson
                20 mins ago
















              7












              $begingroup$

              So this is difficult to answer, because these are your nuclear reactors and your rules so you may handwave as you see fit.



              That out of the way, you're effectively talking about a nuclear bomb, not a nuclear reactor:




              The explosion alone would destroy a significant part of the surrounding environment.




              This more or less implies that any attempts to confine or limit the spread of, uh, "theoactive" debris are doomed to failure because shielding and confinement devices in the original reactor will likely be shattered and flung far and wide.



              In a civil nuclear disaster, major explosions are pretty rare... even the chernobyl explosion wasn't really destructive to the surroundings (and it was a steam explosion, not a nuclear one), but rather was a problem because it damaged the containment structure. The issue is radioactive dust and ash and smoke caused by fires, minor explosions and structural collapses in and around the failing reactor being lofted high into the altiude and forming a fallout plume. There are all sorts of theories about how you might make civil reactors safer, many of them dubious, most of them probably won't get field-tested, but none of them apply here because you're following the classic sci-fi trope of nuclear-reactor-go-boom.



              So, to answer:




              I need a way to limit the effects of a failed nuclear reactor from blowing up a huge area




              A reactor won't. A bomb will. You need to choose which one you're dealing with here.



              Edit: I can think of one radiation-releasing nuclear reactor which might go bang when it failed: an antimatter reactor. That, however, will cause almost no fallout because the radiation it releases is prompt EM and light unstable particles that rapidly decay.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                A reactor won't, +1. Especially if you build the expensive kind that helps you build bombs (breeder reactors), which is why most aren't.
                $endgroup$
                – Mazura
                4 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Nuclear bombs themselves are really hard to detonate. The normal mode of operation is for them to do nothing. That's how they're made. Even if you deliberately built a giant nuclear bomb instead of an actual reactor, you don't expect them to explode. They'll break and leak radiation, but not explode. Making things explode is difficult. Cars do not explode easily. Shooting things with bullets don't cause them to explode. Etc. Nuclear reactions certainly do not explode, and nuclear bombs are really difficult to explode. There's a reason the Manhatten project had teams of scientists.
                $endgroup$
                – Nelson
                20 mins ago














              7












              7








              7





              $begingroup$

              So this is difficult to answer, because these are your nuclear reactors and your rules so you may handwave as you see fit.



              That out of the way, you're effectively talking about a nuclear bomb, not a nuclear reactor:




              The explosion alone would destroy a significant part of the surrounding environment.




              This more or less implies that any attempts to confine or limit the spread of, uh, "theoactive" debris are doomed to failure because shielding and confinement devices in the original reactor will likely be shattered and flung far and wide.



              In a civil nuclear disaster, major explosions are pretty rare... even the chernobyl explosion wasn't really destructive to the surroundings (and it was a steam explosion, not a nuclear one), but rather was a problem because it damaged the containment structure. The issue is radioactive dust and ash and smoke caused by fires, minor explosions and structural collapses in and around the failing reactor being lofted high into the altiude and forming a fallout plume. There are all sorts of theories about how you might make civil reactors safer, many of them dubious, most of them probably won't get field-tested, but none of them apply here because you're following the classic sci-fi trope of nuclear-reactor-go-boom.



              So, to answer:




              I need a way to limit the effects of a failed nuclear reactor from blowing up a huge area




              A reactor won't. A bomb will. You need to choose which one you're dealing with here.



              Edit: I can think of one radiation-releasing nuclear reactor which might go bang when it failed: an antimatter reactor. That, however, will cause almost no fallout because the radiation it releases is prompt EM and light unstable particles that rapidly decay.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              So this is difficult to answer, because these are your nuclear reactors and your rules so you may handwave as you see fit.



              That out of the way, you're effectively talking about a nuclear bomb, not a nuclear reactor:




              The explosion alone would destroy a significant part of the surrounding environment.




              This more or less implies that any attempts to confine or limit the spread of, uh, "theoactive" debris are doomed to failure because shielding and confinement devices in the original reactor will likely be shattered and flung far and wide.



              In a civil nuclear disaster, major explosions are pretty rare... even the chernobyl explosion wasn't really destructive to the surroundings (and it was a steam explosion, not a nuclear one), but rather was a problem because it damaged the containment structure. The issue is radioactive dust and ash and smoke caused by fires, minor explosions and structural collapses in and around the failing reactor being lofted high into the altiude and forming a fallout plume. There are all sorts of theories about how you might make civil reactors safer, many of them dubious, most of them probably won't get field-tested, but none of them apply here because you're following the classic sci-fi trope of nuclear-reactor-go-boom.



              So, to answer:




              I need a way to limit the effects of a failed nuclear reactor from blowing up a huge area




              A reactor won't. A bomb will. You need to choose which one you're dealing with here.



              Edit: I can think of one radiation-releasing nuclear reactor which might go bang when it failed: an antimatter reactor. That, however, will cause almost no fallout because the radiation it releases is prompt EM and light unstable particles that rapidly decay.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 5 hours ago

























              answered 7 hours ago









              Starfish PrimeStarfish Prime

              2,094317




              2,094317







              • 1




                $begingroup$
                A reactor won't, +1. Especially if you build the expensive kind that helps you build bombs (breeder reactors), which is why most aren't.
                $endgroup$
                – Mazura
                4 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Nuclear bombs themselves are really hard to detonate. The normal mode of operation is for them to do nothing. That's how they're made. Even if you deliberately built a giant nuclear bomb instead of an actual reactor, you don't expect them to explode. They'll break and leak radiation, but not explode. Making things explode is difficult. Cars do not explode easily. Shooting things with bullets don't cause them to explode. Etc. Nuclear reactions certainly do not explode, and nuclear bombs are really difficult to explode. There's a reason the Manhatten project had teams of scientists.
                $endgroup$
                – Nelson
                20 mins ago













              • 1




                $begingroup$
                A reactor won't, +1. Especially if you build the expensive kind that helps you build bombs (breeder reactors), which is why most aren't.
                $endgroup$
                – Mazura
                4 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Nuclear bombs themselves are really hard to detonate. The normal mode of operation is for them to do nothing. That's how they're made. Even if you deliberately built a giant nuclear bomb instead of an actual reactor, you don't expect them to explode. They'll break and leak radiation, but not explode. Making things explode is difficult. Cars do not explode easily. Shooting things with bullets don't cause them to explode. Etc. Nuclear reactions certainly do not explode, and nuclear bombs are really difficult to explode. There's a reason the Manhatten project had teams of scientists.
                $endgroup$
                – Nelson
                20 mins ago








              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              A reactor won't, +1. Especially if you build the expensive kind that helps you build bombs (breeder reactors), which is why most aren't.
              $endgroup$
              – Mazura
              4 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              A reactor won't, +1. Especially if you build the expensive kind that helps you build bombs (breeder reactors), which is why most aren't.
              $endgroup$
              – Mazura
              4 hours ago












              $begingroup$
              Nuclear bombs themselves are really hard to detonate. The normal mode of operation is for them to do nothing. That's how they're made. Even if you deliberately built a giant nuclear bomb instead of an actual reactor, you don't expect them to explode. They'll break and leak radiation, but not explode. Making things explode is difficult. Cars do not explode easily. Shooting things with bullets don't cause them to explode. Etc. Nuclear reactions certainly do not explode, and nuclear bombs are really difficult to explode. There's a reason the Manhatten project had teams of scientists.
              $endgroup$
              – Nelson
              20 mins ago





              $begingroup$
              Nuclear bombs themselves are really hard to detonate. The normal mode of operation is for them to do nothing. That's how they're made. Even if you deliberately built a giant nuclear bomb instead of an actual reactor, you don't expect them to explode. They'll break and leak radiation, but not explode. Making things explode is difficult. Cars do not explode easily. Shooting things with bullets don't cause them to explode. Etc. Nuclear reactions certainly do not explode, and nuclear bombs are really difficult to explode. There's a reason the Manhatten project had teams of scientists.
              $endgroup$
              – Nelson
              20 mins ago












              2












              $begingroup$

              Make the core a divine power receiver, like a radio receiver but receiving the energy needed for the god-tech bodies. Tesla was working on something like this at the Wardenclyffe Tower. Such a core would allow you to keep the divine soul (and the majority of its power) at a safe distance, in a heavenly or on an infernal plane.



              When the body falls, only the power that it is currently receiving gets unleashed. This is enough to incinerate the body, but is not enough to decimate/contaminate the area or mutate the indigenous life.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                Make the core a divine power receiver, like a radio receiver but receiving the energy needed for the god-tech bodies. Tesla was working on something like this at the Wardenclyffe Tower. Such a core would allow you to keep the divine soul (and the majority of its power) at a safe distance, in a heavenly or on an infernal plane.



                When the body falls, only the power that it is currently receiving gets unleashed. This is enough to incinerate the body, but is not enough to decimate/contaminate the area or mutate the indigenous life.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Make the core a divine power receiver, like a radio receiver but receiving the energy needed for the god-tech bodies. Tesla was working on something like this at the Wardenclyffe Tower. Such a core would allow you to keep the divine soul (and the majority of its power) at a safe distance, in a heavenly or on an infernal plane.



                  When the body falls, only the power that it is currently receiving gets unleashed. This is enough to incinerate the body, but is not enough to decimate/contaminate the area or mutate the indigenous life.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Make the core a divine power receiver, like a radio receiver but receiving the energy needed for the god-tech bodies. Tesla was working on something like this at the Wardenclyffe Tower. Such a core would allow you to keep the divine soul (and the majority of its power) at a safe distance, in a heavenly or on an infernal plane.



                  When the body falls, only the power that it is currently receiving gets unleashed. This is enough to incinerate the body, but is not enough to decimate/contaminate the area or mutate the indigenous life.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 6 hours ago









                  Henry TaylorHenry Taylor

                  47k872169




                  47k872169





















                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      For a fission reactor, you can mitigate their damage by cooling them, moderate or absorb the neutron flow, and reducing their mass below criticality.



                      Cooling: Pour water or chemical salts to conduct heat away from the critical mass. Water keeps the temperature ~100 C on the surface in contact with water. But, Water boils to steam, but as long as the water is replaced this prevents a full-blown meltdown from burning its way down in the Earth.



                      Moderating the Neutron Flow: Flood reactor with neutron absorbers like boron, water(again), titanium, molybdenum, or other more rare elements that absorb neutrons. This can starve the reactor and shut down the chain reaction. This works best while the nuclear core is still intact. If the fuel rods have melted down and are a puddle at the bottom of the reactor vessel this is harder to deal with. But, since you are likely cooling it, adding boric acid to the cooling water can reduce neutron flow.



                      Reducing their mass: Separate the fissionable material into small pieces below its critical mass and the reaction will shut down.



                      For a fusion reactor: Conceptually, adding iron or high atomic number atoms to the reactor would squelch the reactor, if one existed. Atoms like Iron and above are endothermic when they fuse, requiring more energy to fuse then they produce. Atoms below Iron on the periodic table are exothermic, producing more energy than required to fuse them.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Bear in mind that this is mounted in a 30ft tall humanoid thing. It probably won't be carrying a few million gallons of water, though perhaps requiring that it only ever operate whilst waste-deep in water might be a potential workaround...
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        @ Starfish Prime, I completely agree. I am unclear about the author's real needs so chose to answer the precise question put forward. I don't know if the author is looking for a design feature of the God-Body or for a mechanism the locals would need to save themselves from a Godly Melt Down
                        $endgroup$
                        – EDL
                        5 hours ago















                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      For a fission reactor, you can mitigate their damage by cooling them, moderate or absorb the neutron flow, and reducing their mass below criticality.



                      Cooling: Pour water or chemical salts to conduct heat away from the critical mass. Water keeps the temperature ~100 C on the surface in contact with water. But, Water boils to steam, but as long as the water is replaced this prevents a full-blown meltdown from burning its way down in the Earth.



                      Moderating the Neutron Flow: Flood reactor with neutron absorbers like boron, water(again), titanium, molybdenum, or other more rare elements that absorb neutrons. This can starve the reactor and shut down the chain reaction. This works best while the nuclear core is still intact. If the fuel rods have melted down and are a puddle at the bottom of the reactor vessel this is harder to deal with. But, since you are likely cooling it, adding boric acid to the cooling water can reduce neutron flow.



                      Reducing their mass: Separate the fissionable material into small pieces below its critical mass and the reaction will shut down.



                      For a fusion reactor: Conceptually, adding iron or high atomic number atoms to the reactor would squelch the reactor, if one existed. Atoms like Iron and above are endothermic when they fuse, requiring more energy to fuse then they produce. Atoms below Iron on the periodic table are exothermic, producing more energy than required to fuse them.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Bear in mind that this is mounted in a 30ft tall humanoid thing. It probably won't be carrying a few million gallons of water, though perhaps requiring that it only ever operate whilst waste-deep in water might be a potential workaround...
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        @ Starfish Prime, I completely agree. I am unclear about the author's real needs so chose to answer the precise question put forward. I don't know if the author is looking for a design feature of the God-Body or for a mechanism the locals would need to save themselves from a Godly Melt Down
                        $endgroup$
                        – EDL
                        5 hours ago













                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      For a fission reactor, you can mitigate their damage by cooling them, moderate or absorb the neutron flow, and reducing their mass below criticality.



                      Cooling: Pour water or chemical salts to conduct heat away from the critical mass. Water keeps the temperature ~100 C on the surface in contact with water. But, Water boils to steam, but as long as the water is replaced this prevents a full-blown meltdown from burning its way down in the Earth.



                      Moderating the Neutron Flow: Flood reactor with neutron absorbers like boron, water(again), titanium, molybdenum, or other more rare elements that absorb neutrons. This can starve the reactor and shut down the chain reaction. This works best while the nuclear core is still intact. If the fuel rods have melted down and are a puddle at the bottom of the reactor vessel this is harder to deal with. But, since you are likely cooling it, adding boric acid to the cooling water can reduce neutron flow.



                      Reducing their mass: Separate the fissionable material into small pieces below its critical mass and the reaction will shut down.



                      For a fusion reactor: Conceptually, adding iron or high atomic number atoms to the reactor would squelch the reactor, if one existed. Atoms like Iron and above are endothermic when they fuse, requiring more energy to fuse then they produce. Atoms below Iron on the periodic table are exothermic, producing more energy than required to fuse them.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      For a fission reactor, you can mitigate their damage by cooling them, moderate or absorb the neutron flow, and reducing their mass below criticality.



                      Cooling: Pour water or chemical salts to conduct heat away from the critical mass. Water keeps the temperature ~100 C on the surface in contact with water. But, Water boils to steam, but as long as the water is replaced this prevents a full-blown meltdown from burning its way down in the Earth.



                      Moderating the Neutron Flow: Flood reactor with neutron absorbers like boron, water(again), titanium, molybdenum, or other more rare elements that absorb neutrons. This can starve the reactor and shut down the chain reaction. This works best while the nuclear core is still intact. If the fuel rods have melted down and are a puddle at the bottom of the reactor vessel this is harder to deal with. But, since you are likely cooling it, adding boric acid to the cooling water can reduce neutron flow.



                      Reducing their mass: Separate the fissionable material into small pieces below its critical mass and the reaction will shut down.



                      For a fusion reactor: Conceptually, adding iron or high atomic number atoms to the reactor would squelch the reactor, if one existed. Atoms like Iron and above are endothermic when they fuse, requiring more energy to fuse then they produce. Atoms below Iron on the periodic table are exothermic, producing more energy than required to fuse them.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 6 hours ago









                      EDLEDL

                      8826




                      8826











                      • $begingroup$
                        Bear in mind that this is mounted in a 30ft tall humanoid thing. It probably won't be carrying a few million gallons of water, though perhaps requiring that it only ever operate whilst waste-deep in water might be a potential workaround...
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        @ Starfish Prime, I completely agree. I am unclear about the author's real needs so chose to answer the precise question put forward. I don't know if the author is looking for a design feature of the God-Body or for a mechanism the locals would need to save themselves from a Godly Melt Down
                        $endgroup$
                        – EDL
                        5 hours ago
















                      • $begingroup$
                        Bear in mind that this is mounted in a 30ft tall humanoid thing. It probably won't be carrying a few million gallons of water, though perhaps requiring that it only ever operate whilst waste-deep in water might be a potential workaround...
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        @ Starfish Prime, I completely agree. I am unclear about the author's real needs so chose to answer the precise question put forward. I don't know if the author is looking for a design feature of the God-Body or for a mechanism the locals would need to save themselves from a Godly Melt Down
                        $endgroup$
                        – EDL
                        5 hours ago















                      $begingroup$
                      Bear in mind that this is mounted in a 30ft tall humanoid thing. It probably won't be carrying a few million gallons of water, though perhaps requiring that it only ever operate whilst waste-deep in water might be a potential workaround...
                      $endgroup$
                      – Starfish Prime
                      6 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Bear in mind that this is mounted in a 30ft tall humanoid thing. It probably won't be carrying a few million gallons of water, though perhaps requiring that it only ever operate whilst waste-deep in water might be a potential workaround...
                      $endgroup$
                      – Starfish Prime
                      6 hours ago




                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      @ Starfish Prime, I completely agree. I am unclear about the author's real needs so chose to answer the precise question put forward. I don't know if the author is looking for a design feature of the God-Body or for a mechanism the locals would need to save themselves from a Godly Melt Down
                      $endgroup$
                      – EDL
                      5 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @ Starfish Prime, I completely agree. I am unclear about the author's real needs so chose to answer the precise question put forward. I don't know if the author is looking for a design feature of the God-Body or for a mechanism the locals would need to save themselves from a Godly Melt Down
                      $endgroup$
                      – EDL
                      5 hours ago











                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      So the way I see things is that you could basically have some Godtech that prevents the spreading of the radiation after the body explodes. Let's say for instance that when the body is created, some tech is included in the body such that when it is destroyed, molecules in the body, maybe an extra organ that contains a substance, binds to the God particles and renders them dormant. This could add a few extra layers to your world where non-God creatures could try to harness God particles in dormant form and make themselves Gods, etc.



                      Another option could be a celestial force that is specialized and tasked with recapturing the God particles. You could make it such that the particles are more like large gems that a creature could consume to mutate and each God "body" releases X number of them upon explosion that must be tracked down.



                      Really the world is your oyster here because there is no limit to how things can work for you. I personally like the idea of there being crystal like objects that are expelled on release because it introduces the chance for a black market that trades them, a task force to recover them, even a limit to the amount that exist that makes it so there are a finite number of God "bodies" that can be created at any one time.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        So the way I see things is that you could basically have some Godtech that prevents the spreading of the radiation after the body explodes. Let's say for instance that when the body is created, some tech is included in the body such that when it is destroyed, molecules in the body, maybe an extra organ that contains a substance, binds to the God particles and renders them dormant. This could add a few extra layers to your world where non-God creatures could try to harness God particles in dormant form and make themselves Gods, etc.



                        Another option could be a celestial force that is specialized and tasked with recapturing the God particles. You could make it such that the particles are more like large gems that a creature could consume to mutate and each God "body" releases X number of them upon explosion that must be tracked down.



                        Really the world is your oyster here because there is no limit to how things can work for you. I personally like the idea of there being crystal like objects that are expelled on release because it introduces the chance for a black market that trades them, a task force to recover them, even a limit to the amount that exist that makes it so there are a finite number of God "bodies" that can be created at any one time.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          So the way I see things is that you could basically have some Godtech that prevents the spreading of the radiation after the body explodes. Let's say for instance that when the body is created, some tech is included in the body such that when it is destroyed, molecules in the body, maybe an extra organ that contains a substance, binds to the God particles and renders them dormant. This could add a few extra layers to your world where non-God creatures could try to harness God particles in dormant form and make themselves Gods, etc.



                          Another option could be a celestial force that is specialized and tasked with recapturing the God particles. You could make it such that the particles are more like large gems that a creature could consume to mutate and each God "body" releases X number of them upon explosion that must be tracked down.



                          Really the world is your oyster here because there is no limit to how things can work for you. I personally like the idea of there being crystal like objects that are expelled on release because it introduces the chance for a black market that trades them, a task force to recover them, even a limit to the amount that exist that makes it so there are a finite number of God "bodies" that can be created at any one time.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          So the way I see things is that you could basically have some Godtech that prevents the spreading of the radiation after the body explodes. Let's say for instance that when the body is created, some tech is included in the body such that when it is destroyed, molecules in the body, maybe an extra organ that contains a substance, binds to the God particles and renders them dormant. This could add a few extra layers to your world where non-God creatures could try to harness God particles in dormant form and make themselves Gods, etc.



                          Another option could be a celestial force that is specialized and tasked with recapturing the God particles. You could make it such that the particles are more like large gems that a creature could consume to mutate and each God "body" releases X number of them upon explosion that must be tracked down.



                          Really the world is your oyster here because there is no limit to how things can work for you. I personally like the idea of there being crystal like objects that are expelled on release because it introduces the chance for a black market that trades them, a task force to recover them, even a limit to the amount that exist that makes it so there are a finite number of God "bodies" that can be created at any one time.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 5 hours ago









                          Michael PlattMichael Platt

                          1412




                          1412



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147377%2fhow-can-i-minimize-the-damage-of-an-unstable-nuclear-reactor-to-the-surrounding%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Log på Navigationsmenu

                              Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

                              Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse