Find hamming distance between two Strings of equal length in JavaEdit Distance Between Two StringsCalculating and displaying number statisticsAcquiring indices for anagrams of an input stringEdit distance between 2 stringsA sequence of mistakesAssignement on reading from stdin in CHamming distance between numbers in JavaScriptCalculation of Hamming distance between two adjacency listsHamming distanceJava class named HeadPhone to represent a headphone set
Can a tourist shoot a gun in the USA?
What episode was being referenced by this part of Discovery's season 2 episode 13 recap?
Why did I need to *reboot* to change my group membership
Why was Endgame Thanos so different than Infinity War Thanos?
Conditional probability - sum of dice is even given that at least one is a five
Quote from Leibniz
What are the holes in files created with fallocate?
Area under the curve - Integrals (Antiderivatives)
Longest Text in Latin
When a land becomes a creature, is it untapped?
Safety when modifying old electrical work
Could there be a material that inverts the colours seen through it?
Does Lawful Interception of 4G / the proposed 5G provide a back door for hackers as well?
On what legal basis did the UK remove the 'European Union' from its passport?
LWC1513: @salesforce/resourceUrl modules only support default imports
Ex-manager wants to stay in touch, I don't want to
Can't find the release for this wiring harness connector
Interior smooth regularity
Why does my circuit work on a breadboard, but not on a perfboard? I am new to soldering
Would an 8% reduction in drag outweigh the weight addition from this custom CFD-tested winglet?
Anabelian geometry ~ higher category theory
Program which behaves differently in/out of a debugger
Are there any established rules for splitting books into parts, chapters, sections etc?
Why is tomato paste so cheap?
Find hamming distance between two Strings of equal length in Java
Edit Distance Between Two StringsCalculating and displaying number statisticsAcquiring indices for anagrams of an input stringEdit distance between 2 stringsA sequence of mistakesAssignement on reading from stdin in CHamming distance between numbers in JavaScriptCalculation of Hamming distance between two adjacency listsHamming distanceJava class named HeadPhone to represent a headphone set
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I have a private class that I want to be able to find the shortest Hamming Distance between two Strings of equal length in Java. The private class holds a char[]
and contains a method to compare against other char arrays. It returns true if there is only a hamming distance of one.
The average length of the Strings used is 9 characters. They range from 1 to 24 characters.
Is there a way to make the isDistanceOne(char[])
method go any faster?
private class WordArray
char[] word;
/**
* Creates a new WordArray object.
*
* @param word The word to add to the WordArray.
*/
private WordArray(String word)
this.word = word.toCharArray();
/**
* Returns whether the argument is within a Hamming Distance of one from
* the char[] contained in the WordArray.
*
* Both char[]s should be of the same length.
*
* @param otherWord The word to compare with this.word.
* @return boolean.
*/
private boolean isDistanceOne(char[] otherWord)
int count = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word[i] != otherWord[i])
count++;
return (count == 1);
java performance strings array edit-distance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a private class that I want to be able to find the shortest Hamming Distance between two Strings of equal length in Java. The private class holds a char[]
and contains a method to compare against other char arrays. It returns true if there is only a hamming distance of one.
The average length of the Strings used is 9 characters. They range from 1 to 24 characters.
Is there a way to make the isDistanceOne(char[])
method go any faster?
private class WordArray
char[] word;
/**
* Creates a new WordArray object.
*
* @param word The word to add to the WordArray.
*/
private WordArray(String word)
this.word = word.toCharArray();
/**
* Returns whether the argument is within a Hamming Distance of one from
* the char[] contained in the WordArray.
*
* Both char[]s should be of the same length.
*
* @param otherWord The word to compare with this.word.
* @return boolean.
*/
private boolean isDistanceOne(char[] otherWord)
int count = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word[i] != otherWord[i])
count++;
return (count == 1);
java performance strings array edit-distance
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a private class that I want to be able to find the shortest Hamming Distance between two Strings of equal length in Java. The private class holds a char[]
and contains a method to compare against other char arrays. It returns true if there is only a hamming distance of one.
The average length of the Strings used is 9 characters. They range from 1 to 24 characters.
Is there a way to make the isDistanceOne(char[])
method go any faster?
private class WordArray
char[] word;
/**
* Creates a new WordArray object.
*
* @param word The word to add to the WordArray.
*/
private WordArray(String word)
this.word = word.toCharArray();
/**
* Returns whether the argument is within a Hamming Distance of one from
* the char[] contained in the WordArray.
*
* Both char[]s should be of the same length.
*
* @param otherWord The word to compare with this.word.
* @return boolean.
*/
private boolean isDistanceOne(char[] otherWord)
int count = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word[i] != otherWord[i])
count++;
return (count == 1);
java performance strings array edit-distance
$endgroup$
I have a private class that I want to be able to find the shortest Hamming Distance between two Strings of equal length in Java. The private class holds a char[]
and contains a method to compare against other char arrays. It returns true if there is only a hamming distance of one.
The average length of the Strings used is 9 characters. They range from 1 to 24 characters.
Is there a way to make the isDistanceOne(char[])
method go any faster?
private class WordArray
char[] word;
/**
* Creates a new WordArray object.
*
* @param word The word to add to the WordArray.
*/
private WordArray(String word)
this.word = word.toCharArray();
/**
* Returns whether the argument is within a Hamming Distance of one from
* the char[] contained in the WordArray.
*
* Both char[]s should be of the same length.
*
* @param otherWord The word to compare with this.word.
* @return boolean.
*/
private boolean isDistanceOne(char[] otherWord)
int count = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word[i] != otherWord[i])
count++;
return (count == 1);
java performance strings array edit-distance
java performance strings array edit-distance
edited 5 hours ago
200_success
132k20159426
132k20159426
asked 6 hours ago
LuminousNutriaLuminousNutria
22416
22416
1
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Given the limited context, and no information about where the hotspot is in the code, it's difficult to give concrete advice. Here are some musings for your consideration:
For ease of reading, it's preferable to have whitespace after control flow keywords and before the (
.
It is suggested to always include curly braces, even when they're not required by the compiler.
Use final
where possible to reduce cognitive load on the readers of your code.
word
should be private.
There's no apparent reason to use char[]
instead of just keeping a pointer to the original String
. They're costing you time and space to make, to no benefit.
You can short-circuit out of your for
loop if the count ever becomes greater than one. Unless a significant fraction of your inputs have a distance of one, you should see some performance gain here.
Using a boolean
instead of an int
might make a very small difference in execution time, but that would need to be tested. It also makes the code harder to read.
private class WordArray
private final String word;
private WordArray(final String word)
this.word = word;
private boolean isDistanceOne(final char[] otherWord)
assert word.length() == otherWord.length;
int distance = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word.charAt(i) == otherWord[i])
continue;
if (distance > 0)
return false;
distance++;
return distance == 1;
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't think you can beat that linear complexity since you need to look at each character to determine the Hamming distance.
One small optimization you can do is to short-circuit once your count goes above one, but that adds an extra check in every iteration, so it might have worse runtime depending on the inputs.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f220144%2ffind-hamming-distance-between-two-strings-of-equal-length-in-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Given the limited context, and no information about where the hotspot is in the code, it's difficult to give concrete advice. Here are some musings for your consideration:
For ease of reading, it's preferable to have whitespace after control flow keywords and before the (
.
It is suggested to always include curly braces, even when they're not required by the compiler.
Use final
where possible to reduce cognitive load on the readers of your code.
word
should be private.
There's no apparent reason to use char[]
instead of just keeping a pointer to the original String
. They're costing you time and space to make, to no benefit.
You can short-circuit out of your for
loop if the count ever becomes greater than one. Unless a significant fraction of your inputs have a distance of one, you should see some performance gain here.
Using a boolean
instead of an int
might make a very small difference in execution time, but that would need to be tested. It also makes the code harder to read.
private class WordArray
private final String word;
private WordArray(final String word)
this.word = word;
private boolean isDistanceOne(final char[] otherWord)
assert word.length() == otherWord.length;
int distance = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word.charAt(i) == otherWord[i])
continue;
if (distance > 0)
return false;
distance++;
return distance == 1;
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given the limited context, and no information about where the hotspot is in the code, it's difficult to give concrete advice. Here are some musings for your consideration:
For ease of reading, it's preferable to have whitespace after control flow keywords and before the (
.
It is suggested to always include curly braces, even when they're not required by the compiler.
Use final
where possible to reduce cognitive load on the readers of your code.
word
should be private.
There's no apparent reason to use char[]
instead of just keeping a pointer to the original String
. They're costing you time and space to make, to no benefit.
You can short-circuit out of your for
loop if the count ever becomes greater than one. Unless a significant fraction of your inputs have a distance of one, you should see some performance gain here.
Using a boolean
instead of an int
might make a very small difference in execution time, but that would need to be tested. It also makes the code harder to read.
private class WordArray
private final String word;
private WordArray(final String word)
this.word = word;
private boolean isDistanceOne(final char[] otherWord)
assert word.length() == otherWord.length;
int distance = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word.charAt(i) == otherWord[i])
continue;
if (distance > 0)
return false;
distance++;
return distance == 1;
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given the limited context, and no information about where the hotspot is in the code, it's difficult to give concrete advice. Here are some musings for your consideration:
For ease of reading, it's preferable to have whitespace after control flow keywords and before the (
.
It is suggested to always include curly braces, even when they're not required by the compiler.
Use final
where possible to reduce cognitive load on the readers of your code.
word
should be private.
There's no apparent reason to use char[]
instead of just keeping a pointer to the original String
. They're costing you time and space to make, to no benefit.
You can short-circuit out of your for
loop if the count ever becomes greater than one. Unless a significant fraction of your inputs have a distance of one, you should see some performance gain here.
Using a boolean
instead of an int
might make a very small difference in execution time, but that would need to be tested. It also makes the code harder to read.
private class WordArray
private final String word;
private WordArray(final String word)
this.word = word;
private boolean isDistanceOne(final char[] otherWord)
assert word.length() == otherWord.length;
int distance = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word.charAt(i) == otherWord[i])
continue;
if (distance > 0)
return false;
distance++;
return distance == 1;
$endgroup$
Given the limited context, and no information about where the hotspot is in the code, it's difficult to give concrete advice. Here are some musings for your consideration:
For ease of reading, it's preferable to have whitespace after control flow keywords and before the (
.
It is suggested to always include curly braces, even when they're not required by the compiler.
Use final
where possible to reduce cognitive load on the readers of your code.
word
should be private.
There's no apparent reason to use char[]
instead of just keeping a pointer to the original String
. They're costing you time and space to make, to no benefit.
You can short-circuit out of your for
loop if the count ever becomes greater than one. Unless a significant fraction of your inputs have a distance of one, you should see some performance gain here.
Using a boolean
instead of an int
might make a very small difference in execution time, but that would need to be tested. It also makes the code harder to read.
private class WordArray
private final String word;
private WordArray(final String word)
this.word = word;
private boolean isDistanceOne(final char[] otherWord)
assert word.length() == otherWord.length;
int distance = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word.charAt(i) == otherWord[i])
continue;
if (distance > 0)
return false;
distance++;
return distance == 1;
answered 3 hours ago
Eric SteinEric Stein
4,307613
4,307613
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't think you can beat that linear complexity since you need to look at each character to determine the Hamming distance.
One small optimization you can do is to short-circuit once your count goes above one, but that adds an extra check in every iteration, so it might have worse runtime depending on the inputs.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't think you can beat that linear complexity since you need to look at each character to determine the Hamming distance.
One small optimization you can do is to short-circuit once your count goes above one, but that adds an extra check in every iteration, so it might have worse runtime depending on the inputs.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't think you can beat that linear complexity since you need to look at each character to determine the Hamming distance.
One small optimization you can do is to short-circuit once your count goes above one, but that adds an extra check in every iteration, so it might have worse runtime depending on the inputs.
$endgroup$
I don't think you can beat that linear complexity since you need to look at each character to determine the Hamming distance.
One small optimization you can do is to short-circuit once your count goes above one, but that adds an extra check in every iteration, so it might have worse runtime depending on the inputs.
answered 3 hours ago
Hesham AttiaHesham Attia
71329
71329
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f220144%2ffind-hamming-distance-between-two-strings-of-equal-length-in-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
5 hours ago