Labeling matrices/rectangles and drawing Sigma inside rectangleLabeling rectangle above rectangleDrawing a 3x2 rectangleDrawing and labeling asymptotesRectangle between midpoints of rotated rectanglesDrawing rectangle with tikzpictureTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionRelative transparency in TikZ?Drawing a rectangle around text inside lstlistingWrong rectangle drawingMatrices and TikZ : arrows inside the matrix
Missouri raptors have wild hairdos
Does gravity affect the time evolution of a QM wave function?
Why are solar panels kept tilted?
Can't find the release for this wiring harness connector
Quote from Leibniz
What information do scammers need to withdraw money from an account?
what does a native speaker say when he wanted to leave his work?
Does Lawful Interception of 4G / the proposed 5G provide a back door for hackers as well?
51% attack - apparently very easy? refering to CZ's "rollback btc chain" - How to make sure such corruptible scenario can never happen so easily?
Extracting sublists that contain similar elements
If current results hold, Man City would win PL title
Is 12 minutes connection in Bristol Temple Meads long enough?
Do I need to say 'o`clock'?
Is the expression "To think you would stoop so low" often misused?
What to do if SUS scores contradict qualitative feedback?
What are the implications of the new alleged key recovery attack preprint on SIMON?
Help in identifying a mystery wall socket
Could there be a material that inverts the colours seen through it?
Tikz draw contour without some edges, and fill
Show that in a compact metric space there are at most a countable number of clopen sets
Formal Definition of Dot Product
declared variable inside void setup is forgotten in void loop
Why does the headset man not get on the tractor?
Area under the curve - Integrals (Antiderivatives)
Labeling matrices/rectangles and drawing Sigma inside rectangle
Labeling rectangle above rectangleDrawing a 3x2 rectangleDrawing and labeling asymptotesRectangle between midpoints of rotated rectanglesDrawing rectangle with tikzpictureTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionRelative transparency in TikZ?Drawing a rectangle around text inside lstlistingWrong rectangle drawingMatrices and TikZ : arrows inside the matrix
I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.
So far, I've tried this:
documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
add a comment |
I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.
So far, I've tried this:
documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
4 hours ago
1
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.
So far, I've tried this:
documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.
So far, I've tried this:
documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
tikz-pgf
edited 4 hours ago
naveganteX
asked 4 hours ago
naveganteXnaveganteX
826
826
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
4 hours ago
1
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
add a comment |
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
4 hours ago
1
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
4 hours ago
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
4 hours ago
1
1
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline
key in an ordinary equation (and contour
for the Sigma
). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep
and inner ysep
. And overlay
is used to avoid that the FEATURES
node above U
does not introduce additional horizontal space.
documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)]
node[draw,inner xsep=2.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (X)$mathsfX$;
draw ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;
~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES
]
enddocument
1
haha, I missed you! Always a pleasure! Thank you!
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490532%2flabeling-matrices-rectangles-and-drawing-sigma-inside-rectangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline
key in an ordinary equation (and contour
for the Sigma
). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep
and inner ysep
. And overlay
is used to avoid that the FEATURES
node above U
does not introduce additional horizontal space.
documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)]
node[draw,inner xsep=2.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (X)$mathsfX$;
draw ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;
~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES
]
enddocument
1
haha, I missed you! Always a pleasure! Thank you!
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
add a comment |
How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline
key in an ordinary equation (and contour
for the Sigma
). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep
and inner ysep
. And overlay
is used to avoid that the FEATURES
node above U
does not introduce additional horizontal space.
documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)]
node[draw,inner xsep=2.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (X)$mathsfX$;
draw ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;
~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES
]
enddocument
1
haha, I missed you! Always a pleasure! Thank you!
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
add a comment |
How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline
key in an ordinary equation (and contour
for the Sigma
). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep
and inner ysep
. And overlay
is used to avoid that the FEATURES
node above U
does not introduce additional horizontal space.
documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)]
node[draw,inner xsep=2.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (X)$mathsfX$;
draw ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;
~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES
]
enddocument
How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline
key in an ordinary equation (and contour
for the Sigma
). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep
and inner ysep
. And overlay
is used to avoid that the FEATURES
node above U
does not introduce additional horizontal space.
documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)]
node[draw,inner xsep=2.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (X)$mathsfX$;
draw ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;
~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES
]
enddocument
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
marmotmarmot
126k6162308
126k6162308
1
haha, I missed you! Always a pleasure! Thank you!
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1
haha, I missed you! Always a pleasure! Thank you!
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
1
1
haha, I missed you! Always a pleasure! Thank you!
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
haha, I missed you! Always a pleasure! Thank you!
– naveganteX
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490532%2flabeling-matrices-rectangles-and-drawing-sigma-inside-rectangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
4 hours ago
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
4 hours ago
1
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
4 hours ago