Why does an injection from a set to a countable set imply that set is countable?An injection from an infinite set $X$ to $mathbbNimplies X$ is countable.Show that a set is countableEvery infinite set has an infinite countable subset?Show that there exists a bijection from a set that is countable and infinite into natural numbers.Surjective function from a countable setexistence of injection from countable sets to u countable setsProve that $ T $ is at most countableProve a set is countableProve that if $X$ is and infinite set and $Y$ is countable or finite, then $|X cup Y| = |X|$Prove that set $ mathbbZ×mathbbQ$ is countably infinite by constructing a bijection from that set to the natural numbers

Connecting circles clockwise in TikZ

Differential of a one-form eating a vector?

How to safely discharge oneself

Is being an extrovert a necessary condition to be a manager?

Can't think of a good word or term to describe not feeling or thinking

Why is there no current between two capacitors connected in series?

Is it wise to pay off mortgage with 401k?

Any way to add more GPIOs to the AIY Voice Kit?

Is there a realtime, uncut video of Saturn V ignition through tower clear?

On a piano, are the effects of holding notes and the sustain pedal the same for a single chord?

Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"

Why was Houston selected as the location for the Manned Spacecraft Center?

Story about encounter with hostile aliens

Is there a way to generate a mapping graph like this?

How to convince boss to spend notice period on documentation instead of new projects

Germany rejected my entry to Schengen countries

What city and town structures are important in a low fantasy medieval world?

Is my company merging branches wrong?

How to choose the correct exposure for flower photography?

How to tease a romance without a cat and mouse chase?

Hotel booking: Why is Agoda much cheaper than booking.com?

How to say "invitation for war"?

How could Dwarves prevent sand from filling up their settlements

pwaS eht tirsf dna tasl setterl fo hace dorw



Why does an injection from a set to a countable set imply that set is countable?


An injection from an infinite set $X$ to $mathbbNimplies X$ is countable.Show that a set is countableEvery infinite set has an infinite countable subset?Show that there exists a bijection from a set that is countable and infinite into natural numbers.Surjective function from a countable setexistence of injection from countable sets to u countable setsProve that $ T $ is at most countableProve a set is countableProve that if $X$ is and infinite set and $Y$ is countable or finite, then $|X cup Y| = |X|$Prove that set $ mathbbZ×mathbbQ$ is countably infinite by constructing a bijection from that set to the natural numbers













3












$begingroup$


I'm reading a proof, and it concludes that a set $A$ is countable after finding an injection from $A$ to a countable set. Why is this true? I thought that we need to find a bijection from $A$ to a countable set to prove $A$ is countable.



Shouldn't $A$ be at most countable?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



gallileo22 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    See Countable set : "In mathematics, a countable set is a set with the same cardinality (number of elements) as some subset of the set of natural numbers. A countable set is either a finite set or a countably infinite set."
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have voted to close this question for lacking context. To better answer your question, it would be necessary to know how the authors of the text you are reading have defined "countable". Some authors define it to mean "of cardinality equal to the natural numbers," while others define it to mean "of cardinality less than or equal to the natural numbers". A citation to the work you are reading would go a long way towards establishing context. That being said, I think that if you carefully read the definitions provided to you, the question answers itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    1 hour ago















3












$begingroup$


I'm reading a proof, and it concludes that a set $A$ is countable after finding an injection from $A$ to a countable set. Why is this true? I thought that we need to find a bijection from $A$ to a countable set to prove $A$ is countable.



Shouldn't $A$ be at most countable?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



gallileo22 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    See Countable set : "In mathematics, a countable set is a set with the same cardinality (number of elements) as some subset of the set of natural numbers. A countable set is either a finite set or a countably infinite set."
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have voted to close this question for lacking context. To better answer your question, it would be necessary to know how the authors of the text you are reading have defined "countable". Some authors define it to mean "of cardinality equal to the natural numbers," while others define it to mean "of cardinality less than or equal to the natural numbers". A citation to the work you are reading would go a long way towards establishing context. That being said, I think that if you carefully read the definitions provided to you, the question answers itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    1 hour ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I'm reading a proof, and it concludes that a set $A$ is countable after finding an injection from $A$ to a countable set. Why is this true? I thought that we need to find a bijection from $A$ to a countable set to prove $A$ is countable.



Shouldn't $A$ be at most countable?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



gallileo22 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




I'm reading a proof, and it concludes that a set $A$ is countable after finding an injection from $A$ to a countable set. Why is this true? I thought that we need to find a bijection from $A$ to a countable set to prove $A$ is countable.



Shouldn't $A$ be at most countable?







functions elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



gallileo22 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



gallileo22 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









Asaf Karagila

311k33444776




311k33444776






New contributor



gallileo22 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 3 hours ago









gallileo22gallileo22

1161




1161




New contributor



gallileo22 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




gallileo22 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    See Countable set : "In mathematics, a countable set is a set with the same cardinality (number of elements) as some subset of the set of natural numbers. A countable set is either a finite set or a countably infinite set."
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have voted to close this question for lacking context. To better answer your question, it would be necessary to know how the authors of the text you are reading have defined "countable". Some authors define it to mean "of cardinality equal to the natural numbers," while others define it to mean "of cardinality less than or equal to the natural numbers". A citation to the work you are reading would go a long way towards establishing context. That being said, I think that if you carefully read the definitions provided to you, the question answers itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    1 hour ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    See Countable set : "In mathematics, a countable set is a set with the same cardinality (number of elements) as some subset of the set of natural numbers. A countable set is either a finite set or a countably infinite set."
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have voted to close this question for lacking context. To better answer your question, it would be necessary to know how the authors of the text you are reading have defined "countable". Some authors define it to mean "of cardinality equal to the natural numbers," while others define it to mean "of cardinality less than or equal to the natural numbers". A citation to the work you are reading would go a long way towards establishing context. That being said, I think that if you carefully read the definitions provided to you, the question answers itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    1 hour ago







3




3




$begingroup$
See Countable set : "In mathematics, a countable set is a set with the same cardinality (number of elements) as some subset of the set of natural numbers. A countable set is either a finite set or a countably infinite set."
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
See Countable set : "In mathematics, a countable set is a set with the same cardinality (number of elements) as some subset of the set of natural numbers. A countable set is either a finite set or a countably infinite set."
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
I have voted to close this question for lacking context. To better answer your question, it would be necessary to know how the authors of the text you are reading have defined "countable". Some authors define it to mean "of cardinality equal to the natural numbers," while others define it to mean "of cardinality less than or equal to the natural numbers". A citation to the work you are reading would go a long way towards establishing context. That being said, I think that if you carefully read the definitions provided to you, the question answers itself.
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I have voted to close this question for lacking context. To better answer your question, it would be necessary to know how the authors of the text you are reading have defined "countable". Some authors define it to mean "of cardinality equal to the natural numbers," while others define it to mean "of cardinality less than or equal to the natural numbers". A citation to the work you are reading would go a long way towards establishing context. That being said, I think that if you carefully read the definitions provided to you, the question answers itself.
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
1 hour ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Unfortunately, there is no uniform agreement to the meaning of "countable". Specifically, does it mean only countably infinite, or do we include also finite sets?



Well. The answer depends on context, convenience, and author. Sometimes it's easier to separate the finite and infinite, and sometimes it's clearer if we lump them together.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    every finite set is countable.
    $endgroup$
    – Zest
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. Except for when you define countable sets as those sets which are in bijection with $omega$.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Honestly, I'm not sure why people downvoted this. The question is literally asking about the confusion whether or not an injection or a bijection is enough to prove a set is countable. This is literally about the definition of being countable.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    it wasn't me though. my answer got downvoted too.
    $endgroup$
    – Zest
    2 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$

If $B$ is countable denote it $B = b_n_n in mathbbN$.



If $f : A to B$ is injective for all $a in A$ there is a $b_n = a$. Since the map is injective two different elements in $A$ map to different points in $B$, so can you see how to enumerate $A$ now?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Consider this:



    Let $A$ be an arbitrary set, $M$ be a countable set and $f:A to M$ injective.



    It holds that the preimage $f^-1(m_i) in A$ of each $m_i in M$ ($i=1,2,...$) is a single pointed set.



    In other words: each individual element $m_i in M$ has an individual preimage $f^-1(m_i) = a_i subset A$



    Since $M = bigcup_i^nm_i$ was countable, $$f^-1(M) = f^-1left(bigcup_i^nm_iright) = left(bigcup_if^-1m_iright)= bigcup_i=1^na_i = A$$ is countable itself.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      Use induction! Well, more conveniently, in well ordering-principle form.



      Suppose that $f:Ato N'$ is a bijection (basically $N'$ is the range of $A$) where $N'subseteq mathbbN$. Now we consider elements in $N'$. Take the smallest element in $N'$ (which exists by the well-ordering principle), say $x_1$. Then consider the second smallest element (which exists because $N'backslashx_1$ is a set), and call this $x_2$. Repeat with $x_3$, etc. (if we ever run out of elements in $N'$ then we know $A$ is finite which is fine).



      Now we know that $f:Ato x_i: iinmathbbN$ is a bijection. This is good news, because this is a bijection from $A$ to $mathbbN$ if you think about it carefully. In other words, ordering our set $N'$ from smallest to largest makes it a bijection to $N$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        gallileo22 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3230912%2fwhy-does-an-injection-from-a-set-to-a-countable-set-imply-that-set-is-countable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2












        $begingroup$

        Unfortunately, there is no uniform agreement to the meaning of "countable". Specifically, does it mean only countably infinite, or do we include also finite sets?



        Well. The answer depends on context, convenience, and author. Sometimes it's easier to separate the finite and infinite, and sometimes it's clearer if we lump them together.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          every finite set is countable.
          $endgroup$
          – Zest
          2 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Yes. Except for when you define countable sets as those sets which are in bijection with $omega$.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          2 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          Honestly, I'm not sure why people downvoted this. The question is literally asking about the confusion whether or not an injection or a bijection is enough to prove a set is countable. This is literally about the definition of being countable.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          2 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          it wasn't me though. my answer got downvoted too.
          $endgroup$
          – Zest
          2 hours ago















        2












        $begingroup$

        Unfortunately, there is no uniform agreement to the meaning of "countable". Specifically, does it mean only countably infinite, or do we include also finite sets?



        Well. The answer depends on context, convenience, and author. Sometimes it's easier to separate the finite and infinite, and sometimes it's clearer if we lump them together.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          every finite set is countable.
          $endgroup$
          – Zest
          2 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Yes. Except for when you define countable sets as those sets which are in bijection with $omega$.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          2 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          Honestly, I'm not sure why people downvoted this. The question is literally asking about the confusion whether or not an injection or a bijection is enough to prove a set is countable. This is literally about the definition of being countable.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          2 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          it wasn't me though. my answer got downvoted too.
          $endgroup$
          – Zest
          2 hours ago













        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Unfortunately, there is no uniform agreement to the meaning of "countable". Specifically, does it mean only countably infinite, or do we include also finite sets?



        Well. The answer depends on context, convenience, and author. Sometimes it's easier to separate the finite and infinite, and sometimes it's clearer if we lump them together.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Unfortunately, there is no uniform agreement to the meaning of "countable". Specifically, does it mean only countably infinite, or do we include also finite sets?



        Well. The answer depends on context, convenience, and author. Sometimes it's easier to separate the finite and infinite, and sometimes it's clearer if we lump them together.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        Asaf KaragilaAsaf Karagila

        311k33444776




        311k33444776











        • $begingroup$
          every finite set is countable.
          $endgroup$
          – Zest
          2 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Yes. Except for when you define countable sets as those sets which are in bijection with $omega$.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          2 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          Honestly, I'm not sure why people downvoted this. The question is literally asking about the confusion whether or not an injection or a bijection is enough to prove a set is countable. This is literally about the definition of being countable.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          2 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          it wasn't me though. my answer got downvoted too.
          $endgroup$
          – Zest
          2 hours ago
















        • $begingroup$
          every finite set is countable.
          $endgroup$
          – Zest
          2 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Yes. Except for when you define countable sets as those sets which are in bijection with $omega$.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          2 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          Honestly, I'm not sure why people downvoted this. The question is literally asking about the confusion whether or not an injection or a bijection is enough to prove a set is countable. This is literally about the definition of being countable.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          2 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          it wasn't me though. my answer got downvoted too.
          $endgroup$
          – Zest
          2 hours ago















        $begingroup$
        every finite set is countable.
        $endgroup$
        – Zest
        2 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        every finite set is countable.
        $endgroup$
        – Zest
        2 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        Yes. Except for when you define countable sets as those sets which are in bijection with $omega$.
        $endgroup$
        – Asaf Karagila
        2 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        Yes. Except for when you define countable sets as those sets which are in bijection with $omega$.
        $endgroup$
        – Asaf Karagila
        2 hours ago












        $begingroup$
        Honestly, I'm not sure why people downvoted this. The question is literally asking about the confusion whether or not an injection or a bijection is enough to prove a set is countable. This is literally about the definition of being countable.
        $endgroup$
        – Asaf Karagila
        2 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        Honestly, I'm not sure why people downvoted this. The question is literally asking about the confusion whether or not an injection or a bijection is enough to prove a set is countable. This is literally about the definition of being countable.
        $endgroup$
        – Asaf Karagila
        2 hours ago












        $begingroup$
        it wasn't me though. my answer got downvoted too.
        $endgroup$
        – Zest
        2 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        it wasn't me though. my answer got downvoted too.
        $endgroup$
        – Zest
        2 hours ago











        1












        $begingroup$

        If $B$ is countable denote it $B = b_n_n in mathbbN$.



        If $f : A to B$ is injective for all $a in A$ there is a $b_n = a$. Since the map is injective two different elements in $A$ map to different points in $B$, so can you see how to enumerate $A$ now?






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          1












          $begingroup$

          If $B$ is countable denote it $B = b_n_n in mathbbN$.



          If $f : A to B$ is injective for all $a in A$ there is a $b_n = a$. Since the map is injective two different elements in $A$ map to different points in $B$, so can you see how to enumerate $A$ now?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            If $B$ is countable denote it $B = b_n_n in mathbbN$.



            If $f : A to B$ is injective for all $a in A$ there is a $b_n = a$. Since the map is injective two different elements in $A$ map to different points in $B$, so can you see how to enumerate $A$ now?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            If $B$ is countable denote it $B = b_n_n in mathbbN$.



            If $f : A to B$ is injective for all $a in A$ there is a $b_n = a$. Since the map is injective two different elements in $A$ map to different points in $B$, so can you see how to enumerate $A$ now?







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            MariahMariah

            2,1431718




            2,1431718





















                0












                $begingroup$

                Consider this:



                Let $A$ be an arbitrary set, $M$ be a countable set and $f:A to M$ injective.



                It holds that the preimage $f^-1(m_i) in A$ of each $m_i in M$ ($i=1,2,...$) is a single pointed set.



                In other words: each individual element $m_i in M$ has an individual preimage $f^-1(m_i) = a_i subset A$



                Since $M = bigcup_i^nm_i$ was countable, $$f^-1(M) = f^-1left(bigcup_i^nm_iright) = left(bigcup_if^-1m_iright)= bigcup_i=1^na_i = A$$ is countable itself.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  Consider this:



                  Let $A$ be an arbitrary set, $M$ be a countable set and $f:A to M$ injective.



                  It holds that the preimage $f^-1(m_i) in A$ of each $m_i in M$ ($i=1,2,...$) is a single pointed set.



                  In other words: each individual element $m_i in M$ has an individual preimage $f^-1(m_i) = a_i subset A$



                  Since $M = bigcup_i^nm_i$ was countable, $$f^-1(M) = f^-1left(bigcup_i^nm_iright) = left(bigcup_if^-1m_iright)= bigcup_i=1^na_i = A$$ is countable itself.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    Consider this:



                    Let $A$ be an arbitrary set, $M$ be a countable set and $f:A to M$ injective.



                    It holds that the preimage $f^-1(m_i) in A$ of each $m_i in M$ ($i=1,2,...$) is a single pointed set.



                    In other words: each individual element $m_i in M$ has an individual preimage $f^-1(m_i) = a_i subset A$



                    Since $M = bigcup_i^nm_i$ was countable, $$f^-1(M) = f^-1left(bigcup_i^nm_iright) = left(bigcup_if^-1m_iright)= bigcup_i=1^na_i = A$$ is countable itself.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Consider this:



                    Let $A$ be an arbitrary set, $M$ be a countable set and $f:A to M$ injective.



                    It holds that the preimage $f^-1(m_i) in A$ of each $m_i in M$ ($i=1,2,...$) is a single pointed set.



                    In other words: each individual element $m_i in M$ has an individual preimage $f^-1(m_i) = a_i subset A$



                    Since $M = bigcup_i^nm_i$ was countable, $$f^-1(M) = f^-1left(bigcup_i^nm_iright) = left(bigcup_if^-1m_iright)= bigcup_i=1^na_i = A$$ is countable itself.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    ZestZest

                    314213




                    314213





















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Use induction! Well, more conveniently, in well ordering-principle form.



                        Suppose that $f:Ato N'$ is a bijection (basically $N'$ is the range of $A$) where $N'subseteq mathbbN$. Now we consider elements in $N'$. Take the smallest element in $N'$ (which exists by the well-ordering principle), say $x_1$. Then consider the second smallest element (which exists because $N'backslashx_1$ is a set), and call this $x_2$. Repeat with $x_3$, etc. (if we ever run out of elements in $N'$ then we know $A$ is finite which is fine).



                        Now we know that $f:Ato x_i: iinmathbbN$ is a bijection. This is good news, because this is a bijection from $A$ to $mathbbN$ if you think about it carefully. In other words, ordering our set $N'$ from smallest to largest makes it a bijection to $N$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Use induction! Well, more conveniently, in well ordering-principle form.



                          Suppose that $f:Ato N'$ is a bijection (basically $N'$ is the range of $A$) where $N'subseteq mathbbN$. Now we consider elements in $N'$. Take the smallest element in $N'$ (which exists by the well-ordering principle), say $x_1$. Then consider the second smallest element (which exists because $N'backslashx_1$ is a set), and call this $x_2$. Repeat with $x_3$, etc. (if we ever run out of elements in $N'$ then we know $A$ is finite which is fine).



                          Now we know that $f:Ato x_i: iinmathbbN$ is a bijection. This is good news, because this is a bijection from $A$ to $mathbbN$ if you think about it carefully. In other words, ordering our set $N'$ from smallest to largest makes it a bijection to $N$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            Use induction! Well, more conveniently, in well ordering-principle form.



                            Suppose that $f:Ato N'$ is a bijection (basically $N'$ is the range of $A$) where $N'subseteq mathbbN$. Now we consider elements in $N'$. Take the smallest element in $N'$ (which exists by the well-ordering principle), say $x_1$. Then consider the second smallest element (which exists because $N'backslashx_1$ is a set), and call this $x_2$. Repeat with $x_3$, etc. (if we ever run out of elements in $N'$ then we know $A$ is finite which is fine).



                            Now we know that $f:Ato x_i: iinmathbbN$ is a bijection. This is good news, because this is a bijection from $A$ to $mathbbN$ if you think about it carefully. In other words, ordering our set $N'$ from smallest to largest makes it a bijection to $N$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Use induction! Well, more conveniently, in well ordering-principle form.



                            Suppose that $f:Ato N'$ is a bijection (basically $N'$ is the range of $A$) where $N'subseteq mathbbN$. Now we consider elements in $N'$. Take the smallest element in $N'$ (which exists by the well-ordering principle), say $x_1$. Then consider the second smallest element (which exists because $N'backslashx_1$ is a set), and call this $x_2$. Repeat with $x_3$, etc. (if we ever run out of elements in $N'$ then we know $A$ is finite which is fine).



                            Now we know that $f:Ato x_i: iinmathbbN$ is a bijection. This is good news, because this is a bijection from $A$ to $mathbbN$ if you think about it carefully. In other words, ordering our set $N'$ from smallest to largest makes it a bijection to $N$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 2 hours ago









                            WenWen

                            1,712417




                            1,712417




















                                gallileo22 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                gallileo22 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                gallileo22 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                gallileo22 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3230912%2fwhy-does-an-injection-from-a-set-to-a-countable-set-imply-that-set-is-countable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Siegen Nawigatsjuun

                                Log på Navigationsmenu

                                Log på Navigationsmenu