Natural language into sentence logic The Next CEO of Stack OverflowIs an argument in natural language as logically valid as in formal logic?Questions about the relationship between Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations and TractatusWhere Wittgenstein argues that thinking is done in natural language?

I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin

What does this shorthand mean?

What's the point of interval inversion?

How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

Can a caster that cast Polymorph on themselves stop concentrating at any point even if their Int is low?

How easy is it to start Magic from scratch?

Why were Madagascar and New Zealand discovered so late?

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?

Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?

Need some help with wall behind rangetop

What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?

How to make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?

Natural language into sentence logic

India just shot down a satellite from the ground. At what altitude range is the resulting debris field?

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?

What makes a siege story/plot interesting?

Opposite of a diet

How to get regions to plot as graphics

Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?

How do I construct this japanese bowl?



Natural language into sentence logic



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowIs an argument in natural language as logically valid as in formal logic?Questions about the relationship between Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations and TractatusWhere Wittgenstein argues that thinking is done in natural language?










2















Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true



  1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


  2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.










share|improve this question


























    2















    Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



    D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true



    1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


    2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2


      1






      Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



      D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true



      1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


      2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.










      share|improve this question














      Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



      D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true



      1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


      2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.







      natural-language






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      A. DelargeA. Delarge

      563




      563




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:

          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E



          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:

          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            3 hours ago











          • Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

            – cenicero
            1 hour ago











          • @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

            – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "265"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61465%2fnatural-language-into-sentence-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:

          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E



          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:

          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            3 hours ago











          • Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

            – cenicero
            1 hour ago











          • @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

            – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
            1 hour ago















          3














          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:

          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E



          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:

          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            3 hours ago











          • Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

            – cenicero
            1 hour ago











          • @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

            – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
            1 hour ago













          3












          3








          3







          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:

          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E



          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:

          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:

          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E



          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:

          ~F∨~D







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 4 hours ago









          cenicerocenicero

          311




          311




          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.












          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            3 hours ago











          • Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

            – cenicero
            1 hour ago











          • @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

            – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
            1 hour ago

















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            3 hours ago











          • Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

            – cenicero
            1 hour ago











          • @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

            – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
            1 hour ago
















          Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

          – A. Delarge
          3 hours ago





          Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

          – A. Delarge
          3 hours ago













          Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

          – cenicero
          1 hour ago





          Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

          – cenicero
          1 hour ago













          @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

          – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
          1 hour ago





          @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

          – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
          1 hour ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Philosophy Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61465%2fnatural-language-into-sentence-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Log på Navigationsmenu

          Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

          Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse