What would happen if the UK refused to take part in EU Parliamentary elections?How long does it take for a parliamentary government to hold unscheduled elections?If the UK government did not follow through with Brexit what would happen?Phenomenon where politically incorrect candidates do better in actual elections than in polls?What would happen if Donald Trump lost and refused to concede the election?Montana special House election: when will the winner take office?What method can be used to estimate the likelihood of a civil war?Why are the 2019 elections an objection to extending Article 50?Research on short election cycles influencing political choices?Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?What would a revoked Brexit after the 2019 EU parliament elections mean for the European Parliament?

How do you say 头大 in English?

How can we prove that any integral in the set of non-elementary integrals cannot be expressed in the form of elementary functions?

Lay out the Carpet

Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!

Fastening aluminum fascia to wooden subfascia

What's the purpose of "true" in bash "if sudo true; then"

System.debug(JSON.Serialize(o)) Not longer shows full string

Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

Why is "this" different from "this.attribute"?

How does the UK government determine the size of a mandate?

Where is sum(vin) > sum(vout) check in Bitcoin Core?

when is out of tune ok?

Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?

Flag only first row where condition is met in a DataFrame

First index is not integer using foreach loop from 0

How did Doctor Strange see the winning outcome in Avengers: Infinity War?

Integer addition + constant, is it a group?

How does Loki do this?

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

Is it okay for two "sein" to be next to each other

Opposite of a diet



What would happen if the UK refused to take part in EU Parliamentary elections?


How long does it take for a parliamentary government to hold unscheduled elections?If the UK government did not follow through with Brexit what would happen?Phenomenon where politically incorrect candidates do better in actual elections than in polls?What would happen if Donald Trump lost and refused to concede the election?Montana special House election: when will the winner take office?What method can be used to estimate the likelihood of a civil war?Why are the 2019 elections an objection to extending Article 50?Research on short election cycles influencing political choices?Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?What would a revoked Brexit after the 2019 EU parliament elections mean for the European Parliament?













7















I've seen a lot in the news over the past couple of weeks about the UK having to take part in the EU Parliamentary elections, if they still haven't left the EU by 22 May. For example:




BBC Brussel's reporter Adam Fleming says: "The EU are absolutely
insistent that if the UK stays in the EU beyond 22 May then the UK has
to take part in the European Parliament elections.



"They are uncompromising about that."




Why would the UK have to take part? What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

    – SpacePhoenix
    23 hours ago















7















I've seen a lot in the news over the past couple of weeks about the UK having to take part in the EU Parliamentary elections, if they still haven't left the EU by 22 May. For example:




BBC Brussel's reporter Adam Fleming says: "The EU are absolutely
insistent that if the UK stays in the EU beyond 22 May then the UK has
to take part in the European Parliament elections.



"They are uncompromising about that."




Why would the UK have to take part? What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

    – SpacePhoenix
    23 hours ago













7












7








7








I've seen a lot in the news over the past couple of weeks about the UK having to take part in the EU Parliamentary elections, if they still haven't left the EU by 22 May. For example:




BBC Brussel's reporter Adam Fleming says: "The EU are absolutely
insistent that if the UK stays in the EU beyond 22 May then the UK has
to take part in the European Parliament elections.



"They are uncompromising about that."




Why would the UK have to take part? What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I've seen a lot in the news over the past couple of weeks about the UK having to take part in the EU Parliamentary elections, if they still haven't left the EU by 22 May. For example:




BBC Brussel's reporter Adam Fleming says: "The EU are absolutely
insistent that if the UK stays in the EU beyond 22 May then the UK has
to take part in the European Parliament elections.



"They are uncompromising about that."




Why would the UK have to take part? What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?







election european-union brexit






share|improve this question







New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Time4TeaTime4Tea

378311




378311




New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

    – SpacePhoenix
    23 hours ago

















  • The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

    – SpacePhoenix
    23 hours ago
















The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

– SpacePhoenix
23 hours ago





The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

– SpacePhoenix
23 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















16














The EU has powers, granted by the treaties that all member states are party to, to sanction countries that fail to provide their citizens with a fair and free democracy. Refusing to participate in European elections, leaving UK citizens unrepresented and disrupting the operation of the European Parliament, would certainly count.



The matter would be taken up by the European Council, which is made up of member states' heads of state, including the British Prime Minister. Sanctions can include financial penalties, loss of privileges and benefits of membership, and legal action to try to force the issue.



There would also likely be legal action in the UK to force the government to participate, from citizens who were disenfranchised.






share|improve this answer


















  • 6





    "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

    – alephzero
    23 hours ago






  • 10





    @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

    – Cubic
    20 hours ago











  • @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

    – Joshua
    20 hours ago











  • @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

    – JAD
    10 hours ago











  • @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

    – Bilkokuya
    5 hours ago


















8














Why?



Because if the UK is still an EU member by election day, then all UK voters and all EU citizens living in the UK have a right to partipate in the election. Refusing this right to the voters calls the legitimacy of the entire election into question.



Imagine an UK parliamentary election where Scotland refuses to take part.



What would happen?



If the UK are open about not participating, they don't get an extension beyond April 12th. It is not just the UK which must agree to a deal or an extension, the same applies to the EU27.



If the UK promise to hold elections and then renege, that would be a grave breach of trust. Article 7 would probably apply, but enacting that could be a blunt sword against someone who wants to leave anyway.






share|improve this answer























  • There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

    – alephzero
    23 hours ago







  • 19





    @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

    – Abigail
    23 hours ago


















6














The way things currently look, they would most likely just be out of the European Union because they won't get an extension to beyond that point without participating in those elections.



If somehow they managed to stay in the European Union (for example by revoking their invocation of Article 50) and then refuse to participate in the elections, it's mostly just that they will lose a lot of political goodwill from the other members of the European Union. One would expect it is demanded the UK pay for the elections despite not participating. In addition, this will put them in a worse position in other negotiations (such as the Brexit negotiations) and if the member states feel strongly enough, they could impose other sanctions.



Basically, this is a situation that could go from bad to worse so fast that nobody wants to risk seeing how far the other is willing to go, therefore it doesn't happen.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



























    3














    The sticking point here was that the EC feared the UK might revoke article 50 at some point between the EU elections and when the new parliament sits, putting the legitimacy of the parliament in jeopardy. The agreed upon solution is to demand that the UK make up its mind on whether to participate or not in the next EU elections by April 12th, which is when the election period begins in full swing. In practical terms:



    • If these prerequisites of having a deal on the horizon aren't met by April 12th, then a no-deal Brexit occurs and your question is moot.


    • If the UK decides to leave by May 22nd the question is also moot.


    • If the UK decides to stay for longer by April 12th, it means it's committed to organizing EU elections -- and one would hope Article 7 doesn't need to get triggered for not doing so.






    share|improve this answer
































      1















      Why would the UK have to take part?




      There are fears that if the UK remains in the EU but doesn't elect MEPs then any action taken by the European Parliament would be vulnerable to impugnation on the grounds that the Parliament was not legitimately composed.




      What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?




      No-one knows for sure, and no-one wants to find out. That's why the UK has been told that any delay of Brexit beyond the date where it would need to start preparation of the elections is conditional upon that preparation.






      share|improve this answer






















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "475"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Time4Tea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39834%2fwhat-would-happen-if-the-uk-refused-to-take-part-in-eu-parliamentary-elections%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        16














        The EU has powers, granted by the treaties that all member states are party to, to sanction countries that fail to provide their citizens with a fair and free democracy. Refusing to participate in European elections, leaving UK citizens unrepresented and disrupting the operation of the European Parliament, would certainly count.



        The matter would be taken up by the European Council, which is made up of member states' heads of state, including the British Prime Minister. Sanctions can include financial penalties, loss of privileges and benefits of membership, and legal action to try to force the issue.



        There would also likely be legal action in the UK to force the government to participate, from citizens who were disenfranchised.






        share|improve this answer


















        • 6





          "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

          – alephzero
          23 hours ago






        • 10





          @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

          – Cubic
          20 hours ago











        • @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

          – Joshua
          20 hours ago











        • @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

          – JAD
          10 hours ago











        • @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

          – Bilkokuya
          5 hours ago















        16














        The EU has powers, granted by the treaties that all member states are party to, to sanction countries that fail to provide their citizens with a fair and free democracy. Refusing to participate in European elections, leaving UK citizens unrepresented and disrupting the operation of the European Parliament, would certainly count.



        The matter would be taken up by the European Council, which is made up of member states' heads of state, including the British Prime Minister. Sanctions can include financial penalties, loss of privileges and benefits of membership, and legal action to try to force the issue.



        There would also likely be legal action in the UK to force the government to participate, from citizens who were disenfranchised.






        share|improve this answer


















        • 6





          "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

          – alephzero
          23 hours ago






        • 10





          @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

          – Cubic
          20 hours ago











        • @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

          – Joshua
          20 hours ago











        • @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

          – JAD
          10 hours ago











        • @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

          – Bilkokuya
          5 hours ago













        16












        16








        16







        The EU has powers, granted by the treaties that all member states are party to, to sanction countries that fail to provide their citizens with a fair and free democracy. Refusing to participate in European elections, leaving UK citizens unrepresented and disrupting the operation of the European Parliament, would certainly count.



        The matter would be taken up by the European Council, which is made up of member states' heads of state, including the British Prime Minister. Sanctions can include financial penalties, loss of privileges and benefits of membership, and legal action to try to force the issue.



        There would also likely be legal action in the UK to force the government to participate, from citizens who were disenfranchised.






        share|improve this answer













        The EU has powers, granted by the treaties that all member states are party to, to sanction countries that fail to provide their citizens with a fair and free democracy. Refusing to participate in European elections, leaving UK citizens unrepresented and disrupting the operation of the European Parliament, would certainly count.



        The matter would be taken up by the European Council, which is made up of member states' heads of state, including the British Prime Minister. Sanctions can include financial penalties, loss of privileges and benefits of membership, and legal action to try to force the issue.



        There would also likely be legal action in the UK to force the government to participate, from citizens who were disenfranchised.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        useruser

        9,77732140




        9,77732140







        • 6





          "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

          – alephzero
          23 hours ago






        • 10





          @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

          – Cubic
          20 hours ago











        • @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

          – Joshua
          20 hours ago











        • @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

          – JAD
          10 hours ago











        • @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

          – Bilkokuya
          5 hours ago












        • 6





          "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

          – alephzero
          23 hours ago






        • 10





          @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

          – Cubic
          20 hours ago











        • @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

          – Joshua
          20 hours ago











        • @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

          – JAD
          10 hours ago











        • @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

          – Bilkokuya
          5 hours ago







        6




        6





        "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

        – alephzero
        23 hours ago





        "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

        – alephzero
        23 hours ago




        10




        10





        @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

        – Cubic
        20 hours ago





        @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

        – Cubic
        20 hours ago













        @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

        – Joshua
        20 hours ago





        @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

        – Joshua
        20 hours ago













        @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

        – JAD
        10 hours ago





        @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

        – JAD
        10 hours ago













        @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

        – Bilkokuya
        5 hours ago





        @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

        – Bilkokuya
        5 hours ago











        8














        Why?



        Because if the UK is still an EU member by election day, then all UK voters and all EU citizens living in the UK have a right to partipate in the election. Refusing this right to the voters calls the legitimacy of the entire election into question.



        Imagine an UK parliamentary election where Scotland refuses to take part.



        What would happen?



        If the UK are open about not participating, they don't get an extension beyond April 12th. It is not just the UK which must agree to a deal or an extension, the same applies to the EU27.



        If the UK promise to hold elections and then renege, that would be a grave breach of trust. Article 7 would probably apply, but enacting that could be a blunt sword against someone who wants to leave anyway.






        share|improve this answer























        • There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

          – alephzero
          23 hours ago







        • 19





          @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

          – Abigail
          23 hours ago















        8














        Why?



        Because if the UK is still an EU member by election day, then all UK voters and all EU citizens living in the UK have a right to partipate in the election. Refusing this right to the voters calls the legitimacy of the entire election into question.



        Imagine an UK parliamentary election where Scotland refuses to take part.



        What would happen?



        If the UK are open about not participating, they don't get an extension beyond April 12th. It is not just the UK which must agree to a deal or an extension, the same applies to the EU27.



        If the UK promise to hold elections and then renege, that would be a grave breach of trust. Article 7 would probably apply, but enacting that could be a blunt sword against someone who wants to leave anyway.






        share|improve this answer























        • There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

          – alephzero
          23 hours ago







        • 19





          @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

          – Abigail
          23 hours ago













        8












        8








        8







        Why?



        Because if the UK is still an EU member by election day, then all UK voters and all EU citizens living in the UK have a right to partipate in the election. Refusing this right to the voters calls the legitimacy of the entire election into question.



        Imagine an UK parliamentary election where Scotland refuses to take part.



        What would happen?



        If the UK are open about not participating, they don't get an extension beyond April 12th. It is not just the UK which must agree to a deal or an extension, the same applies to the EU27.



        If the UK promise to hold elections and then renege, that would be a grave breach of trust. Article 7 would probably apply, but enacting that could be a blunt sword against someone who wants to leave anyway.






        share|improve this answer













        Why?



        Because if the UK is still an EU member by election day, then all UK voters and all EU citizens living in the UK have a right to partipate in the election. Refusing this right to the voters calls the legitimacy of the entire election into question.



        Imagine an UK parliamentary election where Scotland refuses to take part.



        What would happen?



        If the UK are open about not participating, they don't get an extension beyond April 12th. It is not just the UK which must agree to a deal or an extension, the same applies to the EU27.



        If the UK promise to hold elections and then renege, that would be a grave breach of trust. Article 7 would probably apply, but enacting that could be a blunt sword against someone who wants to leave anyway.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        o.m.o.m.

        10.3k11943




        10.3k11943












        • There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

          – alephzero
          23 hours ago







        • 19





          @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

          – Abigail
          23 hours ago

















        • There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

          – alephzero
          23 hours ago







        • 19





          @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

          – Abigail
          23 hours ago
















        There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

        – alephzero
        23 hours ago






        There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

        – alephzero
        23 hours ago





        19




        19





        @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

        – Abigail
        23 hours ago





        @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

        – Abigail
        23 hours ago











        6














        The way things currently look, they would most likely just be out of the European Union because they won't get an extension to beyond that point without participating in those elections.



        If somehow they managed to stay in the European Union (for example by revoking their invocation of Article 50) and then refuse to participate in the elections, it's mostly just that they will lose a lot of political goodwill from the other members of the European Union. One would expect it is demanded the UK pay for the elections despite not participating. In addition, this will put them in a worse position in other negotiations (such as the Brexit negotiations) and if the member states feel strongly enough, they could impose other sanctions.



        Basically, this is a situation that could go from bad to worse so fast that nobody wants to risk seeing how far the other is willing to go, therefore it doesn't happen.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.
























          6














          The way things currently look, they would most likely just be out of the European Union because they won't get an extension to beyond that point without participating in those elections.



          If somehow they managed to stay in the European Union (for example by revoking their invocation of Article 50) and then refuse to participate in the elections, it's mostly just that they will lose a lot of political goodwill from the other members of the European Union. One would expect it is demanded the UK pay for the elections despite not participating. In addition, this will put them in a worse position in other negotiations (such as the Brexit negotiations) and if the member states feel strongly enough, they could impose other sanctions.



          Basically, this is a situation that could go from bad to worse so fast that nobody wants to risk seeing how far the other is willing to go, therefore it doesn't happen.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            6












            6








            6







            The way things currently look, they would most likely just be out of the European Union because they won't get an extension to beyond that point without participating in those elections.



            If somehow they managed to stay in the European Union (for example by revoking their invocation of Article 50) and then refuse to participate in the elections, it's mostly just that they will lose a lot of political goodwill from the other members of the European Union. One would expect it is demanded the UK pay for the elections despite not participating. In addition, this will put them in a worse position in other negotiations (such as the Brexit negotiations) and if the member states feel strongly enough, they could impose other sanctions.



            Basically, this is a situation that could go from bad to worse so fast that nobody wants to risk seeing how far the other is willing to go, therefore it doesn't happen.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.










            The way things currently look, they would most likely just be out of the European Union because they won't get an extension to beyond that point without participating in those elections.



            If somehow they managed to stay in the European Union (for example by revoking their invocation of Article 50) and then refuse to participate in the elections, it's mostly just that they will lose a lot of political goodwill from the other members of the European Union. One would expect it is demanded the UK pay for the elections despite not participating. In addition, this will put them in a worse position in other negotiations (such as the Brexit negotiations) and if the member states feel strongly enough, they could impose other sanctions.



            Basically, this is a situation that could go from bad to worse so fast that nobody wants to risk seeing how far the other is willing to go, therefore it doesn't happen.







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 19 hours ago





















            New contributor




            Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered yesterday









            JasperJasper

            1733




            1733




            New contributor




            Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                3














                The sticking point here was that the EC feared the UK might revoke article 50 at some point between the EU elections and when the new parliament sits, putting the legitimacy of the parliament in jeopardy. The agreed upon solution is to demand that the UK make up its mind on whether to participate or not in the next EU elections by April 12th, which is when the election period begins in full swing. In practical terms:



                • If these prerequisites of having a deal on the horizon aren't met by April 12th, then a no-deal Brexit occurs and your question is moot.


                • If the UK decides to leave by May 22nd the question is also moot.


                • If the UK decides to stay for longer by April 12th, it means it's committed to organizing EU elections -- and one would hope Article 7 doesn't need to get triggered for not doing so.






                share|improve this answer





























                  3














                  The sticking point here was that the EC feared the UK might revoke article 50 at some point between the EU elections and when the new parliament sits, putting the legitimacy of the parliament in jeopardy. The agreed upon solution is to demand that the UK make up its mind on whether to participate or not in the next EU elections by April 12th, which is when the election period begins in full swing. In practical terms:



                  • If these prerequisites of having a deal on the horizon aren't met by April 12th, then a no-deal Brexit occurs and your question is moot.


                  • If the UK decides to leave by May 22nd the question is also moot.


                  • If the UK decides to stay for longer by April 12th, it means it's committed to organizing EU elections -- and one would hope Article 7 doesn't need to get triggered for not doing so.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    3












                    3








                    3







                    The sticking point here was that the EC feared the UK might revoke article 50 at some point between the EU elections and when the new parliament sits, putting the legitimacy of the parliament in jeopardy. The agreed upon solution is to demand that the UK make up its mind on whether to participate or not in the next EU elections by April 12th, which is when the election period begins in full swing. In practical terms:



                    • If these prerequisites of having a deal on the horizon aren't met by April 12th, then a no-deal Brexit occurs and your question is moot.


                    • If the UK decides to leave by May 22nd the question is also moot.


                    • If the UK decides to stay for longer by April 12th, it means it's committed to organizing EU elections -- and one would hope Article 7 doesn't need to get triggered for not doing so.






                    share|improve this answer















                    The sticking point here was that the EC feared the UK might revoke article 50 at some point between the EU elections and when the new parliament sits, putting the legitimacy of the parliament in jeopardy. The agreed upon solution is to demand that the UK make up its mind on whether to participate or not in the next EU elections by April 12th, which is when the election period begins in full swing. In practical terms:



                    • If these prerequisites of having a deal on the horizon aren't met by April 12th, then a no-deal Brexit occurs and your question is moot.


                    • If the UK decides to leave by May 22nd the question is also moot.


                    • If the UK decides to stay for longer by April 12th, it means it's committed to organizing EU elections -- and one would hope Article 7 doesn't need to get triggered for not doing so.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 21 hours ago

























                    answered 23 hours ago









                    Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

                    13.5k33756




                    13.5k33756





















                        1















                        Why would the UK have to take part?




                        There are fears that if the UK remains in the EU but doesn't elect MEPs then any action taken by the European Parliament would be vulnerable to impugnation on the grounds that the Parliament was not legitimately composed.




                        What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?




                        No-one knows for sure, and no-one wants to find out. That's why the UK has been told that any delay of Brexit beyond the date where it would need to start preparation of the elections is conditional upon that preparation.






                        share|improve this answer



























                          1















                          Why would the UK have to take part?




                          There are fears that if the UK remains in the EU but doesn't elect MEPs then any action taken by the European Parliament would be vulnerable to impugnation on the grounds that the Parliament was not legitimately composed.




                          What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?




                          No-one knows for sure, and no-one wants to find out. That's why the UK has been told that any delay of Brexit beyond the date where it would need to start preparation of the elections is conditional upon that preparation.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            1












                            1








                            1








                            Why would the UK have to take part?




                            There are fears that if the UK remains in the EU but doesn't elect MEPs then any action taken by the European Parliament would be vulnerable to impugnation on the grounds that the Parliament was not legitimately composed.




                            What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?




                            No-one knows for sure, and no-one wants to find out. That's why the UK has been told that any delay of Brexit beyond the date where it would need to start preparation of the elections is conditional upon that preparation.






                            share|improve this answer














                            Why would the UK have to take part?




                            There are fears that if the UK remains in the EU but doesn't elect MEPs then any action taken by the European Parliament would be vulnerable to impugnation on the grounds that the Parliament was not legitimately composed.




                            What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?




                            No-one knows for sure, and no-one wants to find out. That's why the UK has been told that any delay of Brexit beyond the date where it would need to start preparation of the elections is conditional upon that preparation.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 4 hours ago









                            Peter TaylorPeter Taylor

                            2,343817




                            2,343817




















                                Time4Tea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Time4Tea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Time4Tea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Time4Tea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39834%2fwhat-would-happen-if-the-uk-refused-to-take-part-in-eu-parliamentary-elections%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Siegen Nawigatsjuun

                                Log på Navigationsmenu

                                Log på Navigationsmenu