Have there been any examples of re-usable rockets in the past?Why won't the SLS boosters be recovered?Do any realistic rocket systems use different substances for propellant and fuel?How many 1st stage boosters will SpaceX settle for, for its LEO/GTO fleet?Is the Paramagnetism of Liquid Oxygen Ever Considered in Engine or Tank Design?How do rocket propellant combinations rank in terms of “brightness”?How can phenolic (resin?) handle rocket engine nozzle temperatures?Why didn't the space shuttle use non-foam-shedding external tanks?How far have autophage rockets been developed?Have there been any other cheap, modular launcher designs like the OTRAG?Heat Shielding Material for Reusable CraftIs the BFB/super heavy likely to have an easier time landing than the Falcon 9 booster?
Why is the A380’s with-reversers stopping distance the same as its no-reversers stopping distance?
Why is the marginal distribution/marginal probability described as "marginal"?
How does the Heat Metal spell interact with a follow-up Frostbite spell?
Enqueue Queueable class multiple times
Does a non-singular matrix have a large minor with disjoint rows and columns and full rank?
Was the dragon prowess intentionally downplayed in S08E04?
Find the area of the rectangle
AD: OU for system administrator accounts
Roman Numerals Equation 2
Why did the soldiers of the North disobey Jon?
Usage of the relative pronoun "dont"
When the match time is called, does the current turn end immediately?
What would a Dragon have to exhale to cause rain?
How come Arya Stark didn't burn in Game of Thrones Season 8 Episode 5
Why would company (decision makers) wait for someone to retire, rather than lay them off, when their role is no longer needed?
Why is vowel phonology represented in a trapezoid instead of a square?
Resistor Selection to retain same brightness in LED PWM circuit
A person lacking money who shows off a lot
Why would you put your input amplifier in front of your filtering for and ECG signal?
refer string as a field API name
Can a person still be an Orthodox Jew and believe that the Torah contains narratives that are not scientifically correct?
Why is so much ransomware breakable?
Cycling to work - 30mile return
How can I make dummy text (like lipsum) grey?
Have there been any examples of re-usable rockets in the past?
Why won't the SLS boosters be recovered?Do any realistic rocket systems use different substances for propellant and fuel?How many 1st stage boosters will SpaceX settle for, for its LEO/GTO fleet?Is the Paramagnetism of Liquid Oxygen Ever Considered in Engine or Tank Design?How do rocket propellant combinations rank in terms of “brightness”?How can phenolic (resin?) handle rocket engine nozzle temperatures?Why didn't the space shuttle use non-foam-shedding external tanks?How far have autophage rockets been developed?Have there been any other cheap, modular launcher designs like the OTRAG?Heat Shielding Material for Reusable CraftIs the BFB/super heavy likely to have an easier time landing than the Falcon 9 booster?
$begingroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
New contributor
Roger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
New contributor
Roger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
New contributor
Roger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
rockets space-shuttle reuse
New contributor
Roger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Roger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 5 hours ago
Russell Borogove
92k3308393
92k3308393
New contributor
Roger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
RogerRoger
1405
1405
New contributor
Roger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Roger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$

The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.

$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
2 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Roger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36171%2fhave-there-been-any-examples-of-re-usable-rockets-in-the-past%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$

The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.

$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
2 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$

The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.

$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
2 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$

The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.

$endgroup$

The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.

edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
geoffcgeoffc
56.9k10165318
56.9k10165318
1
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
2 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
2 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
2 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
$endgroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92k3308393
92k3308393
add a comment |
add a comment |
Roger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Roger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Roger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Roger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36171%2fhave-there-been-any-examples-of-re-usable-rockets-in-the-past%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago