LiOH hydrolysis of methyl 2,2-dimethoxyacetate not giving product?Hydrolysis of cyclic acetalSynthesizing 2-methyl-2-butanolWhy is the molecular peak not observed in the mass spectrum of 2,2-dimethylbutane?What is the major hydrolysis product of 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl 2-acetamido-3-phenylprop-2-enoate?Hydrolysis of an esterWhy 2,2-dimethylpropane is not called isopentane?Which mechanism is not seen during hydrolysis of esters?What happens to the methanol formed by the hydrolysis of methyl 2-hydroxybenzoate (oil of wintergreen) when synthesising salicylic acid?Inductive vs conjugation effects in ester hydrolysisPreference for basic conditions in ester hydrolysis
How to get the decimal part of a number in apex
How to make a kid's bike easier to pedal
What chord could the notes 'F A♭ E♭' form?
While drilling into kitchen wall, hit a wire - any advice?
And now you see it
How is it believable that Euron could so easily pull off this ambush?
In a series of books, what happens after the coming of age?
Which "exotic salt" can lower water's freezing point by 70 °C?
How can I test a shell script in a "safe environment" to avoid harm to my computer?
Bash prompt takes only the first word of a hostname before the dot
Select list elements based on other list
All of my Firefox add-ons have been disabled suddenly, how can I re-enable them?
Musical Shape on music stand
Picking a theme as a discovery writer
Displaying an Estimated Execution Plan generates CXPACKET, PAGELATCH_SH, and LATCH_EX [ACCESS_METHODS_DATASET_PARENT] waits
GitLab account hacked and repo wiped
Scaling rounded rectangles in Illustrator
Why did Gendry call himself Gendry Rivers?
Justification of physical currency in an interstellar civilization?
Why is the blank symbol not considered part of the input alphabet of a Turing machine?
How can I finally understand the confusing modal verb "мочь"?
What detail can Hubble see on Mars?
Why doesn't a particle exert force on itself?
Crime rates in a post-scarcity economy
LiOH hydrolysis of methyl 2,2-dimethoxyacetate not giving product?
Hydrolysis of cyclic acetalSynthesizing 2-methyl-2-butanolWhy is the molecular peak not observed in the mass spectrum of 2,2-dimethylbutane?What is the major hydrolysis product of 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl 2-acetamido-3-phenylprop-2-enoate?Hydrolysis of an esterWhy 2,2-dimethylpropane is not called isopentane?Which mechanism is not seen during hydrolysis of esters?What happens to the methanol formed by the hydrolysis of methyl 2-hydroxybenzoate (oil of wintergreen) when synthesising salicylic acid?Inductive vs conjugation effects in ester hydrolysisPreference for basic conditions in ester hydrolysis
$begingroup$
I am forming 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid from its methyl ester, and below is the experimental protocol I am following (from Tetrahedron 2016, 72 (3), 420–430):
2,2-Dimethoxy Acetic Acid Formation
- Add lithium hydroxide monohydrate ($pu89.5 mmol$, $pu3.75 g$, $pu1.2 equiv$) to a solution of methyl dimethoxyacetate ($pu74.6 mmol$, $pu10 g$, $pu1 equiv$) in dioxane ($pu45 mL$) and water ($pu45 mL$) at $pu0 ^circC$.
- Stir the mixture for $pu1 h$ at $pu0 ^circC$ and one additional hour at room temperature.
- Add sodium hydroxide ($pu1M$ aq soln, $pu75 mL$) to the mixture.
- Extract the mixture with diethyl ether ($pu375 mL$).
- Acidify the recovered aqueous layer with hydrogen chloride ($pu6N$ aq soln) until a pH of 1-2.
- Extract the organics with diethyl ether ($pu375 mL$).
- Dry the combined organic layers with magnesium sulfate and filter.
- Evaporate the solvent slowly under reduced pressure to obtain 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid.
I repeated this reaction many times but every time I check the $mathrm^13C$-NMR, I only see a single peak at $delta : pu67.12 ppm$. I believe this corresponds to C-OMe. By theory (and by literature) I should see 3 peaks.
$mathrm^1H$-NMR does show 6:1 ratio of singlets at $delta : pu3.704 ppm$ (6H) and $delta : pu3.458 ppm$ (1H) but it is not well aligned with literature; By theory, a single hydrogen atom adjacent to $ceC=O$ group should be more deshielded than $delta : pu3.458 ppm$ (i.e. be placed at higher ppm). I thought through what I have done and I still can't figure out which step has gone wrong. Any thoughts and ideas? Would appreciate any advice.
organic-chemistry experimental-chemistry carbonyl-compounds
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I am forming 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid from its methyl ester, and below is the experimental protocol I am following (from Tetrahedron 2016, 72 (3), 420–430):
2,2-Dimethoxy Acetic Acid Formation
- Add lithium hydroxide monohydrate ($pu89.5 mmol$, $pu3.75 g$, $pu1.2 equiv$) to a solution of methyl dimethoxyacetate ($pu74.6 mmol$, $pu10 g$, $pu1 equiv$) in dioxane ($pu45 mL$) and water ($pu45 mL$) at $pu0 ^circC$.
- Stir the mixture for $pu1 h$ at $pu0 ^circC$ and one additional hour at room temperature.
- Add sodium hydroxide ($pu1M$ aq soln, $pu75 mL$) to the mixture.
- Extract the mixture with diethyl ether ($pu375 mL$).
- Acidify the recovered aqueous layer with hydrogen chloride ($pu6N$ aq soln) until a pH of 1-2.
- Extract the organics with diethyl ether ($pu375 mL$).
- Dry the combined organic layers with magnesium sulfate and filter.
- Evaporate the solvent slowly under reduced pressure to obtain 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid.
I repeated this reaction many times but every time I check the $mathrm^13C$-NMR, I only see a single peak at $delta : pu67.12 ppm$. I believe this corresponds to C-OMe. By theory (and by literature) I should see 3 peaks.
$mathrm^1H$-NMR does show 6:1 ratio of singlets at $delta : pu3.704 ppm$ (6H) and $delta : pu3.458 ppm$ (1H) but it is not well aligned with literature; By theory, a single hydrogen atom adjacent to $ceC=O$ group should be more deshielded than $delta : pu3.458 ppm$ (i.e. be placed at higher ppm). I thought through what I have done and I still can't figure out which step has gone wrong. Any thoughts and ideas? Would appreciate any advice.
organic-chemistry experimental-chemistry carbonyl-compounds
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
What weight of material do you get after concentrating the ether extract? I can't access the paper but I see it comes from a reputable group. Are you required to reproduce this procedure exactly or can you change it?
$endgroup$
– Waylander
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ Waylander: OP has followed exactly what experimental section given in the paper. Only change is the volume of ether extracts. Paper recorded 99% yield of colorless liquid as a product: $mathrm^1H$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 3.44 (s, 6H), 4.85 (s, 1H), and 10.32 (broad s, 1H). $mathrm^13C$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
$endgroup$
– Mathew Mahindaratne
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I assume you have mixed up your ether extracts and had an NMR made of the cleaved methanol. A single peak in 13C !?!
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
The step that draws my suspicion is the acidification with 6N HCl to pH 1-2. It would be easy to add a bit too much acid, leave the mixture too long, or let it get a bit too warm and hydrolyse the dimethyl acetal. The resulting glyoxalic acid, if formed, would not easily extract from aqueous.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok, the CS doesn't fit, and of course also the 1H spectrum you report.
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I am forming 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid from its methyl ester, and below is the experimental protocol I am following (from Tetrahedron 2016, 72 (3), 420–430):
2,2-Dimethoxy Acetic Acid Formation
- Add lithium hydroxide monohydrate ($pu89.5 mmol$, $pu3.75 g$, $pu1.2 equiv$) to a solution of methyl dimethoxyacetate ($pu74.6 mmol$, $pu10 g$, $pu1 equiv$) in dioxane ($pu45 mL$) and water ($pu45 mL$) at $pu0 ^circC$.
- Stir the mixture for $pu1 h$ at $pu0 ^circC$ and one additional hour at room temperature.
- Add sodium hydroxide ($pu1M$ aq soln, $pu75 mL$) to the mixture.
- Extract the mixture with diethyl ether ($pu375 mL$).
- Acidify the recovered aqueous layer with hydrogen chloride ($pu6N$ aq soln) until a pH of 1-2.
- Extract the organics with diethyl ether ($pu375 mL$).
- Dry the combined organic layers with magnesium sulfate and filter.
- Evaporate the solvent slowly under reduced pressure to obtain 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid.
I repeated this reaction many times but every time I check the $mathrm^13C$-NMR, I only see a single peak at $delta : pu67.12 ppm$. I believe this corresponds to C-OMe. By theory (and by literature) I should see 3 peaks.
$mathrm^1H$-NMR does show 6:1 ratio of singlets at $delta : pu3.704 ppm$ (6H) and $delta : pu3.458 ppm$ (1H) but it is not well aligned with literature; By theory, a single hydrogen atom adjacent to $ceC=O$ group should be more deshielded than $delta : pu3.458 ppm$ (i.e. be placed at higher ppm). I thought through what I have done and I still can't figure out which step has gone wrong. Any thoughts and ideas? Would appreciate any advice.
organic-chemistry experimental-chemistry carbonyl-compounds
$endgroup$
I am forming 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid from its methyl ester, and below is the experimental protocol I am following (from Tetrahedron 2016, 72 (3), 420–430):
2,2-Dimethoxy Acetic Acid Formation
- Add lithium hydroxide monohydrate ($pu89.5 mmol$, $pu3.75 g$, $pu1.2 equiv$) to a solution of methyl dimethoxyacetate ($pu74.6 mmol$, $pu10 g$, $pu1 equiv$) in dioxane ($pu45 mL$) and water ($pu45 mL$) at $pu0 ^circC$.
- Stir the mixture for $pu1 h$ at $pu0 ^circC$ and one additional hour at room temperature.
- Add sodium hydroxide ($pu1M$ aq soln, $pu75 mL$) to the mixture.
- Extract the mixture with diethyl ether ($pu375 mL$).
- Acidify the recovered aqueous layer with hydrogen chloride ($pu6N$ aq soln) until a pH of 1-2.
- Extract the organics with diethyl ether ($pu375 mL$).
- Dry the combined organic layers with magnesium sulfate and filter.
- Evaporate the solvent slowly under reduced pressure to obtain 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid.
I repeated this reaction many times but every time I check the $mathrm^13C$-NMR, I only see a single peak at $delta : pu67.12 ppm$. I believe this corresponds to C-OMe. By theory (and by literature) I should see 3 peaks.
$mathrm^1H$-NMR does show 6:1 ratio of singlets at $delta : pu3.704 ppm$ (6H) and $delta : pu3.458 ppm$ (1H) but it is not well aligned with literature; By theory, a single hydrogen atom adjacent to $ceC=O$ group should be more deshielded than $delta : pu3.458 ppm$ (i.e. be placed at higher ppm). I thought through what I have done and I still can't figure out which step has gone wrong. Any thoughts and ideas? Would appreciate any advice.
organic-chemistry experimental-chemistry carbonyl-compounds
organic-chemistry experimental-chemistry carbonyl-compounds
edited 5 hours ago
Mathew Mahindaratne
7,049929
7,049929
asked 8 hours ago
chemresechemrese
515
515
2
$begingroup$
What weight of material do you get after concentrating the ether extract? I can't access the paper but I see it comes from a reputable group. Are you required to reproduce this procedure exactly or can you change it?
$endgroup$
– Waylander
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ Waylander: OP has followed exactly what experimental section given in the paper. Only change is the volume of ether extracts. Paper recorded 99% yield of colorless liquid as a product: $mathrm^1H$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 3.44 (s, 6H), 4.85 (s, 1H), and 10.32 (broad s, 1H). $mathrm^13C$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
$endgroup$
– Mathew Mahindaratne
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I assume you have mixed up your ether extracts and had an NMR made of the cleaved methanol. A single peak in 13C !?!
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
The step that draws my suspicion is the acidification with 6N HCl to pH 1-2. It would be easy to add a bit too much acid, leave the mixture too long, or let it get a bit too warm and hydrolyse the dimethyl acetal. The resulting glyoxalic acid, if formed, would not easily extract from aqueous.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok, the CS doesn't fit, and of course also the 1H spectrum you report.
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
2
$begingroup$
What weight of material do you get after concentrating the ether extract? I can't access the paper but I see it comes from a reputable group. Are you required to reproduce this procedure exactly or can you change it?
$endgroup$
– Waylander
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ Waylander: OP has followed exactly what experimental section given in the paper. Only change is the volume of ether extracts. Paper recorded 99% yield of colorless liquid as a product: $mathrm^1H$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 3.44 (s, 6H), 4.85 (s, 1H), and 10.32 (broad s, 1H). $mathrm^13C$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
$endgroup$
– Mathew Mahindaratne
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I assume you have mixed up your ether extracts and had an NMR made of the cleaved methanol. A single peak in 13C !?!
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
The step that draws my suspicion is the acidification with 6N HCl to pH 1-2. It would be easy to add a bit too much acid, leave the mixture too long, or let it get a bit too warm and hydrolyse the dimethyl acetal. The resulting glyoxalic acid, if formed, would not easily extract from aqueous.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok, the CS doesn't fit, and of course also the 1H spectrum you report.
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
What weight of material do you get after concentrating the ether extract? I can't access the paper but I see it comes from a reputable group. Are you required to reproduce this procedure exactly or can you change it?
$endgroup$
– Waylander
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
What weight of material do you get after concentrating the ether extract? I can't access the paper but I see it comes from a reputable group. Are you required to reproduce this procedure exactly or can you change it?
$endgroup$
– Waylander
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ Waylander: OP has followed exactly what experimental section given in the paper. Only change is the volume of ether extracts. Paper recorded 99% yield of colorless liquid as a product: $mathrm^1H$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 3.44 (s, 6H), 4.85 (s, 1H), and 10.32 (broad s, 1H). $mathrm^13C$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
$endgroup$
– Mathew Mahindaratne
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ Waylander: OP has followed exactly what experimental section given in the paper. Only change is the volume of ether extracts. Paper recorded 99% yield of colorless liquid as a product: $mathrm^1H$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 3.44 (s, 6H), 4.85 (s, 1H), and 10.32 (broad s, 1H). $mathrm^13C$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
$endgroup$
– Mathew Mahindaratne
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I assume you have mixed up your ether extracts and had an NMR made of the cleaved methanol. A single peak in 13C !?!
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I assume you have mixed up your ether extracts and had an NMR made of the cleaved methanol. A single peak in 13C !?!
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
The step that draws my suspicion is the acidification with 6N HCl to pH 1-2. It would be easy to add a bit too much acid, leave the mixture too long, or let it get a bit too warm and hydrolyse the dimethyl acetal. The resulting glyoxalic acid, if formed, would not easily extract from aqueous.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
The step that draws my suspicion is the acidification with 6N HCl to pH 1-2. It would be easy to add a bit too much acid, leave the mixture too long, or let it get a bit too warm and hydrolyse the dimethyl acetal. The resulting glyoxalic acid, if formed, would not easily extract from aqueous.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok, the CS doesn't fit, and of course also the 1H spectrum you report.
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok, the CS doesn't fit, and of course also the 1H spectrum you report.
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If your reaction has worked and you get the expected product, you should see following NMR data as the sought literature reported:
$mathrm^1H$-NMR: $delta$ 3.44 (s, $ce6H$), 4.85 (s, $ce1H$), and 10.32 (broad s, $ce1H$).
$mathrm^13C$-NMR: $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
Instead, you got two peaks, $delta$ 3.704 (s, $ce6H$) and $delta$ 3.458 (s, $ce1H$), in your $mathrm^1H$-NMR. And, you got only one peak at $delta$ 67.12 in your $mathrm^13C$-NMR. All this data telling me is your reaction has not worked as expected. What you have is 1,4-dioxane during the ether extract, $mathrm^1H$-NMR of which gives only a singlet at $delta$ 3.71 when $ceCDCl3$ is the solvent. It also gives one peak at $delta$ 67.14 in $mathrm^13C$-NMR under same solvent (Ref.1).
I believe your compound may still be in the aqueous phase. You may need to saturate the aqueous phase with salt ($ceNaCl$) before extract the product to organic phase. Note that acetic acid is very soluble in water. Therefore, I expect 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid to be highly soluble in water as well (a $ceC4(H2O)4$ compound like a monosaccharide).
References:
- H. E. Gottlieb, V. Kotlyar, A. Nudelman, “NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities,” J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62(21), 7512–7515 (DOI: 10.1021/jo971176v).
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And maybe not add the NaOH soln. I don't see why that was done, you're just increasing the volume of the aq phase.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Dioxane, of course! And a spot of water, which probably comes from the CDCl3 bottle.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Waylander It lowers the dioxane content in the aqueous phase, helping to get a better phase separation for the extraction of methanol and residual ester.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not working is it
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer from @Mathew Mahindaratne in my opinion correctly identifies what the OP has isolated. It remains to suggest how to get the required product. It may be a matter of salting out the aq phase, but there are other possibilities. Some observers may feel that given a literature prep from a respected group there is no need to alter it, however the OP has not been able to replicate it. Accordingly I offer this procedure.
Dissolve the methyl dimethoxy acetate in a mixture of 9:1 THF/water at rt. Add 1.1eq of LiOH monohydrate. Leave to stir at rt overnight. Concentrate under reduced pressure. Dissolve the residue in a minimum amount of water, cool in ice bath. Wash with Et2O. Acidify using a slight excess of 2N HCl (pH really doesn't need to go below 3.0 as pKa of product is probably around 3.7). Extract x3 with Et2O. Dry the combined organic extract, filter and concentrate. This should minimise any change of hydrolysing the acetal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114923%2flioh-hydrolysis-of-methyl-2-2-dimethoxyacetate-not-giving-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If your reaction has worked and you get the expected product, you should see following NMR data as the sought literature reported:
$mathrm^1H$-NMR: $delta$ 3.44 (s, $ce6H$), 4.85 (s, $ce1H$), and 10.32 (broad s, $ce1H$).
$mathrm^13C$-NMR: $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
Instead, you got two peaks, $delta$ 3.704 (s, $ce6H$) and $delta$ 3.458 (s, $ce1H$), in your $mathrm^1H$-NMR. And, you got only one peak at $delta$ 67.12 in your $mathrm^13C$-NMR. All this data telling me is your reaction has not worked as expected. What you have is 1,4-dioxane during the ether extract, $mathrm^1H$-NMR of which gives only a singlet at $delta$ 3.71 when $ceCDCl3$ is the solvent. It also gives one peak at $delta$ 67.14 in $mathrm^13C$-NMR under same solvent (Ref.1).
I believe your compound may still be in the aqueous phase. You may need to saturate the aqueous phase with salt ($ceNaCl$) before extract the product to organic phase. Note that acetic acid is very soluble in water. Therefore, I expect 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid to be highly soluble in water as well (a $ceC4(H2O)4$ compound like a monosaccharide).
References:
- H. E. Gottlieb, V. Kotlyar, A. Nudelman, “NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities,” J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62(21), 7512–7515 (DOI: 10.1021/jo971176v).
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And maybe not add the NaOH soln. I don't see why that was done, you're just increasing the volume of the aq phase.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Dioxane, of course! And a spot of water, which probably comes from the CDCl3 bottle.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Waylander It lowers the dioxane content in the aqueous phase, helping to get a better phase separation for the extraction of methanol and residual ester.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not working is it
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your reaction has worked and you get the expected product, you should see following NMR data as the sought literature reported:
$mathrm^1H$-NMR: $delta$ 3.44 (s, $ce6H$), 4.85 (s, $ce1H$), and 10.32 (broad s, $ce1H$).
$mathrm^13C$-NMR: $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
Instead, you got two peaks, $delta$ 3.704 (s, $ce6H$) and $delta$ 3.458 (s, $ce1H$), in your $mathrm^1H$-NMR. And, you got only one peak at $delta$ 67.12 in your $mathrm^13C$-NMR. All this data telling me is your reaction has not worked as expected. What you have is 1,4-dioxane during the ether extract, $mathrm^1H$-NMR of which gives only a singlet at $delta$ 3.71 when $ceCDCl3$ is the solvent. It also gives one peak at $delta$ 67.14 in $mathrm^13C$-NMR under same solvent (Ref.1).
I believe your compound may still be in the aqueous phase. You may need to saturate the aqueous phase with salt ($ceNaCl$) before extract the product to organic phase. Note that acetic acid is very soluble in water. Therefore, I expect 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid to be highly soluble in water as well (a $ceC4(H2O)4$ compound like a monosaccharide).
References:
- H. E. Gottlieb, V. Kotlyar, A. Nudelman, “NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities,” J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62(21), 7512–7515 (DOI: 10.1021/jo971176v).
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And maybe not add the NaOH soln. I don't see why that was done, you're just increasing the volume of the aq phase.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Dioxane, of course! And a spot of water, which probably comes from the CDCl3 bottle.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Waylander It lowers the dioxane content in the aqueous phase, helping to get a better phase separation for the extraction of methanol and residual ester.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not working is it
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your reaction has worked and you get the expected product, you should see following NMR data as the sought literature reported:
$mathrm^1H$-NMR: $delta$ 3.44 (s, $ce6H$), 4.85 (s, $ce1H$), and 10.32 (broad s, $ce1H$).
$mathrm^13C$-NMR: $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
Instead, you got two peaks, $delta$ 3.704 (s, $ce6H$) and $delta$ 3.458 (s, $ce1H$), in your $mathrm^1H$-NMR. And, you got only one peak at $delta$ 67.12 in your $mathrm^13C$-NMR. All this data telling me is your reaction has not worked as expected. What you have is 1,4-dioxane during the ether extract, $mathrm^1H$-NMR of which gives only a singlet at $delta$ 3.71 when $ceCDCl3$ is the solvent. It also gives one peak at $delta$ 67.14 in $mathrm^13C$-NMR under same solvent (Ref.1).
I believe your compound may still be in the aqueous phase. You may need to saturate the aqueous phase with salt ($ceNaCl$) before extract the product to organic phase. Note that acetic acid is very soluble in water. Therefore, I expect 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid to be highly soluble in water as well (a $ceC4(H2O)4$ compound like a monosaccharide).
References:
- H. E. Gottlieb, V. Kotlyar, A. Nudelman, “NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities,” J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62(21), 7512–7515 (DOI: 10.1021/jo971176v).
$endgroup$
If your reaction has worked and you get the expected product, you should see following NMR data as the sought literature reported:
$mathrm^1H$-NMR: $delta$ 3.44 (s, $ce6H$), 4.85 (s, $ce1H$), and 10.32 (broad s, $ce1H$).
$mathrm^13C$-NMR: $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
Instead, you got two peaks, $delta$ 3.704 (s, $ce6H$) and $delta$ 3.458 (s, $ce1H$), in your $mathrm^1H$-NMR. And, you got only one peak at $delta$ 67.12 in your $mathrm^13C$-NMR. All this data telling me is your reaction has not worked as expected. What you have is 1,4-dioxane during the ether extract, $mathrm^1H$-NMR of which gives only a singlet at $delta$ 3.71 when $ceCDCl3$ is the solvent. It also gives one peak at $delta$ 67.14 in $mathrm^13C$-NMR under same solvent (Ref.1).
I believe your compound may still be in the aqueous phase. You may need to saturate the aqueous phase with salt ($ceNaCl$) before extract the product to organic phase. Note that acetic acid is very soluble in water. Therefore, I expect 2,2-dimethoxyacetic acid to be highly soluble in water as well (a $ceC4(H2O)4$ compound like a monosaccharide).
References:
- H. E. Gottlieb, V. Kotlyar, A. Nudelman, “NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities,” J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62(21), 7512–7515 (DOI: 10.1021/jo971176v).
answered 4 hours ago
Mathew MahindaratneMathew Mahindaratne
7,049929
7,049929
2
$begingroup$
And maybe not add the NaOH soln. I don't see why that was done, you're just increasing the volume of the aq phase.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Dioxane, of course! And a spot of water, which probably comes from the CDCl3 bottle.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Waylander It lowers the dioxane content in the aqueous phase, helping to get a better phase separation for the extraction of methanol and residual ester.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not working is it
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
And maybe not add the NaOH soln. I don't see why that was done, you're just increasing the volume of the aq phase.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Dioxane, of course! And a spot of water, which probably comes from the CDCl3 bottle.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Waylander It lowers the dioxane content in the aqueous phase, helping to get a better phase separation for the extraction of methanol and residual ester.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not working is it
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
And maybe not add the NaOH soln. I don't see why that was done, you're just increasing the volume of the aq phase.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
And maybe not add the NaOH soln. I don't see why that was done, you're just increasing the volume of the aq phase.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Dioxane, of course! And a spot of water, which probably comes from the CDCl3 bottle.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Dioxane, of course! And a spot of water, which probably comes from the CDCl3 bottle.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Waylander It lowers the dioxane content in the aqueous phase, helping to get a better phase separation for the extraction of methanol and residual ester.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Waylander It lowers the dioxane content in the aqueous phase, helping to get a better phase separation for the extraction of methanol and residual ester.
$endgroup$
– Karl
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not working is it
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not working is it
$endgroup$
– Waylander
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer from @Mathew Mahindaratne in my opinion correctly identifies what the OP has isolated. It remains to suggest how to get the required product. It may be a matter of salting out the aq phase, but there are other possibilities. Some observers may feel that given a literature prep from a respected group there is no need to alter it, however the OP has not been able to replicate it. Accordingly I offer this procedure.
Dissolve the methyl dimethoxy acetate in a mixture of 9:1 THF/water at rt. Add 1.1eq of LiOH monohydrate. Leave to stir at rt overnight. Concentrate under reduced pressure. Dissolve the residue in a minimum amount of water, cool in ice bath. Wash with Et2O. Acidify using a slight excess of 2N HCl (pH really doesn't need to go below 3.0 as pKa of product is probably around 3.7). Extract x3 with Et2O. Dry the combined organic extract, filter and concentrate. This should minimise any change of hydrolysing the acetal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer from @Mathew Mahindaratne in my opinion correctly identifies what the OP has isolated. It remains to suggest how to get the required product. It may be a matter of salting out the aq phase, but there are other possibilities. Some observers may feel that given a literature prep from a respected group there is no need to alter it, however the OP has not been able to replicate it. Accordingly I offer this procedure.
Dissolve the methyl dimethoxy acetate in a mixture of 9:1 THF/water at rt. Add 1.1eq of LiOH monohydrate. Leave to stir at rt overnight. Concentrate under reduced pressure. Dissolve the residue in a minimum amount of water, cool in ice bath. Wash with Et2O. Acidify using a slight excess of 2N HCl (pH really doesn't need to go below 3.0 as pKa of product is probably around 3.7). Extract x3 with Et2O. Dry the combined organic extract, filter and concentrate. This should minimise any change of hydrolysing the acetal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer from @Mathew Mahindaratne in my opinion correctly identifies what the OP has isolated. It remains to suggest how to get the required product. It may be a matter of salting out the aq phase, but there are other possibilities. Some observers may feel that given a literature prep from a respected group there is no need to alter it, however the OP has not been able to replicate it. Accordingly I offer this procedure.
Dissolve the methyl dimethoxy acetate in a mixture of 9:1 THF/water at rt. Add 1.1eq of LiOH monohydrate. Leave to stir at rt overnight. Concentrate under reduced pressure. Dissolve the residue in a minimum amount of water, cool in ice bath. Wash with Et2O. Acidify using a slight excess of 2N HCl (pH really doesn't need to go below 3.0 as pKa of product is probably around 3.7). Extract x3 with Et2O. Dry the combined organic extract, filter and concentrate. This should minimise any change of hydrolysing the acetal.
$endgroup$
The answer from @Mathew Mahindaratne in my opinion correctly identifies what the OP has isolated. It remains to suggest how to get the required product. It may be a matter of salting out the aq phase, but there are other possibilities. Some observers may feel that given a literature prep from a respected group there is no need to alter it, however the OP has not been able to replicate it. Accordingly I offer this procedure.
Dissolve the methyl dimethoxy acetate in a mixture of 9:1 THF/water at rt. Add 1.1eq of LiOH monohydrate. Leave to stir at rt overnight. Concentrate under reduced pressure. Dissolve the residue in a minimum amount of water, cool in ice bath. Wash with Et2O. Acidify using a slight excess of 2N HCl (pH really doesn't need to go below 3.0 as pKa of product is probably around 3.7). Extract x3 with Et2O. Dry the combined organic extract, filter and concentrate. This should minimise any change of hydrolysing the acetal.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
WaylanderWaylander
7,31411726
7,31411726
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114923%2flioh-hydrolysis-of-methyl-2-2-dimethoxyacetate-not-giving-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
What weight of material do you get after concentrating the ether extract? I can't access the paper but I see it comes from a reputable group. Are you required to reproduce this procedure exactly or can you change it?
$endgroup$
– Waylander
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ Waylander: OP has followed exactly what experimental section given in the paper. Only change is the volume of ether extracts. Paper recorded 99% yield of colorless liquid as a product: $mathrm^1H$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 3.44 (s, 6H), 4.85 (s, 1H), and 10.32 (broad s, 1H). $mathrm^13C$-NMR are reported as $delta$ 54.1 ($ce2CH3$), 98.6 ($ceCH$), and 170.7 ($ceC_q$).
$endgroup$
– Mathew Mahindaratne
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I assume you have mixed up your ether extracts and had an NMR made of the cleaved methanol. A single peak in 13C !?!
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
The step that draws my suspicion is the acidification with 6N HCl to pH 1-2. It would be easy to add a bit too much acid, leave the mixture too long, or let it get a bit too warm and hydrolyse the dimethyl acetal. The resulting glyoxalic acid, if formed, would not easily extract from aqueous.
$endgroup$
– Waylander
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok, the CS doesn't fit, and of course also the 1H spectrum you report.
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago