How to prevent z-fighting in OpenSCAD?How to remove internal part of a hex gridAre there any “best” or at least “common” practices to handle allowances in OpenSCAD code?OpenSCAD library for empty space/holesHow to specify rotation origin in openscadOpenSCAD editor font is unreadableOpenSCAD 2018 Command lineOpenSCAD “not valid 2-manifold” useful informationWhy is 2 / -2 / 2 equal to -2 in OpenSCAD? (Mathematical Order of Operations)

"You've called the wrong number" or "You called the wrong number"

How to not starve gigantic beasts

How can I practically buy stocks?

Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?

Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

Extension of 2-adic valuation to the real numbers

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

Which big number is bigger?

How to limit Drive Letters Windows assigns to new removable USB drives

Don’t seats that recline flat defeat the purpose of having seatbelts?

Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

Betweenness centrality formula

a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat

Converting a sprinkler system's 24V AC outputs to 3.3V DC logic inputs

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

What does ゆーか mean?

"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context

Is there a way to generate a list of distinct numbers such that no two subsets ever have an equal sum?

How to fry ground beef so it is well-browned

How does Captain America channel this power?

How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?



How to prevent z-fighting in OpenSCAD?


How to remove internal part of a hex gridAre there any “best” or at least “common” practices to handle allowances in OpenSCAD code?OpenSCAD library for empty space/holesHow to specify rotation origin in openscadOpenSCAD editor font is unreadableOpenSCAD 2018 Command lineOpenSCAD “not valid 2-manifold” useful informationWhy is 2 / -2 / 2 equal to -2 in OpenSCAD? (Mathematical Order of Operations)













3












$begingroup$


Z-fighting is a 3D rendering artifact of coplanar surfaces (means, triangles are located in exactly the same plane, and overlap).



It can happen in OpenSCAD's preview mode when doing a difference() or union() operation. In case of difference(), the rendering artifacts can prevent seeing into a hole in the object. The "compile and render" mode in OpenSCAD does not have z-fighting issues, but it can take some time to render an object.



How best to avoid z-fighting?



If the answer involves changes to the code, I would love to see an idiomatic answer / established convention of OpenSCAD coders, if that exists.










share|improve this question









New contributor




tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    Z-fighting is a 3D rendering artifact of coplanar surfaces (means, triangles are located in exactly the same plane, and overlap).



    It can happen in OpenSCAD's preview mode when doing a difference() or union() operation. In case of difference(), the rendering artifacts can prevent seeing into a hole in the object. The "compile and render" mode in OpenSCAD does not have z-fighting issues, but it can take some time to render an object.



    How best to avoid z-fighting?



    If the answer involves changes to the code, I would love to see an idiomatic answer / established convention of OpenSCAD coders, if that exists.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Z-fighting is a 3D rendering artifact of coplanar surfaces (means, triangles are located in exactly the same plane, and overlap).



      It can happen in OpenSCAD's preview mode when doing a difference() or union() operation. In case of difference(), the rendering artifacts can prevent seeing into a hole in the object. The "compile and render" mode in OpenSCAD does not have z-fighting issues, but it can take some time to render an object.



      How best to avoid z-fighting?



      If the answer involves changes to the code, I would love to see an idiomatic answer / established convention of OpenSCAD coders, if that exists.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Z-fighting is a 3D rendering artifact of coplanar surfaces (means, triangles are located in exactly the same plane, and overlap).



      It can happen in OpenSCAD's preview mode when doing a difference() or union() operation. In case of difference(), the rendering artifacts can prevent seeing into a hole in the object. The "compile and render" mode in OpenSCAD does not have z-fighting issues, but it can take some time to render an object.



      How best to avoid z-fighting?



      If the answer involves changes to the code, I would love to see an idiomatic answer / established convention of OpenSCAD coders, if that exists.







      openscad






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago







      tanius













      New contributor




      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 6 hours ago









      taniustanius

      1585




      1585




      New contributor




      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          The general advice in the OpenSCAD community is to "extend your cuts and embed your joins" (source). Not just because of the rendering artifacts but also because z-fighting can cause unexpected errors during STL export.



          So you would change the dimensions of your objects very slightly (0.01 mm works fine) so that:



          • for a union(), there is overlap volume between the parts

          • for a difference(), the intersector has volume both inside and outside of the intersected part

          Now you could adjust both the size and position of your parts to keep the mathematically exact dimensions for the resulting part. But I found that for the purposes of 3D printing, such accuracy is not worth it because it complicates the formulas so much.



          Instead, I adjust either position or size of a part, depending on what is simpler in each case. A measure in the final design will be off by 0.01 mm, which does not matter.



          And I keep the 0.01 mm offset in a variable called nothing (picked that up somewhere and liked it …). This keeps the calculations intuitively understandable.



          Example



          To create a cylinder and cut a hole to half of its depth, it would do this:



          //!OpenSCAD
          nothing=0.01;
          height=40;

          difference()
          cylinder(h=height, r=20, center=true);

          translate([0, 0, height/4 + nothing])
          cylinder(h=height/2, r=15, center=true);



          Now the hole is nothing=0.01 less deep than half of the cylinder – that's the inaccuracy I accept.



          (Note: You can try the above code online by copy & pasting it into OpenJSCAD. Include the magic comment in the first line to switch it to OpenSCAD syntax.)






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
            $endgroup$
            – fred_dot_u
            3 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "640"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          tanius is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2f3dprinting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9794%2fhow-to-prevent-z-fighting-in-openscad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          The general advice in the OpenSCAD community is to "extend your cuts and embed your joins" (source). Not just because of the rendering artifacts but also because z-fighting can cause unexpected errors during STL export.



          So you would change the dimensions of your objects very slightly (0.01 mm works fine) so that:



          • for a union(), there is overlap volume between the parts

          • for a difference(), the intersector has volume both inside and outside of the intersected part

          Now you could adjust both the size and position of your parts to keep the mathematically exact dimensions for the resulting part. But I found that for the purposes of 3D printing, such accuracy is not worth it because it complicates the formulas so much.



          Instead, I adjust either position or size of a part, depending on what is simpler in each case. A measure in the final design will be off by 0.01 mm, which does not matter.



          And I keep the 0.01 mm offset in a variable called nothing (picked that up somewhere and liked it …). This keeps the calculations intuitively understandable.



          Example



          To create a cylinder and cut a hole to half of its depth, it would do this:



          //!OpenSCAD
          nothing=0.01;
          height=40;

          difference()
          cylinder(h=height, r=20, center=true);

          translate([0, 0, height/4 + nothing])
          cylinder(h=height/2, r=15, center=true);



          Now the hole is nothing=0.01 less deep than half of the cylinder – that's the inaccuracy I accept.



          (Note: You can try the above code online by copy & pasting it into OpenJSCAD. Include the magic comment in the first line to switch it to OpenSCAD syntax.)






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
            $endgroup$
            – fred_dot_u
            3 hours ago















          4












          $begingroup$

          The general advice in the OpenSCAD community is to "extend your cuts and embed your joins" (source). Not just because of the rendering artifacts but also because z-fighting can cause unexpected errors during STL export.



          So you would change the dimensions of your objects very slightly (0.01 mm works fine) so that:



          • for a union(), there is overlap volume between the parts

          • for a difference(), the intersector has volume both inside and outside of the intersected part

          Now you could adjust both the size and position of your parts to keep the mathematically exact dimensions for the resulting part. But I found that for the purposes of 3D printing, such accuracy is not worth it because it complicates the formulas so much.



          Instead, I adjust either position or size of a part, depending on what is simpler in each case. A measure in the final design will be off by 0.01 mm, which does not matter.



          And I keep the 0.01 mm offset in a variable called nothing (picked that up somewhere and liked it …). This keeps the calculations intuitively understandable.



          Example



          To create a cylinder and cut a hole to half of its depth, it would do this:



          //!OpenSCAD
          nothing=0.01;
          height=40;

          difference()
          cylinder(h=height, r=20, center=true);

          translate([0, 0, height/4 + nothing])
          cylinder(h=height/2, r=15, center=true);



          Now the hole is nothing=0.01 less deep than half of the cylinder – that's the inaccuracy I accept.



          (Note: You can try the above code online by copy & pasting it into OpenJSCAD. Include the magic comment in the first line to switch it to OpenSCAD syntax.)






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
            $endgroup$
            – fred_dot_u
            3 hours ago













          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          The general advice in the OpenSCAD community is to "extend your cuts and embed your joins" (source). Not just because of the rendering artifacts but also because z-fighting can cause unexpected errors during STL export.



          So you would change the dimensions of your objects very slightly (0.01 mm works fine) so that:



          • for a union(), there is overlap volume between the parts

          • for a difference(), the intersector has volume both inside and outside of the intersected part

          Now you could adjust both the size and position of your parts to keep the mathematically exact dimensions for the resulting part. But I found that for the purposes of 3D printing, such accuracy is not worth it because it complicates the formulas so much.



          Instead, I adjust either position or size of a part, depending on what is simpler in each case. A measure in the final design will be off by 0.01 mm, which does not matter.



          And I keep the 0.01 mm offset in a variable called nothing (picked that up somewhere and liked it …). This keeps the calculations intuitively understandable.



          Example



          To create a cylinder and cut a hole to half of its depth, it would do this:



          //!OpenSCAD
          nothing=0.01;
          height=40;

          difference()
          cylinder(h=height, r=20, center=true);

          translate([0, 0, height/4 + nothing])
          cylinder(h=height/2, r=15, center=true);



          Now the hole is nothing=0.01 less deep than half of the cylinder – that's the inaccuracy I accept.



          (Note: You can try the above code online by copy & pasting it into OpenJSCAD. Include the magic comment in the first line to switch it to OpenSCAD syntax.)






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$



          The general advice in the OpenSCAD community is to "extend your cuts and embed your joins" (source). Not just because of the rendering artifacts but also because z-fighting can cause unexpected errors during STL export.



          So you would change the dimensions of your objects very slightly (0.01 mm works fine) so that:



          • for a union(), there is overlap volume between the parts

          • for a difference(), the intersector has volume both inside and outside of the intersected part

          Now you could adjust both the size and position of your parts to keep the mathematically exact dimensions for the resulting part. But I found that for the purposes of 3D printing, such accuracy is not worth it because it complicates the formulas so much.



          Instead, I adjust either position or size of a part, depending on what is simpler in each case. A measure in the final design will be off by 0.01 mm, which does not matter.



          And I keep the 0.01 mm offset in a variable called nothing (picked that up somewhere and liked it …). This keeps the calculations intuitively understandable.



          Example



          To create a cylinder and cut a hole to half of its depth, it would do this:



          //!OpenSCAD
          nothing=0.01;
          height=40;

          difference()
          cylinder(h=height, r=20, center=true);

          translate([0, 0, height/4 + nothing])
          cylinder(h=height/2, r=15, center=true);



          Now the hole is nothing=0.01 less deep than half of the cylinder – that's the inaccuracy I accept.



          (Note: You can try the above code online by copy & pasting it into OpenJSCAD. Include the magic comment in the first line to switch it to OpenSCAD syntax.)







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago





















          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 6 hours ago









          taniustanius

          1585




          1585




          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
            $endgroup$
            – fred_dot_u
            3 hours ago












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
            $endgroup$
            – fred_dot_u
            3 hours ago







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
          $endgroup$
          – fred_dot_u
          3 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
          $endgroup$
          – fred_dot_u
          3 hours ago










          tanius is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          tanius is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          tanius is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          tanius is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to 3D Printing Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2f3dprinting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9794%2fhow-to-prevent-z-fighting-in-openscad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Log på Navigationsmenu

          Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

          Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse