Noun clause (singular all the time?)Should there be a comma after 'and'?Plural of noun and concept takes singular verb?Difference between an adverb modifying an NP consisting a single noun, and an adverb modifying a nounClause QuestionWhy plural noun and verb in singular form, present tense takes 's'?whatever - Are these all noun clauses?How to determine the number of the noun phrase 'a world of + plural noun'?embedded interrogative Clause when quoting“the only one of + plural noun” = singular or plural verb? (focus on the only)superlative + relative clause

Don’t seats that recline flat defeat the purpose of having seatbelts?

What route did the Hindenburg take when traveling from Germany to the U.S.?

Size of electromagnet needed to replicate Earth's magnetic field

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?

How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

US visa is under administrative processing, I need the passport back ASAP

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?

Rivers without rain

Who is the Umpire in this picture?

Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?

Apply MapThread to all but one variable

How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?

How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?

Mac Pro install disk keeps ejecting itself

How can I place the product on a social media post better?

Binary Numbers Magic Trick

Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?

Unexpected email from Yorkshire Bank

Critique of timeline aesthetic

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

What does KSP mean?

Does holding a wand and speaking its command word count as V/S/M spell components?

Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?



Noun clause (singular all the time?)


Should there be a comma after 'and'?Plural of noun and concept takes singular verb?Difference between an adverb modifying an NP consisting a single noun, and an adverb modifying a nounClause QuestionWhy plural noun and verb in singular form, present tense takes 's'?whatever - Are these all noun clauses?How to determine the number of the noun phrase 'a world of + plural noun'?embedded interrogative Clause when quoting“the only one of + plural noun” = singular or plural verb? (focus on the only)superlative + relative clause






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
- Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
- WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
Should "are" be "is" then?










share|improve this question




























    2















    I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
    Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
    - Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
    - WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



    Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
    Should "are" be "is" then?










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2


      1






      I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
      Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
      - Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
      - WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



      Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
      Should "are" be "is" then?










      share|improve this question














      I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
      Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
      - Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
      - WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



      Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
      Should "are" be "is" then?







      grammar verb-agreement noun-phrases






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      Fadli SheikhFadli Sheikh

      223




      223




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Interesting question :)



          I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



          In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

            – John Lawler
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago


















          0














          It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






          share|improve this answer























          • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago











          • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago







          • 1





            'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496421%2fnoun-clause-singular-all-the-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Interesting question :)



          I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



          In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

            – John Lawler
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago















          1














          Interesting question :)



          I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



          In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

            – John Lawler
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          1












          1








          1







          Interesting question :)



          I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



          In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






          share|improve this answer















          Interesting question :)



          I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



          In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 52 mins ago

























          answered 1 hour ago









          HannahHannah

          308210




          308210







          • 1





            Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

            – John Lawler
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • 1





            Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

            – John Lawler
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago







          1




          1





          Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

          – John Lawler
          1 hour ago





          Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

          – John Lawler
          1 hour ago




          1




          1





          @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

          – Hannah
          1 hour ago





          @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

          – Hannah
          1 hour ago













          0














          It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






          share|improve this answer























          • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago











          • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago







          • 1





            'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago
















          0














          It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






          share|improve this answer























          • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago











          • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago







          • 1





            'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago














          0












          0








          0







          It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






          share|improve this answer













          It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          Philip WoodPhilip Wood

          4676




          4676












          • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago











          • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago







          • 1





            'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago


















          • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago











          • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago












          • "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago







          • 1





            'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago

















          The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

          – Hannah
          1 hour ago






          The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

          – Hannah
          1 hour ago














          (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

          – Philip Wood
          1 hour ago





          (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

          – Philip Wood
          1 hour ago













          Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

          – Hannah
          1 hour ago






          Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

          – Hannah
          1 hour ago














          "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

          – Philip Wood
          1 hour ago






          "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

          – Philip Wood
          1 hour ago





          1




          1





          'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

          – Philip Wood
          1 hour ago






          'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

          – Philip Wood
          1 hour ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496421%2fnoun-clause-singular-all-the-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Siegen Nawigatsjuun

          Log på Navigationsmenu

          Log på Navigationsmenu