Presidential Pardon The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraDoes the concept of presidential pardon have a justification in terms of separation between the executive and the judiciary? (France)Does the President's Pardon authority extend to crimes not committed at the time of the pardon?Is there something legally stronger than a pardon that does not constitute an admission of guilt?Can use of a pre-emptive pardon also be illegal obstruction of justice?Do (any) US State Governors have legal authority to preemptively pardon persons of a state crime?Can the POTUS really pardon via tweet? If so, what would one actually look like?Can a Presidential pardon nullify a search warrant?Can Congress issue a legislative pardon?Overturning a presidential pardon and double jeopardyCan a U.S. President pardon an accessory to murder if the murder occurred in a foreign country?
Nested ellipses in tikzpicture: Chomsky hierarchy
Presidential Pardon
Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?
Can each chord in a progression create its own key?
Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?
Why did Peik Lin say, "I'm not an animal"?
Drawing vertical/oblique lines in Metrical tree (tikz-qtree, tipa)
Fixing different display colors within string
Word for: a synonym with a positive connotation?
Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?
Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?
Match Roman Numerals
Sub-subscripts in strings cause different spacings than subscripts
Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?
Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
How to make Illustrator type tool selection automatically adapt with text length
Circular reasoning in L'Hopital's rule
"is" operation returns false even though two objects have same id
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
Make it rain characters
How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?
Presidential Pardon
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraDoes the concept of presidential pardon have a justification in terms of separation between the executive and the judiciary? (France)Does the President's Pardon authority extend to crimes not committed at the time of the pardon?Is there something legally stronger than a pardon that does not constitute an admission of guilt?Can use of a pre-emptive pardon also be illegal obstruction of justice?Do (any) US State Governors have legal authority to preemptively pardon persons of a state crime?Can the POTUS really pardon via tweet? If so, what would one actually look like?Can a Presidential pardon nullify a search warrant?Can Congress issue a legislative pardon?Overturning a presidential pardon and double jeopardyCan a U.S. President pardon an accessory to murder if the murder occurred in a foreign country?
When and how are pardons supposed to be used? Why does the Constitution even grant the president the power to pardon? Can it be used to pardon any crime?
On the surface, it seems to make the president above the law. CNN just reported that president Trump promised to pardon the head of CBP if he broke the law. It would seem the president could just do this for any law or policy he doesn't like and thereby bypass Congress or the courts.
pardon
asked 2 hours ago
user27343user27343
756
add a comment |
When and how are pardons supposed to be used? Why does the Constitution even grant the president the power to pardon? Can it be used to pardon any crime?
On the surface, it seems to make the president above the law. CNN just reported that president Trump promised to pardon the head of CBP if he broke the law. It would seem the president could just do this for any law or policy he doesn't like and thereby bypass Congress or the courts.
pardon
asked 2 hours ago
user27343user27343
756
add a comment |
When and how are pardons supposed to be used? Why does the Constitution even grant the president the power to pardon? Can it be used to pardon any crime?
On the surface, it seems to make the president above the law. CNN just reported that president Trump promised to pardon the head of CBP if he broke the law. It would seem the president could just do this for any law or policy he doesn't like and thereby bypass Congress or the courts.
pardon
asked 2 hours ago
user27343user27343
756
When and how are pardons supposed to be used? Why does the Constitution even grant the president the power to pardon? Can it be used to pardon any crime?
On the surface, it seems to make the president above the law. CNN just reported that president Trump promised to pardon the head of CBP if he broke the law. It would seem the president could just do this for any law or policy he doesn't like and thereby bypass Congress or the courts.
pardon
pardon
asked 2 hours ago
user27343user27343
756
asked 2 hours ago
user27343user27343
756
asked 2 hours ago
user27343user27343
756
asked 2 hours ago
user27343user27343
756
asked 2 hours ago
user27343user27343
756
756
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Presidential pardons can be used to pardon someone for any federal crime, if you are convicted of a state crime, the governor of that state has the right to pardon you. Impeachment is the only instance where the constitution prohibits pardons.
Of the founding fathters, Alexander Hamaliton was the most supportive of Pardons and wrote about the need for them in the Federalist Paper No. 74. The idea behind them was that some situations negate the need to punish someone or to punish them severely.
The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity, that without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed74.asp
Some people do view some pardons as inappropriate because they take away the ability of the courts to enforce their rulings. Who gets one is in the discretion of the President though.
answered 2 hours ago
PutviPutvi
85718
add a comment |
If a President uses pardons too freely, and in what seems to be a corrupt manner, Congress could, in theory, impeach the President and remove him or her from office. This has never happened. How likely it might be in future is more a subject for the politics forum.
A pardon cannot immunize a person from an individual damage suit, or even from a later governmental civil penalty, only from a criminal prosecution.
A President probably cannot pardon himself (or herself). We can't be sure, no US President has ever tried, so no court has ever ruled on this. Gerald Ford's pardon of Nixon is as close as the US has gotten to such a case.
Pardons, like most governmental powers, can be abused. There are various checks to try to deter and limit abuse, but they are not perfect. If the President (or any high official) is abusive, powers will be abused.
The constitutional power of the president to grant pardons is copied from the power that the King of England had to grant pardons. Federalist #74, as Putvi points out, justifies the power and its scope at some length.
answered 2 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
16.9k3665
Upon what do you base the claim that the president can be impeached for using pardons too freely? I understand you said it's not likely, I just don't think it meets the standard.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
@Putvi the president can be impeached and removed for whatever a majority of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate think proper. There is no enforceable standard beyond the good judgement of Congress. Read a history of the impeachment and trial of President Johnson (who came within 1 vote of conviction and removal) to see what reasons have passed muster in the past. But as to this case, i think in the section on impeachment, the Federalist says that it is the general remedy for the abuse of presidential power. And I think that has been the general understanding ever since. Who says otherwise?
– David Siegel
1 hour ago
I have researched the trial of Johnson, but that was based on what is considered "high crimes and misdemeanors, not just anything congress feels is enough.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
1
@Putvi corrupt conduct would fall within the ambit of high crimes and misdemeanours
– Dale M
1 hour ago
1
@DaleM I guess you could try for anything being a high crime or misdemeanor, but I don't think many people would agree.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
|
show 7 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39066%2fpresidential-pardon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Presidential pardons can be used to pardon someone for any federal crime, if you are convicted of a state crime, the governor of that state has the right to pardon you. Impeachment is the only instance where the constitution prohibits pardons.
Of the founding fathters, Alexander Hamaliton was the most supportive of Pardons and wrote about the need for them in the Federalist Paper No. 74. The idea behind them was that some situations negate the need to punish someone or to punish them severely.
The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity, that without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed74.asp
Some people do view some pardons as inappropriate because they take away the ability of the courts to enforce their rulings. Who gets one is in the discretion of the President though.
answered 2 hours ago
PutviPutvi
85718
add a comment |
Presidential pardons can be used to pardon someone for any federal crime, if you are convicted of a state crime, the governor of that state has the right to pardon you. Impeachment is the only instance where the constitution prohibits pardons.
Of the founding fathters, Alexander Hamaliton was the most supportive of Pardons and wrote about the need for them in the Federalist Paper No. 74. The idea behind them was that some situations negate the need to punish someone or to punish them severely.
The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity, that without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed74.asp
Some people do view some pardons as inappropriate because they take away the ability of the courts to enforce their rulings. Who gets one is in the discretion of the President though.
answered 2 hours ago
PutviPutvi
85718
add a comment |
Presidential pardons can be used to pardon someone for any federal crime, if you are convicted of a state crime, the governor of that state has the right to pardon you. Impeachment is the only instance where the constitution prohibits pardons.
Of the founding fathters, Alexander Hamaliton was the most supportive of Pardons and wrote about the need for them in the Federalist Paper No. 74. The idea behind them was that some situations negate the need to punish someone or to punish them severely.
The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity, that without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed74.asp
Some people do view some pardons as inappropriate because they take away the ability of the courts to enforce their rulings. Who gets one is in the discretion of the President though.
answered 2 hours ago
PutviPutvi
85718
Presidential pardons can be used to pardon someone for any federal crime, if you are convicted of a state crime, the governor of that state has the right to pardon you. Impeachment is the only instance where the constitution prohibits pardons.
Of the founding fathters, Alexander Hamaliton was the most supportive of Pardons and wrote about the need for them in the Federalist Paper No. 74. The idea behind them was that some situations negate the need to punish someone or to punish them severely.
The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity, that without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed74.asp
Some people do view some pardons as inappropriate because they take away the ability of the courts to enforce their rulings. Who gets one is in the discretion of the President though.
answered 2 hours ago
PutviPutvi
85718
answered 2 hours ago
PutviPutvi
85718
answered 2 hours ago
PutviPutvi
85718
answered 2 hours ago
PutviPutvi
85718
85718
add a comment |
add a comment |
If a President uses pardons too freely, and in what seems to be a corrupt manner, Congress could, in theory, impeach the President and remove him or her from office. This has never happened. How likely it might be in future is more a subject for the politics forum.
A pardon cannot immunize a person from an individual damage suit, or even from a later governmental civil penalty, only from a criminal prosecution.
A President probably cannot pardon himself (or herself). We can't be sure, no US President has ever tried, so no court has ever ruled on this. Gerald Ford's pardon of Nixon is as close as the US has gotten to such a case.
Pardons, like most governmental powers, can be abused. There are various checks to try to deter and limit abuse, but they are not perfect. If the President (or any high official) is abusive, powers will be abused.
The constitutional power of the president to grant pardons is copied from the power that the King of England had to grant pardons. Federalist #74, as Putvi points out, justifies the power and its scope at some length.
answered 2 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
16.9k3665
Upon what do you base the claim that the president can be impeached for using pardons too freely? I understand you said it's not likely, I just don't think it meets the standard.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
@Putvi the president can be impeached and removed for whatever a majority of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate think proper. There is no enforceable standard beyond the good judgement of Congress. Read a history of the impeachment and trial of President Johnson (who came within 1 vote of conviction and removal) to see what reasons have passed muster in the past. But as to this case, i think in the section on impeachment, the Federalist says that it is the general remedy for the abuse of presidential power. And I think that has been the general understanding ever since. Who says otherwise?
– David Siegel
1 hour ago
I have researched the trial of Johnson, but that was based on what is considered "high crimes and misdemeanors, not just anything congress feels is enough.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
1
@Putvi corrupt conduct would fall within the ambit of high crimes and misdemeanours
– Dale M
1 hour ago
1
@DaleM I guess you could try for anything being a high crime or misdemeanor, but I don't think many people would agree.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
|
show 7 more comments
If a President uses pardons too freely, and in what seems to be a corrupt manner, Congress could, in theory, impeach the President and remove him or her from office. This has never happened. How likely it might be in future is more a subject for the politics forum.
A pardon cannot immunize a person from an individual damage suit, or even from a later governmental civil penalty, only from a criminal prosecution.
A President probably cannot pardon himself (or herself). We can't be sure, no US President has ever tried, so no court has ever ruled on this. Gerald Ford's pardon of Nixon is as close as the US has gotten to such a case.
Pardons, like most governmental powers, can be abused. There are various checks to try to deter and limit abuse, but they are not perfect. If the President (or any high official) is abusive, powers will be abused.
The constitutional power of the president to grant pardons is copied from the power that the King of England had to grant pardons. Federalist #74, as Putvi points out, justifies the power and its scope at some length.
answered 2 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
16.9k3665
Upon what do you base the claim that the president can be impeached for using pardons too freely? I understand you said it's not likely, I just don't think it meets the standard.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
@Putvi the president can be impeached and removed for whatever a majority of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate think proper. There is no enforceable standard beyond the good judgement of Congress. Read a history of the impeachment and trial of President Johnson (who came within 1 vote of conviction and removal) to see what reasons have passed muster in the past. But as to this case, i think in the section on impeachment, the Federalist says that it is the general remedy for the abuse of presidential power. And I think that has been the general understanding ever since. Who says otherwise?
– David Siegel
1 hour ago
I have researched the trial of Johnson, but that was based on what is considered "high crimes and misdemeanors, not just anything congress feels is enough.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
1
@Putvi corrupt conduct would fall within the ambit of high crimes and misdemeanours
– Dale M
1 hour ago
1
@DaleM I guess you could try for anything being a high crime or misdemeanor, but I don't think many people would agree.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
|
show 7 more comments
If a President uses pardons too freely, and in what seems to be a corrupt manner, Congress could, in theory, impeach the President and remove him or her from office. This has never happened. How likely it might be in future is more a subject for the politics forum.
A pardon cannot immunize a person from an individual damage suit, or even from a later governmental civil penalty, only from a criminal prosecution.
A President probably cannot pardon himself (or herself). We can't be sure, no US President has ever tried, so no court has ever ruled on this. Gerald Ford's pardon of Nixon is as close as the US has gotten to such a case.
Pardons, like most governmental powers, can be abused. There are various checks to try to deter and limit abuse, but they are not perfect. If the President (or any high official) is abusive, powers will be abused.
The constitutional power of the president to grant pardons is copied from the power that the King of England had to grant pardons. Federalist #74, as Putvi points out, justifies the power and its scope at some length.
answered 2 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
16.9k3665
If a President uses pardons too freely, and in what seems to be a corrupt manner, Congress could, in theory, impeach the President and remove him or her from office. This has never happened. How likely it might be in future is more a subject for the politics forum.
A pardon cannot immunize a person from an individual damage suit, or even from a later governmental civil penalty, only from a criminal prosecution.
A President probably cannot pardon himself (or herself). We can't be sure, no US President has ever tried, so no court has ever ruled on this. Gerald Ford's pardon of Nixon is as close as the US has gotten to such a case.
Pardons, like most governmental powers, can be abused. There are various checks to try to deter and limit abuse, but they are not perfect. If the President (or any high official) is abusive, powers will be abused.
The constitutional power of the president to grant pardons is copied from the power that the King of England had to grant pardons. Federalist #74, as Putvi points out, justifies the power and its scope at some length.
answered 2 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
16.9k3665
answered 2 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
16.9k3665
answered 2 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
16.9k3665
answered 2 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
16.9k3665
16.9k3665
Upon what do you base the claim that the president can be impeached for using pardons too freely? I understand you said it's not likely, I just don't think it meets the standard.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
@Putvi the president can be impeached and removed for whatever a majority of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate think proper. There is no enforceable standard beyond the good judgement of Congress. Read a history of the impeachment and trial of President Johnson (who came within 1 vote of conviction and removal) to see what reasons have passed muster in the past. But as to this case, i think in the section on impeachment, the Federalist says that it is the general remedy for the abuse of presidential power. And I think that has been the general understanding ever since. Who says otherwise?
– David Siegel
1 hour ago
I have researched the trial of Johnson, but that was based on what is considered "high crimes and misdemeanors, not just anything congress feels is enough.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
1
@Putvi corrupt conduct would fall within the ambit of high crimes and misdemeanours
– Dale M
1 hour ago
1
@DaleM I guess you could try for anything being a high crime or misdemeanor, but I don't think many people would agree.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
|
show 7 more comments
Upon what do you base the claim that the president can be impeached for using pardons too freely? I understand you said it's not likely, I just don't think it meets the standard.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
@Putvi the president can be impeached and removed for whatever a majority of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate think proper. There is no enforceable standard beyond the good judgement of Congress. Read a history of the impeachment and trial of President Johnson (who came within 1 vote of conviction and removal) to see what reasons have passed muster in the past. But as to this case, i think in the section on impeachment, the Federalist says that it is the general remedy for the abuse of presidential power. And I think that has been the general understanding ever since. Who says otherwise?
– David Siegel
1 hour ago
I have researched the trial of Johnson, but that was based on what is considered "high crimes and misdemeanors, not just anything congress feels is enough.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
1
@Putvi corrupt conduct would fall within the ambit of high crimes and misdemeanours
– Dale M
1 hour ago
1
@DaleM I guess you could try for anything being a high crime or misdemeanor, but I don't think many people would agree.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
Upon what do you base the claim that the president can be impeached for using pardons too freely? I understand you said it's not likely, I just don't think it meets the standard.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
Upon what do you base the claim that the president can be impeached for using pardons too freely? I understand you said it's not likely, I just don't think it meets the standard.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
@Putvi the president can be impeached and removed for whatever a majority of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate think proper. There is no enforceable standard beyond the good judgement of Congress. Read a history of the impeachment and trial of President Johnson (who came within 1 vote of conviction and removal) to see what reasons have passed muster in the past. But as to this case, i think in the section on impeachment, the Federalist says that it is the general remedy for the abuse of presidential power. And I think that has been the general understanding ever since. Who says otherwise?
– David Siegel
1 hour ago
@Putvi the president can be impeached and removed for whatever a majority of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate think proper. There is no enforceable standard beyond the good judgement of Congress. Read a history of the impeachment and trial of President Johnson (who came within 1 vote of conviction and removal) to see what reasons have passed muster in the past. But as to this case, i think in the section on impeachment, the Federalist says that it is the general remedy for the abuse of presidential power. And I think that has been the general understanding ever since. Who says otherwise?
– David Siegel
1 hour ago
I have researched the trial of Johnson, but that was based on what is considered "high crimes and misdemeanors, not just anything congress feels is enough.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
I have researched the trial of Johnson, but that was based on what is considered "high crimes and misdemeanors, not just anything congress feels is enough.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
1
1
@Putvi corrupt conduct would fall within the ambit of high crimes and misdemeanours
– Dale M
1 hour ago
@Putvi corrupt conduct would fall within the ambit of high crimes and misdemeanours
– Dale M
1 hour ago
1
1
@DaleM I guess you could try for anything being a high crime or misdemeanor, but I don't think many people would agree.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
@DaleM I guess you could try for anything being a high crime or misdemeanor, but I don't think many people would agree.
– Putvi
1 hour ago
|
show 7 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39066%2fpresidential-pardon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
