c++ what does , means after ifWhat does the comma operator , do?What are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?What does the explicit keyword mean?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListWhat is the effect of extern “C” in C++?What is the “-->” operator in C++?What is The Rule of Three?What are the basic rules and idioms for operator overloading?C++11 introduced a standardized memory model. What does it mean? And how is it going to affect C++ programming?Why are elementwise additions much faster in separate loops than in a combined loop?Why is my program slow when looping over exactly 8192 elements?
As programers say: Strive to be lazy
How to Access data returned from Apex class in JS controller using Lightning web component
A curve pass via points at TiKz
iMac 27" 2017 memory upgrade question
Smallest Guaranteed hash collision cycle length
Find the cipher used
How can a Lich look like a human without magic?
Why do Thanos's punches not kill Captain America or at least cause some mortal injuries?
On studying Computer Science vs. Software Engineering to become a proficient coder
Was this a power play by Daenerys?
Bishop Berkeley's ideas put to the test
Does kinetic energy warp spacetime?
Why was Thor doubtful about his worthiness to Mjolnir?
How are one-time password generators like Google Authenticator different from having two passwords?
Do atomic orbitals "pulse" in time?
Does the 500 feet falling cap apply per fall, or per turn?
Why does my circuit work on a breadboard, but not on a perfboard? I am new to soldering
How to minimise the cost of guessing a number in a high/low guess game?
What is the best way for a skeleton to impersonate human without using magic?
Change FormFunction button color
Two researchers want to work on the same extension to my paper. Who to help?
What's special about a Bunsen burner?
What does "Ich wusste, dass aus dir mal was wird" mean?
How can I answer high-school writing prompts without sounding weird and fake?
c++ what does , means after if
What does the comma operator , do?What are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?What does the explicit keyword mean?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListWhat is the effect of extern “C” in C++?What is the “-->” operator in C++?What is The Rule of Three?What are the basic rules and idioms for operator overloading?C++11 introduced a standardized memory model. What does it mean? And how is it going to affect C++ programming?Why are elementwise additions much faster in separate loops than in a combined loop?Why is my program slow when looping over exactly 8192 elements?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
for (auto i = 0; i < g.size(); ++i)
for (auto j = 0; j < g.size(); ++j) if (g[i][j] == 0) dfs(g, i, j), ++regions;
return regions;
I don't like one line code, can you please explain what does the code execute in the if() I am confused by the "," sign
usually I would write it as
for (auto i = 0; i < g.size(); ++i)
{
for (auto j = 0; j < g.size(); ++j)
if (g[i][j] == 0)
dfs(g, i, j)
,++regions; // not sure what to do here? inside the "if" scope??
return regions;
Please help or refer me to the direction?
c++
add a comment |
for (auto i = 0; i < g.size(); ++i)
for (auto j = 0; j < g.size(); ++j) if (g[i][j] == 0) dfs(g, i, j), ++regions;
return regions;
I don't like one line code, can you please explain what does the code execute in the if() I am confused by the "," sign
usually I would write it as
for (auto i = 0; i < g.size(); ++i)
{
for (auto j = 0; j < g.size(); ++j)
if (g[i][j] == 0)
dfs(g, i, j)
,++regions; // not sure what to do here? inside the "if" scope??
return regions;
Please help or refer me to the direction?
c++
add a comment |
for (auto i = 0; i < g.size(); ++i)
for (auto j = 0; j < g.size(); ++j) if (g[i][j] == 0) dfs(g, i, j), ++regions;
return regions;
I don't like one line code, can you please explain what does the code execute in the if() I am confused by the "," sign
usually I would write it as
for (auto i = 0; i < g.size(); ++i)
{
for (auto j = 0; j < g.size(); ++j)
if (g[i][j] == 0)
dfs(g, i, j)
,++regions; // not sure what to do here? inside the "if" scope??
return regions;
Please help or refer me to the direction?
c++
for (auto i = 0; i < g.size(); ++i)
for (auto j = 0; j < g.size(); ++j) if (g[i][j] == 0) dfs(g, i, j), ++regions;
return regions;
I don't like one line code, can you please explain what does the code execute in the if() I am confused by the "," sign
usually I would write it as
for (auto i = 0; i < g.size(); ++i)
{
for (auto j = 0; j < g.size(); ++j)
if (g[i][j] == 0)
dfs(g, i, j)
,++regions; // not sure what to do here? inside the "if" scope??
return regions;
Please help or refer me to the direction?
c++
c++
asked 1 hour ago
GiladGilad
3,46383990
3,46383990
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The programmer has used the comma operator to provide two unrelated expressions in a single statement. Because it's a single statement, both expressions are "inside" the if condition.
It's a poor hack, which would be better done with actual braces surrounding two statements.
Your example is not equivalent; it should be:
if (g[i][j] == 0)
dfs(g, i, j);
++regions;
2
ohh god, why why why would anyone write this code. Thanks
– Gilad
1 hour ago
2
@Gilad Trying to be clever, most likely! And failing.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
1 hour ago
1
+1 for the question and +1 for the answer! I didn't even know this was possible, let alone what it meant! Thanks!
– Constantinos Glynos
59 mins ago
@Gilad a very smart programmer once said Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. What I took from this was write the stupidest possible code that can meet the requirements. Even if I can debug sneaky code, the person I hand it off to to maintain might not.
– user4581301
59 mins ago
2
@LightnessRacesinOrbit This is a habit of old school programmers due to small monitor resolution (25 rows 80 columns) code was writing as short as possible. More code on one page better readability. Try read modern code on such monitor and you will see how many empty rows in it.
– Andrey Sv
49 mins ago
|
show 6 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f56094137%2fc-what-does-means-after-if%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The programmer has used the comma operator to provide two unrelated expressions in a single statement. Because it's a single statement, both expressions are "inside" the if condition.
It's a poor hack, which would be better done with actual braces surrounding two statements.
Your example is not equivalent; it should be:
if (g[i][j] == 0)
dfs(g, i, j);
++regions;
2
ohh god, why why why would anyone write this code. Thanks
– Gilad
1 hour ago
2
@Gilad Trying to be clever, most likely! And failing.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
1 hour ago
1
+1 for the question and +1 for the answer! I didn't even know this was possible, let alone what it meant! Thanks!
– Constantinos Glynos
59 mins ago
@Gilad a very smart programmer once said Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. What I took from this was write the stupidest possible code that can meet the requirements. Even if I can debug sneaky code, the person I hand it off to to maintain might not.
– user4581301
59 mins ago
2
@LightnessRacesinOrbit This is a habit of old school programmers due to small monitor resolution (25 rows 80 columns) code was writing as short as possible. More code on one page better readability. Try read modern code on such monitor and you will see how many empty rows in it.
– Andrey Sv
49 mins ago
|
show 6 more comments
The programmer has used the comma operator to provide two unrelated expressions in a single statement. Because it's a single statement, both expressions are "inside" the if condition.
It's a poor hack, which would be better done with actual braces surrounding two statements.
Your example is not equivalent; it should be:
if (g[i][j] == 0)
dfs(g, i, j);
++regions;
2
ohh god, why why why would anyone write this code. Thanks
– Gilad
1 hour ago
2
@Gilad Trying to be clever, most likely! And failing.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
1 hour ago
1
+1 for the question and +1 for the answer! I didn't even know this was possible, let alone what it meant! Thanks!
– Constantinos Glynos
59 mins ago
@Gilad a very smart programmer once said Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. What I took from this was write the stupidest possible code that can meet the requirements. Even if I can debug sneaky code, the person I hand it off to to maintain might not.
– user4581301
59 mins ago
2
@LightnessRacesinOrbit This is a habit of old school programmers due to small monitor resolution (25 rows 80 columns) code was writing as short as possible. More code on one page better readability. Try read modern code on such monitor and you will see how many empty rows in it.
– Andrey Sv
49 mins ago
|
show 6 more comments
The programmer has used the comma operator to provide two unrelated expressions in a single statement. Because it's a single statement, both expressions are "inside" the if condition.
It's a poor hack, which would be better done with actual braces surrounding two statements.
Your example is not equivalent; it should be:
if (g[i][j] == 0)
dfs(g, i, j);
++regions;
The programmer has used the comma operator to provide two unrelated expressions in a single statement. Because it's a single statement, both expressions are "inside" the if condition.
It's a poor hack, which would be better done with actual braces surrounding two statements.
Your example is not equivalent; it should be:
if (g[i][j] == 0)
dfs(g, i, j);
++regions;
answered 1 hour ago
Lightness Races in OrbitLightness Races in Orbit
298k56481827
298k56481827
2
ohh god, why why why would anyone write this code. Thanks
– Gilad
1 hour ago
2
@Gilad Trying to be clever, most likely! And failing.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
1 hour ago
1
+1 for the question and +1 for the answer! I didn't even know this was possible, let alone what it meant! Thanks!
– Constantinos Glynos
59 mins ago
@Gilad a very smart programmer once said Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. What I took from this was write the stupidest possible code that can meet the requirements. Even if I can debug sneaky code, the person I hand it off to to maintain might not.
– user4581301
59 mins ago
2
@LightnessRacesinOrbit This is a habit of old school programmers due to small monitor resolution (25 rows 80 columns) code was writing as short as possible. More code on one page better readability. Try read modern code on such monitor and you will see how many empty rows in it.
– Andrey Sv
49 mins ago
|
show 6 more comments
2
ohh god, why why why would anyone write this code. Thanks
– Gilad
1 hour ago
2
@Gilad Trying to be clever, most likely! And failing.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
1 hour ago
1
+1 for the question and +1 for the answer! I didn't even know this was possible, let alone what it meant! Thanks!
– Constantinos Glynos
59 mins ago
@Gilad a very smart programmer once said Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. What I took from this was write the stupidest possible code that can meet the requirements. Even if I can debug sneaky code, the person I hand it off to to maintain might not.
– user4581301
59 mins ago
2
@LightnessRacesinOrbit This is a habit of old school programmers due to small monitor resolution (25 rows 80 columns) code was writing as short as possible. More code on one page better readability. Try read modern code on such monitor and you will see how many empty rows in it.
– Andrey Sv
49 mins ago
2
2
ohh god, why why why would anyone write this code. Thanks
– Gilad
1 hour ago
ohh god, why why why would anyone write this code. Thanks
– Gilad
1 hour ago
2
2
@Gilad Trying to be clever, most likely! And failing.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
1 hour ago
@Gilad Trying to be clever, most likely! And failing.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
1 hour ago
1
1
+1 for the question and +1 for the answer! I didn't even know this was possible, let alone what it meant! Thanks!
– Constantinos Glynos
59 mins ago
+1 for the question and +1 for the answer! I didn't even know this was possible, let alone what it meant! Thanks!
– Constantinos Glynos
59 mins ago
@Gilad a very smart programmer once said Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. What I took from this was write the stupidest possible code that can meet the requirements. Even if I can debug sneaky code, the person I hand it off to to maintain might not.
– user4581301
59 mins ago
@Gilad a very smart programmer once said Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. What I took from this was write the stupidest possible code that can meet the requirements. Even if I can debug sneaky code, the person I hand it off to to maintain might not.
– user4581301
59 mins ago
2
2
@LightnessRacesinOrbit This is a habit of old school programmers due to small monitor resolution (25 rows 80 columns) code was writing as short as possible. More code on one page better readability. Try read modern code on such monitor and you will see how many empty rows in it.
– Andrey Sv
49 mins ago
@LightnessRacesinOrbit This is a habit of old school programmers due to small monitor resolution (25 rows 80 columns) code was writing as short as possible. More code on one page better readability. Try read modern code on such monitor and you will see how many empty rows in it.
– Andrey Sv
49 mins ago
|
show 6 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f56094137%2fc-what-does-means-after-if%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown