Compactness in normed vector spaces.Are Arzelà–Ascoli theorems results of similar theorems on normed spaces, metric spaces or other spaces?Finiteness of the dimension of a normed space and compactnessProof of compactness for sets of norm equal to one in finite-dimensional normed vector spacesConvex hull, compactness, normed spacesAre all the finite dimensional vector spaces with a metric isometric to $mathbb R^n$Compactness of subspaces of finite-dimensional vector spacesCounterexample showing that weakly* compact sets might not be norm bounded in a normed spaces.Dual of a normed vector spaceCompactness of normed linear spacesProblem about strictly normed spaces.

Pre-1993 comic in which Wolverine's claws were turned to rubber?

Company stopped paying my salary. What are my options?

Are there vaccine ingredients which may not be disclosed ("hidden", "trade secret", or similar)?

Add Columns to .csv from Multiple Files

How can I test a shell script in a "safe environment" to avoid harm to my computer?

Was there a contingency plan in place if Little Boy failed to detonate?

How can I make parentheses stick to formula?

Was the Highlands Ranch shooting the 115th mass shooting in the US in 2019

Which spells are in some way related to shadows or the Shadowfell?

Why are thrust reversers not used to slow down to taxi speeds?

Lorentz invariance of Maxwell's equations in matter

resoldering copper waste pipe

What's the difference between "ricochet" and "bounce"?

Probability of taking balls without replacement from a bag question

How to explain intravenous drug abuse to a 6-year-old?

How did Captain Marvel know where to find these characters?

How is it possible for this circuit to continue functioning correctly?

"Estrontium" on poster

Renting a house to a graduate student in my department

Row vectors and column vectors (Mathematica vs Matlab)

How long can fsck take on a 30 TB volume?

What can cause an unfrozen indoor copper drain pipe to crack?

How to handle DM constantly stealing everything from sleeping characters?

Why was Sam Wilson chosen for this, but not Bucky?



Compactness in normed vector spaces.


Are Arzelà–Ascoli theorems results of similar theorems on normed spaces, metric spaces or other spaces?Finiteness of the dimension of a normed space and compactnessProof of compactness for sets of norm equal to one in finite-dimensional normed vector spacesConvex hull, compactness, normed spacesAre all the finite dimensional vector spaces with a metric isometric to $mathbb R^n$Compactness of subspaces of finite-dimensional vector spacesCounterexample showing that weakly* compact sets might not be norm bounded in a normed spaces.Dual of a normed vector spaceCompactness of normed linear spacesProblem about strictly normed spaces.













3












$begingroup$


Let $(X,VertcdotVert)$ be a normed $mathbbK$-vector space and $A subset X$ be closed and bounded. My problem is how to determine whether $A$ is compact?



I know that a compact subset is always closed and bounded. And that in $mathbbR$ the converse holds due to Bolzano–Weierstraß.



But I think I am missing something. Do there exist subsets in normed vector spaces which are closed and bounded but not compact?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    Let $(X,VertcdotVert)$ be a normed $mathbbK$-vector space and $A subset X$ be closed and bounded. My problem is how to determine whether $A$ is compact?



    I know that a compact subset is always closed and bounded. And that in $mathbbR$ the converse holds due to Bolzano–Weierstraß.



    But I think I am missing something. Do there exist subsets in normed vector spaces which are closed and bounded but not compact?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Let $(X,VertcdotVert)$ be a normed $mathbbK$-vector space and $A subset X$ be closed and bounded. My problem is how to determine whether $A$ is compact?



      I know that a compact subset is always closed and bounded. And that in $mathbbR$ the converse holds due to Bolzano–Weierstraß.



      But I think I am missing something. Do there exist subsets in normed vector spaces which are closed and bounded but not compact?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $(X,VertcdotVert)$ be a normed $mathbbK$-vector space and $A subset X$ be closed and bounded. My problem is how to determine whether $A$ is compact?



      I know that a compact subset is always closed and bounded. And that in $mathbbR$ the converse holds due to Bolzano–Weierstraß.



      But I think I am missing something. Do there exist subsets in normed vector spaces which are closed and bounded but not compact?







      functional-analysis compactness normed-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago







      Grazel

















      asked 1 hour ago









      GrazelGrazel

      155115




      155115




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Let $c_0$ denote the infinite-dimensional normed vector space consisting of sequences that converge to $0$. The norm on $c_0$ is given by:



          $$
          |(a_1,a_1,a_3,ldots)|:=sup_kinmathbbN|a_k|.
          $$



          Let $A$ denote the set of all vectors in $c_0$ of norm at most one. Clearly $A$ is bounded and it is easy to show that $A$ is closed. To see that $A$ is not compact, let, for each $xin A$, $B_1/2(x):=yin c_0:$. Then, $B_1/2(x):xin A$ is an open cover of $A$. To see that it has no finite subcover, let, for each $kinmathbbN$, $e_k$ denote the sequence $(0,ldots,0,1,0,ldots)$, where the $1$ is in position $k$. Since $|e_k-e_ell|=1$ if $knot=ell$, it follows that no two such vectors can belong to the same $B_1/2(x)$ for any $x$.



          Note that in general, a set in a metric space is compact if and only if it is complete and totally bounded.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            4












            $begingroup$

            Yes.



            The equivalence of "compact" and "closed and bounded" holds only in finite-dimensional spaces.



            In a general, infinite-dimensional normed space (e.g., over the real scalars), for a set to be compact, it is not enough that it be closed and bounded. It must be closed and totally bounded.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              1












              $begingroup$

              Example. The unit ball $B$ in Hilbert space $l^2$. It is closed and bounded, but not compact. Let the orthonormal unit vectors be $e_n, n=1,2,3,dots$. Then sequence $e_n$ is a sequence in $B$, but it has no convergent subsequence. This is because all the distances are $|e_n-e_m| = sqrt2$ so in fact no subsequence is even a Cauchy sequence.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3218973%2fcompactness-in-normed-vector-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                2












                $begingroup$

                Let $c_0$ denote the infinite-dimensional normed vector space consisting of sequences that converge to $0$. The norm on $c_0$ is given by:



                $$
                |(a_1,a_1,a_3,ldots)|:=sup_kinmathbbN|a_k|.
                $$



                Let $A$ denote the set of all vectors in $c_0$ of norm at most one. Clearly $A$ is bounded and it is easy to show that $A$ is closed. To see that $A$ is not compact, let, for each $xin A$, $B_1/2(x):=yin c_0:$. Then, $B_1/2(x):xin A$ is an open cover of $A$. To see that it has no finite subcover, let, for each $kinmathbbN$, $e_k$ denote the sequence $(0,ldots,0,1,0,ldots)$, where the $1$ is in position $k$. Since $|e_k-e_ell|=1$ if $knot=ell$, it follows that no two such vectors can belong to the same $B_1/2(x)$ for any $x$.



                Note that in general, a set in a metric space is compact if and only if it is complete and totally bounded.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  Let $c_0$ denote the infinite-dimensional normed vector space consisting of sequences that converge to $0$. The norm on $c_0$ is given by:



                  $$
                  |(a_1,a_1,a_3,ldots)|:=sup_kinmathbbN|a_k|.
                  $$



                  Let $A$ denote the set of all vectors in $c_0$ of norm at most one. Clearly $A$ is bounded and it is easy to show that $A$ is closed. To see that $A$ is not compact, let, for each $xin A$, $B_1/2(x):=yin c_0:$. Then, $B_1/2(x):xin A$ is an open cover of $A$. To see that it has no finite subcover, let, for each $kinmathbbN$, $e_k$ denote the sequence $(0,ldots,0,1,0,ldots)$, where the $1$ is in position $k$. Since $|e_k-e_ell|=1$ if $knot=ell$, it follows that no two such vectors can belong to the same $B_1/2(x)$ for any $x$.



                  Note that in general, a set in a metric space is compact if and only if it is complete and totally bounded.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    Let $c_0$ denote the infinite-dimensional normed vector space consisting of sequences that converge to $0$. The norm on $c_0$ is given by:



                    $$
                    |(a_1,a_1,a_3,ldots)|:=sup_kinmathbbN|a_k|.
                    $$



                    Let $A$ denote the set of all vectors in $c_0$ of norm at most one. Clearly $A$ is bounded and it is easy to show that $A$ is closed. To see that $A$ is not compact, let, for each $xin A$, $B_1/2(x):=yin c_0:$. Then, $B_1/2(x):xin A$ is an open cover of $A$. To see that it has no finite subcover, let, for each $kinmathbbN$, $e_k$ denote the sequence $(0,ldots,0,1,0,ldots)$, where the $1$ is in position $k$. Since $|e_k-e_ell|=1$ if $knot=ell$, it follows that no two such vectors can belong to the same $B_1/2(x)$ for any $x$.



                    Note that in general, a set in a metric space is compact if and only if it is complete and totally bounded.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Let $c_0$ denote the infinite-dimensional normed vector space consisting of sequences that converge to $0$. The norm on $c_0$ is given by:



                    $$
                    |(a_1,a_1,a_3,ldots)|:=sup_kinmathbbN|a_k|.
                    $$



                    Let $A$ denote the set of all vectors in $c_0$ of norm at most one. Clearly $A$ is bounded and it is easy to show that $A$ is closed. To see that $A$ is not compact, let, for each $xin A$, $B_1/2(x):=yin c_0:$. Then, $B_1/2(x):xin A$ is an open cover of $A$. To see that it has no finite subcover, let, for each $kinmathbbN$, $e_k$ denote the sequence $(0,ldots,0,1,0,ldots)$, where the $1$ is in position $k$. Since $|e_k-e_ell|=1$ if $knot=ell$, it follows that no two such vectors can belong to the same $B_1/2(x)$ for any $x$.



                    Note that in general, a set in a metric space is compact if and only if it is complete and totally bounded.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 1 hour ago









                    ervxervx

                    10.4k31438




                    10.4k31438





















                        4












                        $begingroup$

                        Yes.



                        The equivalence of "compact" and "closed and bounded" holds only in finite-dimensional spaces.



                        In a general, infinite-dimensional normed space (e.g., over the real scalars), for a set to be compact, it is not enough that it be closed and bounded. It must be closed and totally bounded.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          4












                          $begingroup$

                          Yes.



                          The equivalence of "compact" and "closed and bounded" holds only in finite-dimensional spaces.



                          In a general, infinite-dimensional normed space (e.g., over the real scalars), for a set to be compact, it is not enough that it be closed and bounded. It must be closed and totally bounded.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            4












                            4








                            4





                            $begingroup$

                            Yes.



                            The equivalence of "compact" and "closed and bounded" holds only in finite-dimensional spaces.



                            In a general, infinite-dimensional normed space (e.g., over the real scalars), for a set to be compact, it is not enough that it be closed and bounded. It must be closed and totally bounded.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Yes.



                            The equivalence of "compact" and "closed and bounded" holds only in finite-dimensional spaces.



                            In a general, infinite-dimensional normed space (e.g., over the real scalars), for a set to be compact, it is not enough that it be closed and bounded. It must be closed and totally bounded.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 1 hour ago









                            avsavs

                            4,6701515




                            4,6701515





















                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                Example. The unit ball $B$ in Hilbert space $l^2$. It is closed and bounded, but not compact. Let the orthonormal unit vectors be $e_n, n=1,2,3,dots$. Then sequence $e_n$ is a sequence in $B$, but it has no convergent subsequence. This is because all the distances are $|e_n-e_m| = sqrt2$ so in fact no subsequence is even a Cauchy sequence.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$

















                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Example. The unit ball $B$ in Hilbert space $l^2$. It is closed and bounded, but not compact. Let the orthonormal unit vectors be $e_n, n=1,2,3,dots$. Then sequence $e_n$ is a sequence in $B$, but it has no convergent subsequence. This is because all the distances are $|e_n-e_m| = sqrt2$ so in fact no subsequence is even a Cauchy sequence.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$















                                    1












                                    1








                                    1





                                    $begingroup$

                                    Example. The unit ball $B$ in Hilbert space $l^2$. It is closed and bounded, but not compact. Let the orthonormal unit vectors be $e_n, n=1,2,3,dots$. Then sequence $e_n$ is a sequence in $B$, but it has no convergent subsequence. This is because all the distances are $|e_n-e_m| = sqrt2$ so in fact no subsequence is even a Cauchy sequence.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    Example. The unit ball $B$ in Hilbert space $l^2$. It is closed and bounded, but not compact. Let the orthonormal unit vectors be $e_n, n=1,2,3,dots$. Then sequence $e_n$ is a sequence in $B$, but it has no convergent subsequence. This is because all the distances are $|e_n-e_m| = sqrt2$ so in fact no subsequence is even a Cauchy sequence.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered 1 hour ago









                                    GEdgarGEdgar

                                    63.9k369177




                                    63.9k369177



























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3218973%2fcompactness-in-normed-vector-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Siegen Nawigatsjuun

                                        Log på Navigationsmenu

                                        Log på Navigationsmenu