Was there a contingency plan in place if Little Boy failed to detonate?Was Casablanca a “safe” place for the Allies to hold a global conference in January, 1943?Was there a plan “B” for the D-Day?Why is there less public attention on the firebombing of Japan compared to its atomic bombing?What was going to be Hitler's next plan after taking Russia?Was there a plan to use nuclear weapons for terrain modification in North America?Why was Hiroshima selected to be the city in Japan on which the first atom bomb was dropped?Why were there no nuclear detonations in 1959?Was there an official name for the bomb detonated in the Manhattan ProjectWhere did Operation Bogart take place?How did the US plan to use nuclear shells for naval guns?
What can cause an unfrozen indoor copper drain pipe to crack?
And now you see it II (the B side)
What are these round pads on the bottom of a PCB?
Program for finding longest run of zeros from a list of 100 random integers which are either 0 or 1
Origins of the "array like" strings in BASIC
How do carbureted and fuel injected engines compare in high altitude?
Can I bring back Planetary Romance as a genre?
What Firewall Port is required for snap package management?
Examples where existence is harder than evaluation
What replaces x86 intrinsics for C when Apple ditches Intel CPUs for their own chips?
My perfect evil overlord plan... or is it?
Two (probably) equal real numbers which are not proved to be equal?
Libertine font numbers have a different height than text
Why are thrust reversers not used to slow down to taxi speeds?
Not taking the bishop by the knight, why?
How to avoid making self and former employee look bad when reporting on fixing former employee's work?
Thawing Glaciers return to hand interaction
Best species to breed to intelligence
Why Faces eat each other?
What is the minimum required technology to reanimate someone who has been cryogenically frozen?
"Estrontium" on poster
Do Monks gain the 9th level Unarmored Movement benefit when wearing armor or using a shield?
Are there vaccine ingredients which may not be disclosed ("hidden", "trade secret", or similar)?
How to handle DM constantly stealing everything from sleeping characters?
Was there a contingency plan in place if Little Boy failed to detonate?
Was Casablanca a “safe” place for the Allies to hold a global conference in January, 1943?Was there a plan “B” for the D-Day?Why is there less public attention on the firebombing of Japan compared to its atomic bombing?What was going to be Hitler's next plan after taking Russia?Was there a plan to use nuclear weapons for terrain modification in North America?Why was Hiroshima selected to be the city in Japan on which the first atom bomb was dropped?Why were there no nuclear detonations in 1959?Was there an official name for the bomb detonated in the Manhattan ProjectWhere did Operation Bogart take place?How did the US plan to use nuclear shells for naval guns?
It's August 6th, 1945. The first atomic bomb ever dropped hurtles to the ground. Its fuse fails and with a thunk it buries itself in the ground. The Enola Gay flies home, it's crew worried they did something wrong.
Now the brass back in Washington have a problem; they just hand delivered an atomic bomb to their desperate enemies, and it might be easy to repair.
I couldn't find any contingencies about it, but I'm also not a professionally trained historian with access to primary sources. I did find plans, which were abandoned, for building a giant concrete containment vessel around the Trinity device in case that failed to completely detonate, so they could save the uranium.
My question is, what, if anything was their plan for this situation?
world-war-two nuclear-weapons
add a comment |
It's August 6th, 1945. The first atomic bomb ever dropped hurtles to the ground. Its fuse fails and with a thunk it buries itself in the ground. The Enola Gay flies home, it's crew worried they did something wrong.
Now the brass back in Washington have a problem; they just hand delivered an atomic bomb to their desperate enemies, and it might be easy to repair.
I couldn't find any contingencies about it, but I'm also not a professionally trained historian with access to primary sources. I did find plans, which were abandoned, for building a giant concrete containment vessel around the Trinity device in case that failed to completely detonate, so they could save the uranium.
My question is, what, if anything was their plan for this situation?
world-war-two nuclear-weapons
9
What questions do you have that are not answered here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-type_fission_weapon "Even a "fizzle" would have completely disintegrated the device, while the multiple redundancies built into the "Little Boy" design meant there was negligible if any potential for the device to strike the ground without detonating at all."
– AllInOne
6 hours ago
7
@AllInOne: Ryan is asking what, if any, contingency plan there was if the "negligible, if any" chance turned out to be non-zero after all. I think it is a fair question (albeit about a very unlikely event).
– DevSolar
6 hours ago
What did your research reveal? (Please edit the answer into the question - questions should show evidence of prior research, and nobody should have to read comments to understand the question).
– Mark C. Wallace♦
5 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_(nuclear_test)
– Denis de Bernardy
2 hours ago
add a comment |
It's August 6th, 1945. The first atomic bomb ever dropped hurtles to the ground. Its fuse fails and with a thunk it buries itself in the ground. The Enola Gay flies home, it's crew worried they did something wrong.
Now the brass back in Washington have a problem; they just hand delivered an atomic bomb to their desperate enemies, and it might be easy to repair.
I couldn't find any contingencies about it, but I'm also not a professionally trained historian with access to primary sources. I did find plans, which were abandoned, for building a giant concrete containment vessel around the Trinity device in case that failed to completely detonate, so they could save the uranium.
My question is, what, if anything was their plan for this situation?
world-war-two nuclear-weapons
It's August 6th, 1945. The first atomic bomb ever dropped hurtles to the ground. Its fuse fails and with a thunk it buries itself in the ground. The Enola Gay flies home, it's crew worried they did something wrong.
Now the brass back in Washington have a problem; they just hand delivered an atomic bomb to their desperate enemies, and it might be easy to repair.
I couldn't find any contingencies about it, but I'm also not a professionally trained historian with access to primary sources. I did find plans, which were abandoned, for building a giant concrete containment vessel around the Trinity device in case that failed to completely detonate, so they could save the uranium.
My question is, what, if anything was their plan for this situation?
world-war-two nuclear-weapons
world-war-two nuclear-weapons
edited 58 mins ago
Mark C. Wallace♦
24k974115
24k974115
asked 6 hours ago
Ryan_LRyan_L
32226
32226
9
What questions do you have that are not answered here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-type_fission_weapon "Even a "fizzle" would have completely disintegrated the device, while the multiple redundancies built into the "Little Boy" design meant there was negligible if any potential for the device to strike the ground without detonating at all."
– AllInOne
6 hours ago
7
@AllInOne: Ryan is asking what, if any, contingency plan there was if the "negligible, if any" chance turned out to be non-zero after all. I think it is a fair question (albeit about a very unlikely event).
– DevSolar
6 hours ago
What did your research reveal? (Please edit the answer into the question - questions should show evidence of prior research, and nobody should have to read comments to understand the question).
– Mark C. Wallace♦
5 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_(nuclear_test)
– Denis de Bernardy
2 hours ago
add a comment |
9
What questions do you have that are not answered here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-type_fission_weapon "Even a "fizzle" would have completely disintegrated the device, while the multiple redundancies built into the "Little Boy" design meant there was negligible if any potential for the device to strike the ground without detonating at all."
– AllInOne
6 hours ago
7
@AllInOne: Ryan is asking what, if any, contingency plan there was if the "negligible, if any" chance turned out to be non-zero after all. I think it is a fair question (albeit about a very unlikely event).
– DevSolar
6 hours ago
What did your research reveal? (Please edit the answer into the question - questions should show evidence of prior research, and nobody should have to read comments to understand the question).
– Mark C. Wallace♦
5 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_(nuclear_test)
– Denis de Bernardy
2 hours ago
9
9
What questions do you have that are not answered here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-type_fission_weapon "Even a "fizzle" would have completely disintegrated the device, while the multiple redundancies built into the "Little Boy" design meant there was negligible if any potential for the device to strike the ground without detonating at all."
– AllInOne
6 hours ago
What questions do you have that are not answered here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-type_fission_weapon "Even a "fizzle" would have completely disintegrated the device, while the multiple redundancies built into the "Little Boy" design meant there was negligible if any potential for the device to strike the ground without detonating at all."
– AllInOne
6 hours ago
7
7
@AllInOne: Ryan is asking what, if any, contingency plan there was if the "negligible, if any" chance turned out to be non-zero after all. I think it is a fair question (albeit about a very unlikely event).
– DevSolar
6 hours ago
@AllInOne: Ryan is asking what, if any, contingency plan there was if the "negligible, if any" chance turned out to be non-zero after all. I think it is a fair question (albeit about a very unlikely event).
– DevSolar
6 hours ago
What did your research reveal? (Please edit the answer into the question - questions should show evidence of prior research, and nobody should have to read comments to understand the question).
– Mark C. Wallace♦
5 hours ago
What did your research reveal? (Please edit the answer into the question - questions should show evidence of prior research, and nobody should have to read comments to understand the question).
– Mark C. Wallace♦
5 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_(nuclear_test)
– Denis de Bernardy
2 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_(nuclear_test)
– Denis de Bernardy
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
...win the war anyway within a few months, and pick up the wrecked bomb from wherever the Japanese had stored it.
Even if Japan could figure out what that bomb was supposed to be doing and repair it, they didn't have any delivery system that could reach mainland USA (with any degree of certainty).
More importantly, the USA knew Japan did not have the capacities to build a second bomb, so even the microscopic chance that Japan could deliver the salvaged bomb to some target would not have changed the outcome.
The USA had both the delivery system and the production capacity to build a second, third, fourth bomb, quite aside from having the strategic upper hand so firmly that they did not actually need the A-bomb to win the war. Not even in the very, very unlikely scenario of a major city, Pearl Harbor, or any other single location taken out by the salvaged Little Boy.
2
Well, they didn't really have enough uranium to build a second, third, fourth Little Boy.
– Vladimir F
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The primary contingency plan was the design of the bomb itself. Little Boy was not a safe design: any number of unplanned events could cause a detonation. Foremost among these is impact: a 500 g impact, such as would happen after a 15,000-foot fall, is sufficient to bring the bullet and target together, detonating the bomb. If the bomb hit water instead of land, the water would act as a neutron moderator, causing a criticality event and severe radioactive contamination. In the event of an airplane crash, any resulting fire will trigger the explosives, setting off the bomb.
In short, once the bomb is fully assembled, it's very hard to keep it from going off. In the event that the crew of Enola Gay had to abort their mission, they had no intention of trying to land with the bomb still aboard.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52517%2fwas-there-a-contingency-plan-in-place-if-little-boy-failed-to-detonate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
...win the war anyway within a few months, and pick up the wrecked bomb from wherever the Japanese had stored it.
Even if Japan could figure out what that bomb was supposed to be doing and repair it, they didn't have any delivery system that could reach mainland USA (with any degree of certainty).
More importantly, the USA knew Japan did not have the capacities to build a second bomb, so even the microscopic chance that Japan could deliver the salvaged bomb to some target would not have changed the outcome.
The USA had both the delivery system and the production capacity to build a second, third, fourth bomb, quite aside from having the strategic upper hand so firmly that they did not actually need the A-bomb to win the war. Not even in the very, very unlikely scenario of a major city, Pearl Harbor, or any other single location taken out by the salvaged Little Boy.
2
Well, they didn't really have enough uranium to build a second, third, fourth Little Boy.
– Vladimir F
1 hour ago
add a comment |
...win the war anyway within a few months, and pick up the wrecked bomb from wherever the Japanese had stored it.
Even if Japan could figure out what that bomb was supposed to be doing and repair it, they didn't have any delivery system that could reach mainland USA (with any degree of certainty).
More importantly, the USA knew Japan did not have the capacities to build a second bomb, so even the microscopic chance that Japan could deliver the salvaged bomb to some target would not have changed the outcome.
The USA had both the delivery system and the production capacity to build a second, third, fourth bomb, quite aside from having the strategic upper hand so firmly that they did not actually need the A-bomb to win the war. Not even in the very, very unlikely scenario of a major city, Pearl Harbor, or any other single location taken out by the salvaged Little Boy.
2
Well, they didn't really have enough uranium to build a second, third, fourth Little Boy.
– Vladimir F
1 hour ago
add a comment |
...win the war anyway within a few months, and pick up the wrecked bomb from wherever the Japanese had stored it.
Even if Japan could figure out what that bomb was supposed to be doing and repair it, they didn't have any delivery system that could reach mainland USA (with any degree of certainty).
More importantly, the USA knew Japan did not have the capacities to build a second bomb, so even the microscopic chance that Japan could deliver the salvaged bomb to some target would not have changed the outcome.
The USA had both the delivery system and the production capacity to build a second, third, fourth bomb, quite aside from having the strategic upper hand so firmly that they did not actually need the A-bomb to win the war. Not even in the very, very unlikely scenario of a major city, Pearl Harbor, or any other single location taken out by the salvaged Little Boy.
...win the war anyway within a few months, and pick up the wrecked bomb from wherever the Japanese had stored it.
Even if Japan could figure out what that bomb was supposed to be doing and repair it, they didn't have any delivery system that could reach mainland USA (with any degree of certainty).
More importantly, the USA knew Japan did not have the capacities to build a second bomb, so even the microscopic chance that Japan could deliver the salvaged bomb to some target would not have changed the outcome.
The USA had both the delivery system and the production capacity to build a second, third, fourth bomb, quite aside from having the strategic upper hand so firmly that they did not actually need the A-bomb to win the war. Not even in the very, very unlikely scenario of a major city, Pearl Harbor, or any other single location taken out by the salvaged Little Boy.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
DevSolarDevSolar
6,9192547
6,9192547
2
Well, they didn't really have enough uranium to build a second, third, fourth Little Boy.
– Vladimir F
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2
Well, they didn't really have enough uranium to build a second, third, fourth Little Boy.
– Vladimir F
1 hour ago
2
2
Well, they didn't really have enough uranium to build a second, third, fourth Little Boy.
– Vladimir F
1 hour ago
Well, they didn't really have enough uranium to build a second, third, fourth Little Boy.
– Vladimir F
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The primary contingency plan was the design of the bomb itself. Little Boy was not a safe design: any number of unplanned events could cause a detonation. Foremost among these is impact: a 500 g impact, such as would happen after a 15,000-foot fall, is sufficient to bring the bullet and target together, detonating the bomb. If the bomb hit water instead of land, the water would act as a neutron moderator, causing a criticality event and severe radioactive contamination. In the event of an airplane crash, any resulting fire will trigger the explosives, setting off the bomb.
In short, once the bomb is fully assembled, it's very hard to keep it from going off. In the event that the crew of Enola Gay had to abort their mission, they had no intention of trying to land with the bomb still aboard.
add a comment |
The primary contingency plan was the design of the bomb itself. Little Boy was not a safe design: any number of unplanned events could cause a detonation. Foremost among these is impact: a 500 g impact, such as would happen after a 15,000-foot fall, is sufficient to bring the bullet and target together, detonating the bomb. If the bomb hit water instead of land, the water would act as a neutron moderator, causing a criticality event and severe radioactive contamination. In the event of an airplane crash, any resulting fire will trigger the explosives, setting off the bomb.
In short, once the bomb is fully assembled, it's very hard to keep it from going off. In the event that the crew of Enola Gay had to abort their mission, they had no intention of trying to land with the bomb still aboard.
add a comment |
The primary contingency plan was the design of the bomb itself. Little Boy was not a safe design: any number of unplanned events could cause a detonation. Foremost among these is impact: a 500 g impact, such as would happen after a 15,000-foot fall, is sufficient to bring the bullet and target together, detonating the bomb. If the bomb hit water instead of land, the water would act as a neutron moderator, causing a criticality event and severe radioactive contamination. In the event of an airplane crash, any resulting fire will trigger the explosives, setting off the bomb.
In short, once the bomb is fully assembled, it's very hard to keep it from going off. In the event that the crew of Enola Gay had to abort their mission, they had no intention of trying to land with the bomb still aboard.
The primary contingency plan was the design of the bomb itself. Little Boy was not a safe design: any number of unplanned events could cause a detonation. Foremost among these is impact: a 500 g impact, such as would happen after a 15,000-foot fall, is sufficient to bring the bullet and target together, detonating the bomb. If the bomb hit water instead of land, the water would act as a neutron moderator, causing a criticality event and severe radioactive contamination. In the event of an airplane crash, any resulting fire will trigger the explosives, setting off the bomb.
In short, once the bomb is fully assembled, it's very hard to keep it from going off. In the event that the crew of Enola Gay had to abort their mission, they had no intention of trying to land with the bomb still aboard.
answered 1 hour ago
MarkMark
3,3841636
3,3841636
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52517%2fwas-there-a-contingency-plan-in-place-if-little-boy-failed-to-detonate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
9
What questions do you have that are not answered here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-type_fission_weapon "Even a "fizzle" would have completely disintegrated the device, while the multiple redundancies built into the "Little Boy" design meant there was negligible if any potential for the device to strike the ground without detonating at all."
– AllInOne
6 hours ago
7
@AllInOne: Ryan is asking what, if any, contingency plan there was if the "negligible, if any" chance turned out to be non-zero after all. I think it is a fair question (albeit about a very unlikely event).
– DevSolar
6 hours ago
What did your research reveal? (Please edit the answer into the question - questions should show evidence of prior research, and nobody should have to read comments to understand the question).
– Mark C. Wallace♦
5 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_(nuclear_test)
– Denis de Bernardy
2 hours ago