Are there any crystals that are theoretically possible, but haven't yet been made?Miller Indices: How to deal with some weird(-ish) cases?Testing for asbestos using readily available chemicals and tools?
How many Dothraki are left as of Game of Thrones S8E5?
Save my secrets!
multicol package causes underfull hbox
How do I balance a campaign consisting of four kobold PCs?
Why does the U.S military use mercenaries?
Why is Drogon so much better in battle than Rhaegal and Viserion?
Can I get the output of a command line program with TeX (using e.g. read18)?
Largest memory peripheral for Sinclair ZX81?
Why is the S-duct intake on the Tu-154 uniquely oblong?
Can the Gate spell draw a creature larger that 20 feet in every dimension through the portal it creates?
How would fantasy dwarves exist, realistically?
Alternative classical explanation of the Stern-Gerlach Experiment?
Parse a C++14 integer literal
Pedaling at different gear ratios on flat terrain: what's the point?
When did Britain learn about the American Declaration of Independence?
What is the probability that two cards drawn from a deck are both face cards and at least one is red?
Sort a section of a file
how to create an executable file for an AppleScript?
Referring to a character in 3rd person when they have amnesia
Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand
Divisor Rich and Poor Numbers
Why are there five extra turns in tournament Magic?
Show that the characteristic polynomial is the same as the minimal polynomial
Why does Taylor’s series “work”?
Are there any crystals that are theoretically possible, but haven't yet been made?
Miller Indices: How to deal with some weird(-ish) cases?Testing for asbestos using readily available chemicals and tools?
$begingroup$
Are there any crystals (that exist at standard temperature and pressure) that are theoretically possible, but haven't yet been made?
For example, the predicted requirements for temperature, pressure, materials etc. for crystallisation to occur are too difficult to achieve.
crystallography
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are there any crystals (that exist at standard temperature and pressure) that are theoretically possible, but haven't yet been made?
For example, the predicted requirements for temperature, pressure, materials etc. for crystallisation to occur are too difficult to achieve.
crystallography
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are there any crystals (that exist at standard temperature and pressure) that are theoretically possible, but haven't yet been made?
For example, the predicted requirements for temperature, pressure, materials etc. for crystallisation to occur are too difficult to achieve.
crystallography
$endgroup$
Are there any crystals (that exist at standard temperature and pressure) that are theoretically possible, but haven't yet been made?
For example, the predicted requirements for temperature, pressure, materials etc. for crystallisation to occur are too difficult to achieve.
crystallography
crystallography
asked 3 hours ago
user52673user52673
1212
1212
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When we are talking about prediction of materials, it is generally about the structure and corresponding free energy, not the crystallization process. That being said there are a huge number of inorganic materials that predicted to be stable yet no one has synthesized them. There are computational databases like Materials Project (https://www.materialsproject.org/) that contain automatically generated (theoretical) structures and their estimated free energy, solubility, magnetic properties, bandgap, stability compared to competing phases etc.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115432%2fare-there-any-crystals-that-are-theoretically-possible-but-havent-yet-been-mad%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When we are talking about prediction of materials, it is generally about the structure and corresponding free energy, not the crystallization process. That being said there are a huge number of inorganic materials that predicted to be stable yet no one has synthesized them. There are computational databases like Materials Project (https://www.materialsproject.org/) that contain automatically generated (theoretical) structures and their estimated free energy, solubility, magnetic properties, bandgap, stability compared to competing phases etc.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When we are talking about prediction of materials, it is generally about the structure and corresponding free energy, not the crystallization process. That being said there are a huge number of inorganic materials that predicted to be stable yet no one has synthesized them. There are computational databases like Materials Project (https://www.materialsproject.org/) that contain automatically generated (theoretical) structures and their estimated free energy, solubility, magnetic properties, bandgap, stability compared to competing phases etc.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When we are talking about prediction of materials, it is generally about the structure and corresponding free energy, not the crystallization process. That being said there are a huge number of inorganic materials that predicted to be stable yet no one has synthesized them. There are computational databases like Materials Project (https://www.materialsproject.org/) that contain automatically generated (theoretical) structures and their estimated free energy, solubility, magnetic properties, bandgap, stability compared to competing phases etc.
$endgroup$
When we are talking about prediction of materials, it is generally about the structure and corresponding free energy, not the crystallization process. That being said there are a huge number of inorganic materials that predicted to be stable yet no one has synthesized them. There are computational databases like Materials Project (https://www.materialsproject.org/) that contain automatically generated (theoretical) structures and their estimated free energy, solubility, magnetic properties, bandgap, stability compared to competing phases etc.
answered 3 hours ago
GregGreg
4,4491428
4,4491428
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115432%2fare-there-any-crystals-that-are-theoretically-possible-but-havent-yet-been-mad%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown