Large dominating sets in tournamentsIs the feedback vertex number bounded by the maximum number of leaves in a spanning tree?What is the best lower bound for the domination number in regular graphs of girth 5?Rock-paper-scissors…expected number of cycles in a “random” bipartite directed graphProperties of a smallest tournament with domination number $k$Maximum number of hyperedges on a hypergraph without a spanning treefinding dominating cycles in $2K_2$-free graphsHamming graph and independent setsDoes every connected vertex transitive graph on $n$ vertices (except for $C_n$) have minimum feedback vertex set of size $Omega(n)$?Minimum dominating sets in tournaments

Large dominating sets in tournaments


Is the feedback vertex number bounded by the maximum number of leaves in a spanning tree?What is the best lower bound for the domination number in regular graphs of girth 5?Rock-paper-scissors…expected number of cycles in a “random” bipartite directed graphProperties of a smallest tournament with domination number $k$Maximum number of hyperedges on a hypergraph without a spanning treefinding dominating cycles in $2K_2$-free graphsHamming graph and independent setsDoes every connected vertex transitive graph on $n$ vertices (except for $C_n$) have minimum feedback vertex set of size $Omega(n)$?Minimum dominating sets in tournaments













3












$begingroup$


It is known that in any tournament with $n$ vertices, there is a dominating set of size no more than $lceil log_2 nrceil$. (See Fact 2.5 here.)



What are tournaments such that any dominating set is of size $Omega(log n)$? No example is given in the link above. A tournament that does not work is one where the vertices are on a cycle and each vertex has an edge to $(n-1)/2$ following vertices clockwise -- in this case taking two opposite vertices already gives a dominating set.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    It is known that in any tournament with $n$ vertices, there is a dominating set of size no more than $lceil log_2 nrceil$. (See Fact 2.5 here.)



    What are tournaments such that any dominating set is of size $Omega(log n)$? No example is given in the link above. A tournament that does not work is one where the vertices are on a cycle and each vertex has an edge to $(n-1)/2$ following vertices clockwise -- in this case taking two opposite vertices already gives a dominating set.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      It is known that in any tournament with $n$ vertices, there is a dominating set of size no more than $lceil log_2 nrceil$. (See Fact 2.5 here.)



      What are tournaments such that any dominating set is of size $Omega(log n)$? No example is given in the link above. A tournament that does not work is one where the vertices are on a cycle and each vertex has an edge to $(n-1)/2$ following vertices clockwise -- in this case taking two opposite vertices already gives a dominating set.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      It is known that in any tournament with $n$ vertices, there is a dominating set of size no more than $lceil log_2 nrceil$. (See Fact 2.5 here.)



      What are tournaments such that any dominating set is of size $Omega(log n)$? No example is given in the link above. A tournament that does not work is one where the vertices are on a cycle and each vertex has an edge to $(n-1)/2$ following vertices clockwise -- in this case taking two opposite vertices already gives a dominating set.







      co.combinatorics graph-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      pi66pi66

      287110




      287110




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          1. Random tournaments have this property with high probability, due to Erdős [1].


          2. Paley tournaments (Graham&Spencer [2]): if $qequiv3pmod4$ is a prime power, define a tournament whose vertex set is the finite field $mathbb F_q$ by
            $$xto yiff y-xtext is a square in mathbb F_q.$$


          References:



          [1] Paul Erdős: On a problem in graph theory, Mathematical Gazette 47 (1963), no. 361, pp. 220-223.



          [2] Ronald L. Graham, Joel H. Spencer: A constructive solution to a tournament problem, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 14 (1971), no. 1, pp. 45-48.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "504"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f331716%2flarge-dominating-sets-in-tournaments%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            1. Random tournaments have this property with high probability, due to Erdős [1].


            2. Paley tournaments (Graham&Spencer [2]): if $qequiv3pmod4$ is a prime power, define a tournament whose vertex set is the finite field $mathbb F_q$ by
              $$xto yiff y-xtext is a square in mathbb F_q.$$


            References:



            [1] Paul Erdős: On a problem in graph theory, Mathematical Gazette 47 (1963), no. 361, pp. 220-223.



            [2] Ronald L. Graham, Joel H. Spencer: A constructive solution to a tournament problem, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 14 (1971), no. 1, pp. 45-48.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              4












              $begingroup$

              1. Random tournaments have this property with high probability, due to Erdős [1].


              2. Paley tournaments (Graham&Spencer [2]): if $qequiv3pmod4$ is a prime power, define a tournament whose vertex set is the finite field $mathbb F_q$ by
                $$xto yiff y-xtext is a square in mathbb F_q.$$


              References:



              [1] Paul Erdős: On a problem in graph theory, Mathematical Gazette 47 (1963), no. 361, pp. 220-223.



              [2] Ronald L. Graham, Joel H. Spencer: A constructive solution to a tournament problem, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 14 (1971), no. 1, pp. 45-48.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                4












                4








                4





                $begingroup$

                1. Random tournaments have this property with high probability, due to Erdős [1].


                2. Paley tournaments (Graham&Spencer [2]): if $qequiv3pmod4$ is a prime power, define a tournament whose vertex set is the finite field $mathbb F_q$ by
                  $$xto yiff y-xtext is a square in mathbb F_q.$$


                References:



                [1] Paul Erdős: On a problem in graph theory, Mathematical Gazette 47 (1963), no. 361, pp. 220-223.



                [2] Ronald L. Graham, Joel H. Spencer: A constructive solution to a tournament problem, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 14 (1971), no. 1, pp. 45-48.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                1. Random tournaments have this property with high probability, due to Erdős [1].


                2. Paley tournaments (Graham&Spencer [2]): if $qequiv3pmod4$ is a prime power, define a tournament whose vertex set is the finite field $mathbb F_q$ by
                  $$xto yiff y-xtext is a square in mathbb F_q.$$


                References:



                [1] Paul Erdős: On a problem in graph theory, Mathematical Gazette 47 (1963), no. 361, pp. 220-223.



                [2] Ronald L. Graham, Joel H. Spencer: A constructive solution to a tournament problem, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 14 (1971), no. 1, pp. 45-48.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 3 hours ago

























                answered 4 hours ago









                Emil JeřábekEmil Jeřábek

                30.8k390144




                30.8k390144



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f331716%2flarge-dominating-sets-in-tournaments%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Log på Navigationsmenu

                    Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

                    Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse