Can I tell a prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving?How to approach my boss about a job change?As assistant manager, supporting a team member the boss is down onHow to give a polite ultimatum?Manager wants to hire an employee he's sleeping with, against the advice of his team leadersFeeling threatened with new coworker joining team who is better than meHow to convince users to follow a new policy when they're used to work under a wrong oneHow to tell my boss that his decision quenched the last bit of my already low motivation?How do we evaluate a candidate who would not speak to any women during the interview process?Do I have to bring up a candidate's troubled history?How do I deal with my insecurity about hiring an employee that outputs work faster than me?
Does French have the English "short i" vowel?
What does kpsewhich stand for?
What is the meaning of "<&3" and "done < file11 3< file22"
Do photons bend spacetime or not?
Need to read my home electrical Meter
Testing using real data of the customer
Is superuser the same as root?
Are black holes spherical during merger?
Non-containing subsets of two sizes
Is there a context where the expression `a.b::c` makes sense?
Why is unzipped directory exactly 4.0k (much smaller than zipped file)?
How to melt snow without fire or body heat?
Why did Jon Snow do this immoral act if he is so honorable?
What is the use case for non-breathable waterproof pants?
Can a character with the War Caster feat call a bolt with Call Lightning instead of making an opportunity attack?
Why did Theresa May offer a vote on a second Brexit referendum?
What is the view of Buddhism in correcting others' view in spite of their willingness to accept it?
When playing Edgar Markov, what is the definition of a "Vampire spell"?
How was Daenerys able to legitimise this character?
What's difference between "depends on" and "is blocked by" relations between issues in Jira next-gen board?
Is keeping the forking link on a true fork necessary (Github/GPL)?
Replacement stem cap and bolt
Can a person survive on blood in place of water?
Heat lost in ideal capacitor charging
Can I tell a prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving?
How to approach my boss about a job change?As assistant manager, supporting a team member the boss is down onHow to give a polite ultimatum?Manager wants to hire an employee he's sleeping with, against the advice of his team leadersFeeling threatened with new coworker joining team who is better than meHow to convince users to follow a new policy when they're used to work under a wrong oneHow to tell my boss that his decision quenched the last bit of my already low motivation?How do we evaluate a candidate who would not speak to any women during the interview process?Do I have to bring up a candidate's troubled history?How do I deal with my insecurity about hiring an employee that outputs work faster than me?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
everyone in my team (3 people) is very much dissatisfied with the direction that the company is going. The hours are long, the pay mediocre and the pressure huge. We're all actively looking to change jobs. Right now we're also recruiting a new team member to replace the one who left last month.
We had a great candidate, who I really liked not only as a potential coworker but also as a person. Right now he's reluctant to change jobs, afraid of the consequences as his present job is not at all bad. Our HR is working hard on convincing him what a great workplace we are. Personally, I would hate for him to start working in this toxic place, especially after the entire team leaves.
I think I would like to contact him and let him know that we're all looking to leave soon. Can I? Or do I have to stay loyal to the company - what are the possible consequences of warning him?
EDIT: I am not working in HR. I was directly running the first round of interviews as a team member. I don't expect to have any more official interactions with him until he joins our team, so I'd have to reach out to him.
interviewing communication work-environment
New contributor
add a comment |
everyone in my team (3 people) is very much dissatisfied with the direction that the company is going. The hours are long, the pay mediocre and the pressure huge. We're all actively looking to change jobs. Right now we're also recruiting a new team member to replace the one who left last month.
We had a great candidate, who I really liked not only as a potential coworker but also as a person. Right now he's reluctant to change jobs, afraid of the consequences as his present job is not at all bad. Our HR is working hard on convincing him what a great workplace we are. Personally, I would hate for him to start working in this toxic place, especially after the entire team leaves.
I think I would like to contact him and let him know that we're all looking to leave soon. Can I? Or do I have to stay loyal to the company - what are the possible consequences of warning him?
EDIT: I am not working in HR. I was directly running the first round of interviews as a team member. I don't expect to have any more official interactions with him until he joins our team, so I'd have to reach out to him.
interviewing communication work-environment
New contributor
4
can you rephrase what you are asking? "Should I" questions are going to get opinions for answers. Questions like 'how can I discreetly do X" or "what potential consequences will X have" are more likely to get meaningful answers.
– dbeer
8 hours ago
3
Can you edit your question and describe your involvement or responsibilities during the hiring process? I.e. are you responsible for communication with the candidate? Are you involved in the interview? etc.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
I agree with dwizum. Anyone answering has to make an assumption about your role in the hiring process and that assumption may be the difference between a good answer and a bad one. Please clarify if your job duties will bring you into contact with the candidate organically or if you would need to create that contact.
– Myles
7 hours ago
Keep in mind if you do tell this prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving you are outing not only yourself but your teammates. They might not appreciate you announcing that they are leaving if it gets back to the company and it could get you all fired or make your lives more miserable until you find another job. You may not care but your teammates might.
– JeffC
14 mins ago
add a comment |
everyone in my team (3 people) is very much dissatisfied with the direction that the company is going. The hours are long, the pay mediocre and the pressure huge. We're all actively looking to change jobs. Right now we're also recruiting a new team member to replace the one who left last month.
We had a great candidate, who I really liked not only as a potential coworker but also as a person. Right now he's reluctant to change jobs, afraid of the consequences as his present job is not at all bad. Our HR is working hard on convincing him what a great workplace we are. Personally, I would hate for him to start working in this toxic place, especially after the entire team leaves.
I think I would like to contact him and let him know that we're all looking to leave soon. Can I? Or do I have to stay loyal to the company - what are the possible consequences of warning him?
EDIT: I am not working in HR. I was directly running the first round of interviews as a team member. I don't expect to have any more official interactions with him until he joins our team, so I'd have to reach out to him.
interviewing communication work-environment
New contributor
everyone in my team (3 people) is very much dissatisfied with the direction that the company is going. The hours are long, the pay mediocre and the pressure huge. We're all actively looking to change jobs. Right now we're also recruiting a new team member to replace the one who left last month.
We had a great candidate, who I really liked not only as a potential coworker but also as a person. Right now he's reluctant to change jobs, afraid of the consequences as his present job is not at all bad. Our HR is working hard on convincing him what a great workplace we are. Personally, I would hate for him to start working in this toxic place, especially after the entire team leaves.
I think I would like to contact him and let him know that we're all looking to leave soon. Can I? Or do I have to stay loyal to the company - what are the possible consequences of warning him?
EDIT: I am not working in HR. I was directly running the first round of interviews as a team member. I don't expect to have any more official interactions with him until he joins our team, so I'd have to reach out to him.
interviewing communication work-environment
interviewing communication work-environment
New contributor
New contributor
edited 7 hours ago
Sourav Ghosh
16.6k1684104
16.6k1684104
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
RiverSongRiverSong
694
694
New contributor
New contributor
4
can you rephrase what you are asking? "Should I" questions are going to get opinions for answers. Questions like 'how can I discreetly do X" or "what potential consequences will X have" are more likely to get meaningful answers.
– dbeer
8 hours ago
3
Can you edit your question and describe your involvement or responsibilities during the hiring process? I.e. are you responsible for communication with the candidate? Are you involved in the interview? etc.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
I agree with dwizum. Anyone answering has to make an assumption about your role in the hiring process and that assumption may be the difference between a good answer and a bad one. Please clarify if your job duties will bring you into contact with the candidate organically or if you would need to create that contact.
– Myles
7 hours ago
Keep in mind if you do tell this prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving you are outing not only yourself but your teammates. They might not appreciate you announcing that they are leaving if it gets back to the company and it could get you all fired or make your lives more miserable until you find another job. You may not care but your teammates might.
– JeffC
14 mins ago
add a comment |
4
can you rephrase what you are asking? "Should I" questions are going to get opinions for answers. Questions like 'how can I discreetly do X" or "what potential consequences will X have" are more likely to get meaningful answers.
– dbeer
8 hours ago
3
Can you edit your question and describe your involvement or responsibilities during the hiring process? I.e. are you responsible for communication with the candidate? Are you involved in the interview? etc.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
I agree with dwizum. Anyone answering has to make an assumption about your role in the hiring process and that assumption may be the difference between a good answer and a bad one. Please clarify if your job duties will bring you into contact with the candidate organically or if you would need to create that contact.
– Myles
7 hours ago
Keep in mind if you do tell this prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving you are outing not only yourself but your teammates. They might not appreciate you announcing that they are leaving if it gets back to the company and it could get you all fired or make your lives more miserable until you find another job. You may not care but your teammates might.
– JeffC
14 mins ago
4
4
can you rephrase what you are asking? "Should I" questions are going to get opinions for answers. Questions like 'how can I discreetly do X" or "what potential consequences will X have" are more likely to get meaningful answers.
– dbeer
8 hours ago
can you rephrase what you are asking? "Should I" questions are going to get opinions for answers. Questions like 'how can I discreetly do X" or "what potential consequences will X have" are more likely to get meaningful answers.
– dbeer
8 hours ago
3
3
Can you edit your question and describe your involvement or responsibilities during the hiring process? I.e. are you responsible for communication with the candidate? Are you involved in the interview? etc.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
Can you edit your question and describe your involvement or responsibilities during the hiring process? I.e. are you responsible for communication with the candidate? Are you involved in the interview? etc.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
I agree with dwizum. Anyone answering has to make an assumption about your role in the hiring process and that assumption may be the difference between a good answer and a bad one. Please clarify if your job duties will bring you into contact with the candidate organically or if you would need to create that contact.
– Myles
7 hours ago
I agree with dwizum. Anyone answering has to make an assumption about your role in the hiring process and that assumption may be the difference between a good answer and a bad one. Please clarify if your job duties will bring you into contact with the candidate organically or if you would need to create that contact.
– Myles
7 hours ago
Keep in mind if you do tell this prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving you are outing not only yourself but your teammates. They might not appreciate you announcing that they are leaving if it gets back to the company and it could get you all fired or make your lives more miserable until you find another job. You may not care but your teammates might.
– JeffC
14 mins ago
Keep in mind if you do tell this prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving you are outing not only yourself but your teammates. They might not appreciate you announcing that they are leaving if it gets back to the company and it could get you all fired or make your lives more miserable until you find another job. You may not care but your teammates might.
– JeffC
14 mins ago
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
Are you anticipating talking to the candidate as part of the interview process?
If so, then you should answer his questions honestly. You could make him aware of specific problems that he may come across, but don't badmouth the company. Ultimately it's his decision and his responsibility to do due diligence.
If not, and you're proposing contacting him unsolicited outside the process, then you are in risky territory. You are certainly exposing yourself to disciplinary action if the company finds out, which may well happen if the candidate declines an offer and the company ask why. (Though I accept you may not care about your current job, being fired will still make your next job hunt harder). There might also be data protection issues around obtaining the candidate's contact details without authority.
add a comment |
Can you? Yes. There is nothing stopping you, physically or legally. There are a variety of options on how to do this, if you choose to do it.
Possible consequences of telling him? If you tell him, and the word gets back to the company that it was you, you are reasonably likely to get fired before you can get a new job. The company would be correct to do it - you're being pretty blatantly disloyal - but that doesn't mean that it's the wrong decision, morally speaking. If the company finds out that someone warned him away, but doesn't find out who, then they might not fire you all, but it's likely that your relationship with your bosses will get even more toxic before you flee. If the company finds out from this that you're all planning on leaving, that could have similar results, but at the end of the day, the worst they can do to you is either fire you without severance or make your work life suck more.
You can control for this somewhat by reducing the information you provide to the potential new hire, and asking him to keep quiet on it. Make a throwaway email account, and give him a warning about the troubles with the company that doesn't directly say "and we're all leaving". It'll make it notably less likely that he'll say anything about his reasons, and even if he does, he won't know that it's you, and he won't know that you're all planning on leaving. It won't be as compelling as you telling him directly, but if he's uncertain, then it should be enough to ward him off.
"Blatantly disloyal" to a company that probably won't show you an iota of loyalty when things get tough ...yeah, I'm having trouble seeing the moral dilemma here.
– Kenneth K.
26 mins ago
add a comment |
If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem. You cannot prevent everyone to join your team, and only giving heads up to the people you like would also be wrong.
As long as you are part of the team, you should stay out of this, if you are asked to be part of the interview process either you decline or make sure you are not screwing it up.
After you leave if someone ask you about the company you can say whatever you want.
If you screw your company because they are screwing you, you are not much better than them. Just do your job well till the las day and move on when you can.
I agree almost completely, except that I don't think you need to decline to participate from the interview process. You should answer questions honestly, and fairly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), but you also need to realize that your answer is subjective. Maybe compared to where he is now, the hours are good and it is less pressure.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
I agree, I suggested he decline if he cannot give propper opinions without talking shit about his company, for exaple the word "toxic" shouldn't be mentioned
– Homerothompson
7 hours ago
7
"If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem." - there are people out there for whom even a lousy job would be welcomed. This guy already has a job, and one that he's reasonably happy with. The only reason he's considering it is because HR has been doing really well at selling this lousy job.
– Ben Barden
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1. Do not misrepresent your company.
Important part of the interview is when you ask the candidate about his expectations of the new job and give him the overall idea about the work processes in your company. One of the points here is to make sure that your company doesn't, by any chance, have the same traits that were getting on candidate's nerves at his last workplace. Because if it does - the candidate would find that out the day he joins in, and he would certainly be unhappy about not knowing that up front. While you (and your team, and your company) want a happy colleague who wouldn't think that he's been tricked. Hence, put the facts plain and square, neither concealing them, nor decorating nor disfiguring your company. It is the right thing on many levels: making sure that the prospective candidate would stay; maintaining honest company profile; identifying weak points of your company and bringing them to the management.
2. Protective advices are for close friends.
To begin with, taking a personal advice requires trust. Are you sure he trusts you enough to take such advice from an interviewer?
The second reason is that once he has all the facts he would make his own conclusions and wouldn't need that advice anyway.
3. Let him have his opinion and be his own master.
People who has left (or are going to leave) often tend to paint the things more grim than they appear to an uninvolved person. It's not about being dishonest, it's more about accumulated dissatisfaction. His opinion may vary. If he thinks that those facts are a molehill - so be it. Perhaps, he values that particular job higher then possible long hours. If after a few years he changes his mind - so be it, too.
4. Speak only for yourself.
Don't speak for other people. Statement like "we all think that ..." sounds like you're striving to give your claim all the weight it may get, while at the same time excusing yourself of sole responsibility for such opinion. Sorry, that just wouldn't smell good.
Edit:
At the current stage, when your communication with the candidate is over, I wouldn't advice you to contact him behind the company's back. The best thing (in terms of honour) I can think of is to persuade the HR person to give the prospective candidate the key facts about the job. On the ground of representing the company in a fair way and hiring a consciously willing candidate.
New contributor
add a comment |
I'd say, stay within a proper employer (you are interviewing) and employee (the prospective candidate) relationship.
If, during the scheduled discussion, they ask
If selected, are we going to work together?
You can respond
Most likely not, I will be leaving the organization soon.
If they ask
Why?
Say
I have my personal reasons.
and leave it there.
No, you don't need to discuss / inform about others, staying or leaving.
You MUST NOT try to solicit them in any other ways/ channel apart of the official channel through which you're supposed to communicate. Remember, the candidate is not communicating with you in some personal capacity, they will be communicating with you in a professional capacity. I understand your feelings, but that said, there's professionalism. It's not about being loyal, it's about being ethical and legal.
1
Why the MUST NOT? An imperative of that strength seems like it would call for some justification.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden If the candidate is a "potential candidate" and you're informing them of some information only someone from inside the organization can supply, via a out-of-band communication - you're participating in insider trading - which is mostly illegal.
– Sourav Ghosh
8 hours ago
5
"Insider trading is the buying or selling of a publicly traded company's stock by someone who has non-public, material information about that stock." No one is buying or selling stock here. It doesn't apply.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden OK, I should have chosen the words carefully. However, it's still insider information. At times, a person leaving an organization can have impact on it's financial things: stocks - for example, and informing that to an outsider would not be desirable, if not illegal. Why to take the chance?
– Sourav Ghosh
7 hours ago
1
@SouravGhosh, in USA if you work for a public company, somebody will tell you if and when you are not allowed to talk about the company's prospects to follow SEC rules about insider trading. If nobody has talked to you about it, you're not one of those insiders.
– O. Jones
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Based on my own Personal Opinion I would say, contact him via phone after work and clue him in. Again this is my own personal opinion. But I were to looking to join a new team, and I was running blindly into a toxic, unstable environment I would really appreciate a heads up from someone on the inside.
However, that being said. If your current office got wind of your warning that would prove most difficult for you including you getting fired. So be prepared for that.
As a side note, I suggested calling him vs an email to not leave any kind of paper trail.
if the candidate were to tell HR someone called him and warned him you could deny deny deny deny. But if the candidate were to forward an email he received to your HR it would be hard to deny.
This is horrible advice. When you take their money, you have certain obligations to them - one of which is to not do anything to harm the company. Reaching out to the candidate, to tell him to decline an offer, or list all the bad things with your team, would definitely harm the firm. While you have a right to answer questions honestly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), it would be extremely wrong to reach out and contact him at all, especially to dissuade him from joining.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
RiverSong is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137037%2fcan-i-tell-a-prospective-employee-that-everyone-in-the-team-is-leaving%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function ()
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
var showEditor = function()
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
;
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True')
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup(
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup)
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
)
else
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
showEditor();
);
);
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Are you anticipating talking to the candidate as part of the interview process?
If so, then you should answer his questions honestly. You could make him aware of specific problems that he may come across, but don't badmouth the company. Ultimately it's his decision and his responsibility to do due diligence.
If not, and you're proposing contacting him unsolicited outside the process, then you are in risky territory. You are certainly exposing yourself to disciplinary action if the company finds out, which may well happen if the candidate declines an offer and the company ask why. (Though I accept you may not care about your current job, being fired will still make your next job hunt harder). There might also be data protection issues around obtaining the candidate's contact details without authority.
add a comment |
Are you anticipating talking to the candidate as part of the interview process?
If so, then you should answer his questions honestly. You could make him aware of specific problems that he may come across, but don't badmouth the company. Ultimately it's his decision and his responsibility to do due diligence.
If not, and you're proposing contacting him unsolicited outside the process, then you are in risky territory. You are certainly exposing yourself to disciplinary action if the company finds out, which may well happen if the candidate declines an offer and the company ask why. (Though I accept you may not care about your current job, being fired will still make your next job hunt harder). There might also be data protection issues around obtaining the candidate's contact details without authority.
add a comment |
Are you anticipating talking to the candidate as part of the interview process?
If so, then you should answer his questions honestly. You could make him aware of specific problems that he may come across, but don't badmouth the company. Ultimately it's his decision and his responsibility to do due diligence.
If not, and you're proposing contacting him unsolicited outside the process, then you are in risky territory. You are certainly exposing yourself to disciplinary action if the company finds out, which may well happen if the candidate declines an offer and the company ask why. (Though I accept you may not care about your current job, being fired will still make your next job hunt harder). There might also be data protection issues around obtaining the candidate's contact details without authority.
Are you anticipating talking to the candidate as part of the interview process?
If so, then you should answer his questions honestly. You could make him aware of specific problems that he may come across, but don't badmouth the company. Ultimately it's his decision and his responsibility to do due diligence.
If not, and you're proposing contacting him unsolicited outside the process, then you are in risky territory. You are certainly exposing yourself to disciplinary action if the company finds out, which may well happen if the candidate declines an offer and the company ask why. (Though I accept you may not care about your current job, being fired will still make your next job hunt harder). There might also be data protection issues around obtaining the candidate's contact details without authority.
answered 8 hours ago
Julia HaywardJulia Hayward
13.8k73943
13.8k73943
add a comment |
add a comment |
Can you? Yes. There is nothing stopping you, physically or legally. There are a variety of options on how to do this, if you choose to do it.
Possible consequences of telling him? If you tell him, and the word gets back to the company that it was you, you are reasonably likely to get fired before you can get a new job. The company would be correct to do it - you're being pretty blatantly disloyal - but that doesn't mean that it's the wrong decision, morally speaking. If the company finds out that someone warned him away, but doesn't find out who, then they might not fire you all, but it's likely that your relationship with your bosses will get even more toxic before you flee. If the company finds out from this that you're all planning on leaving, that could have similar results, but at the end of the day, the worst they can do to you is either fire you without severance or make your work life suck more.
You can control for this somewhat by reducing the information you provide to the potential new hire, and asking him to keep quiet on it. Make a throwaway email account, and give him a warning about the troubles with the company that doesn't directly say "and we're all leaving". It'll make it notably less likely that he'll say anything about his reasons, and even if he does, he won't know that it's you, and he won't know that you're all planning on leaving. It won't be as compelling as you telling him directly, but if he's uncertain, then it should be enough to ward him off.
"Blatantly disloyal" to a company that probably won't show you an iota of loyalty when things get tough ...yeah, I'm having trouble seeing the moral dilemma here.
– Kenneth K.
26 mins ago
add a comment |
Can you? Yes. There is nothing stopping you, physically or legally. There are a variety of options on how to do this, if you choose to do it.
Possible consequences of telling him? If you tell him, and the word gets back to the company that it was you, you are reasonably likely to get fired before you can get a new job. The company would be correct to do it - you're being pretty blatantly disloyal - but that doesn't mean that it's the wrong decision, morally speaking. If the company finds out that someone warned him away, but doesn't find out who, then they might not fire you all, but it's likely that your relationship with your bosses will get even more toxic before you flee. If the company finds out from this that you're all planning on leaving, that could have similar results, but at the end of the day, the worst they can do to you is either fire you without severance or make your work life suck more.
You can control for this somewhat by reducing the information you provide to the potential new hire, and asking him to keep quiet on it. Make a throwaway email account, and give him a warning about the troubles with the company that doesn't directly say "and we're all leaving". It'll make it notably less likely that he'll say anything about his reasons, and even if he does, he won't know that it's you, and he won't know that you're all planning on leaving. It won't be as compelling as you telling him directly, but if he's uncertain, then it should be enough to ward him off.
"Blatantly disloyal" to a company that probably won't show you an iota of loyalty when things get tough ...yeah, I'm having trouble seeing the moral dilemma here.
– Kenneth K.
26 mins ago
add a comment |
Can you? Yes. There is nothing stopping you, physically or legally. There are a variety of options on how to do this, if you choose to do it.
Possible consequences of telling him? If you tell him, and the word gets back to the company that it was you, you are reasonably likely to get fired before you can get a new job. The company would be correct to do it - you're being pretty blatantly disloyal - but that doesn't mean that it's the wrong decision, morally speaking. If the company finds out that someone warned him away, but doesn't find out who, then they might not fire you all, but it's likely that your relationship with your bosses will get even more toxic before you flee. If the company finds out from this that you're all planning on leaving, that could have similar results, but at the end of the day, the worst they can do to you is either fire you without severance or make your work life suck more.
You can control for this somewhat by reducing the information you provide to the potential new hire, and asking him to keep quiet on it. Make a throwaway email account, and give him a warning about the troubles with the company that doesn't directly say "and we're all leaving". It'll make it notably less likely that he'll say anything about his reasons, and even if he does, he won't know that it's you, and he won't know that you're all planning on leaving. It won't be as compelling as you telling him directly, but if he's uncertain, then it should be enough to ward him off.
Can you? Yes. There is nothing stopping you, physically or legally. There are a variety of options on how to do this, if you choose to do it.
Possible consequences of telling him? If you tell him, and the word gets back to the company that it was you, you are reasonably likely to get fired before you can get a new job. The company would be correct to do it - you're being pretty blatantly disloyal - but that doesn't mean that it's the wrong decision, morally speaking. If the company finds out that someone warned him away, but doesn't find out who, then they might not fire you all, but it's likely that your relationship with your bosses will get even more toxic before you flee. If the company finds out from this that you're all planning on leaving, that could have similar results, but at the end of the day, the worst they can do to you is either fire you without severance or make your work life suck more.
You can control for this somewhat by reducing the information you provide to the potential new hire, and asking him to keep quiet on it. Make a throwaway email account, and give him a warning about the troubles with the company that doesn't directly say "and we're all leaving". It'll make it notably less likely that he'll say anything about his reasons, and even if he does, he won't know that it's you, and he won't know that you're all planning on leaving. It won't be as compelling as you telling him directly, but if he's uncertain, then it should be enough to ward him off.
answered 8 hours ago
Ben BardenBen Barden
10.5k82630
10.5k82630
"Blatantly disloyal" to a company that probably won't show you an iota of loyalty when things get tough ...yeah, I'm having trouble seeing the moral dilemma here.
– Kenneth K.
26 mins ago
add a comment |
"Blatantly disloyal" to a company that probably won't show you an iota of loyalty when things get tough ...yeah, I'm having trouble seeing the moral dilemma here.
– Kenneth K.
26 mins ago
"Blatantly disloyal" to a company that probably won't show you an iota of loyalty when things get tough ...yeah, I'm having trouble seeing the moral dilemma here.
– Kenneth K.
26 mins ago
"Blatantly disloyal" to a company that probably won't show you an iota of loyalty when things get tough ...yeah, I'm having trouble seeing the moral dilemma here.
– Kenneth K.
26 mins ago
add a comment |
If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem. You cannot prevent everyone to join your team, and only giving heads up to the people you like would also be wrong.
As long as you are part of the team, you should stay out of this, if you are asked to be part of the interview process either you decline or make sure you are not screwing it up.
After you leave if someone ask you about the company you can say whatever you want.
If you screw your company because they are screwing you, you are not much better than them. Just do your job well till the las day and move on when you can.
I agree almost completely, except that I don't think you need to decline to participate from the interview process. You should answer questions honestly, and fairly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), but you also need to realize that your answer is subjective. Maybe compared to where he is now, the hours are good and it is less pressure.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
I agree, I suggested he decline if he cannot give propper opinions without talking shit about his company, for exaple the word "toxic" shouldn't be mentioned
– Homerothompson
7 hours ago
7
"If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem." - there are people out there for whom even a lousy job would be welcomed. This guy already has a job, and one that he's reasonably happy with. The only reason he's considering it is because HR has been doing really well at selling this lousy job.
– Ben Barden
7 hours ago
add a comment |
If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem. You cannot prevent everyone to join your team, and only giving heads up to the people you like would also be wrong.
As long as you are part of the team, you should stay out of this, if you are asked to be part of the interview process either you decline or make sure you are not screwing it up.
After you leave if someone ask you about the company you can say whatever you want.
If you screw your company because they are screwing you, you are not much better than them. Just do your job well till the las day and move on when you can.
I agree almost completely, except that I don't think you need to decline to participate from the interview process. You should answer questions honestly, and fairly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), but you also need to realize that your answer is subjective. Maybe compared to where he is now, the hours are good and it is less pressure.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
I agree, I suggested he decline if he cannot give propper opinions without talking shit about his company, for exaple the word "toxic" shouldn't be mentioned
– Homerothompson
7 hours ago
7
"If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem." - there are people out there for whom even a lousy job would be welcomed. This guy already has a job, and one that he's reasonably happy with. The only reason he's considering it is because HR has been doing really well at selling this lousy job.
– Ben Barden
7 hours ago
add a comment |
If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem. You cannot prevent everyone to join your team, and only giving heads up to the people you like would also be wrong.
As long as you are part of the team, you should stay out of this, if you are asked to be part of the interview process either you decline or make sure you are not screwing it up.
After you leave if someone ask you about the company you can say whatever you want.
If you screw your company because they are screwing you, you are not much better than them. Just do your job well till the las day and move on when you can.
If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem. You cannot prevent everyone to join your team, and only giving heads up to the people you like would also be wrong.
As long as you are part of the team, you should stay out of this, if you are asked to be part of the interview process either you decline or make sure you are not screwing it up.
After you leave if someone ask you about the company you can say whatever you want.
If you screw your company because they are screwing you, you are not much better than them. Just do your job well till the las day and move on when you can.
answered 8 hours ago
HomerothompsonHomerothompson
2,601723
2,601723
I agree almost completely, except that I don't think you need to decline to participate from the interview process. You should answer questions honestly, and fairly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), but you also need to realize that your answer is subjective. Maybe compared to where he is now, the hours are good and it is less pressure.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
I agree, I suggested he decline if he cannot give propper opinions without talking shit about his company, for exaple the word "toxic" shouldn't be mentioned
– Homerothompson
7 hours ago
7
"If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem." - there are people out there for whom even a lousy job would be welcomed. This guy already has a job, and one that he's reasonably happy with. The only reason he's considering it is because HR has been doing really well at selling this lousy job.
– Ben Barden
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I agree almost completely, except that I don't think you need to decline to participate from the interview process. You should answer questions honestly, and fairly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), but you also need to realize that your answer is subjective. Maybe compared to where he is now, the hours are good and it is less pressure.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
I agree, I suggested he decline if he cannot give propper opinions without talking shit about his company, for exaple the word "toxic" shouldn't be mentioned
– Homerothompson
7 hours ago
7
"If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem." - there are people out there for whom even a lousy job would be welcomed. This guy already has a job, and one that he's reasonably happy with. The only reason he's considering it is because HR has been doing really well at selling this lousy job.
– Ben Barden
7 hours ago
I agree almost completely, except that I don't think you need to decline to participate from the interview process. You should answer questions honestly, and fairly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), but you also need to realize that your answer is subjective. Maybe compared to where he is now, the hours are good and it is less pressure.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
I agree almost completely, except that I don't think you need to decline to participate from the interview process. You should answer questions honestly, and fairly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), but you also need to realize that your answer is subjective. Maybe compared to where he is now, the hours are good and it is less pressure.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
I agree, I suggested he decline if he cannot give propper opinions without talking shit about his company, for exaple the word "toxic" shouldn't be mentioned
– Homerothompson
7 hours ago
I agree, I suggested he decline if he cannot give propper opinions without talking shit about his company, for exaple the word "toxic" shouldn't be mentioned
– Homerothompson
7 hours ago
7
7
"If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem." - there are people out there for whom even a lousy job would be welcomed. This guy already has a job, and one that he's reasonably happy with. The only reason he's considering it is because HR has been doing really well at selling this lousy job.
– Ben Barden
7 hours ago
"If it's not him, another soul will get into the same problem." - there are people out there for whom even a lousy job would be welcomed. This guy already has a job, and one that he's reasonably happy with. The only reason he's considering it is because HR has been doing really well at selling this lousy job.
– Ben Barden
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1. Do not misrepresent your company.
Important part of the interview is when you ask the candidate about his expectations of the new job and give him the overall idea about the work processes in your company. One of the points here is to make sure that your company doesn't, by any chance, have the same traits that were getting on candidate's nerves at his last workplace. Because if it does - the candidate would find that out the day he joins in, and he would certainly be unhappy about not knowing that up front. While you (and your team, and your company) want a happy colleague who wouldn't think that he's been tricked. Hence, put the facts plain and square, neither concealing them, nor decorating nor disfiguring your company. It is the right thing on many levels: making sure that the prospective candidate would stay; maintaining honest company profile; identifying weak points of your company and bringing them to the management.
2. Protective advices are for close friends.
To begin with, taking a personal advice requires trust. Are you sure he trusts you enough to take such advice from an interviewer?
The second reason is that once he has all the facts he would make his own conclusions and wouldn't need that advice anyway.
3. Let him have his opinion and be his own master.
People who has left (or are going to leave) often tend to paint the things more grim than they appear to an uninvolved person. It's not about being dishonest, it's more about accumulated dissatisfaction. His opinion may vary. If he thinks that those facts are a molehill - so be it. Perhaps, he values that particular job higher then possible long hours. If after a few years he changes his mind - so be it, too.
4. Speak only for yourself.
Don't speak for other people. Statement like "we all think that ..." sounds like you're striving to give your claim all the weight it may get, while at the same time excusing yourself of sole responsibility for such opinion. Sorry, that just wouldn't smell good.
Edit:
At the current stage, when your communication with the candidate is over, I wouldn't advice you to contact him behind the company's back. The best thing (in terms of honour) I can think of is to persuade the HR person to give the prospective candidate the key facts about the job. On the ground of representing the company in a fair way and hiring a consciously willing candidate.
New contributor
add a comment |
1. Do not misrepresent your company.
Important part of the interview is when you ask the candidate about his expectations of the new job and give him the overall idea about the work processes in your company. One of the points here is to make sure that your company doesn't, by any chance, have the same traits that were getting on candidate's nerves at his last workplace. Because if it does - the candidate would find that out the day he joins in, and he would certainly be unhappy about not knowing that up front. While you (and your team, and your company) want a happy colleague who wouldn't think that he's been tricked. Hence, put the facts plain and square, neither concealing them, nor decorating nor disfiguring your company. It is the right thing on many levels: making sure that the prospective candidate would stay; maintaining honest company profile; identifying weak points of your company and bringing them to the management.
2. Protective advices are for close friends.
To begin with, taking a personal advice requires trust. Are you sure he trusts you enough to take such advice from an interviewer?
The second reason is that once he has all the facts he would make his own conclusions and wouldn't need that advice anyway.
3. Let him have his opinion and be his own master.
People who has left (or are going to leave) often tend to paint the things more grim than they appear to an uninvolved person. It's not about being dishonest, it's more about accumulated dissatisfaction. His opinion may vary. If he thinks that those facts are a molehill - so be it. Perhaps, he values that particular job higher then possible long hours. If after a few years he changes his mind - so be it, too.
4. Speak only for yourself.
Don't speak for other people. Statement like "we all think that ..." sounds like you're striving to give your claim all the weight it may get, while at the same time excusing yourself of sole responsibility for such opinion. Sorry, that just wouldn't smell good.
Edit:
At the current stage, when your communication with the candidate is over, I wouldn't advice you to contact him behind the company's back. The best thing (in terms of honour) I can think of is to persuade the HR person to give the prospective candidate the key facts about the job. On the ground of representing the company in a fair way and hiring a consciously willing candidate.
New contributor
add a comment |
1. Do not misrepresent your company.
Important part of the interview is when you ask the candidate about his expectations of the new job and give him the overall idea about the work processes in your company. One of the points here is to make sure that your company doesn't, by any chance, have the same traits that were getting on candidate's nerves at his last workplace. Because if it does - the candidate would find that out the day he joins in, and he would certainly be unhappy about not knowing that up front. While you (and your team, and your company) want a happy colleague who wouldn't think that he's been tricked. Hence, put the facts plain and square, neither concealing them, nor decorating nor disfiguring your company. It is the right thing on many levels: making sure that the prospective candidate would stay; maintaining honest company profile; identifying weak points of your company and bringing them to the management.
2. Protective advices are for close friends.
To begin with, taking a personal advice requires trust. Are you sure he trusts you enough to take such advice from an interviewer?
The second reason is that once he has all the facts he would make his own conclusions and wouldn't need that advice anyway.
3. Let him have his opinion and be his own master.
People who has left (or are going to leave) often tend to paint the things more grim than they appear to an uninvolved person. It's not about being dishonest, it's more about accumulated dissatisfaction. His opinion may vary. If he thinks that those facts are a molehill - so be it. Perhaps, he values that particular job higher then possible long hours. If after a few years he changes his mind - so be it, too.
4. Speak only for yourself.
Don't speak for other people. Statement like "we all think that ..." sounds like you're striving to give your claim all the weight it may get, while at the same time excusing yourself of sole responsibility for such opinion. Sorry, that just wouldn't smell good.
Edit:
At the current stage, when your communication with the candidate is over, I wouldn't advice you to contact him behind the company's back. The best thing (in terms of honour) I can think of is to persuade the HR person to give the prospective candidate the key facts about the job. On the ground of representing the company in a fair way and hiring a consciously willing candidate.
New contributor
1. Do not misrepresent your company.
Important part of the interview is when you ask the candidate about his expectations of the new job and give him the overall idea about the work processes in your company. One of the points here is to make sure that your company doesn't, by any chance, have the same traits that were getting on candidate's nerves at his last workplace. Because if it does - the candidate would find that out the day he joins in, and he would certainly be unhappy about not knowing that up front. While you (and your team, and your company) want a happy colleague who wouldn't think that he's been tricked. Hence, put the facts plain and square, neither concealing them, nor decorating nor disfiguring your company. It is the right thing on many levels: making sure that the prospective candidate would stay; maintaining honest company profile; identifying weak points of your company and bringing them to the management.
2. Protective advices are for close friends.
To begin with, taking a personal advice requires trust. Are you sure he trusts you enough to take such advice from an interviewer?
The second reason is that once he has all the facts he would make his own conclusions and wouldn't need that advice anyway.
3. Let him have his opinion and be his own master.
People who has left (or are going to leave) often tend to paint the things more grim than they appear to an uninvolved person. It's not about being dishonest, it's more about accumulated dissatisfaction. His opinion may vary. If he thinks that those facts are a molehill - so be it. Perhaps, he values that particular job higher then possible long hours. If after a few years he changes his mind - so be it, too.
4. Speak only for yourself.
Don't speak for other people. Statement like "we all think that ..." sounds like you're striving to give your claim all the weight it may get, while at the same time excusing yourself of sole responsibility for such opinion. Sorry, that just wouldn't smell good.
Edit:
At the current stage, when your communication with the candidate is over, I wouldn't advice you to contact him behind the company's back. The best thing (in terms of honour) I can think of is to persuade the HR person to give the prospective candidate the key facts about the job. On the ground of representing the company in a fair way and hiring a consciously willing candidate.
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
Igor GIgor G
1234
1234
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
I'd say, stay within a proper employer (you are interviewing) and employee (the prospective candidate) relationship.
If, during the scheduled discussion, they ask
If selected, are we going to work together?
You can respond
Most likely not, I will be leaving the organization soon.
If they ask
Why?
Say
I have my personal reasons.
and leave it there.
No, you don't need to discuss / inform about others, staying or leaving.
You MUST NOT try to solicit them in any other ways/ channel apart of the official channel through which you're supposed to communicate. Remember, the candidate is not communicating with you in some personal capacity, they will be communicating with you in a professional capacity. I understand your feelings, but that said, there's professionalism. It's not about being loyal, it's about being ethical and legal.
1
Why the MUST NOT? An imperative of that strength seems like it would call for some justification.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden If the candidate is a "potential candidate" and you're informing them of some information only someone from inside the organization can supply, via a out-of-band communication - you're participating in insider trading - which is mostly illegal.
– Sourav Ghosh
8 hours ago
5
"Insider trading is the buying or selling of a publicly traded company's stock by someone who has non-public, material information about that stock." No one is buying or selling stock here. It doesn't apply.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden OK, I should have chosen the words carefully. However, it's still insider information. At times, a person leaving an organization can have impact on it's financial things: stocks - for example, and informing that to an outsider would not be desirable, if not illegal. Why to take the chance?
– Sourav Ghosh
7 hours ago
1
@SouravGhosh, in USA if you work for a public company, somebody will tell you if and when you are not allowed to talk about the company's prospects to follow SEC rules about insider trading. If nobody has talked to you about it, you're not one of those insiders.
– O. Jones
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
I'd say, stay within a proper employer (you are interviewing) and employee (the prospective candidate) relationship.
If, during the scheduled discussion, they ask
If selected, are we going to work together?
You can respond
Most likely not, I will be leaving the organization soon.
If they ask
Why?
Say
I have my personal reasons.
and leave it there.
No, you don't need to discuss / inform about others, staying or leaving.
You MUST NOT try to solicit them in any other ways/ channel apart of the official channel through which you're supposed to communicate. Remember, the candidate is not communicating with you in some personal capacity, they will be communicating with you in a professional capacity. I understand your feelings, but that said, there's professionalism. It's not about being loyal, it's about being ethical and legal.
1
Why the MUST NOT? An imperative of that strength seems like it would call for some justification.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden If the candidate is a "potential candidate" and you're informing them of some information only someone from inside the organization can supply, via a out-of-band communication - you're participating in insider trading - which is mostly illegal.
– Sourav Ghosh
8 hours ago
5
"Insider trading is the buying or selling of a publicly traded company's stock by someone who has non-public, material information about that stock." No one is buying or selling stock here. It doesn't apply.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden OK, I should have chosen the words carefully. However, it's still insider information. At times, a person leaving an organization can have impact on it's financial things: stocks - for example, and informing that to an outsider would not be desirable, if not illegal. Why to take the chance?
– Sourav Ghosh
7 hours ago
1
@SouravGhosh, in USA if you work for a public company, somebody will tell you if and when you are not allowed to talk about the company's prospects to follow SEC rules about insider trading. If nobody has talked to you about it, you're not one of those insiders.
– O. Jones
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
I'd say, stay within a proper employer (you are interviewing) and employee (the prospective candidate) relationship.
If, during the scheduled discussion, they ask
If selected, are we going to work together?
You can respond
Most likely not, I will be leaving the organization soon.
If they ask
Why?
Say
I have my personal reasons.
and leave it there.
No, you don't need to discuss / inform about others, staying or leaving.
You MUST NOT try to solicit them in any other ways/ channel apart of the official channel through which you're supposed to communicate. Remember, the candidate is not communicating with you in some personal capacity, they will be communicating with you in a professional capacity. I understand your feelings, but that said, there's professionalism. It's not about being loyal, it's about being ethical and legal.
I'd say, stay within a proper employer (you are interviewing) and employee (the prospective candidate) relationship.
If, during the scheduled discussion, they ask
If selected, are we going to work together?
You can respond
Most likely not, I will be leaving the organization soon.
If they ask
Why?
Say
I have my personal reasons.
and leave it there.
No, you don't need to discuss / inform about others, staying or leaving.
You MUST NOT try to solicit them in any other ways/ channel apart of the official channel through which you're supposed to communicate. Remember, the candidate is not communicating with you in some personal capacity, they will be communicating with you in a professional capacity. I understand your feelings, but that said, there's professionalism. It's not about being loyal, it's about being ethical and legal.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
16.6k1684104
16.6k1684104
1
Why the MUST NOT? An imperative of that strength seems like it would call for some justification.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden If the candidate is a "potential candidate" and you're informing them of some information only someone from inside the organization can supply, via a out-of-band communication - you're participating in insider trading - which is mostly illegal.
– Sourav Ghosh
8 hours ago
5
"Insider trading is the buying or selling of a publicly traded company's stock by someone who has non-public, material information about that stock." No one is buying or selling stock here. It doesn't apply.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden OK, I should have chosen the words carefully. However, it's still insider information. At times, a person leaving an organization can have impact on it's financial things: stocks - for example, and informing that to an outsider would not be desirable, if not illegal. Why to take the chance?
– Sourav Ghosh
7 hours ago
1
@SouravGhosh, in USA if you work for a public company, somebody will tell you if and when you are not allowed to talk about the company's prospects to follow SEC rules about insider trading. If nobody has talked to you about it, you're not one of those insiders.
– O. Jones
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
1
Why the MUST NOT? An imperative of that strength seems like it would call for some justification.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden If the candidate is a "potential candidate" and you're informing them of some information only someone from inside the organization can supply, via a out-of-band communication - you're participating in insider trading - which is mostly illegal.
– Sourav Ghosh
8 hours ago
5
"Insider trading is the buying or selling of a publicly traded company's stock by someone who has non-public, material information about that stock." No one is buying or selling stock here. It doesn't apply.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden OK, I should have chosen the words carefully. However, it's still insider information. At times, a person leaving an organization can have impact on it's financial things: stocks - for example, and informing that to an outsider would not be desirable, if not illegal. Why to take the chance?
– Sourav Ghosh
7 hours ago
1
@SouravGhosh, in USA if you work for a public company, somebody will tell you if and when you are not allowed to talk about the company's prospects to follow SEC rules about insider trading. If nobody has talked to you about it, you're not one of those insiders.
– O. Jones
4 hours ago
1
1
Why the MUST NOT? An imperative of that strength seems like it would call for some justification.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
Why the MUST NOT? An imperative of that strength seems like it would call for some justification.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden If the candidate is a "potential candidate" and you're informing them of some information only someone from inside the organization can supply, via a out-of-band communication - you're participating in insider trading - which is mostly illegal.
– Sourav Ghosh
8 hours ago
@BenBarden If the candidate is a "potential candidate" and you're informing them of some information only someone from inside the organization can supply, via a out-of-band communication - you're participating in insider trading - which is mostly illegal.
– Sourav Ghosh
8 hours ago
5
5
"Insider trading is the buying or selling of a publicly traded company's stock by someone who has non-public, material information about that stock." No one is buying or selling stock here. It doesn't apply.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
"Insider trading is the buying or selling of a publicly traded company's stock by someone who has non-public, material information about that stock." No one is buying or selling stock here. It doesn't apply.
– Ben Barden
8 hours ago
@BenBarden OK, I should have chosen the words carefully. However, it's still insider information. At times, a person leaving an organization can have impact on it's financial things: stocks - for example, and informing that to an outsider would not be desirable, if not illegal. Why to take the chance?
– Sourav Ghosh
7 hours ago
@BenBarden OK, I should have chosen the words carefully. However, it's still insider information. At times, a person leaving an organization can have impact on it's financial things: stocks - for example, and informing that to an outsider would not be desirable, if not illegal. Why to take the chance?
– Sourav Ghosh
7 hours ago
1
1
@SouravGhosh, in USA if you work for a public company, somebody will tell you if and when you are not allowed to talk about the company's prospects to follow SEC rules about insider trading. If nobody has talked to you about it, you're not one of those insiders.
– O. Jones
4 hours ago
@SouravGhosh, in USA if you work for a public company, somebody will tell you if and when you are not allowed to talk about the company's prospects to follow SEC rules about insider trading. If nobody has talked to you about it, you're not one of those insiders.
– O. Jones
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Based on my own Personal Opinion I would say, contact him via phone after work and clue him in. Again this is my own personal opinion. But I were to looking to join a new team, and I was running blindly into a toxic, unstable environment I would really appreciate a heads up from someone on the inside.
However, that being said. If your current office got wind of your warning that would prove most difficult for you including you getting fired. So be prepared for that.
As a side note, I suggested calling him vs an email to not leave any kind of paper trail.
if the candidate were to tell HR someone called him and warned him you could deny deny deny deny. But if the candidate were to forward an email he received to your HR it would be hard to deny.
This is horrible advice. When you take their money, you have certain obligations to them - one of which is to not do anything to harm the company. Reaching out to the candidate, to tell him to decline an offer, or list all the bad things with your team, would definitely harm the firm. While you have a right to answer questions honestly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), it would be extremely wrong to reach out and contact him at all, especially to dissuade him from joining.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Based on my own Personal Opinion I would say, contact him via phone after work and clue him in. Again this is my own personal opinion. But I were to looking to join a new team, and I was running blindly into a toxic, unstable environment I would really appreciate a heads up from someone on the inside.
However, that being said. If your current office got wind of your warning that would prove most difficult for you including you getting fired. So be prepared for that.
As a side note, I suggested calling him vs an email to not leave any kind of paper trail.
if the candidate were to tell HR someone called him and warned him you could deny deny deny deny. But if the candidate were to forward an email he received to your HR it would be hard to deny.
This is horrible advice. When you take their money, you have certain obligations to them - one of which is to not do anything to harm the company. Reaching out to the candidate, to tell him to decline an offer, or list all the bad things with your team, would definitely harm the firm. While you have a right to answer questions honestly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), it would be extremely wrong to reach out and contact him at all, especially to dissuade him from joining.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Based on my own Personal Opinion I would say, contact him via phone after work and clue him in. Again this is my own personal opinion. But I were to looking to join a new team, and I was running blindly into a toxic, unstable environment I would really appreciate a heads up from someone on the inside.
However, that being said. If your current office got wind of your warning that would prove most difficult for you including you getting fired. So be prepared for that.
As a side note, I suggested calling him vs an email to not leave any kind of paper trail.
if the candidate were to tell HR someone called him and warned him you could deny deny deny deny. But if the candidate were to forward an email he received to your HR it would be hard to deny.
Based on my own Personal Opinion I would say, contact him via phone after work and clue him in. Again this is my own personal opinion. But I were to looking to join a new team, and I was running blindly into a toxic, unstable environment I would really appreciate a heads up from someone on the inside.
However, that being said. If your current office got wind of your warning that would prove most difficult for you including you getting fired. So be prepared for that.
As a side note, I suggested calling him vs an email to not leave any kind of paper trail.
if the candidate were to tell HR someone called him and warned him you could deny deny deny deny. But if the candidate were to forward an email he received to your HR it would be hard to deny.
answered 8 hours ago
jessejesse
1,26439
1,26439
This is horrible advice. When you take their money, you have certain obligations to them - one of which is to not do anything to harm the company. Reaching out to the candidate, to tell him to decline an offer, or list all the bad things with your team, would definitely harm the firm. While you have a right to answer questions honestly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), it would be extremely wrong to reach out and contact him at all, especially to dissuade him from joining.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
add a comment |
This is horrible advice. When you take their money, you have certain obligations to them - one of which is to not do anything to harm the company. Reaching out to the candidate, to tell him to decline an offer, or list all the bad things with your team, would definitely harm the firm. While you have a right to answer questions honestly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), it would be extremely wrong to reach out and contact him at all, especially to dissuade him from joining.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
This is horrible advice. When you take their money, you have certain obligations to them - one of which is to not do anything to harm the company. Reaching out to the candidate, to tell him to decline an offer, or list all the bad things with your team, would definitely harm the firm. While you have a right to answer questions honestly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), it would be extremely wrong to reach out and contact him at all, especially to dissuade him from joining.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
This is horrible advice. When you take their money, you have certain obligations to them - one of which is to not do anything to harm the company. Reaching out to the candidate, to tell him to decline an offer, or list all the bad things with your team, would definitely harm the firm. While you have a right to answer questions honestly (e.g. "How would you describe working here?", "We'll, it is a high pressure shop, and we do put in some pretty long hours"), it would be extremely wrong to reach out and contact him at all, especially to dissuade him from joining.
– dan.m was user2321368
8 hours ago
add a comment |
RiverSong is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RiverSong is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RiverSong is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RiverSong is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137037%2fcan-i-tell-a-prospective-employee-that-everyone-in-the-team-is-leaving%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
can you rephrase what you are asking? "Should I" questions are going to get opinions for answers. Questions like 'how can I discreetly do X" or "what potential consequences will X have" are more likely to get meaningful answers.
– dbeer
8 hours ago
3
Can you edit your question and describe your involvement or responsibilities during the hiring process? I.e. are you responsible for communication with the candidate? Are you involved in the interview? etc.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
I agree with dwizum. Anyone answering has to make an assumption about your role in the hiring process and that assumption may be the difference between a good answer and a bad one. Please clarify if your job duties will bring you into contact with the candidate organically or if you would need to create that contact.
– Myles
7 hours ago
Keep in mind if you do tell this prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving you are outing not only yourself but your teammates. They might not appreciate you announcing that they are leaving if it gets back to the company and it could get you all fired or make your lives more miserable until you find another job. You may not care but your teammates might.
– JeffC
14 mins ago