Question about tidal forces and the Roche limitIs there any orbit at which the Roche limit can be “felt”?How Wide is Earth's Roche Limit?Roche limit - calculation with centrifugal forcesFilling the Roche LobeHow was Io not torn apart by tidal forces during its formation?Roche Limit for Earth-like body around Earth-like bodyHow can I calculate how the debris of an object ripped apart at the Roche limit will spread out?How does gradual crossing over of the Roche limit transform a planet or moon?The effect of gravitational wave is like tidal forces?What is the real position of the tidal bulge?Is the Roche limit used this way?Eventual outcome of tidal acceleration and decelerationRoche limit - calculation with centrifugal forcesIs there any orbit at which the Roche limit can be “felt”?
Early arrival in Australia, early check in not available
Should I pay on student loans in deferment or continue to snowball other debts?
Is there a need for better software for writers?
Noob at soldering, can anyone explain why my circuit wont work?
Thesis' "Future Work" section – is it acceptable to omit personal involvement in a mentioned project?
Why do Thanos' punches not kill Captain America or at least cause some mortal injuries?
Are there variations of the regular runtimes of the Big-O-Notation?
How can I avoid subordinates and coworkers leaving work until the last minute, then having no time for revisions?
Further factorisation of a difference of cubes?
Windows OS quantum vs. SQL OS Quantum
Print a string of characters with their occurrences
How is CoreiX like Corei5, i7 is related to Haswell, Ivy Bridge?
Two researchers want to work on the same extension to my paper. Who to help?
Is this state of Earth possible, after humans left for a million years?
How to efficiently lower your karma
Cropping a message using array splits
What does this quote in Small Gods refer to?
When do you stop "pushing" a book?
How to make a language evolve quickly?
Names of the Six Tastes
Extending Kan fibrations, without using minimal fibrations
Is there an application which does HTTP PUT?
Pre-1993 comic in which Wolverine's claws were turned to rubber?
Detect the first rising edge of 3 input signals
Question about tidal forces and the Roche limit
Is there any orbit at which the Roche limit can be “felt”?How Wide is Earth's Roche Limit?Roche limit - calculation with centrifugal forcesFilling the Roche LobeHow was Io not torn apart by tidal forces during its formation?Roche Limit for Earth-like body around Earth-like bodyHow can I calculate how the debris of an object ripped apart at the Roche limit will spread out?How does gradual crossing over of the Roche limit transform a planet or moon?The effect of gravitational wave is like tidal forces?What is the real position of the tidal bulge?Is the Roche limit used this way?Eventual outcome of tidal acceleration and decelerationRoche limit - calculation with centrifugal forcesIs there any orbit at which the Roche limit can be “felt”?
$begingroup$
As we know, an object that is beyond the Roche limit doesn't disintegrate (obviously) because the tidal forces upon the object are weaker than the gravitational pull of the object towards its centre, so the planet remains intact.
My question is: if that's so, ¿why does the body deforms even before crossing the Roche limit?
If the gravitational pull of the particles in the object outweighs the tidal forces, ¿wouldn't the object have to stay totally round? It couldn't have been any deformation because the tidal forces are totally canceled out.
tidal-forces roche-limit
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As we know, an object that is beyond the Roche limit doesn't disintegrate (obviously) because the tidal forces upon the object are weaker than the gravitational pull of the object towards its centre, so the planet remains intact.
My question is: if that's so, ¿why does the body deforms even before crossing the Roche limit?
If the gravitational pull of the particles in the object outweighs the tidal forces, ¿wouldn't the object have to stay totally round? It couldn't have been any deformation because the tidal forces are totally canceled out.
tidal-forces roche-limit
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I've added an answer, let me know if this is the kind of answer you are looking for, or if you'd like anything further clarified. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As we know, an object that is beyond the Roche limit doesn't disintegrate (obviously) because the tidal forces upon the object are weaker than the gravitational pull of the object towards its centre, so the planet remains intact.
My question is: if that's so, ¿why does the body deforms even before crossing the Roche limit?
If the gravitational pull of the particles in the object outweighs the tidal forces, ¿wouldn't the object have to stay totally round? It couldn't have been any deformation because the tidal forces are totally canceled out.
tidal-forces roche-limit
$endgroup$
As we know, an object that is beyond the Roche limit doesn't disintegrate (obviously) because the tidal forces upon the object are weaker than the gravitational pull of the object towards its centre, so the planet remains intact.
My question is: if that's so, ¿why does the body deforms even before crossing the Roche limit?
If the gravitational pull of the particles in the object outweighs the tidal forces, ¿wouldn't the object have to stay totally round? It couldn't have been any deformation because the tidal forces are totally canceled out.
tidal-forces roche-limit
tidal-forces roche-limit
edited 4 hours ago
Carlos Vázquez Monzón
asked 4 hours ago
Carlos Vázquez MonzónCarlos Vázquez Monzón
483313
483313
$begingroup$
I've added an answer, let me know if this is the kind of answer you are looking for, or if you'd like anything further clarified. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've added an answer, let me know if this is the kind of answer you are looking for, or if you'd like anything further clarified. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've added an answer, let me know if this is the kind of answer you are looking for, or if you'd like anything further clarified. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've added an answer, let me know if this is the kind of answer you are looking for, or if you'd like anything further clarified. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When we do mathematical calculations, sometimes terms cancel and we get to draw a line through them.
But in the real world cancellations and "total cancellations" don't really happen.
Forces just add. Often there's a big force and one or more little forces, and as long as the big force substantially dominates the little forces, we tend to notice only the big force. But it doesn't cancel, it just covers up the effects of the others to the casual observer.
Let's think about gravity. We are so used to moving around in 1 g of gravity that we don't notice it. You could say that our brain "cancels" out 1 g from our conscious awareness and we compensate for it automatically. We don't feel and notice the 1 g when we stand or sit or lay down, even though we make use of it to stay put.
However, get in an elevator or an amusement ride and add a little acceleration, and we notice it right away! That sinking feeling when a fast elevator starts accelerating downward for example watch (but don't listen to) the video The Equivalence Principle
The purpose of the above discussion is to discount the idea of "total cancellations". A bit of rock or soil on the surface of a body feels the gravitation of the rest of the body pulling down, the "centrifugal force pulling" it up if the body is rotating, and the gravitation of nearby bodies (e.g. Sun or Moon or planet) pulling up or down or sideways depending on orientation. It feels all of these all the time.
If the net force, the sum of all the forces, pulls up, then the body starts to disintegrate. If the net force is still down, it doesn't.
Think of it as a threshold, rather than a cancellation.
...if that's so, ¿why does the body deforms even before crossing the Roche limit?
As long as the body is made of material capable of deforming or flowing (which rock certainly is, especially when hot) then it will continue to move or flow until the sum of all the forces reaches zero. Gravity usually dominates, but it's the force of the compressed layer below pushing up that counters the sum of all the forces.
If the body is rotating, then the net force is weaker on the equator than at the poles, and so less pressure is needed to compensate. That means the higher pressure at the poles will cause some of the material to move to the equator.
To read more about several of the competing forces pulling on us all the time as we stand on the Earth, see:
- @DavidHammen's cool table
- my (sadly down-voted) calculation
- all of the answers to Did the Mars rovers actually confirm the gravity of Mars?
Once you are comfortable with the idea of equilibrium, multiple forces adding and pressure, then have a look at all the interesting answers to these particular Roche limit-related questions:
- Is there any orbit at which the Roche limit can be “felt”?
- Roche limit - calculation with centrifugal forces
- How Wide is Earth's Roche Limit?
- Filling the Roche Lobe
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Slightly long for a comment, so I'll put it here.
A comparison could be drawn to the equatorial bulge. A planet that rotates is fatter at the equator than the poles. Nothing "lifts" off the surface because the outward force from the rotation is generally much weaker than the gravity, but the planet still bulges because the forces get added together and the planet effectively has less gravitation on it's axis of rotation.
Just as Earth's rotation, which on a person's weight might only be a fraction of a lb between equator and pole, that variation is still enough to give the Earth a 42 km tidal bulge.
Equatorial bulge of the planets
0.5% weight loss at the Equator vs North Pole. (note 80% of your equatorial weight loss is due to rotation, 20% is due to further distance from the center).
The tidal force on Earth is quite a bit weaker than that and the bulge is measured in feet, not 21 km radius, but Earth being as large as it is, even a small force over the entire surface creates a bulge. Here's a fun answer on the tidal force calculated on the surface of Phobos.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "514"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31824%2fquestion-about-tidal-forces-and-the-roche-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When we do mathematical calculations, sometimes terms cancel and we get to draw a line through them.
But in the real world cancellations and "total cancellations" don't really happen.
Forces just add. Often there's a big force and one or more little forces, and as long as the big force substantially dominates the little forces, we tend to notice only the big force. But it doesn't cancel, it just covers up the effects of the others to the casual observer.
Let's think about gravity. We are so used to moving around in 1 g of gravity that we don't notice it. You could say that our brain "cancels" out 1 g from our conscious awareness and we compensate for it automatically. We don't feel and notice the 1 g when we stand or sit or lay down, even though we make use of it to stay put.
However, get in an elevator or an amusement ride and add a little acceleration, and we notice it right away! That sinking feeling when a fast elevator starts accelerating downward for example watch (but don't listen to) the video The Equivalence Principle
The purpose of the above discussion is to discount the idea of "total cancellations". A bit of rock or soil on the surface of a body feels the gravitation of the rest of the body pulling down, the "centrifugal force pulling" it up if the body is rotating, and the gravitation of nearby bodies (e.g. Sun or Moon or planet) pulling up or down or sideways depending on orientation. It feels all of these all the time.
If the net force, the sum of all the forces, pulls up, then the body starts to disintegrate. If the net force is still down, it doesn't.
Think of it as a threshold, rather than a cancellation.
...if that's so, ¿why does the body deforms even before crossing the Roche limit?
As long as the body is made of material capable of deforming or flowing (which rock certainly is, especially when hot) then it will continue to move or flow until the sum of all the forces reaches zero. Gravity usually dominates, but it's the force of the compressed layer below pushing up that counters the sum of all the forces.
If the body is rotating, then the net force is weaker on the equator than at the poles, and so less pressure is needed to compensate. That means the higher pressure at the poles will cause some of the material to move to the equator.
To read more about several of the competing forces pulling on us all the time as we stand on the Earth, see:
- @DavidHammen's cool table
- my (sadly down-voted) calculation
- all of the answers to Did the Mars rovers actually confirm the gravity of Mars?
Once you are comfortable with the idea of equilibrium, multiple forces adding and pressure, then have a look at all the interesting answers to these particular Roche limit-related questions:
- Is there any orbit at which the Roche limit can be “felt”?
- Roche limit - calculation with centrifugal forces
- How Wide is Earth's Roche Limit?
- Filling the Roche Lobe
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When we do mathematical calculations, sometimes terms cancel and we get to draw a line through them.
But in the real world cancellations and "total cancellations" don't really happen.
Forces just add. Often there's a big force and one or more little forces, and as long as the big force substantially dominates the little forces, we tend to notice only the big force. But it doesn't cancel, it just covers up the effects of the others to the casual observer.
Let's think about gravity. We are so used to moving around in 1 g of gravity that we don't notice it. You could say that our brain "cancels" out 1 g from our conscious awareness and we compensate for it automatically. We don't feel and notice the 1 g when we stand or sit or lay down, even though we make use of it to stay put.
However, get in an elevator or an amusement ride and add a little acceleration, and we notice it right away! That sinking feeling when a fast elevator starts accelerating downward for example watch (but don't listen to) the video The Equivalence Principle
The purpose of the above discussion is to discount the idea of "total cancellations". A bit of rock or soil on the surface of a body feels the gravitation of the rest of the body pulling down, the "centrifugal force pulling" it up if the body is rotating, and the gravitation of nearby bodies (e.g. Sun or Moon or planet) pulling up or down or sideways depending on orientation. It feels all of these all the time.
If the net force, the sum of all the forces, pulls up, then the body starts to disintegrate. If the net force is still down, it doesn't.
Think of it as a threshold, rather than a cancellation.
...if that's so, ¿why does the body deforms even before crossing the Roche limit?
As long as the body is made of material capable of deforming or flowing (which rock certainly is, especially when hot) then it will continue to move or flow until the sum of all the forces reaches zero. Gravity usually dominates, but it's the force of the compressed layer below pushing up that counters the sum of all the forces.
If the body is rotating, then the net force is weaker on the equator than at the poles, and so less pressure is needed to compensate. That means the higher pressure at the poles will cause some of the material to move to the equator.
To read more about several of the competing forces pulling on us all the time as we stand on the Earth, see:
- @DavidHammen's cool table
- my (sadly down-voted) calculation
- all of the answers to Did the Mars rovers actually confirm the gravity of Mars?
Once you are comfortable with the idea of equilibrium, multiple forces adding and pressure, then have a look at all the interesting answers to these particular Roche limit-related questions:
- Is there any orbit at which the Roche limit can be “felt”?
- Roche limit - calculation with centrifugal forces
- How Wide is Earth's Roche Limit?
- Filling the Roche Lobe
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When we do mathematical calculations, sometimes terms cancel and we get to draw a line through them.
But in the real world cancellations and "total cancellations" don't really happen.
Forces just add. Often there's a big force and one or more little forces, and as long as the big force substantially dominates the little forces, we tend to notice only the big force. But it doesn't cancel, it just covers up the effects of the others to the casual observer.
Let's think about gravity. We are so used to moving around in 1 g of gravity that we don't notice it. You could say that our brain "cancels" out 1 g from our conscious awareness and we compensate for it automatically. We don't feel and notice the 1 g when we stand or sit or lay down, even though we make use of it to stay put.
However, get in an elevator or an amusement ride and add a little acceleration, and we notice it right away! That sinking feeling when a fast elevator starts accelerating downward for example watch (but don't listen to) the video The Equivalence Principle
The purpose of the above discussion is to discount the idea of "total cancellations". A bit of rock or soil on the surface of a body feels the gravitation of the rest of the body pulling down, the "centrifugal force pulling" it up if the body is rotating, and the gravitation of nearby bodies (e.g. Sun or Moon or planet) pulling up or down or sideways depending on orientation. It feels all of these all the time.
If the net force, the sum of all the forces, pulls up, then the body starts to disintegrate. If the net force is still down, it doesn't.
Think of it as a threshold, rather than a cancellation.
...if that's so, ¿why does the body deforms even before crossing the Roche limit?
As long as the body is made of material capable of deforming or flowing (which rock certainly is, especially when hot) then it will continue to move or flow until the sum of all the forces reaches zero. Gravity usually dominates, but it's the force of the compressed layer below pushing up that counters the sum of all the forces.
If the body is rotating, then the net force is weaker on the equator than at the poles, and so less pressure is needed to compensate. That means the higher pressure at the poles will cause some of the material to move to the equator.
To read more about several of the competing forces pulling on us all the time as we stand on the Earth, see:
- @DavidHammen's cool table
- my (sadly down-voted) calculation
- all of the answers to Did the Mars rovers actually confirm the gravity of Mars?
Once you are comfortable with the idea of equilibrium, multiple forces adding and pressure, then have a look at all the interesting answers to these particular Roche limit-related questions:
- Is there any orbit at which the Roche limit can be “felt”?
- Roche limit - calculation with centrifugal forces
- How Wide is Earth's Roche Limit?
- Filling the Roche Lobe
$endgroup$
When we do mathematical calculations, sometimes terms cancel and we get to draw a line through them.
But in the real world cancellations and "total cancellations" don't really happen.
Forces just add. Often there's a big force and one or more little forces, and as long as the big force substantially dominates the little forces, we tend to notice only the big force. But it doesn't cancel, it just covers up the effects of the others to the casual observer.
Let's think about gravity. We are so used to moving around in 1 g of gravity that we don't notice it. You could say that our brain "cancels" out 1 g from our conscious awareness and we compensate for it automatically. We don't feel and notice the 1 g when we stand or sit or lay down, even though we make use of it to stay put.
However, get in an elevator or an amusement ride and add a little acceleration, and we notice it right away! That sinking feeling when a fast elevator starts accelerating downward for example watch (but don't listen to) the video The Equivalence Principle
The purpose of the above discussion is to discount the idea of "total cancellations". A bit of rock or soil on the surface of a body feels the gravitation of the rest of the body pulling down, the "centrifugal force pulling" it up if the body is rotating, and the gravitation of nearby bodies (e.g. Sun or Moon or planet) pulling up or down or sideways depending on orientation. It feels all of these all the time.
If the net force, the sum of all the forces, pulls up, then the body starts to disintegrate. If the net force is still down, it doesn't.
Think of it as a threshold, rather than a cancellation.
...if that's so, ¿why does the body deforms even before crossing the Roche limit?
As long as the body is made of material capable of deforming or flowing (which rock certainly is, especially when hot) then it will continue to move or flow until the sum of all the forces reaches zero. Gravity usually dominates, but it's the force of the compressed layer below pushing up that counters the sum of all the forces.
If the body is rotating, then the net force is weaker on the equator than at the poles, and so less pressure is needed to compensate. That means the higher pressure at the poles will cause some of the material to move to the equator.
To read more about several of the competing forces pulling on us all the time as we stand on the Earth, see:
- @DavidHammen's cool table
- my (sadly down-voted) calculation
- all of the answers to Did the Mars rovers actually confirm the gravity of Mars?
Once you are comfortable with the idea of equilibrium, multiple forces adding and pressure, then have a look at all the interesting answers to these particular Roche limit-related questions:
- Is there any orbit at which the Roche limit can be “felt”?
- Roche limit - calculation with centrifugal forces
- How Wide is Earth's Roche Limit?
- Filling the Roche Lobe
edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
uhohuhoh
8,53222279
8,53222279
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Slightly long for a comment, so I'll put it here.
A comparison could be drawn to the equatorial bulge. A planet that rotates is fatter at the equator than the poles. Nothing "lifts" off the surface because the outward force from the rotation is generally much weaker than the gravity, but the planet still bulges because the forces get added together and the planet effectively has less gravitation on it's axis of rotation.
Just as Earth's rotation, which on a person's weight might only be a fraction of a lb between equator and pole, that variation is still enough to give the Earth a 42 km tidal bulge.
Equatorial bulge of the planets
0.5% weight loss at the Equator vs North Pole. (note 80% of your equatorial weight loss is due to rotation, 20% is due to further distance from the center).
The tidal force on Earth is quite a bit weaker than that and the bulge is measured in feet, not 21 km radius, but Earth being as large as it is, even a small force over the entire surface creates a bulge. Here's a fun answer on the tidal force calculated on the surface of Phobos.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Slightly long for a comment, so I'll put it here.
A comparison could be drawn to the equatorial bulge. A planet that rotates is fatter at the equator than the poles. Nothing "lifts" off the surface because the outward force from the rotation is generally much weaker than the gravity, but the planet still bulges because the forces get added together and the planet effectively has less gravitation on it's axis of rotation.
Just as Earth's rotation, which on a person's weight might only be a fraction of a lb between equator and pole, that variation is still enough to give the Earth a 42 km tidal bulge.
Equatorial bulge of the planets
0.5% weight loss at the Equator vs North Pole. (note 80% of your equatorial weight loss is due to rotation, 20% is due to further distance from the center).
The tidal force on Earth is quite a bit weaker than that and the bulge is measured in feet, not 21 km radius, but Earth being as large as it is, even a small force over the entire surface creates a bulge. Here's a fun answer on the tidal force calculated on the surface of Phobos.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Slightly long for a comment, so I'll put it here.
A comparison could be drawn to the equatorial bulge. A planet that rotates is fatter at the equator than the poles. Nothing "lifts" off the surface because the outward force from the rotation is generally much weaker than the gravity, but the planet still bulges because the forces get added together and the planet effectively has less gravitation on it's axis of rotation.
Just as Earth's rotation, which on a person's weight might only be a fraction of a lb between equator and pole, that variation is still enough to give the Earth a 42 km tidal bulge.
Equatorial bulge of the planets
0.5% weight loss at the Equator vs North Pole. (note 80% of your equatorial weight loss is due to rotation, 20% is due to further distance from the center).
The tidal force on Earth is quite a bit weaker than that and the bulge is measured in feet, not 21 km radius, but Earth being as large as it is, even a small force over the entire surface creates a bulge. Here's a fun answer on the tidal force calculated on the surface of Phobos.
$endgroup$
Slightly long for a comment, so I'll put it here.
A comparison could be drawn to the equatorial bulge. A planet that rotates is fatter at the equator than the poles. Nothing "lifts" off the surface because the outward force from the rotation is generally much weaker than the gravity, but the planet still bulges because the forces get added together and the planet effectively has less gravitation on it's axis of rotation.
Just as Earth's rotation, which on a person's weight might only be a fraction of a lb between equator and pole, that variation is still enough to give the Earth a 42 km tidal bulge.
Equatorial bulge of the planets
0.5% weight loss at the Equator vs North Pole. (note 80% of your equatorial weight loss is due to rotation, 20% is due to further distance from the center).
The tidal force on Earth is quite a bit weaker than that and the bulge is measured in feet, not 21 km radius, but Earth being as large as it is, even a small force over the entire surface creates a bulge. Here's a fun answer on the tidal force calculated on the surface of Phobos.
answered 1 hour ago
userLTKuserLTK
16.8k12248
16.8k12248
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Astronomy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31824%2fquestion-about-tidal-forces-and-the-roche-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I've added an answer, let me know if this is the kind of answer you are looking for, or if you'd like anything further clarified. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
3 hours ago