Thesis' “Future Work” section – is it acceptable to omit personal involvement in a mentioned project?Include background to ideas for future work in related work chapter of master thesis?Which is better for PhD application: research-based BS thesis somewhat related to interests, or extra courses + standard thesis in area of interest?PhD Dissertation Introduction: What to call section on thesis structure/overview?Can my undergraduate research thesis be published in a scientific paper? If so, how should I go?Getting stuck in a rut while writing a thesisRecalling standard results in a master's thesis appendix for reader's convenience and/or self-containednessHow to continue doing researchInconsistent advice on PhD wordcountIs original research required for an undergraduate thesis?Does it look bad to have a PhD thesis unrelated to the rest of future research?

Would encrypting a database protect against a compromised admin account?

Has there been evidence of any other gods?

Why does the Earth follow an elliptical trajectory rather than a parabolic one?

How to handle DM constantly stealing everything from sleeping characters?

Peculiarities in low dimensions or low order or etc

Why are parallelograms defined as quadrilaterals? What term would encompass polygons with greater than two parallel pairs?

Is ‘despite that’ right?

Passport stamps art, can it be done?

Why did they go to Dragonstone?

Was there a contingency plan in place if Little Boy failed to detonate?

Cryptography and elliptic curves

Why use steam instead of just hot air?

Why did Captain America age?

How to slow yourself down (for playing nice with others)

What was the plan for an abort of the Enola Gay's mission to drop the atomic bomb?

We are two immediate neighbors who forged our own powers to form concatenated relationship. Who are we?

Are there non-military uses of 20%-enriched Uranium?

Succinct and gender-neutral Russian word for "writer"

How do I compare the result of "1d20+x, with advantage" to "1d20+y, without advantage", assuming x < y?

Best species to breed to intelligence

Remove color cast in darktable?

Further factorisation of a difference of cubes?

Why does increasing the sampling rate make implementing an anti-aliasing filter easier?

Watching the game, having a puzzle



Thesis' “Future Work” section – is it acceptable to omit personal involvement in a mentioned project?


Include background to ideas for future work in related work chapter of master thesis?Which is better for PhD application: research-based BS thesis somewhat related to interests, or extra courses + standard thesis in area of interest?PhD Dissertation Introduction: What to call section on thesis structure/overview?Can my undergraduate research thesis be published in a scientific paper? If so, how should I go?Getting stuck in a rut while writing a thesisRecalling standard results in a master's thesis appendix for reader's convenience and/or self-containednessHow to continue doing researchInconsistent advice on PhD wordcountIs original research required for an undergraduate thesis?Does it look bad to have a PhD thesis unrelated to the rest of future research?













14















So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 17





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    yesterday






  • 13





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    yesterday






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    yesterday











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    14 hours ago












  • I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    10 hours ago















14















So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 17





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    yesterday






  • 13





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    yesterday






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    yesterday











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    14 hours ago












  • I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    10 hours ago













14












14








14


1






So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?







thesis






share|improve this question









New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









Søren D. Ptæus

1052




1052






New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked yesterday









Jim AlisonJim Alison

7713




7713




New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 17





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    yesterday






  • 13





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    yesterday






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    yesterday











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    14 hours ago












  • I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    10 hours ago












  • 17





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    yesterday






  • 13





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    yesterday






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    yesterday











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    14 hours ago












  • I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    10 hours ago







17




17





Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

– Buffy
yesterday





Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

– Buffy
yesterday




13




13





Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

– Soltius
yesterday





Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

– Soltius
yesterday




3




3





I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

– TEK
yesterday





I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

– TEK
yesterday













"I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

– smci
14 hours ago






"I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

– smci
14 hours ago














I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

– Mike
10 hours ago





I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

– Mike
10 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















64















Am I overthinking this?




Yes.




my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






share|improve this answer
































    27














    The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






    share|improve this answer






























      11














      You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



      If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






      share|improve this answer























      • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

        – Jim Alison
        yesterday






      • 5





        @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

        – Johanna
        yesterday


















      5














      You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
      So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "415"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Jim Alison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130273%2fthesis-future-work-section-is-it-acceptable-to-omit-personal-involvement-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        64















        Am I overthinking this?




        Yes.




        my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




        Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




        I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




        A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



        It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




        we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




        You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






        share|improve this answer





























          64















          Am I overthinking this?




          Yes.




          my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




          Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




          I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




          A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



          It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




          we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




          You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






          share|improve this answer



























            64












            64








            64








            Am I overthinking this?




            Yes.




            my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




            Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




            I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




            A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



            It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




            we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




            You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






            share|improve this answer
















            Am I overthinking this?




            Yes.




            my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




            Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




            I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




            A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



            It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




            we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




            You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited yesterday

























            answered yesterday









            user2768user2768

            15.7k34063




            15.7k34063





















                27














                The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






                share|improve this answer



























                  27














                  The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






                  share|improve this answer

























                    27












                    27








                    27







                    The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






                    share|improve this answer













                    The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    cheersmatecheersmate

                    487129




                    487129





















                        11














                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






                        share|improve this answer























                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          yesterday






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          yesterday















                        11














                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






                        share|improve this answer























                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          yesterday






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          yesterday













                        11












                        11








                        11







                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






                        share|improve this answer













                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered yesterday









                        JohannaJohanna

                        7,71722537




                        7,71722537












                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          yesterday






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          yesterday

















                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          yesterday






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          yesterday
















                        Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                        – Jim Alison
                        yesterday





                        Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                        – Jim Alison
                        yesterday




                        5




                        5





                        @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                        – Johanna
                        yesterday





                        @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                        – Johanna
                        yesterday











                        5














                        You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                        So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






                        share|improve this answer



























                          5














                          You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                          So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            5












                            5








                            5







                            You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                            So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






                            share|improve this answer













                            You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                            So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered yesterday









                            FooBarFooBar

                            1795




                            1795




















                                Jim Alison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Jim Alison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Jim Alison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Jim Alison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130273%2fthesis-future-work-section-is-it-acceptable-to-omit-personal-involvement-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Log på Navigationsmenu

                                Creating second map without labels using QGIS?How to lock map labels for inset map in Print Composer?How to Force the Showing of Labels of a Vector File in QGISQGIS Valmiera, Labels only show for part of polygonsRemoving duplicate point labels in QGISLabeling every feature using QGIS?Show labels for point features outside map canvasAbbreviate Road Labels in QGIS only when requiredExporting map from composer in QGIS - text labels have moved in output?How to make sure labels in qgis turn up in layout map?Writing label expression with ArcMap and If then Statement?

                                Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse