Equivalence relation by the symmetric difference of setsWhy isn't reflexivity redundant in the definition of equivalence relation?Show that the restriction of an equivalence relation is an equivalence relation.Equivalence-relations question.Equivalence relation $gsim h :Longleftrightarrow h in g,g^-1$Equivalence relation question with functionsProving something is an equivalence relationProving that rational equivalence is an equivalence relation on any set.Elementary set theory - challenging problem from relations and equivalence classesProve that the union of relations is an equivalence relationEquivalence Relation Requiring Set of all Sets
Can I summon an otherworldly creature with the Gate spell without knowing its true name?
My players want to grind XP but we're using milestone advancement
Construct a word ladder
Why does the hash of infinity have the digits of π?
Where's this lookout in Nova Scotia?
Who is in charge of Wakanda?
Who decides how to classify a novel?
Popcorn is the only acceptable snack to consume while watching a movie
Why does this if-statement combining assignment and an equality check return true?
The art of clickbait captions
Do photons bend spacetime or not?
Remove CiviCRM and Drupal links / banner on profile form
How to cut a climbing rope?
Why were helmets and other body armour not commonplace in the 1800s?
Is the field of q-series 'dead'?
How to ignore kerning of underbrace in math mode
Why did Jon Snow do this immoral act if he is so honorable?
How to patch glass cuts in a bicycle tire?
How can I tell if I'm being too picky as a referee?
Why isn't 'chemically-strengthened glass' made with potassium carbonate to begin with?
Which European Languages are not Indo-European?
Do I need full recovery mode when I have multiple daily backup?
Where have Brexit voters gone?
Pirate democracy at its finest
Equivalence relation by the symmetric difference of sets
Why isn't reflexivity redundant in the definition of equivalence relation?Show that the restriction of an equivalence relation is an equivalence relation.Equivalence-relations question.Equivalence relation $gsim h :Longleftrightarrow h in g,g^-1$Equivalence relation question with functionsProving something is an equivalence relationProving that rational equivalence is an equivalence relation on any set.Elementary set theory - challenging problem from relations and equivalence classesProve that the union of relations is an equivalence relationEquivalence Relation Requiring Set of all Sets
$begingroup$
Let $A, B$ subsets of $X$ and $mathbb P(X)$ the power set,
we define the following equivalence relation on $mathbb P(X)$:
Let $ Ssubseteq X$ a fixed subset of $X$ and $A$~$B$ $iff A△B subseteq S$
Prove that is is an equivalence relation and find the class of $X$ and $S$
My work:
I have already shown that the relationship satisfies reflexivity and symmetry, all this is justified respectively by the fact that the empty set is a subset of any set and the symmetric difference is commutative.
My problem is with transitivity, I do not know how to do it, that is when I try to use it for the definition of symmetric difference I fall in many cases. There is some way to test transitivity using only operations between sets. And with respect to the equivalence class of $S$, I showed that they are all subsets of $X$ contained in $S$. But with respect to the equivalence class of $X4 I do not see what it is.
Any help would be useful. Thank you!
elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $A, B$ subsets of $X$ and $mathbb P(X)$ the power set,
we define the following equivalence relation on $mathbb P(X)$:
Let $ Ssubseteq X$ a fixed subset of $X$ and $A$~$B$ $iff A△B subseteq S$
Prove that is is an equivalence relation and find the class of $X$ and $S$
My work:
I have already shown that the relationship satisfies reflexivity and symmetry, all this is justified respectively by the fact that the empty set is a subset of any set and the symmetric difference is commutative.
My problem is with transitivity, I do not know how to do it, that is when I try to use it for the definition of symmetric difference I fall in many cases. There is some way to test transitivity using only operations between sets. And with respect to the equivalence class of $S$, I showed that they are all subsets of $X$ contained in $S$. But with respect to the equivalence class of $X4 I do not see what it is.
Any help would be useful. Thank you!
elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker You're right, my mistake!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $A, B$ subsets of $X$ and $mathbb P(X)$ the power set,
we define the following equivalence relation on $mathbb P(X)$:
Let $ Ssubseteq X$ a fixed subset of $X$ and $A$~$B$ $iff A△B subseteq S$
Prove that is is an equivalence relation and find the class of $X$ and $S$
My work:
I have already shown that the relationship satisfies reflexivity and symmetry, all this is justified respectively by the fact that the empty set is a subset of any set and the symmetric difference is commutative.
My problem is with transitivity, I do not know how to do it, that is when I try to use it for the definition of symmetric difference I fall in many cases. There is some way to test transitivity using only operations between sets. And with respect to the equivalence class of $S$, I showed that they are all subsets of $X$ contained in $S$. But with respect to the equivalence class of $X4 I do not see what it is.
Any help would be useful. Thank you!
elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
Let $A, B$ subsets of $X$ and $mathbb P(X)$ the power set,
we define the following equivalence relation on $mathbb P(X)$:
Let $ Ssubseteq X$ a fixed subset of $X$ and $A$~$B$ $iff A△B subseteq S$
Prove that is is an equivalence relation and find the class of $X$ and $S$
My work:
I have already shown that the relationship satisfies reflexivity and symmetry, all this is justified respectively by the fact that the empty set is a subset of any set and the symmetric difference is commutative.
My problem is with transitivity, I do not know how to do it, that is when I try to use it for the definition of symmetric difference I fall in many cases. There is some way to test transitivity using only operations between sets. And with respect to the equivalence class of $S$, I showed that they are all subsets of $X$ contained in $S$. But with respect to the equivalence class of $X4 I do not see what it is.
Any help would be useful. Thank you!
elementary-set-theory
elementary-set-theory
edited 2 hours ago
Hendrik Matamoros
asked 2 hours ago
Hendrik MatamorosHendrik Matamoros
440310
440310
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker You're right, my mistake!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker You're right, my mistake!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker You're right, my mistake!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker You're right, my mistake!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Two hints about ways to go.
- Draw a Venn diagram for $A, B, C, X$ showing $A Delta B$ and so on.
- Know or show that $Delta$ is associative. That and the fact that $B
Delta B$ is empty leads to an algebraic proof.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, you're right! Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We need to show theat $Asim B$ and $B sim C$ give $A sim C$. This can easily be seen by visualising $A, B, C$ in a Venn diagram (try it yourself!)
To put the Venn diagram proof formally, consider any element $x$ in $A$ but not in $C$. If $x$ is in $B$, it lies in the symmetric difference of $B$ and $C$ and so is in $S$. If $x$ is not in $B$, it lies in the symmetric difference of $A$ and $B$ and so is in $S$. By symmetry any element in $C$ but not $A$ is in $S$, completing the proof.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $A Delta B subseteq S$ and $B Delta C subseteq S$, then
$A Delta C= (A Delta B) Delta (B Delta C) subseteq C$ as well.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Must be, subset of $S$. Any help about the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
By definition, $Asim B$ means $A-B$ and $B-Asubset S$. So you have to show that, if $A-B, B-A, B-C, C-Bsubset S$, then both $A-C$ and $C-A$ are subsets of $S$.
Consider first an element $xin A-C$. Either it is in $B$, or it is not in $B$. What can you deduce from the hypotheses in each case?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! My problem is now, what is the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Well, it seems to be made up of the subsets of $X$ which contain $X-S$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3237576%2fequivalence-relation-by-the-symmetric-difference-of-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Two hints about ways to go.
- Draw a Venn diagram for $A, B, C, X$ showing $A Delta B$ and so on.
- Know or show that $Delta$ is associative. That and the fact that $B
Delta B$ is empty leads to an algebraic proof.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, you're right! Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two hints about ways to go.
- Draw a Venn diagram for $A, B, C, X$ showing $A Delta B$ and so on.
- Know or show that $Delta$ is associative. That and the fact that $B
Delta B$ is empty leads to an algebraic proof.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, you're right! Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two hints about ways to go.
- Draw a Venn diagram for $A, B, C, X$ showing $A Delta B$ and so on.
- Know or show that $Delta$ is associative. That and the fact that $B
Delta B$ is empty leads to an algebraic proof.
$endgroup$
Two hints about ways to go.
- Draw a Venn diagram for $A, B, C, X$ showing $A Delta B$ and so on.
- Know or show that $Delta$ is associative. That and the fact that $B
Delta B$ is empty leads to an algebraic proof.
answered 2 hours ago
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
48.8k556125
48.8k556125
$begingroup$
Oh, you're right! Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oh, you're right! Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh, you're right! Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh, you're right! Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We need to show theat $Asim B$ and $B sim C$ give $A sim C$. This can easily be seen by visualising $A, B, C$ in a Venn diagram (try it yourself!)
To put the Venn diagram proof formally, consider any element $x$ in $A$ but not in $C$. If $x$ is in $B$, it lies in the symmetric difference of $B$ and $C$ and so is in $S$. If $x$ is not in $B$, it lies in the symmetric difference of $A$ and $B$ and so is in $S$. By symmetry any element in $C$ but not $A$ is in $S$, completing the proof.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We need to show theat $Asim B$ and $B sim C$ give $A sim C$. This can easily be seen by visualising $A, B, C$ in a Venn diagram (try it yourself!)
To put the Venn diagram proof formally, consider any element $x$ in $A$ but not in $C$. If $x$ is in $B$, it lies in the symmetric difference of $B$ and $C$ and so is in $S$. If $x$ is not in $B$, it lies in the symmetric difference of $A$ and $B$ and so is in $S$. By symmetry any element in $C$ but not $A$ is in $S$, completing the proof.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We need to show theat $Asim B$ and $B sim C$ give $A sim C$. This can easily be seen by visualising $A, B, C$ in a Venn diagram (try it yourself!)
To put the Venn diagram proof formally, consider any element $x$ in $A$ but not in $C$. If $x$ is in $B$, it lies in the symmetric difference of $B$ and $C$ and so is in $S$. If $x$ is not in $B$, it lies in the symmetric difference of $A$ and $B$ and so is in $S$. By symmetry any element in $C$ but not $A$ is in $S$, completing the proof.
New contributor
$endgroup$
We need to show theat $Asim B$ and $B sim C$ give $A sim C$. This can easily be seen by visualising $A, B, C$ in a Venn diagram (try it yourself!)
To put the Venn diagram proof formally, consider any element $x$ in $A$ but not in $C$. If $x$ is in $B$, it lies in the symmetric difference of $B$ and $C$ and so is in $S$. If $x$ is not in $B$, it lies in the symmetric difference of $A$ and $B$ and so is in $S$. By symmetry any element in $C$ but not $A$ is in $S$, completing the proof.
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
Bernard
126k743120
126k743120
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
auscryptauscrypt
1,3867
1,3867
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $A Delta B subseteq S$ and $B Delta C subseteq S$, then
$A Delta C= (A Delta B) Delta (B Delta C) subseteq C$ as well.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Must be, subset of $S$. Any help about the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $A Delta B subseteq S$ and $B Delta C subseteq S$, then
$A Delta C= (A Delta B) Delta (B Delta C) subseteq C$ as well.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Must be, subset of $S$. Any help about the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $A Delta B subseteq S$ and $B Delta C subseteq S$, then
$A Delta C= (A Delta B) Delta (B Delta C) subseteq C$ as well.
$endgroup$
If $A Delta B subseteq S$ and $B Delta C subseteq S$, then
$A Delta C= (A Delta B) Delta (B Delta C) subseteq C$ as well.
answered 2 hours ago
Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma
120k351132
120k351132
$begingroup$
Must be, subset of $S$. Any help about the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Must be, subset of $S$. Any help about the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Must be, subset of $S$. Any help about the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Must be, subset of $S$. Any help about the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
By definition, $Asim B$ means $A-B$ and $B-Asubset S$. So you have to show that, if $A-B, B-A, B-C, C-Bsubset S$, then both $A-C$ and $C-A$ are subsets of $S$.
Consider first an element $xin A-C$. Either it is in $B$, or it is not in $B$. What can you deduce from the hypotheses in each case?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! My problem is now, what is the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Well, it seems to be made up of the subsets of $X$ which contain $X-S$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
By definition, $Asim B$ means $A-B$ and $B-Asubset S$. So you have to show that, if $A-B, B-A, B-C, C-Bsubset S$, then both $A-C$ and $C-A$ are subsets of $S$.
Consider first an element $xin A-C$. Either it is in $B$, or it is not in $B$. What can you deduce from the hypotheses in each case?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! My problem is now, what is the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Well, it seems to be made up of the subsets of $X$ which contain $X-S$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
By definition, $Asim B$ means $A-B$ and $B-Asubset S$. So you have to show that, if $A-B, B-A, B-C, C-Bsubset S$, then both $A-C$ and $C-A$ are subsets of $S$.
Consider first an element $xin A-C$. Either it is in $B$, or it is not in $B$. What can you deduce from the hypotheses in each case?
$endgroup$
Hint:
By definition, $Asim B$ means $A-B$ and $B-Asubset S$. So you have to show that, if $A-B, B-A, B-C, C-Bsubset S$, then both $A-C$ and $C-A$ are subsets of $S$.
Consider first an element $xin A-C$. Either it is in $B$, or it is not in $B$. What can you deduce from the hypotheses in each case?
answered 2 hours ago
BernardBernard
126k743120
126k743120
$begingroup$
Thanks! My problem is now, what is the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Well, it seems to be made up of the subsets of $X$ which contain $X-S$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks! My problem is now, what is the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Well, it seems to be made up of the subsets of $X$ which contain $X-S$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks! My problem is now, what is the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks! My problem is now, what is the equivalence class of $X$?
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Well, it seems to be made up of the subsets of $X$ which contain $X-S$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Well, it seems to be made up of the subsets of $X$ which contain $X-S$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3237576%2fequivalence-relation-by-the-symmetric-difference-of-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker You're right, my mistake!
$endgroup$
– Hendrik Matamoros
2 hours ago