How was the quadratic formula created?Why can ALL quadratic equations be solved by the quadratic formula?Why people have to find quadratic formula,isn't that the formula cannot solve a polynomial with 2 and 1/2 degree?How was the quadratic formula found and proven?Proving the quadratic formula (for dummies)When do you use the quadratic formula?Universal quadratic formula?How do you prove that the quadratic formula workes without doing millions of examples and proving nothing? how do you think it was created?Why does the discriminant in the Quadratic Formula reveal the number of real solutions?How to derive this factorization $ax^2 + bx + c = a(x − x_1)(x − x_2) $?Solving quadratic equation $x^2-(k+1)x+k+1=0$ using quadratic formula

BOOM! Perfect Clear for Mr. T

Can my company stop me from working overtime?

Would the Disguise Self spell be able to reveal hidden birthmarks/tattoos (of the person they're disguised as) to a character?

Does a card have a keyword if it has the same effect as said keyword?

Set collection doesn't always enforce uniqueness with the Date datatype? Does the following example seem correct?

Should I replace my bicycle tires if they have not been inflated in multiple years

I have a unique character that I'm having a problem writing. He's a virus!

What is the difference between 'unconcealed' and 'revealed'?

Independent, post-Brexit Scotland - would there be a hard border with England?

Can Infinity Stones be retrieved more than once?

How can I close a gap between my fence and my neighbor's that's on his side of the property line?

What are the differences between credential stuffing and password spraying?

On which topic did Indiana Jones write his doctoral thesis?

How do I tell my manager that his code review comment is wrong?

Make some Prime Squares!

I drew a randomly colored grid of points with tikz, how do I force it to remember the first grid from then on?

Understanding trademark infringements in a world where many dictionary words are trademarks?

Why do money exchangers give different rates to different bills?

Using column size much larger than necessary

Send iMessage from Firefox

Can an isometry leave entropy invariant?

Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion?

Multi-channel audio upsampling interpolation

In Avengers 1, why does Thanos need Loki?



How was the quadratic formula created?


Why can ALL quadratic equations be solved by the quadratic formula?Why people have to find quadratic formula,isn't that the formula cannot solve a polynomial with 2 and 1/2 degree?How was the quadratic formula found and proven?Proving the quadratic formula (for dummies)When do you use the quadratic formula?Universal quadratic formula?How do you prove that the quadratic formula workes without doing millions of examples and proving nothing? how do you think it was created?Why does the discriminant in the Quadratic Formula reveal the number of real solutions?How to derive this factorization $ax^2 + bx + c = a(x − x_1)(x − x_2) $?Solving quadratic equation $x^2-(k+1)x+k+1=0$ using quadratic formula













1












$begingroup$


I have tested the quadratic formula and I have found that it works, yet I am curious as to how it was created. Can anybody please tell me one of the ways that it was created?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with completing the square?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner I googled completing the square and got this link: mathsisfun.com/algebra/completing-square.html this link only tells me vertex form and how it was made not how the quadratic formula was made
    $endgroup$
    – dat boi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is the geometric proof.
    $endgroup$
    – ersh
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @datboi: that link you found discusses the steps to solve a quadratic equation; if you carry it through in the general case, you'll essentially derive the quadratic formula
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    2 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


I have tested the quadratic formula and I have found that it works, yet I am curious as to how it was created. Can anybody please tell me one of the ways that it was created?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with completing the square?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner I googled completing the square and got this link: mathsisfun.com/algebra/completing-square.html this link only tells me vertex form and how it was made not how the quadratic formula was made
    $endgroup$
    – dat boi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is the geometric proof.
    $endgroup$
    – ersh
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @datboi: that link you found discusses the steps to solve a quadratic equation; if you carry it through in the general case, you'll essentially derive the quadratic formula
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    2 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I have tested the quadratic formula and I have found that it works, yet I am curious as to how it was created. Can anybody please tell me one of the ways that it was created?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have tested the quadratic formula and I have found that it works, yet I am curious as to how it was created. Can anybody please tell me one of the ways that it was created?







algebra-precalculus polynomials roots quadratics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Eevee Trainer

11.2k31945




11.2k31945










asked 3 hours ago









dat boidat boi

4710




4710







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with completing the square?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner I googled completing the square and got this link: mathsisfun.com/algebra/completing-square.html this link only tells me vertex form and how it was made not how the quadratic formula was made
    $endgroup$
    – dat boi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is the geometric proof.
    $endgroup$
    – ersh
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @datboi: that link you found discusses the steps to solve a quadratic equation; if you carry it through in the general case, you'll essentially derive the quadratic formula
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    2 hours ago












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with completing the square?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner I googled completing the square and got this link: mathsisfun.com/algebra/completing-square.html this link only tells me vertex form and how it was made not how the quadratic formula was made
    $endgroup$
    – dat boi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is the geometric proof.
    $endgroup$
    – ersh
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @datboi: that link you found discusses the steps to solve a quadratic equation; if you carry it through in the general case, you'll essentially derive the quadratic formula
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    2 hours ago







4




4




$begingroup$
Are you familiar with completing the square?
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are you familiar with completing the square?
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@J.W.Tanner I googled completing the square and got this link: mathsisfun.com/algebra/completing-square.html this link only tells me vertex form and how it was made not how the quadratic formula was made
$endgroup$
– dat boi
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@J.W.Tanner I googled completing the square and got this link: mathsisfun.com/algebra/completing-square.html this link only tells me vertex form and how it was made not how the quadratic formula was made
$endgroup$
– dat boi
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Here is the geometric proof.
$endgroup$
– ersh
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Here is the geometric proof.
$endgroup$
– ersh
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@datboi: that link you found discusses the steps to solve a quadratic equation; if you carry it through in the general case, you'll essentially derive the quadratic formula
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@datboi: that link you found discusses the steps to solve a quadratic equation; if you carry it through in the general case, you'll essentially derive the quadratic formula
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

We begin with the equation $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$, for which we want to find $x$. We divide through by $a$ first, and then bring the constant term to the other side:



$$x^2 + frac b a x = - frac c a $$



Next, we complete the square on the left-hand side. Remember, to complete the square, you take half of the coefficient of the linear term, square it, and add it both sides. This means we add $(b/2a)^2 = b^2/4a^2$ to both sides:



$$x^2 + frac b a x + fracb^24a^2 = fracb^24a^2 - frac c a$$



The left-hand side factors as a result, and we combine the terms on the right-hand side by getting a common denominator:



$$left(x + frac b 2a right)^2 = fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



We now take the square root of both sides:



$$x + frac b 2a = pm sqrt fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



Solve for $x$:



$$x =- frac b 2a pm sqrt fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



Recall that $sqrta/b = sqrt a / sqrt b$. Using this property, the denominator of our root becomes $2a$, giving a common denominator with $-b/2a$. Thus,



$$x = frac -b pm sqrtb^2 - 4ac2a$$



yielding the quadratic formula we all know and love.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    We have $(p+q)^2equiv p^2+2pq+q^2$.



    If we want to solve $ax^2+bx+c=0$, we can rewrite the equation so that the square of some expression involving $x$ is equal to a constant. As $a$ is not necessarily a perfect square, we can multiply the whole equation by $a$ and make it $a^2x^2+abx+ac=0$. But we also want the middle term to be $2$ times something, we further multiply the equation by $4$, which is an even perfect square. So, we have



    beginalign*
    4a^2x^2+4abx+4ac&=0\
    (2ax)^2+2(2ax)(b)+b^2+4ac&=b^2\
    (2ax+b)^2&=b^2-4ac\
    2ax+b&=pmsqrtb^2-4ac\
    x&=frac-bpmsqrtb^2-4ac2a
    endalign*






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      -1












      $begingroup$

      The way to get it is actually a beautiful one. The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development, but here's how I would do it today:



      Let's consider the equation $ax^2+bx+c=0$ If a=0, we have a first degree equation. Otherwise, our equation can be written as $x^2+fracbax +fracca=0$



      On the other hand, $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^2a^2$. This looks like an idea completely out of the air, but you can get it by trying different ones and checking which one works. As you can see, the first two terms look like those form the equation, so we can say that $x^2+fracbax = (x+fracb2a)^2 - fracb^2a^2$



      Now go back to the equation and replace $x^2+fracbax$ We get that $(x+fracb2a)^2 - fracb^2a^2 + fracca = 0$ From this equation, it's just basic algebra.



      $(x+fracb2a)^2 = fracb^2a^2 - fracca$ Take the square root on both sides and enjoy your formula (unless I made a mistake, which I probably have)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        "The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development" -- Do you know where I might find the original proof? The proof you've posted is more or less the only one I've ever been familiar with. Also, you should have added $b^2/4a^2$ to both sides in completing the square (you forgot the $4$)
        $endgroup$
        – Eevee Trainer
        3 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        I know it was made by Al-Juarismi, but I am not sure where to find his original text. For what I've seen, it's a geometrical version of the "completing the square" thing. Maybe try drawing the equations in terms of the areas of squares and rectangles
        $endgroup$
        – David
        3 hours ago







      • 3




        $begingroup$
        You did make a mistake. $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^24a^2$.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Shore
        2 hours ago











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3210332%2fhow-was-the-quadratic-formula-created%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      10












      $begingroup$

      We begin with the equation $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$, for which we want to find $x$. We divide through by $a$ first, and then bring the constant term to the other side:



      $$x^2 + frac b a x = - frac c a $$



      Next, we complete the square on the left-hand side. Remember, to complete the square, you take half of the coefficient of the linear term, square it, and add it both sides. This means we add $(b/2a)^2 = b^2/4a^2$ to both sides:



      $$x^2 + frac b a x + fracb^24a^2 = fracb^24a^2 - frac c a$$



      The left-hand side factors as a result, and we combine the terms on the right-hand side by getting a common denominator:



      $$left(x + frac b 2a right)^2 = fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



      We now take the square root of both sides:



      $$x + frac b 2a = pm sqrt fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



      Solve for $x$:



      $$x =- frac b 2a pm sqrt fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



      Recall that $sqrta/b = sqrt a / sqrt b$. Using this property, the denominator of our root becomes $2a$, giving a common denominator with $-b/2a$. Thus,



      $$x = frac -b pm sqrtb^2 - 4ac2a$$



      yielding the quadratic formula we all know and love.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        10












        $begingroup$

        We begin with the equation $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$, for which we want to find $x$. We divide through by $a$ first, and then bring the constant term to the other side:



        $$x^2 + frac b a x = - frac c a $$



        Next, we complete the square on the left-hand side. Remember, to complete the square, you take half of the coefficient of the linear term, square it, and add it both sides. This means we add $(b/2a)^2 = b^2/4a^2$ to both sides:



        $$x^2 + frac b a x + fracb^24a^2 = fracb^24a^2 - frac c a$$



        The left-hand side factors as a result, and we combine the terms on the right-hand side by getting a common denominator:



        $$left(x + frac b 2a right)^2 = fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



        We now take the square root of both sides:



        $$x + frac b 2a = pm sqrt fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



        Solve for $x$:



        $$x =- frac b 2a pm sqrt fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



        Recall that $sqrta/b = sqrt a / sqrt b$. Using this property, the denominator of our root becomes $2a$, giving a common denominator with $-b/2a$. Thus,



        $$x = frac -b pm sqrtb^2 - 4ac2a$$



        yielding the quadratic formula we all know and love.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          10












          10








          10





          $begingroup$

          We begin with the equation $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$, for which we want to find $x$. We divide through by $a$ first, and then bring the constant term to the other side:



          $$x^2 + frac b a x = - frac c a $$



          Next, we complete the square on the left-hand side. Remember, to complete the square, you take half of the coefficient of the linear term, square it, and add it both sides. This means we add $(b/2a)^2 = b^2/4a^2$ to both sides:



          $$x^2 + frac b a x + fracb^24a^2 = fracb^24a^2 - frac c a$$



          The left-hand side factors as a result, and we combine the terms on the right-hand side by getting a common denominator:



          $$left(x + frac b 2a right)^2 = fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



          We now take the square root of both sides:



          $$x + frac b 2a = pm sqrt fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



          Solve for $x$:



          $$x =- frac b 2a pm sqrt fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



          Recall that $sqrta/b = sqrt a / sqrt b$. Using this property, the denominator of our root becomes $2a$, giving a common denominator with $-b/2a$. Thus,



          $$x = frac -b pm sqrtb^2 - 4ac2a$$



          yielding the quadratic formula we all know and love.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          We begin with the equation $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$, for which we want to find $x$. We divide through by $a$ first, and then bring the constant term to the other side:



          $$x^2 + frac b a x = - frac c a $$



          Next, we complete the square on the left-hand side. Remember, to complete the square, you take half of the coefficient of the linear term, square it, and add it both sides. This means we add $(b/2a)^2 = b^2/4a^2$ to both sides:



          $$x^2 + frac b a x + fracb^24a^2 = fracb^24a^2 - frac c a$$



          The left-hand side factors as a result, and we combine the terms on the right-hand side by getting a common denominator:



          $$left(x + frac b 2a right)^2 = fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



          We now take the square root of both sides:



          $$x + frac b 2a = pm sqrt fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



          Solve for $x$:



          $$x =- frac b 2a pm sqrt fracb^2 - 4ac4a^2$$



          Recall that $sqrta/b = sqrt a / sqrt b$. Using this property, the denominator of our root becomes $2a$, giving a common denominator with $-b/2a$. Thus,



          $$x = frac -b pm sqrtb^2 - 4ac2a$$



          yielding the quadratic formula we all know and love.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

          11.2k31945




          11.2k31945





















              1












              $begingroup$

              We have $(p+q)^2equiv p^2+2pq+q^2$.



              If we want to solve $ax^2+bx+c=0$, we can rewrite the equation so that the square of some expression involving $x$ is equal to a constant. As $a$ is not necessarily a perfect square, we can multiply the whole equation by $a$ and make it $a^2x^2+abx+ac=0$. But we also want the middle term to be $2$ times something, we further multiply the equation by $4$, which is an even perfect square. So, we have



              beginalign*
              4a^2x^2+4abx+4ac&=0\
              (2ax)^2+2(2ax)(b)+b^2+4ac&=b^2\
              (2ax+b)^2&=b^2-4ac\
              2ax+b&=pmsqrtb^2-4ac\
              x&=frac-bpmsqrtb^2-4ac2a
              endalign*






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                We have $(p+q)^2equiv p^2+2pq+q^2$.



                If we want to solve $ax^2+bx+c=0$, we can rewrite the equation so that the square of some expression involving $x$ is equal to a constant. As $a$ is not necessarily a perfect square, we can multiply the whole equation by $a$ and make it $a^2x^2+abx+ac=0$. But we also want the middle term to be $2$ times something, we further multiply the equation by $4$, which is an even perfect square. So, we have



                beginalign*
                4a^2x^2+4abx+4ac&=0\
                (2ax)^2+2(2ax)(b)+b^2+4ac&=b^2\
                (2ax+b)^2&=b^2-4ac\
                2ax+b&=pmsqrtb^2-4ac\
                x&=frac-bpmsqrtb^2-4ac2a
                endalign*






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  We have $(p+q)^2equiv p^2+2pq+q^2$.



                  If we want to solve $ax^2+bx+c=0$, we can rewrite the equation so that the square of some expression involving $x$ is equal to a constant. As $a$ is not necessarily a perfect square, we can multiply the whole equation by $a$ and make it $a^2x^2+abx+ac=0$. But we also want the middle term to be $2$ times something, we further multiply the equation by $4$, which is an even perfect square. So, we have



                  beginalign*
                  4a^2x^2+4abx+4ac&=0\
                  (2ax)^2+2(2ax)(b)+b^2+4ac&=b^2\
                  (2ax+b)^2&=b^2-4ac\
                  2ax+b&=pmsqrtb^2-4ac\
                  x&=frac-bpmsqrtb^2-4ac2a
                  endalign*






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  We have $(p+q)^2equiv p^2+2pq+q^2$.



                  If we want to solve $ax^2+bx+c=0$, we can rewrite the equation so that the square of some expression involving $x$ is equal to a constant. As $a$ is not necessarily a perfect square, we can multiply the whole equation by $a$ and make it $a^2x^2+abx+ac=0$. But we also want the middle term to be $2$ times something, we further multiply the equation by $4$, which is an even perfect square. So, we have



                  beginalign*
                  4a^2x^2+4abx+4ac&=0\
                  (2ax)^2+2(2ax)(b)+b^2+4ac&=b^2\
                  (2ax+b)^2&=b^2-4ac\
                  2ax+b&=pmsqrtb^2-4ac\
                  x&=frac-bpmsqrtb^2-4ac2a
                  endalign*







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  CY AriesCY Aries

                  17.3k11743




                  17.3k11743





















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      The way to get it is actually a beautiful one. The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development, but here's how I would do it today:



                      Let's consider the equation $ax^2+bx+c=0$ If a=0, we have a first degree equation. Otherwise, our equation can be written as $x^2+fracbax +fracca=0$



                      On the other hand, $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^2a^2$. This looks like an idea completely out of the air, but you can get it by trying different ones and checking which one works. As you can see, the first two terms look like those form the equation, so we can say that $x^2+fracbax = (x+fracb2a)^2 - fracb^2a^2$



                      Now go back to the equation and replace $x^2+fracbax$ We get that $(x+fracb2a)^2 - fracb^2a^2 + fracca = 0$ From this equation, it's just basic algebra.



                      $(x+fracb2a)^2 = fracb^2a^2 - fracca$ Take the square root on both sides and enjoy your formula (unless I made a mistake, which I probably have)






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        "The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development" -- Do you know where I might find the original proof? The proof you've posted is more or less the only one I've ever been familiar with. Also, you should have added $b^2/4a^2$ to both sides in completing the square (you forgot the $4$)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Eevee Trainer
                        3 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        I know it was made by Al-Juarismi, but I am not sure where to find his original text. For what I've seen, it's a geometrical version of the "completing the square" thing. Maybe try drawing the equations in terms of the areas of squares and rectangles
                        $endgroup$
                        – David
                        3 hours ago







                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        You did make a mistake. $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^24a^2$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Robert Shore
                        2 hours ago















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      The way to get it is actually a beautiful one. The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development, but here's how I would do it today:



                      Let's consider the equation $ax^2+bx+c=0$ If a=0, we have a first degree equation. Otherwise, our equation can be written as $x^2+fracbax +fracca=0$



                      On the other hand, $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^2a^2$. This looks like an idea completely out of the air, but you can get it by trying different ones and checking which one works. As you can see, the first two terms look like those form the equation, so we can say that $x^2+fracbax = (x+fracb2a)^2 - fracb^2a^2$



                      Now go back to the equation and replace $x^2+fracbax$ We get that $(x+fracb2a)^2 - fracb^2a^2 + fracca = 0$ From this equation, it's just basic algebra.



                      $(x+fracb2a)^2 = fracb^2a^2 - fracca$ Take the square root on both sides and enjoy your formula (unless I made a mistake, which I probably have)






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        "The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development" -- Do you know where I might find the original proof? The proof you've posted is more or less the only one I've ever been familiar with. Also, you should have added $b^2/4a^2$ to both sides in completing the square (you forgot the $4$)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Eevee Trainer
                        3 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        I know it was made by Al-Juarismi, but I am not sure where to find his original text. For what I've seen, it's a geometrical version of the "completing the square" thing. Maybe try drawing the equations in terms of the areas of squares and rectangles
                        $endgroup$
                        – David
                        3 hours ago







                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        You did make a mistake. $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^24a^2$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Robert Shore
                        2 hours ago













                      -1












                      -1








                      -1





                      $begingroup$

                      The way to get it is actually a beautiful one. The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development, but here's how I would do it today:



                      Let's consider the equation $ax^2+bx+c=0$ If a=0, we have a first degree equation. Otherwise, our equation can be written as $x^2+fracbax +fracca=0$



                      On the other hand, $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^2a^2$. This looks like an idea completely out of the air, but you can get it by trying different ones and checking which one works. As you can see, the first two terms look like those form the equation, so we can say that $x^2+fracbax = (x+fracb2a)^2 - fracb^2a^2$



                      Now go back to the equation and replace $x^2+fracbax$ We get that $(x+fracb2a)^2 - fracb^2a^2 + fracca = 0$ From this equation, it's just basic algebra.



                      $(x+fracb2a)^2 = fracb^2a^2 - fracca$ Take the square root on both sides and enjoy your formula (unless I made a mistake, which I probably have)






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      The way to get it is actually a beautiful one. The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development, but here's how I would do it today:



                      Let's consider the equation $ax^2+bx+c=0$ If a=0, we have a first degree equation. Otherwise, our equation can be written as $x^2+fracbax +fracca=0$



                      On the other hand, $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^2a^2$. This looks like an idea completely out of the air, but you can get it by trying different ones and checking which one works. As you can see, the first two terms look like those form the equation, so we can say that $x^2+fracbax = (x+fracb2a)^2 - fracb^2a^2$



                      Now go back to the equation and replace $x^2+fracbax$ We get that $(x+fracb2a)^2 - fracb^2a^2 + fracca = 0$ From this equation, it's just basic algebra.



                      $(x+fracb2a)^2 = fracb^2a^2 - fracca$ Take the square root on both sides and enjoy your formula (unless I made a mistake, which I probably have)







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered 3 hours ago









                      DavidDavid

                      3477




                      3477







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        "The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development" -- Do you know where I might find the original proof? The proof you've posted is more or less the only one I've ever been familiar with. Also, you should have added $b^2/4a^2$ to both sides in completing the square (you forgot the $4$)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Eevee Trainer
                        3 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        I know it was made by Al-Juarismi, but I am not sure where to find his original text. For what I've seen, it's a geometrical version of the "completing the square" thing. Maybe try drawing the equations in terms of the areas of squares and rectangles
                        $endgroup$
                        – David
                        3 hours ago







                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        You did make a mistake. $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^24a^2$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Robert Shore
                        2 hours ago












                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        "The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development" -- Do you know where I might find the original proof? The proof you've posted is more or less the only one I've ever been familiar with. Also, you should have added $b^2/4a^2$ to both sides in completing the square (you forgot the $4$)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Eevee Trainer
                        3 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        I know it was made by Al-Juarismi, but I am not sure where to find his original text. For what I've seen, it's a geometrical version of the "completing the square" thing. Maybe try drawing the equations in terms of the areas of squares and rectangles
                        $endgroup$
                        – David
                        3 hours ago







                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        You did make a mistake. $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^24a^2$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Robert Shore
                        2 hours ago







                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      "The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development" -- Do you know where I might find the original proof? The proof you've posted is more or less the only one I've ever been familiar with. Also, you should have added $b^2/4a^2$ to both sides in completing the square (you forgot the $4$)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eevee Trainer
                      3 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      "The original proof is different since algebra was still in an early stage of development" -- Do you know where I might find the original proof? The proof you've posted is more or less the only one I've ever been familiar with. Also, you should have added $b^2/4a^2$ to both sides in completing the square (you forgot the $4$)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eevee Trainer
                      3 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      I know it was made by Al-Juarismi, but I am not sure where to find his original text. For what I've seen, it's a geometrical version of the "completing the square" thing. Maybe try drawing the equations in terms of the areas of squares and rectangles
                      $endgroup$
                      – David
                      3 hours ago





                      $begingroup$
                      I know it was made by Al-Juarismi, but I am not sure where to find his original text. For what I've seen, it's a geometrical version of the "completing the square" thing. Maybe try drawing the equations in terms of the areas of squares and rectangles
                      $endgroup$
                      – David
                      3 hours ago





                      3




                      3




                      $begingroup$
                      You did make a mistake. $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^24a^2$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Robert Shore
                      2 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      You did make a mistake. $(x+fracb2a)^2=x^2+fracbax+fracb^24a^2$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Robert Shore
                      2 hours ago

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3210332%2fhow-was-the-quadratic-formula-created%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Log på Navigationsmenu

                      Creating second map without labels using QGIS?How to lock map labels for inset map in Print Composer?How to Force the Showing of Labels of a Vector File in QGISQGIS Valmiera, Labels only show for part of polygonsRemoving duplicate point labels in QGISLabeling every feature using QGIS?Show labels for point features outside map canvasAbbreviate Road Labels in QGIS only when requiredExporting map from composer in QGIS - text labels have moved in output?How to make sure labels in qgis turn up in layout map?Writing label expression with ArcMap and If then Statement?

                      Nuuk Indholdsfortegnelse Etyomologi | Historie | Geografi | Transport og infrastruktur | Politik og administration | Uddannelsesinstitutioner | Kultur | Venskabsbyer | Noter | Eksterne henvisninger | Se også | Navigationsmenuwww.sermersooq.gl64°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.75064°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.750DMI - KlimanormalerSalmonsen, s. 850Grønlands Naturinstitut undersøger rensdyr i Akia og Maniitsoq foråret 2008Grønlands NaturinstitutNy vej til Qinngorput indviet i dagAntallet af biler i Nuuk må begrænsesNy taxacentral mødt med demonstrationKøreplan. Rute 1, 2 og 3SnescootersporNuukNord er for storSkoler i Kommuneqarfik SermersooqAtuarfik Samuel KleinschmidtKangillinguit AtuarfiatNuussuup AtuarfiaNuuk Internationale FriskoleIlinniarfissuaq, Grønlands SeminariumLedelseÅrsberetning for 2008Kunst og arkitekturÅrsberetning for 2008Julie om naturenNuuk KunstmuseumSilamiutGrønlands Nationalmuseum og ArkivStatistisk ÅrbogGrønlands LandsbibliotekStore koncerter på stribeVandhund nummer 1.000.000Kommuneqarfik Sermersooq – MalikForsidenVenskabsbyerLyngby-Taarbæk i GrønlandArctic Business NetworkWinter Cities 2008 i NuukDagligt opdaterede satellitbilleder fra NuukområdetKommuneqarfik Sermersooqs hjemmesideTurist i NuukGrønlands Statistiks databankGrønlands Hjemmestyres valgresultaterrrWorldCat124325457671310-5