What happens if you dump antimatter into a black hole?Anti-Matter Black HolesBlack hole formation as seen by a distant observerWhat happens when one black hole eats another black hole?What happens to gravity after matter-antimatter annihilation?Can antimatter becomes black hole?Could the universe's antimatter be hiding in black holes?What happens when anti-matter falls into a black hole?What exactly “triggers” a matter/antimatter detonation?What if a black hole of normal matter and a black hole of antimatter collided?Can we “see” into a black hole using gravity?What happens when antimatter hits dark matter?
What does this colon mean? It is not labeling, it is not ternary operator
What to use instead of cling film to wrap pastry
In Avengers 1, why does Thanos need Loki?
Has a commercial or military jet bi-plane ever been manufactured?
How can I close a gap between my fence and my neighbor's that's on his side of the property line?
Point of the the Dothraki's attack in GoT S8E3?
What are the advantages of luxury car brands like Acura/Lexus over their sibling non-luxury brands Honda/Toyota?
Why do people keep telling me that I am a bad photographer?
Why was the battle set up *outside* Winterfell?
How to apply differences on part of a list and keep the rest
What matters more when it comes to book covers? Is it ‘professional quality’ or relevancy?
How did Shepard's and Grissom's speeds compare with orbital velocity?
Why is the relative clause in the following sentence not directly after the noun and why is the verb not in the end of the sentence?
Why are prions in animal diets not destroyed by the digestive system?
Why do only some White Walkers shatter into ice chips?
Is there an idiom that support the idea that "inflation is bad"?
Pressure inside an infinite ocean?
Apache ErrorDocument returns 404 in place of 302
Manager is threatening to grade me poorly if I don't complete the project
Purpose of のは in this sentence?
Why doesn't WotC use established keywords on all new cards?
Randomness of Python's random
Shantae Dance Matching
How do I make a function that generates nth natural number that isn't a perfect square?
What happens if you dump antimatter into a black hole?
Anti-Matter Black HolesBlack hole formation as seen by a distant observerWhat happens when one black hole eats another black hole?What happens to gravity after matter-antimatter annihilation?Can antimatter becomes black hole?Could the universe's antimatter be hiding in black holes?What happens when anti-matter falls into a black hole?What exactly “triggers” a matter/antimatter detonation?What if a black hole of normal matter and a black hole of antimatter collided?Can we “see” into a black hole using gravity?What happens when antimatter hits dark matter?
$begingroup$
Let's say you have a 10 solar mass BH and dump 10 solar masses of antimatter into the BH... What would happen?
Would I have a 20 solar mass BH?
Would the BH explode
Do we even understand what would happen to antimatter in the BH?
gravity black-holes antimatter
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's say you have a 10 solar mass BH and dump 10 solar masses of antimatter into the BH... What would happen?
Would I have a 20 solar mass BH?
Would the BH explode
Do we even understand what would happen to antimatter in the BH?
gravity black-holes antimatter
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/25982
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's say you have a 10 solar mass BH and dump 10 solar masses of antimatter into the BH... What would happen?
Would I have a 20 solar mass BH?
Would the BH explode
Do we even understand what would happen to antimatter in the BH?
gravity black-holes antimatter
$endgroup$
Let's say you have a 10 solar mass BH and dump 10 solar masses of antimatter into the BH... What would happen?
Would I have a 20 solar mass BH?
Would the BH explode
Do we even understand what would happen to antimatter in the BH?
gravity black-holes antimatter
gravity black-holes antimatter
edited 5 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122031255
108k122031255
asked 5 hours ago
RickRick
623318
623318
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/25982
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/25982
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/25982
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/25982
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We have experimental evidence that antiparticles have positive inertial mass. We have no experimental evidence regarding the gravitational mass of antiparticles, because we can’t find or create enough antimatter to measure its gravity. However, I believe most physicists would be extremely surprised if antimatter had antigravity, as there is no reason why it should, and it would violate the equivalence principle. So the answer is almost certainly that you would simply have a 20 solar mass black hole.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's say you have a 10 solar mass BH and dump 10 solar masses of antimatter into the BH... What would happen?
This depends, like most things in relativity, on where the observer is.
First note that it makes no difference whether it's energy or matter (just a form of energy) inside the event horizon - it will stay inside the event horizon from the point of view of an observer outside the horizon.
As far as we know antimatter is, for the purposes of gravitation, the same as matter. There is no "anti-gravity" effect if you're thinking that. So the anti-matter and matter "attract" each other (although that's not quite how general relativity describes it formally).
Also, although we talk about mass resulting in the gravitational field, it's more accurate to say that any form of energy contributes to the gravitational field. So it's really a case of how much energy is inside the event horizon that defines it's size. Adding more mass or converting mass to energy makes no difference in this sense. More energy of any form increases the size of the event horizon (with some details in the case of charged particles and extra angular momentum).
So from the observer outside all that happens is that the event horizon gets bigger by the equivalent effect of 10 solar masses.
If you are an observer traveling with the antimatter, then you see the antimatter pass across the event horizon and continue falling into the black hole. If it encounters matter it will annihilate some of the antimatter. However once past the event horizon the energy or particles from that annihilation will not leave the black hole. It will in principle fall to the singularity at which point it doesn't matter what form of energy it is.
Would I have a 20 solar mass BH ?
Yes-ish.
In practical terms that much mass-energy dumped into a black hole quickly would certainly result in the release of gravitational waves that would "use up" up some of that energy, possibly a substantial part of that mass-energy.
Would the BH explode ?
No.
You can't break these things as far as we know.
Do we even understand what would happen to antimatter in the BH?
Whatever could happen it outside, could happen inside. The energy equivalent will remain inside and someone on the outside can never know what happened it - that's essentially what an event horizon is : events on one side are not knowable by someone on the other side.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477245%2fwhat-happens-if-you-dump-antimatter-into-a-black-hole%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We have experimental evidence that antiparticles have positive inertial mass. We have no experimental evidence regarding the gravitational mass of antiparticles, because we can’t find or create enough antimatter to measure its gravity. However, I believe most physicists would be extremely surprised if antimatter had antigravity, as there is no reason why it should, and it would violate the equivalence principle. So the answer is almost certainly that you would simply have a 20 solar mass black hole.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have experimental evidence that antiparticles have positive inertial mass. We have no experimental evidence regarding the gravitational mass of antiparticles, because we can’t find or create enough antimatter to measure its gravity. However, I believe most physicists would be extremely surprised if antimatter had antigravity, as there is no reason why it should, and it would violate the equivalence principle. So the answer is almost certainly that you would simply have a 20 solar mass black hole.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have experimental evidence that antiparticles have positive inertial mass. We have no experimental evidence regarding the gravitational mass of antiparticles, because we can’t find or create enough antimatter to measure its gravity. However, I believe most physicists would be extremely surprised if antimatter had antigravity, as there is no reason why it should, and it would violate the equivalence principle. So the answer is almost certainly that you would simply have a 20 solar mass black hole.
$endgroup$
We have experimental evidence that antiparticles have positive inertial mass. We have no experimental evidence regarding the gravitational mass of antiparticles, because we can’t find or create enough antimatter to measure its gravity. However, I believe most physicists would be extremely surprised if antimatter had antigravity, as there is no reason why it should, and it would violate the equivalence principle. So the answer is almost certainly that you would simply have a 20 solar mass black hole.
answered 5 hours ago
G. SmithG. Smith
11.5k11735
11.5k11735
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's say you have a 10 solar mass BH and dump 10 solar masses of antimatter into the BH... What would happen?
This depends, like most things in relativity, on where the observer is.
First note that it makes no difference whether it's energy or matter (just a form of energy) inside the event horizon - it will stay inside the event horizon from the point of view of an observer outside the horizon.
As far as we know antimatter is, for the purposes of gravitation, the same as matter. There is no "anti-gravity" effect if you're thinking that. So the anti-matter and matter "attract" each other (although that's not quite how general relativity describes it formally).
Also, although we talk about mass resulting in the gravitational field, it's more accurate to say that any form of energy contributes to the gravitational field. So it's really a case of how much energy is inside the event horizon that defines it's size. Adding more mass or converting mass to energy makes no difference in this sense. More energy of any form increases the size of the event horizon (with some details in the case of charged particles and extra angular momentum).
So from the observer outside all that happens is that the event horizon gets bigger by the equivalent effect of 10 solar masses.
If you are an observer traveling with the antimatter, then you see the antimatter pass across the event horizon and continue falling into the black hole. If it encounters matter it will annihilate some of the antimatter. However once past the event horizon the energy or particles from that annihilation will not leave the black hole. It will in principle fall to the singularity at which point it doesn't matter what form of energy it is.
Would I have a 20 solar mass BH ?
Yes-ish.
In practical terms that much mass-energy dumped into a black hole quickly would certainly result in the release of gravitational waves that would "use up" up some of that energy, possibly a substantial part of that mass-energy.
Would the BH explode ?
No.
You can't break these things as far as we know.
Do we even understand what would happen to antimatter in the BH?
Whatever could happen it outside, could happen inside. The energy equivalent will remain inside and someone on the outside can never know what happened it - that's essentially what an event horizon is : events on one side are not knowable by someone on the other side.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's say you have a 10 solar mass BH and dump 10 solar masses of antimatter into the BH... What would happen?
This depends, like most things in relativity, on where the observer is.
First note that it makes no difference whether it's energy or matter (just a form of energy) inside the event horizon - it will stay inside the event horizon from the point of view of an observer outside the horizon.
As far as we know antimatter is, for the purposes of gravitation, the same as matter. There is no "anti-gravity" effect if you're thinking that. So the anti-matter and matter "attract" each other (although that's not quite how general relativity describes it formally).
Also, although we talk about mass resulting in the gravitational field, it's more accurate to say that any form of energy contributes to the gravitational field. So it's really a case of how much energy is inside the event horizon that defines it's size. Adding more mass or converting mass to energy makes no difference in this sense. More energy of any form increases the size of the event horizon (with some details in the case of charged particles and extra angular momentum).
So from the observer outside all that happens is that the event horizon gets bigger by the equivalent effect of 10 solar masses.
If you are an observer traveling with the antimatter, then you see the antimatter pass across the event horizon and continue falling into the black hole. If it encounters matter it will annihilate some of the antimatter. However once past the event horizon the energy or particles from that annihilation will not leave the black hole. It will in principle fall to the singularity at which point it doesn't matter what form of energy it is.
Would I have a 20 solar mass BH ?
Yes-ish.
In practical terms that much mass-energy dumped into a black hole quickly would certainly result in the release of gravitational waves that would "use up" up some of that energy, possibly a substantial part of that mass-energy.
Would the BH explode ?
No.
You can't break these things as far as we know.
Do we even understand what would happen to antimatter in the BH?
Whatever could happen it outside, could happen inside. The energy equivalent will remain inside and someone on the outside can never know what happened it - that's essentially what an event horizon is : events on one side are not knowable by someone on the other side.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's say you have a 10 solar mass BH and dump 10 solar masses of antimatter into the BH... What would happen?
This depends, like most things in relativity, on where the observer is.
First note that it makes no difference whether it's energy or matter (just a form of energy) inside the event horizon - it will stay inside the event horizon from the point of view of an observer outside the horizon.
As far as we know antimatter is, for the purposes of gravitation, the same as matter. There is no "anti-gravity" effect if you're thinking that. So the anti-matter and matter "attract" each other (although that's not quite how general relativity describes it formally).
Also, although we talk about mass resulting in the gravitational field, it's more accurate to say that any form of energy contributes to the gravitational field. So it's really a case of how much energy is inside the event horizon that defines it's size. Adding more mass or converting mass to energy makes no difference in this sense. More energy of any form increases the size of the event horizon (with some details in the case of charged particles and extra angular momentum).
So from the observer outside all that happens is that the event horizon gets bigger by the equivalent effect of 10 solar masses.
If you are an observer traveling with the antimatter, then you see the antimatter pass across the event horizon and continue falling into the black hole. If it encounters matter it will annihilate some of the antimatter. However once past the event horizon the energy or particles from that annihilation will not leave the black hole. It will in principle fall to the singularity at which point it doesn't matter what form of energy it is.
Would I have a 20 solar mass BH ?
Yes-ish.
In practical terms that much mass-energy dumped into a black hole quickly would certainly result in the release of gravitational waves that would "use up" up some of that energy, possibly a substantial part of that mass-energy.
Would the BH explode ?
No.
You can't break these things as far as we know.
Do we even understand what would happen to antimatter in the BH?
Whatever could happen it outside, could happen inside. The energy equivalent will remain inside and someone on the outside can never know what happened it - that's essentially what an event horizon is : events on one side are not knowable by someone on the other side.
$endgroup$
Let's say you have a 10 solar mass BH and dump 10 solar masses of antimatter into the BH... What would happen?
This depends, like most things in relativity, on where the observer is.
First note that it makes no difference whether it's energy or matter (just a form of energy) inside the event horizon - it will stay inside the event horizon from the point of view of an observer outside the horizon.
As far as we know antimatter is, for the purposes of gravitation, the same as matter. There is no "anti-gravity" effect if you're thinking that. So the anti-matter and matter "attract" each other (although that's not quite how general relativity describes it formally).
Also, although we talk about mass resulting in the gravitational field, it's more accurate to say that any form of energy contributes to the gravitational field. So it's really a case of how much energy is inside the event horizon that defines it's size. Adding more mass or converting mass to energy makes no difference in this sense. More energy of any form increases the size of the event horizon (with some details in the case of charged particles and extra angular momentum).
So from the observer outside all that happens is that the event horizon gets bigger by the equivalent effect of 10 solar masses.
If you are an observer traveling with the antimatter, then you see the antimatter pass across the event horizon and continue falling into the black hole. If it encounters matter it will annihilate some of the antimatter. However once past the event horizon the energy or particles from that annihilation will not leave the black hole. It will in principle fall to the singularity at which point it doesn't matter what form of energy it is.
Would I have a 20 solar mass BH ?
Yes-ish.
In practical terms that much mass-energy dumped into a black hole quickly would certainly result in the release of gravitational waves that would "use up" up some of that energy, possibly a substantial part of that mass-energy.
Would the BH explode ?
No.
You can't break these things as far as we know.
Do we even understand what would happen to antimatter in the BH?
Whatever could happen it outside, could happen inside. The energy equivalent will remain inside and someone on the outside can never know what happened it - that's essentially what an event horizon is : events on one side are not knowable by someone on the other side.
answered 2 hours ago
StephenGStephenG
5,33021626
5,33021626
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477245%2fwhat-happens-if-you-dump-antimatter-into-a-black-hole%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/25982
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
5 hours ago