Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion?Were the Wright Brothers the first to fly?Why do we open the window shades during landing and take-off?During EAA Airventure Oshkosh, is Wittman Regional Airport the “world's busiest”?Did planes crash into the WTC on 9-11?Did Ukraine set up Russia on the MH17 incident?Can lightning bring down a plane?Was there a coordinated action on 9/11 to crash an unarmed F-16 into a hijacked plane?Did NATO Air Forces start shooting down Russian fighter jets?Do airlines in North America make around $10 profit per customer?Is travelling by car better for preventing climate change than by plane?

Why do money exchangers give different rates to different bills?

How can I support myself financially as a 17 year old with a loan?

Would Hubble Space Telescope improve black hole image observed by EHT if it joined array of telesopes?

How do LIGO and VIRGO know that a gravitational wave has its origin in a neutron star or a black hole?

As matter approaches a black hole, does it speed up?

Does a card have a keyword if it has the same effect as said keyword?

How do I tell my manager that his code review comment is wrong?

Can an isometry leave entropy invariant?

What is the most remote airport from the center of the city it supposedly serves?

How wide is a neg symbol, how to get the width for alignment?

If I readied a spell with the trigger "When I take damage", do I have to make a constitution saving throw to avoid losing Concentration?

What are the advantages of luxury car brands like Acura/Lexus over their sibling non-luxury brands Honda/Toyota?

Would glacier 'trees' be plausible?

Why Isn’t SQL More Refactorable?

What does this colon mean? It is not labeling, it is not ternary operator

Can a nothic's Weird Insight action discover secrets about a player character that the character doesn't know about themselves?

How do I make a function that generates nth natural number that isn't a perfect square?

Verb "geeitet" in an old scientific text

Independent, post-Brexit Scotland - would there be a hard border with England?

What was the first instance of a "planet eater" in sci-fi?

Using a microphone from the 1930s

How to model the curly cable part of the phone

What is the difference between 'unconcealed' and 'revealed'?

Why was the battle set up *outside* Winterfell?



Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion?


Were the Wright Brothers the first to fly?Why do we open the window shades during landing and take-off?During EAA Airventure Oshkosh, is Wittman Regional Airport the “world's busiest”?Did planes crash into the WTC on 9-11?Did Ukraine set up Russia on the MH17 incident?Can lightning bring down a plane?Was there a coordinated action on 9/11 to crash an unarmed F-16 into a hijacked plane?Did NATO Air Forces start shooting down Russian fighter jets?Do airlines in North America make around $10 profit per customer?Is travelling by car better for preventing climate change than by plane?













2















Some people are protesting a proposed expansion of London Heathrow. I saw some protestors of the Heathrow expansion with signs that read "Stop 700 more planes a day".



Photo of protestors



Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?










share|improve this question









New contributor




J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    2















    Some people are protesting a proposed expansion of London Heathrow. I saw some protestors of the Heathrow expansion with signs that read "Stop 700 more planes a day".



    Photo of protestors



    Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      2












      2








      2








      Some people are protesting a proposed expansion of London Heathrow. I saw some protestors of the Heathrow expansion with signs that read "Stop 700 more planes a day".



      Photo of protestors



      Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Some people are protesting a proposed expansion of London Heathrow. I saw some protestors of the Heathrow expansion with signs that read "Stop 700 more planes a day".



      Photo of protestors



      Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?







      aviation






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 24 mins ago









      Barry Harrison

      3,59811355




      3,59811355






      New contributor




      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 hours ago









      J. DJ. D

      112




      112




      New contributor




      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Heathrow Airport has a "dedicated website" for the planned creation of an additional runway. From the dedicated website (emphasis added):




          Heathrow Today



          • 98% capacity – Flight movements at Heathrow are capped at 480,000/year

          Heathrow Expansion:



          • 740,000 flight movements capacity



          Assuming the capacity in the expanded airport is still per year (as is explicitly stated on another Heathrow Airport website), there would be the capacity for an additional 260,000 flights per year. That is equivalent to ~712 flights per day offered by the additional capacity.



          OAG, "an air travel intelligence company," predicts a total of 140,556 air traffic movements (ATMs). Their report is pretty comprehensive and includes long-haul, short-haul, etc. A single departure (and arrival) counts as one ATM. Thus, the increase of 140,556 ATMs is equivalent to 385 additional flights per day. Equivalently, 54.1% of the additional capacity is expected to be used, and not 100%.



          To summarize:




          Would 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?




          Maybe. Probably not. The expansion will increase the airport capacity by 712 flights per day. This is not a guarantee that 712 extra flights will occur a day. In fact, an airline analysis company predicts just 385 additional flights per day. This figure is nowhere near 700.






          share|improve this answer






























            2














            Yes, assuming that the airport continues to run at 98% capacity or higher.



            According to Heathrowexpansion.com (a site apparently also owned by the airport), the expansion would have a "740,000 flight movements capacity" (per year for three runways) while currently the capacity is 480,000/year. This makes the math to figure out the new cap (740,000-480,000)/365 which is about 712 flights per day more than the previous cap. If they run at 98% capacity that makes it 698 flights per day extra.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 2





              But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

              – Bob
              27 mins ago











            • @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

              – J. D
              13 mins ago


















            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            Heathrow Airport has a "dedicated website" for the planned creation of an additional runway. From the dedicated website (emphasis added):




            Heathrow Today



            • 98% capacity – Flight movements at Heathrow are capped at 480,000/year

            Heathrow Expansion:



            • 740,000 flight movements capacity



            Assuming the capacity in the expanded airport is still per year (as is explicitly stated on another Heathrow Airport website), there would be the capacity for an additional 260,000 flights per year. That is equivalent to ~712 flights per day offered by the additional capacity.



            OAG, "an air travel intelligence company," predicts a total of 140,556 air traffic movements (ATMs). Their report is pretty comprehensive and includes long-haul, short-haul, etc. A single departure (and arrival) counts as one ATM. Thus, the increase of 140,556 ATMs is equivalent to 385 additional flights per day. Equivalently, 54.1% of the additional capacity is expected to be used, and not 100%.



            To summarize:




            Would 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?




            Maybe. Probably not. The expansion will increase the airport capacity by 712 flights per day. This is not a guarantee that 712 extra flights will occur a day. In fact, an airline analysis company predicts just 385 additional flights per day. This figure is nowhere near 700.






            share|improve this answer



























              4














              Heathrow Airport has a "dedicated website" for the planned creation of an additional runway. From the dedicated website (emphasis added):




              Heathrow Today



              • 98% capacity – Flight movements at Heathrow are capped at 480,000/year

              Heathrow Expansion:



              • 740,000 flight movements capacity



              Assuming the capacity in the expanded airport is still per year (as is explicitly stated on another Heathrow Airport website), there would be the capacity for an additional 260,000 flights per year. That is equivalent to ~712 flights per day offered by the additional capacity.



              OAG, "an air travel intelligence company," predicts a total of 140,556 air traffic movements (ATMs). Their report is pretty comprehensive and includes long-haul, short-haul, etc. A single departure (and arrival) counts as one ATM. Thus, the increase of 140,556 ATMs is equivalent to 385 additional flights per day. Equivalently, 54.1% of the additional capacity is expected to be used, and not 100%.



              To summarize:




              Would 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?




              Maybe. Probably not. The expansion will increase the airport capacity by 712 flights per day. This is not a guarantee that 712 extra flights will occur a day. In fact, an airline analysis company predicts just 385 additional flights per day. This figure is nowhere near 700.






              share|improve this answer

























                4












                4








                4







                Heathrow Airport has a "dedicated website" for the planned creation of an additional runway. From the dedicated website (emphasis added):




                Heathrow Today



                • 98% capacity – Flight movements at Heathrow are capped at 480,000/year

                Heathrow Expansion:



                • 740,000 flight movements capacity



                Assuming the capacity in the expanded airport is still per year (as is explicitly stated on another Heathrow Airport website), there would be the capacity for an additional 260,000 flights per year. That is equivalent to ~712 flights per day offered by the additional capacity.



                OAG, "an air travel intelligence company," predicts a total of 140,556 air traffic movements (ATMs). Their report is pretty comprehensive and includes long-haul, short-haul, etc. A single departure (and arrival) counts as one ATM. Thus, the increase of 140,556 ATMs is equivalent to 385 additional flights per day. Equivalently, 54.1% of the additional capacity is expected to be used, and not 100%.



                To summarize:




                Would 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?




                Maybe. Probably not. The expansion will increase the airport capacity by 712 flights per day. This is not a guarantee that 712 extra flights will occur a day. In fact, an airline analysis company predicts just 385 additional flights per day. This figure is nowhere near 700.






                share|improve this answer













                Heathrow Airport has a "dedicated website" for the planned creation of an additional runway. From the dedicated website (emphasis added):




                Heathrow Today



                • 98% capacity – Flight movements at Heathrow are capped at 480,000/year

                Heathrow Expansion:



                • 740,000 flight movements capacity



                Assuming the capacity in the expanded airport is still per year (as is explicitly stated on another Heathrow Airport website), there would be the capacity for an additional 260,000 flights per year. That is equivalent to ~712 flights per day offered by the additional capacity.



                OAG, "an air travel intelligence company," predicts a total of 140,556 air traffic movements (ATMs). Their report is pretty comprehensive and includes long-haul, short-haul, etc. A single departure (and arrival) counts as one ATM. Thus, the increase of 140,556 ATMs is equivalent to 385 additional flights per day. Equivalently, 54.1% of the additional capacity is expected to be used, and not 100%.



                To summarize:




                Would 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?




                Maybe. Probably not. The expansion will increase the airport capacity by 712 flights per day. This is not a guarantee that 712 extra flights will occur a day. In fact, an airline analysis company predicts just 385 additional flights per day. This figure is nowhere near 700.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 3 hours ago









                Barry HarrisonBarry Harrison

                3,59811355




                3,59811355





















                    2














                    Yes, assuming that the airport continues to run at 98% capacity or higher.



                    According to Heathrowexpansion.com (a site apparently also owned by the airport), the expansion would have a "740,000 flight movements capacity" (per year for three runways) while currently the capacity is 480,000/year. This makes the math to figure out the new cap (740,000-480,000)/365 which is about 712 flights per day more than the previous cap. If they run at 98% capacity that makes it 698 flights per day extra.






                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 2





                      But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                      – Bob
                      27 mins ago











                    • @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                      – J. D
                      13 mins ago















                    2














                    Yes, assuming that the airport continues to run at 98% capacity or higher.



                    According to Heathrowexpansion.com (a site apparently also owned by the airport), the expansion would have a "740,000 flight movements capacity" (per year for three runways) while currently the capacity is 480,000/year. This makes the math to figure out the new cap (740,000-480,000)/365 which is about 712 flights per day more than the previous cap. If they run at 98% capacity that makes it 698 flights per day extra.






                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 2





                      But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                      – Bob
                      27 mins ago











                    • @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                      – J. D
                      13 mins ago













                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Yes, assuming that the airport continues to run at 98% capacity or higher.



                    According to Heathrowexpansion.com (a site apparently also owned by the airport), the expansion would have a "740,000 flight movements capacity" (per year for three runways) while currently the capacity is 480,000/year. This makes the math to figure out the new cap (740,000-480,000)/365 which is about 712 flights per day more than the previous cap. If they run at 98% capacity that makes it 698 flights per day extra.






                    share|improve this answer













                    Yes, assuming that the airport continues to run at 98% capacity or higher.



                    According to Heathrowexpansion.com (a site apparently also owned by the airport), the expansion would have a "740,000 flight movements capacity" (per year for three runways) while currently the capacity is 480,000/year. This makes the math to figure out the new cap (740,000-480,000)/365 which is about 712 flights per day more than the previous cap. If they run at 98% capacity that makes it 698 flights per day extra.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 3 hours ago









                    LaurelLaurel

                    12.7k65361




                    12.7k65361







                    • 2





                      But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                      – Bob
                      27 mins ago











                    • @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                      – J. D
                      13 mins ago












                    • 2





                      But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                      – Bob
                      27 mins ago











                    • @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                      – J. D
                      13 mins ago







                    2




                    2





                    But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                    – Bob
                    27 mins ago





                    But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                    – Bob
                    27 mins ago













                    @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                    – J. D
                    13 mins ago





                    @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                    – J. D
                    13 mins ago



                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Log på Navigationsmenu

                    Creating second map without labels using QGIS?How to lock map labels for inset map in Print Composer?How to Force the Showing of Labels of a Vector File in QGISQGIS Valmiera, Labels only show for part of polygonsRemoving duplicate point labels in QGISLabeling every feature using QGIS?Show labels for point features outside map canvasAbbreviate Road Labels in QGIS only when requiredExporting map from composer in QGIS - text labels have moved in output?How to make sure labels in qgis turn up in layout map?Writing label expression with ArcMap and If then Statement?

                    Nuuk Indholdsfortegnelse Etyomologi | Historie | Geografi | Transport og infrastruktur | Politik og administration | Uddannelsesinstitutioner | Kultur | Venskabsbyer | Noter | Eksterne henvisninger | Se også | Navigationsmenuwww.sermersooq.gl64°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.75064°10′N 51°45′V / 64.167°N 51.750°V / 64.167; -51.750DMI - KlimanormalerSalmonsen, s. 850Grønlands Naturinstitut undersøger rensdyr i Akia og Maniitsoq foråret 2008Grønlands NaturinstitutNy vej til Qinngorput indviet i dagAntallet af biler i Nuuk må begrænsesNy taxacentral mødt med demonstrationKøreplan. Rute 1, 2 og 3SnescootersporNuukNord er for storSkoler i Kommuneqarfik SermersooqAtuarfik Samuel KleinschmidtKangillinguit AtuarfiatNuussuup AtuarfiaNuuk Internationale FriskoleIlinniarfissuaq, Grønlands SeminariumLedelseÅrsberetning for 2008Kunst og arkitekturÅrsberetning for 2008Julie om naturenNuuk KunstmuseumSilamiutGrønlands Nationalmuseum og ArkivStatistisk ÅrbogGrønlands LandsbibliotekStore koncerter på stribeVandhund nummer 1.000.000Kommuneqarfik Sermersooq – MalikForsidenVenskabsbyerLyngby-Taarbæk i GrønlandArctic Business NetworkWinter Cities 2008 i NuukDagligt opdaterede satellitbilleder fra NuukområdetKommuneqarfik Sermersooqs hjemmesideTurist i NuukGrønlands Statistiks databankGrønlands Hjemmestyres valgresultaterrrWorldCat124325457671310-5