Floor of Riemann zeta functionCertain functional equations for the Riemann Zeta function? Is it true that the sum of a specific floor function of a prime = 1?Mellin inverse of the Hadamard product rep. of the Riemann zeta function?Help with an irregular integralAnalytic continuation of the Dirichlet generating series of the multiplicative partition functionAre the twin primes the only positive double zeros of this real function?expressing $log(left lfloor x right rfloor!)$ in terms of zeta-zerosSome identities with the Riemann-Hurwitz zeta functionA question involving e, floor, and all x > 0About the logarithmic derivative of the Riemann zeta function

Floor of Riemann zeta function


Certain functional equations for the Riemann Zeta function? Is it true that the sum of a specific floor function of a prime = 1?Mellin inverse of the Hadamard product rep. of the Riemann zeta function?Help with an irregular integralAnalytic continuation of the Dirichlet generating series of the multiplicative partition functionAre the twin primes the only positive double zeros of this real function?expressing $log(left lfloor x right rfloor!)$ in terms of zeta-zerosSome identities with the Riemann-Hurwitz zeta functionA question involving e, floor, and all x > 0About the logarithmic derivative of the Riemann zeta function













2












$begingroup$


How to show that $$leftlfloorzetaleft(1+frac1nright)rightrfloor=n$$ for every positive integer $n$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    How to show that $$leftlfloorzetaleft(1+frac1nright)rightrfloor=n$$ for every positive integer $n$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      How to show that $$leftlfloorzetaleft(1+frac1nright)rightrfloor=n$$ for every positive integer $n$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      How to show that $$leftlfloorzetaleft(1+frac1nright)rightrfloor=n$$ for every positive integer $n$?







      nt.number-theory cv.complex-variables analytic-number-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      GH from MO

      59.5k5150228




      59.5k5150228










      asked 2 hours ago









      Gianni del FioreGianni del Fiore

      855




      855




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          It is known that (see Corollary 1.14 in Montgomery-Vaughan: Multiplicative number theory I)
          $$frac1sigma-1<zeta(sigma)<fracsigmasigma-1,qquad sigmain(0,1)cup(1,infty).$$
          In particular, taking $sigma=1+frac1n$, we get
          $$n<zetaleft(1+frac1nright)<n+1.$$
          This is slightly stronger than your claim. Better bounds can be obtained from the Laurent series expansion of $zeta(s)$ around $s=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            thank you very much for your answer
            $endgroup$
            – Gianni del Fiore
            2 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f330573%2ffloor-of-riemann-zeta-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          It is known that (see Corollary 1.14 in Montgomery-Vaughan: Multiplicative number theory I)
          $$frac1sigma-1<zeta(sigma)<fracsigmasigma-1,qquad sigmain(0,1)cup(1,infty).$$
          In particular, taking $sigma=1+frac1n$, we get
          $$n<zetaleft(1+frac1nright)<n+1.$$
          This is slightly stronger than your claim. Better bounds can be obtained from the Laurent series expansion of $zeta(s)$ around $s=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            thank you very much for your answer
            $endgroup$
            – Gianni del Fiore
            2 hours ago















          4












          $begingroup$

          It is known that (see Corollary 1.14 in Montgomery-Vaughan: Multiplicative number theory I)
          $$frac1sigma-1<zeta(sigma)<fracsigmasigma-1,qquad sigmain(0,1)cup(1,infty).$$
          In particular, taking $sigma=1+frac1n$, we get
          $$n<zetaleft(1+frac1nright)<n+1.$$
          This is slightly stronger than your claim. Better bounds can be obtained from the Laurent series expansion of $zeta(s)$ around $s=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            thank you very much for your answer
            $endgroup$
            – Gianni del Fiore
            2 hours ago













          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          It is known that (see Corollary 1.14 in Montgomery-Vaughan: Multiplicative number theory I)
          $$frac1sigma-1<zeta(sigma)<fracsigmasigma-1,qquad sigmain(0,1)cup(1,infty).$$
          In particular, taking $sigma=1+frac1n$, we get
          $$n<zetaleft(1+frac1nright)<n+1.$$
          This is slightly stronger than your claim. Better bounds can be obtained from the Laurent series expansion of $zeta(s)$ around $s=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          It is known that (see Corollary 1.14 in Montgomery-Vaughan: Multiplicative number theory I)
          $$frac1sigma-1<zeta(sigma)<fracsigmasigma-1,qquad sigmain(0,1)cup(1,infty).$$
          In particular, taking $sigma=1+frac1n$, we get
          $$n<zetaleft(1+frac1nright)<n+1.$$
          This is slightly stronger than your claim. Better bounds can be obtained from the Laurent series expansion of $zeta(s)$ around $s=1$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          GH from MOGH from MO

          59.5k5150228




          59.5k5150228







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            thank you very much for your answer
            $endgroup$
            – Gianni del Fiore
            2 hours ago












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            thank you very much for your answer
            $endgroup$
            – Gianni del Fiore
            2 hours ago







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          thank you very much for your answer
          $endgroup$
          – Gianni del Fiore
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          thank you very much for your answer
          $endgroup$
          – Gianni del Fiore
          2 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f330573%2ffloor-of-riemann-zeta-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Siegen Nawigatsjuun

          Log på Navigationsmenu

          Log på Navigationsmenu