Is it safe to use two single-pole breakers for a 240 V circuit?Amp rating of ganged circuit-breakersUsing a 30-amp tandem circuit breaker for a 120/240v circuit?Can you replace a Q1 Circuit Breaker with two QO breakers?60A two pole breaker supplying a sub panel (220v) - how many amps for separate 110v legs?What are good uses for tandem (double-stuff) breakers?Can a single pole (normal/regular) circuit breaker be used in spots designated for tandem?Wiring Options for 14/3 NM-B Cable and Two Single Pole 15 Amp Circuit BreakersCan I replace two Siemens QP type, handle tied, single pole 15 amp breakers with a tandem QT type in the same configuration?Can I use a two-pole single handle breaker for mwbc?Can I install Whole Home Surge Protector into two single pole breakers?

Is 12 minutes connection in Bristol Temple Meads long enough?

Wireless headphones interfere with Wi-Fi signal on laptop

Do crew rest seats count towards the maximum allowed number of seats per flight attendant?

Can a tourist shoot a gun for recreational purpose in the USA?

Polynomial division: Is this trick obvious?

What is this old US Air Force plane?

How to not get blinded by an attack at dawn

Biology of a Firestarter

How do I adjust encounters to challenge my lycanthrope players without negating their cool new abilities?

Can only the master initiate communication in SPI whereas in I2C the slave can also initiate the communication?

Why didn't the Avengers use this object earlier?

Unexpected Netflix account registered to my Gmail address - any way it could be a hack attempt?

Were any of the books mentioned in this scene from the movie Hackers real?

Would life always name the light from their sun "white"

How can we allow remote players to effectively interact with a physical tabletop battle-map?

Should I communicate in my applications that I'm unemployed out of choice rather than because nobody will have me?

Was this seat-belt sign activation standard procedure?

Alias for root of a polynomial

Promotion comes with unexpected 24/7/365 on-call

Is it safe to use two single-pole breakers for a 240 V circuit?

Who commanded or executed this action in Game of Thrones S8E5?

Why does the headset man not get on the tractor?

How to make a not so good looking person more appealing?

Is Valonqar prophecy unfulfilled?



Is it safe to use two single-pole breakers for a 240 V circuit?


Amp rating of ganged circuit-breakersUsing a 30-amp tandem circuit breaker for a 120/240v circuit?Can you replace a Q1 Circuit Breaker with two QO breakers?60A two pole breaker supplying a sub panel (220v) - how many amps for separate 110v legs?What are good uses for tandem (double-stuff) breakers?Can a single pole (normal/regular) circuit breaker be used in spots designated for tandem?Wiring Options for 14/3 NM-B Cable and Two Single Pole 15 Amp Circuit BreakersCan I replace two Siemens QP type, handle tied, single pole 15 amp breakers with a tandem QT type in the same configuration?Can I use a two-pole single handle breaker for mwbc?Can I install Whole Home Surge Protector into two single pole breakers?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8















I recently had an electrician come out and replace my electric panel.



He seemed very knowledgeable and overall appears to have done a good job, even went through and labelled most of the panel... Except for three breakers at the bottom of the panel.



One of these breakers is for the pool lights and an outlet near the pool, so he put a GFCI on it and it works fine, but it wasn't labelled...



The other two breakers above it, I found out, are actually two single pole breakers that I believe are both used for a pool pump that uses 240 V, and it should have a double pole breaker installed.



I think one of these single pole breakers is providing one leg of the circuit and the other breaker is providing the other leg...



This seems unsafe to me. If someone were to mistakenly leave one of these two breakers off, but the other on, the pool pump definitely doesn't run, but it seems there could be some kind of danger here.



Could it cause an electric shock somewhere (in general), or is it just dangerous in the sense that someone might think the circuit is off and go play with wires that might actually be live?










share|improve this question









New contributor



schizoid04 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2





    I am wondering were the original breakers used? The electrician may not known what these 3 were powering. He may have thought this was a MWBC although today these do require a handle tie but in the past they did not.

    – Ed Beal
    8 hours ago


















8















I recently had an electrician come out and replace my electric panel.



He seemed very knowledgeable and overall appears to have done a good job, even went through and labelled most of the panel... Except for three breakers at the bottom of the panel.



One of these breakers is for the pool lights and an outlet near the pool, so he put a GFCI on it and it works fine, but it wasn't labelled...



The other two breakers above it, I found out, are actually two single pole breakers that I believe are both used for a pool pump that uses 240 V, and it should have a double pole breaker installed.



I think one of these single pole breakers is providing one leg of the circuit and the other breaker is providing the other leg...



This seems unsafe to me. If someone were to mistakenly leave one of these two breakers off, but the other on, the pool pump definitely doesn't run, but it seems there could be some kind of danger here.



Could it cause an electric shock somewhere (in general), or is it just dangerous in the sense that someone might think the circuit is off and go play with wires that might actually be live?










share|improve this question









New contributor



schizoid04 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2





    I am wondering were the original breakers used? The electrician may not known what these 3 were powering. He may have thought this was a MWBC although today these do require a handle tie but in the past they did not.

    – Ed Beal
    8 hours ago














8












8








8








I recently had an electrician come out and replace my electric panel.



He seemed very knowledgeable and overall appears to have done a good job, even went through and labelled most of the panel... Except for three breakers at the bottom of the panel.



One of these breakers is for the pool lights and an outlet near the pool, so he put a GFCI on it and it works fine, but it wasn't labelled...



The other two breakers above it, I found out, are actually two single pole breakers that I believe are both used for a pool pump that uses 240 V, and it should have a double pole breaker installed.



I think one of these single pole breakers is providing one leg of the circuit and the other breaker is providing the other leg...



This seems unsafe to me. If someone were to mistakenly leave one of these two breakers off, but the other on, the pool pump definitely doesn't run, but it seems there could be some kind of danger here.



Could it cause an electric shock somewhere (in general), or is it just dangerous in the sense that someone might think the circuit is off and go play with wires that might actually be live?










share|improve this question









New contributor



schizoid04 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I recently had an electrician come out and replace my electric panel.



He seemed very knowledgeable and overall appears to have done a good job, even went through and labelled most of the panel... Except for three breakers at the bottom of the panel.



One of these breakers is for the pool lights and an outlet near the pool, so he put a GFCI on it and it works fine, but it wasn't labelled...



The other two breakers above it, I found out, are actually two single pole breakers that I believe are both used for a pool pump that uses 240 V, and it should have a double pole breaker installed.



I think one of these single pole breakers is providing one leg of the circuit and the other breaker is providing the other leg...



This seems unsafe to me. If someone were to mistakenly leave one of these two breakers off, but the other on, the pool pump definitely doesn't run, but it seems there could be some kind of danger here.



Could it cause an electric shock somewhere (in general), or is it just dangerous in the sense that someone might think the circuit is off and go play with wires that might actually be live?







electrical wiring circuit-breaker






share|improve this question









New contributor



schizoid04 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



schizoid04 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









Peter Mortensen

1557




1557






New contributor



schizoid04 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 10 hours ago









schizoid04schizoid04

1434




1434




New contributor



schizoid04 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




schizoid04 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 2





    I am wondering were the original breakers used? The electrician may not known what these 3 were powering. He may have thought this was a MWBC although today these do require a handle tie but in the past they did not.

    – Ed Beal
    8 hours ago













  • 2





    I am wondering were the original breakers used? The electrician may not known what these 3 were powering. He may have thought this was a MWBC although today these do require a handle tie but in the past they did not.

    – Ed Beal
    8 hours ago








2




2





I am wondering were the original breakers used? The electrician may not known what these 3 were powering. He may have thought this was a MWBC although today these do require a handle tie but in the past they did not.

– Ed Beal
8 hours ago






I am wondering were the original breakers used? The electrician may not known what these 3 were powering. He may have thought this was a MWBC although today these do require a handle tie but in the past they did not.

– Ed Beal
8 hours ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















8














You are correct. The issues at hand are common maintenance shutoff (to solve the problem of which you speak) and common trip (to entirely remove power from a device with a problem).



  • If the circuit serves a device that uses only 240V and does not supply neutral, then common maintenance shutoff will suffice. Go to an electrical supply house that deals in your panel/breaker type, and obtain a proper, listed handle-tie.
    enter image description here

Proper, listed handle ties can be hard to find, especially on a Sunday. An adequate substitute for a handle-tie is a 2-pole breaker. It's overkill and costs about $8 more, but it works.



  • If the circuit serves a 120/240V device (which takes 2 hots and neutral), then common trip is mandatory. Go to any hardware store and obtain a 2-pole breaker appropriate for your panel.

While you're at it, make sure they didn't slip you an alien breaker: a breaker not UL-listed or UL-classified for that panel. For instance if they slipped Homeline breakers into your Siemens panel, a Siemens handle-tie won't fit those breakers, now is the time to fix that.



Also, while you're labeling, put "GFCI protected" on any outlet fed off that GFCI. That's a code requirement most people overlook, causing home inspectors to "write them up".






share|improve this answer
































    6














    You are correct that a 240 volt circuit with separate breakers on each leg is a hazard for future maintainers.



    You should call the electrician and talk to him about it. You don't have to start by insisting that he come back, just ask him to tell you everything he remembers about the installation.



    If he didn't have a reason for leaving the separate single pole breakers, or if you disagree with his reason, ask him to come back and finish the job properly.



    If you can't reach an agreement with the electrician, you can probably install the double breaker yourself. This is something that a reasonably cautious homeowner can safely do.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2





      Note, some locations in the world disallow the homeowner or any unlicensed person from working inside a distribution panel.

      – Criggie
      7 hours ago


















    4














    At a minimum there should be a handle tie if it truly is a 240 V feed.



    For a modern panel, in some cases, the handle ties cost 1/2 of what a brand new breaker costs in these cases. I prefer using a double pole breaker and now you have a couple of spare single poles. But yes, the handles should be tied with a listed tie or a double pole breaker is the code compliant method.






    share|improve this answer
































      0














      In addition to what others have mentioned, if there are two separate single-pole circuits, it's possible some future electrician might move one of the circuits, unaware they are both part of the same 240 V, and mistakenly shift the breaker down a spot. This will put both breakers on the same phase, and cause problems for your 240 V outlet.



      However, are you sure your pool pump is actually 240 V? Is it possible the electrician was just running two completely unrelated circuits through the thicker cable? Maybe the pump is really just 120 V?






      share|improve this answer

























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "73"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        schizoid04 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f165027%2fis-it-safe-to-use-two-single-pole-breakers-for-a-240-v-circuit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        8














        You are correct. The issues at hand are common maintenance shutoff (to solve the problem of which you speak) and common trip (to entirely remove power from a device with a problem).



        • If the circuit serves a device that uses only 240V and does not supply neutral, then common maintenance shutoff will suffice. Go to an electrical supply house that deals in your panel/breaker type, and obtain a proper, listed handle-tie.
          enter image description here

        Proper, listed handle ties can be hard to find, especially on a Sunday. An adequate substitute for a handle-tie is a 2-pole breaker. It's overkill and costs about $8 more, but it works.



        • If the circuit serves a 120/240V device (which takes 2 hots and neutral), then common trip is mandatory. Go to any hardware store and obtain a 2-pole breaker appropriate for your panel.

        While you're at it, make sure they didn't slip you an alien breaker: a breaker not UL-listed or UL-classified for that panel. For instance if they slipped Homeline breakers into your Siemens panel, a Siemens handle-tie won't fit those breakers, now is the time to fix that.



        Also, while you're labeling, put "GFCI protected" on any outlet fed off that GFCI. That's a code requirement most people overlook, causing home inspectors to "write them up".






        share|improve this answer





























          8














          You are correct. The issues at hand are common maintenance shutoff (to solve the problem of which you speak) and common trip (to entirely remove power from a device with a problem).



          • If the circuit serves a device that uses only 240V and does not supply neutral, then common maintenance shutoff will suffice. Go to an electrical supply house that deals in your panel/breaker type, and obtain a proper, listed handle-tie.
            enter image description here

          Proper, listed handle ties can be hard to find, especially on a Sunday. An adequate substitute for a handle-tie is a 2-pole breaker. It's overkill and costs about $8 more, but it works.



          • If the circuit serves a 120/240V device (which takes 2 hots and neutral), then common trip is mandatory. Go to any hardware store and obtain a 2-pole breaker appropriate for your panel.

          While you're at it, make sure they didn't slip you an alien breaker: a breaker not UL-listed or UL-classified for that panel. For instance if they slipped Homeline breakers into your Siemens panel, a Siemens handle-tie won't fit those breakers, now is the time to fix that.



          Also, while you're labeling, put "GFCI protected" on any outlet fed off that GFCI. That's a code requirement most people overlook, causing home inspectors to "write them up".






          share|improve this answer



























            8












            8








            8







            You are correct. The issues at hand are common maintenance shutoff (to solve the problem of which you speak) and common trip (to entirely remove power from a device with a problem).



            • If the circuit serves a device that uses only 240V and does not supply neutral, then common maintenance shutoff will suffice. Go to an electrical supply house that deals in your panel/breaker type, and obtain a proper, listed handle-tie.
              enter image description here

            Proper, listed handle ties can be hard to find, especially on a Sunday. An adequate substitute for a handle-tie is a 2-pole breaker. It's overkill and costs about $8 more, but it works.



            • If the circuit serves a 120/240V device (which takes 2 hots and neutral), then common trip is mandatory. Go to any hardware store and obtain a 2-pole breaker appropriate for your panel.

            While you're at it, make sure they didn't slip you an alien breaker: a breaker not UL-listed or UL-classified for that panel. For instance if they slipped Homeline breakers into your Siemens panel, a Siemens handle-tie won't fit those breakers, now is the time to fix that.



            Also, while you're labeling, put "GFCI protected" on any outlet fed off that GFCI. That's a code requirement most people overlook, causing home inspectors to "write them up".






            share|improve this answer















            You are correct. The issues at hand are common maintenance shutoff (to solve the problem of which you speak) and common trip (to entirely remove power from a device with a problem).



            • If the circuit serves a device that uses only 240V and does not supply neutral, then common maintenance shutoff will suffice. Go to an electrical supply house that deals in your panel/breaker type, and obtain a proper, listed handle-tie.
              enter image description here

            Proper, listed handle ties can be hard to find, especially on a Sunday. An adequate substitute for a handle-tie is a 2-pole breaker. It's overkill and costs about $8 more, but it works.



            • If the circuit serves a 120/240V device (which takes 2 hots and neutral), then common trip is mandatory. Go to any hardware store and obtain a 2-pole breaker appropriate for your panel.

            While you're at it, make sure they didn't slip you an alien breaker: a breaker not UL-listed or UL-classified for that panel. For instance if they slipped Homeline breakers into your Siemens panel, a Siemens handle-tie won't fit those breakers, now is the time to fix that.



            Also, while you're labeling, put "GFCI protected" on any outlet fed off that GFCI. That's a code requirement most people overlook, causing home inspectors to "write them up".







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 hours ago









            Kris

            1,1301611




            1,1301611










            answered 8 hours ago









            HarperHarper

            79k552158




            79k552158























                6














                You are correct that a 240 volt circuit with separate breakers on each leg is a hazard for future maintainers.



                You should call the electrician and talk to him about it. You don't have to start by insisting that he come back, just ask him to tell you everything he remembers about the installation.



                If he didn't have a reason for leaving the separate single pole breakers, or if you disagree with his reason, ask him to come back and finish the job properly.



                If you can't reach an agreement with the electrician, you can probably install the double breaker yourself. This is something that a reasonably cautious homeowner can safely do.






                share|improve this answer


















                • 2





                  Note, some locations in the world disallow the homeowner or any unlicensed person from working inside a distribution panel.

                  – Criggie
                  7 hours ago















                6














                You are correct that a 240 volt circuit with separate breakers on each leg is a hazard for future maintainers.



                You should call the electrician and talk to him about it. You don't have to start by insisting that he come back, just ask him to tell you everything he remembers about the installation.



                If he didn't have a reason for leaving the separate single pole breakers, or if you disagree with his reason, ask him to come back and finish the job properly.



                If you can't reach an agreement with the electrician, you can probably install the double breaker yourself. This is something that a reasonably cautious homeowner can safely do.






                share|improve this answer


















                • 2





                  Note, some locations in the world disallow the homeowner or any unlicensed person from working inside a distribution panel.

                  – Criggie
                  7 hours ago













                6












                6








                6







                You are correct that a 240 volt circuit with separate breakers on each leg is a hazard for future maintainers.



                You should call the electrician and talk to him about it. You don't have to start by insisting that he come back, just ask him to tell you everything he remembers about the installation.



                If he didn't have a reason for leaving the separate single pole breakers, or if you disagree with his reason, ask him to come back and finish the job properly.



                If you can't reach an agreement with the electrician, you can probably install the double breaker yourself. This is something that a reasonably cautious homeowner can safely do.






                share|improve this answer













                You are correct that a 240 volt circuit with separate breakers on each leg is a hazard for future maintainers.



                You should call the electrician and talk to him about it. You don't have to start by insisting that he come back, just ask him to tell you everything he remembers about the installation.



                If he didn't have a reason for leaving the separate single pole breakers, or if you disagree with his reason, ask him to come back and finish the job properly.



                If you can't reach an agreement with the electrician, you can probably install the double breaker yourself. This is something that a reasonably cautious homeowner can safely do.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 9 hours ago









                A. I. BreveleriA. I. Breveleri

                7,9571924




                7,9571924







                • 2





                  Note, some locations in the world disallow the homeowner or any unlicensed person from working inside a distribution panel.

                  – Criggie
                  7 hours ago












                • 2





                  Note, some locations in the world disallow the homeowner or any unlicensed person from working inside a distribution panel.

                  – Criggie
                  7 hours ago







                2




                2





                Note, some locations in the world disallow the homeowner or any unlicensed person from working inside a distribution panel.

                – Criggie
                7 hours ago





                Note, some locations in the world disallow the homeowner or any unlicensed person from working inside a distribution panel.

                – Criggie
                7 hours ago











                4














                At a minimum there should be a handle tie if it truly is a 240 V feed.



                For a modern panel, in some cases, the handle ties cost 1/2 of what a brand new breaker costs in these cases. I prefer using a double pole breaker and now you have a couple of spare single poles. But yes, the handles should be tied with a listed tie or a double pole breaker is the code compliant method.






                share|improve this answer





























                  4














                  At a minimum there should be a handle tie if it truly is a 240 V feed.



                  For a modern panel, in some cases, the handle ties cost 1/2 of what a brand new breaker costs in these cases. I prefer using a double pole breaker and now you have a couple of spare single poles. But yes, the handles should be tied with a listed tie or a double pole breaker is the code compliant method.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    4












                    4








                    4







                    At a minimum there should be a handle tie if it truly is a 240 V feed.



                    For a modern panel, in some cases, the handle ties cost 1/2 of what a brand new breaker costs in these cases. I prefer using a double pole breaker and now you have a couple of spare single poles. But yes, the handles should be tied with a listed tie or a double pole breaker is the code compliant method.






                    share|improve this answer















                    At a minimum there should be a handle tie if it truly is a 240 V feed.



                    For a modern panel, in some cases, the handle ties cost 1/2 of what a brand new breaker costs in these cases. I prefer using a double pole breaker and now you have a couple of spare single poles. But yes, the handles should be tied with a listed tie or a double pole breaker is the code compliant method.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 2 hours ago









                    Peter Mortensen

                    1557




                    1557










                    answered 8 hours ago









                    Ed BealEd Beal

                    35.6k12451




                    35.6k12451





















                        0














                        In addition to what others have mentioned, if there are two separate single-pole circuits, it's possible some future electrician might move one of the circuits, unaware they are both part of the same 240 V, and mistakenly shift the breaker down a spot. This will put both breakers on the same phase, and cause problems for your 240 V outlet.



                        However, are you sure your pool pump is actually 240 V? Is it possible the electrician was just running two completely unrelated circuits through the thicker cable? Maybe the pump is really just 120 V?






                        share|improve this answer





























                          0














                          In addition to what others have mentioned, if there are two separate single-pole circuits, it's possible some future electrician might move one of the circuits, unaware they are both part of the same 240 V, and mistakenly shift the breaker down a spot. This will put both breakers on the same phase, and cause problems for your 240 V outlet.



                          However, are you sure your pool pump is actually 240 V? Is it possible the electrician was just running two completely unrelated circuits through the thicker cable? Maybe the pump is really just 120 V?






                          share|improve this answer



























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            In addition to what others have mentioned, if there are two separate single-pole circuits, it's possible some future electrician might move one of the circuits, unaware they are both part of the same 240 V, and mistakenly shift the breaker down a spot. This will put both breakers on the same phase, and cause problems for your 240 V outlet.



                            However, are you sure your pool pump is actually 240 V? Is it possible the electrician was just running two completely unrelated circuits through the thicker cable? Maybe the pump is really just 120 V?






                            share|improve this answer















                            In addition to what others have mentioned, if there are two separate single-pole circuits, it's possible some future electrician might move one of the circuits, unaware they are both part of the same 240 V, and mistakenly shift the breaker down a spot. This will put both breakers on the same phase, and cause problems for your 240 V outlet.



                            However, are you sure your pool pump is actually 240 V? Is it possible the electrician was just running two completely unrelated circuits through the thicker cable? Maybe the pump is really just 120 V?







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 2 hours ago









                            Peter Mortensen

                            1557




                            1557










                            answered 7 hours ago









                            Jamin GreyJamin Grey

                            1339




                            1339




















                                schizoid04 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                schizoid04 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                schizoid04 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                schizoid04 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f165027%2fis-it-safe-to-use-two-single-pole-breakers-for-a-240-v-circuit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Log på Navigationsmenu

                                Wonderful Copenhagen (sang) Eksterne henvisninger | NavigationsmenurSide på frankloesser.comWonderful Copenhagen

                                Detroit Tigers Spis treści Historia | Skład zespołu | Sukcesy | Członkowie Baseball Hall of Fame | Zastrzeżone numery | Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneEncyclopedia of Detroit - Detroit TigersTigers Stadium, Detroit, MITigers Timeline 1900sDetroit Tigers Team History & EncyclopediaTigers Timeline 1910s1935 World Series1945 World Series1945 World Series1984 World SeriesComerica Park, Detroit, MI2006 World Series2012 World SeriesDetroit Tigers 40-Man RosterDetroit Tigers Coaching StaffTigers Hall of FamersTigers Retired Numberse