Polynomial division: Is this trick obvious?When does a polynomial divide $x^k - 1$ for some $k$?Prime factor of $A=14^7+14^2+1$What is the algorithm for long division of polynomials with multiple variables?Method of finding polynomials $p$, $q$ such that $pf+qg=gcd(f, g)$Ring of polynomials $mathbbZ/(n)[x]$how to find the remainder when a polynomial $p(x)$ is divided my another polynomial $q(x)$A lot of confusion in the “Polynomial Remainder Theorem”?What is the minimum degree of a polynomial for it to satisfy the following conditions?A possible relationship between prime numbers and exponential/polynomial functionsError in predicting remaindersSolve for $a,b,c,d in Bbb R$, given that $a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2-ab-bc-cd-d+frac 25 =0$Finding the sum of squares of roots of a quartic polynomial.

Can you pick an advanced rogue talent with the Extra Rogue Talent feat?

Why doesn't Iron Man's action affect this person in Endgame?

As programmers say: Strive to be lazy

Is this possible when it comes to the relations of P, NP, NP-Hard and NP-Complete?

Source of the Wildfire?

"Every hiker climbed a hill", is there one or multiple hills?

How was this character able to keep fighting effectively in S8E5 of Game of Thrones?

How can we allow remote players to effectively interact with a physical tabletop battle-map?

is it correct to say "When it started to rain, I was in the open air."

Why are solar panels kept tilted?

Where to find every-day healthy food near Heathrow Airport?

Is it safe to use two single-pole breakers for a 240v circuit?

Did galley captains put corks in the mouths of slave rowers to keep them quiet?

After Restoring Log Shipping to Secondary Server, First Stored Procedure Execution is Slow

Formal Definition of Dot Product

How to insert a name of the file as a header of a file?

Were any of the books mentioned in this scene from the movie Hackers real?

Should I communicate in my applications that I'm unemployed out of choice rather than because nobody will have me?

Unexpected Netflix account registered to my Gmail address - any way it could be a hack attempt?

Fixed width with p doesn't work

White foam around tubeless tires

Why did the metro bus stop at each railway crossing, despite no warning indicating a train was coming?

What was the ring Varys took off?

Can only the master initiate communication in SPI whereas in I2C the slave can also initiate the communication?



Polynomial division: Is this trick obvious?


When does a polynomial divide $x^k - 1$ for some $k$?Prime factor of $A=14^7+14^2+1$What is the algorithm for long division of polynomials with multiple variables?Method of finding polynomials $p$, $q$ such that $pf+qg=gcd(f, g)$Ring of polynomials $mathbbZ/(n)[x]$how to find the remainder when a polynomial $p(x)$ is divided my another polynomial $q(x)$A lot of confusion in the “Polynomial Remainder Theorem”?What is the minimum degree of a polynomial for it to satisfy the following conditions?A possible relationship between prime numbers and exponential/polynomial functionsError in predicting remaindersSolve for $a,b,c,d in Bbb R$, given that $a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2-ab-bc-cd-d+frac 25 =0$Finding the sum of squares of roots of a quartic polynomial.













5












$begingroup$


Given that,



$$
P(x)=x^104+x^93+x^82+x^71+1
$$



and,



$$Q(x)=x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$$



what is the remainder of $P(x)$ divided by $Q(x)$.




The given answer was:



Let $Q(x)=0$. Multiplying both sides by $x-1$:



$$
(x-1)(x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1)=0 implies x^5 - 1=0 implies x^5 = 1
$$



Substituting $x^5=1$ in $P(x)$ gives $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$. Thus,



$$
fracP(x)Q(x)=0
$$




This question was asked in a high school test. (The candidates had at most few minutes per question.) Obviously, the candidate is required to come up with a “trick” rather than doing brute force polynomial division. My question is: How is the candidate supposed to think of the suggested method? Is it obvious? How else could one approach the problem?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have never heard of high school students referred to as candidates.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    3 hours ago















5












$begingroup$


Given that,



$$
P(x)=x^104+x^93+x^82+x^71+1
$$



and,



$$Q(x)=x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$$



what is the remainder of $P(x)$ divided by $Q(x)$.




The given answer was:



Let $Q(x)=0$. Multiplying both sides by $x-1$:



$$
(x-1)(x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1)=0 implies x^5 - 1=0 implies x^5 = 1
$$



Substituting $x^5=1$ in $P(x)$ gives $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$. Thus,



$$
fracP(x)Q(x)=0
$$




This question was asked in a high school test. (The candidates had at most few minutes per question.) Obviously, the candidate is required to come up with a “trick” rather than doing brute force polynomial division. My question is: How is the candidate supposed to think of the suggested method? Is it obvious? How else could one approach the problem?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have never heard of high school students referred to as candidates.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    3 hours ago













5












5








5


3



$begingroup$


Given that,



$$
P(x)=x^104+x^93+x^82+x^71+1
$$



and,



$$Q(x)=x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$$



what is the remainder of $P(x)$ divided by $Q(x)$.




The given answer was:



Let $Q(x)=0$. Multiplying both sides by $x-1$:



$$
(x-1)(x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1)=0 implies x^5 - 1=0 implies x^5 = 1
$$



Substituting $x^5=1$ in $P(x)$ gives $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$. Thus,



$$
fracP(x)Q(x)=0
$$




This question was asked in a high school test. (The candidates had at most few minutes per question.) Obviously, the candidate is required to come up with a “trick” rather than doing brute force polynomial division. My question is: How is the candidate supposed to think of the suggested method? Is it obvious? How else could one approach the problem?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Given that,



$$
P(x)=x^104+x^93+x^82+x^71+1
$$



and,



$$Q(x)=x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$$



what is the remainder of $P(x)$ divided by $Q(x)$.




The given answer was:



Let $Q(x)=0$. Multiplying both sides by $x-1$:



$$
(x-1)(x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1)=0 implies x^5 - 1=0 implies x^5 = 1
$$



Substituting $x^5=1$ in $P(x)$ gives $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$. Thus,



$$
fracP(x)Q(x)=0
$$




This question was asked in a high school test. (The candidates had at most few minutes per question.) Obviously, the candidate is required to come up with a “trick” rather than doing brute force polynomial division. My question is: How is the candidate supposed to think of the suggested method? Is it obvious? How else could one approach the problem?







polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Bernard

126k743120




126k743120










asked 4 hours ago









joeblackjoeblack

884




884







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have never heard of high school students referred to as candidates.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    3 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have never heard of high school students referred to as candidates.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    3 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
I have never heard of high school students referred to as candidates.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I have never heard of high school students referred to as candidates.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
3 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

While it may be a standard technique, as Bill's response details, I wouldn't say it's at all obvious at High School level. As a pre-Olympiad challenge problem, however, it's a good one.



My intuition is via cyclotomic polynomials -- $Q(x) = Phi_5(x)$, giving the idea to multiply through by $x-1$ -- but I doubt I would have recognised them before university: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclotomic_polynomial






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    It's standard technique. $Q$ has a "simpler" multiple $,QR = x^5!-!1,$ so we first reduce $P$ mod $,x^large 5! -! 1$ using $bmod x^large 5-1!:, color#c00x^large 5equiv 1Rightarrow, x^large r+5qequiv x^large r(color#c00x^large 5)^large qequiv x^large r,,$ then reduce that result $bmod Q,,$ i.e.



    $$Pbmod Q, =, (Pbmod QR)bmod Qqquad$$



    This idea is ubiquitous, e.g. we already use it implicitly in grade school in radix $10$ to determine integer parity: first reduce mod $10$ to get the units digit, then reduce the units digits mod $2,,$ i.e.



    $$N bmod 2, = (Nbmod 2cdot 5)bmod 2qquad $$



    i.e. an integer has the same parity (even / oddness) as that of its units digit.



    See here and its $25$ linked questions for many more examples (some far less trivial).



    Remark $ $ Further, there are simple algorithms for recognizing cyclotomics (and products of such), e.g. there it shows that $, x^16+x^14-x^10-x^8-x^6+x^2+1$ is cyclotomic (a factor of $x^60-1).,$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      3












      $begingroup$

      I think if the candidates know what a geometric series is, the question is okay. Indeed, one uses exactly this trick to find the formula for the geometric series, i.e. one writes
      $$(x-1)sum_k=1^nx^k=x^n+1-1$$ to find that $$sum_k=1^infty x^k=lim_ntoinftysum_k=1^nx^k=lim_ntoinftyfracx^n+1-1x-1=frac11-x$$
      for $|x|<1$. Therefore, it is not too hard to get from $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ to $x^5-1$. Now you can reduce mod $x^5-1$ by substitution $x^5=1$.



      I think the way one should think about this is to note that $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ is the minimal polynomial of any primitive 5th unit root $alpha$. Now $P(alpha)=0$ since $alpha^5=1$ and therefore $Q$ devides $P$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        3












        $begingroup$

        Let $a$ be zero of $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1=0$. Obviously $ane 1$. Then $$a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1=0$$
        so multiply this with $a-1$ we get $$a^5=1$$ But then $$ Q(a) = a^100a^4+a^90a^3+a^80 a^2+a^70a+1 = a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1=0$$



        So each zero of $Q(x)$ is also a zero of $P(x)$ and since all 4 zeroes of $Q(x)$ are different we have $Q(x)mid P(x)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




















          0












          $begingroup$

          If it's not obvious, an examination of the question quickly reveals the trick. Say



          $$P(x)=x^n$$



          Then begin long division by $Q(x)$:



          $$x^n-x^n-x^n-1-x^n-2-x^n-3-x^n-4$$
          $$x^n-5$$
          $$dots$$
          $$x^n-5k$$



          While it may not be obvious just by looking at the question, anyone who attempts the naive solution has (at least) a reasonable chance of running across a way of solving it.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3224765%2fpolynomial-division-is-this-trick-obvious%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            5 Answers
            5






            active

            oldest

            votes








            5 Answers
            5






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            While it may be a standard technique, as Bill's response details, I wouldn't say it's at all obvious at High School level. As a pre-Olympiad challenge problem, however, it's a good one.



            My intuition is via cyclotomic polynomials -- $Q(x) = Phi_5(x)$, giving the idea to multiply through by $x-1$ -- but I doubt I would have recognised them before university: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclotomic_polynomial






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              5












              $begingroup$

              While it may be a standard technique, as Bill's response details, I wouldn't say it's at all obvious at High School level. As a pre-Olympiad challenge problem, however, it's a good one.



              My intuition is via cyclotomic polynomials -- $Q(x) = Phi_5(x)$, giving the idea to multiply through by $x-1$ -- but I doubt I would have recognised them before university: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclotomic_polynomial






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                While it may be a standard technique, as Bill's response details, I wouldn't say it's at all obvious at High School level. As a pre-Olympiad challenge problem, however, it's a good one.



                My intuition is via cyclotomic polynomials -- $Q(x) = Phi_5(x)$, giving the idea to multiply through by $x-1$ -- but I doubt I would have recognised them before university: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclotomic_polynomial






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                While it may be a standard technique, as Bill's response details, I wouldn't say it's at all obvious at High School level. As a pre-Olympiad challenge problem, however, it's a good one.



                My intuition is via cyclotomic polynomials -- $Q(x) = Phi_5(x)$, giving the idea to multiply through by $x-1$ -- but I doubt I would have recognised them before university: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclotomic_polynomial







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 3 hours ago









                bouncebackbounceback

                541212




                541212





















                    4












                    $begingroup$

                    It's standard technique. $Q$ has a "simpler" multiple $,QR = x^5!-!1,$ so we first reduce $P$ mod $,x^large 5! -! 1$ using $bmod x^large 5-1!:, color#c00x^large 5equiv 1Rightarrow, x^large r+5qequiv x^large r(color#c00x^large 5)^large qequiv x^large r,,$ then reduce that result $bmod Q,,$ i.e.



                    $$Pbmod Q, =, (Pbmod QR)bmod Qqquad$$



                    This idea is ubiquitous, e.g. we already use it implicitly in grade school in radix $10$ to determine integer parity: first reduce mod $10$ to get the units digit, then reduce the units digits mod $2,,$ i.e.



                    $$N bmod 2, = (Nbmod 2cdot 5)bmod 2qquad $$



                    i.e. an integer has the same parity (even / oddness) as that of its units digit.



                    See here and its $25$ linked questions for many more examples (some far less trivial).



                    Remark $ $ Further, there are simple algorithms for recognizing cyclotomics (and products of such), e.g. there it shows that $, x^16+x^14-x^10-x^8-x^6+x^2+1$ is cyclotomic (a factor of $x^60-1).,$






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$

















                      4












                      $begingroup$

                      It's standard technique. $Q$ has a "simpler" multiple $,QR = x^5!-!1,$ so we first reduce $P$ mod $,x^large 5! -! 1$ using $bmod x^large 5-1!:, color#c00x^large 5equiv 1Rightarrow, x^large r+5qequiv x^large r(color#c00x^large 5)^large qequiv x^large r,,$ then reduce that result $bmod Q,,$ i.e.



                      $$Pbmod Q, =, (Pbmod QR)bmod Qqquad$$



                      This idea is ubiquitous, e.g. we already use it implicitly in grade school in radix $10$ to determine integer parity: first reduce mod $10$ to get the units digit, then reduce the units digits mod $2,,$ i.e.



                      $$N bmod 2, = (Nbmod 2cdot 5)bmod 2qquad $$



                      i.e. an integer has the same parity (even / oddness) as that of its units digit.



                      See here and its $25$ linked questions for many more examples (some far less trivial).



                      Remark $ $ Further, there are simple algorithms for recognizing cyclotomics (and products of such), e.g. there it shows that $, x^16+x^14-x^10-x^8-x^6+x^2+1$ is cyclotomic (a factor of $x^60-1).,$






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$















                        4












                        4








                        4





                        $begingroup$

                        It's standard technique. $Q$ has a "simpler" multiple $,QR = x^5!-!1,$ so we first reduce $P$ mod $,x^large 5! -! 1$ using $bmod x^large 5-1!:, color#c00x^large 5equiv 1Rightarrow, x^large r+5qequiv x^large r(color#c00x^large 5)^large qequiv x^large r,,$ then reduce that result $bmod Q,,$ i.e.



                        $$Pbmod Q, =, (Pbmod QR)bmod Qqquad$$



                        This idea is ubiquitous, e.g. we already use it implicitly in grade school in radix $10$ to determine integer parity: first reduce mod $10$ to get the units digit, then reduce the units digits mod $2,,$ i.e.



                        $$N bmod 2, = (Nbmod 2cdot 5)bmod 2qquad $$



                        i.e. an integer has the same parity (even / oddness) as that of its units digit.



                        See here and its $25$ linked questions for many more examples (some far less trivial).



                        Remark $ $ Further, there are simple algorithms for recognizing cyclotomics (and products of such), e.g. there it shows that $, x^16+x^14-x^10-x^8-x^6+x^2+1$ is cyclotomic (a factor of $x^60-1).,$






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$



                        It's standard technique. $Q$ has a "simpler" multiple $,QR = x^5!-!1,$ so we first reduce $P$ mod $,x^large 5! -! 1$ using $bmod x^large 5-1!:, color#c00x^large 5equiv 1Rightarrow, x^large r+5qequiv x^large r(color#c00x^large 5)^large qequiv x^large r,,$ then reduce that result $bmod Q,,$ i.e.



                        $$Pbmod Q, =, (Pbmod QR)bmod Qqquad$$



                        This idea is ubiquitous, e.g. we already use it implicitly in grade school in radix $10$ to determine integer parity: first reduce mod $10$ to get the units digit, then reduce the units digits mod $2,,$ i.e.



                        $$N bmod 2, = (Nbmod 2cdot 5)bmod 2qquad $$



                        i.e. an integer has the same parity (even / oddness) as that of its units digit.



                        See here and its $25$ linked questions for many more examples (some far less trivial).



                        Remark $ $ Further, there are simple algorithms for recognizing cyclotomics (and products of such), e.g. there it shows that $, x^16+x^14-x^10-x^8-x^6+x^2+1$ is cyclotomic (a factor of $x^60-1).,$







                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited 2 hours ago

























                        answered 3 hours ago









                        Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque

                        215k29199662




                        215k29199662





















                            3












                            $begingroup$

                            I think if the candidates know what a geometric series is, the question is okay. Indeed, one uses exactly this trick to find the formula for the geometric series, i.e. one writes
                            $$(x-1)sum_k=1^nx^k=x^n+1-1$$ to find that $$sum_k=1^infty x^k=lim_ntoinftysum_k=1^nx^k=lim_ntoinftyfracx^n+1-1x-1=frac11-x$$
                            for $|x|<1$. Therefore, it is not too hard to get from $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ to $x^5-1$. Now you can reduce mod $x^5-1$ by substitution $x^5=1$.



                            I think the way one should think about this is to note that $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ is the minimal polynomial of any primitive 5th unit root $alpha$. Now $P(alpha)=0$ since $alpha^5=1$ and therefore $Q$ devides $P$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$

















                              3












                              $begingroup$

                              I think if the candidates know what a geometric series is, the question is okay. Indeed, one uses exactly this trick to find the formula for the geometric series, i.e. one writes
                              $$(x-1)sum_k=1^nx^k=x^n+1-1$$ to find that $$sum_k=1^infty x^k=lim_ntoinftysum_k=1^nx^k=lim_ntoinftyfracx^n+1-1x-1=frac11-x$$
                              for $|x|<1$. Therefore, it is not too hard to get from $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ to $x^5-1$. Now you can reduce mod $x^5-1$ by substitution $x^5=1$.



                              I think the way one should think about this is to note that $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ is the minimal polynomial of any primitive 5th unit root $alpha$. Now $P(alpha)=0$ since $alpha^5=1$ and therefore $Q$ devides $P$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$















                                3












                                3








                                3





                                $begingroup$

                                I think if the candidates know what a geometric series is, the question is okay. Indeed, one uses exactly this trick to find the formula for the geometric series, i.e. one writes
                                $$(x-1)sum_k=1^nx^k=x^n+1-1$$ to find that $$sum_k=1^infty x^k=lim_ntoinftysum_k=1^nx^k=lim_ntoinftyfracx^n+1-1x-1=frac11-x$$
                                for $|x|<1$. Therefore, it is not too hard to get from $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ to $x^5-1$. Now you can reduce mod $x^5-1$ by substitution $x^5=1$.



                                I think the way one should think about this is to note that $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ is the minimal polynomial of any primitive 5th unit root $alpha$. Now $P(alpha)=0$ since $alpha^5=1$ and therefore $Q$ devides $P$.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



                                I think if the candidates know what a geometric series is, the question is okay. Indeed, one uses exactly this trick to find the formula for the geometric series, i.e. one writes
                                $$(x-1)sum_k=1^nx^k=x^n+1-1$$ to find that $$sum_k=1^infty x^k=lim_ntoinftysum_k=1^nx^k=lim_ntoinftyfracx^n+1-1x-1=frac11-x$$
                                for $|x|<1$. Therefore, it is not too hard to get from $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ to $x^5-1$. Now you can reduce mod $x^5-1$ by substitution $x^5=1$.



                                I think the way one should think about this is to note that $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ is the minimal polynomial of any primitive 5th unit root $alpha$. Now $P(alpha)=0$ since $alpha^5=1$ and therefore $Q$ devides $P$.







                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                answered 3 hours ago









                                NightgapNightgap

                                1,131210




                                1,131210





















                                    3












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Let $a$ be zero of $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1=0$. Obviously $ane 1$. Then $$a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1=0$$
                                    so multiply this with $a-1$ we get $$a^5=1$$ But then $$ Q(a) = a^100a^4+a^90a^3+a^80 a^2+a^70a+1 = a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1=0$$



                                    So each zero of $Q(x)$ is also a zero of $P(x)$ and since all 4 zeroes of $Q(x)$ are different we have $Q(x)mid P(x)$.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$

















                                      3












                                      $begingroup$

                                      Let $a$ be zero of $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1=0$. Obviously $ane 1$. Then $$a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1=0$$
                                      so multiply this with $a-1$ we get $$a^5=1$$ But then $$ Q(a) = a^100a^4+a^90a^3+a^80 a^2+a^70a+1 = a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1=0$$



                                      So each zero of $Q(x)$ is also a zero of $P(x)$ and since all 4 zeroes of $Q(x)$ are different we have $Q(x)mid P(x)$.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$















                                        3












                                        3








                                        3





                                        $begingroup$

                                        Let $a$ be zero of $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1=0$. Obviously $ane 1$. Then $$a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1=0$$
                                        so multiply this with $a-1$ we get $$a^5=1$$ But then $$ Q(a) = a^100a^4+a^90a^3+a^80 a^2+a^70a+1 = a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1=0$$



                                        So each zero of $Q(x)$ is also a zero of $P(x)$ and since all 4 zeroes of $Q(x)$ are different we have $Q(x)mid P(x)$.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer









                                        $endgroup$



                                        Let $a$ be zero of $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1=0$. Obviously $ane 1$. Then $$a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1=0$$
                                        so multiply this with $a-1$ we get $$a^5=1$$ But then $$ Q(a) = a^100a^4+a^90a^3+a^80 a^2+a^70a+1 = a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1=0$$



                                        So each zero of $Q(x)$ is also a zero of $P(x)$ and since all 4 zeroes of $Q(x)$ are different we have $Q(x)mid P(x)$.







                                        share|cite|improve this answer












                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer










                                        answered 3 hours ago









                                        Maria MazurMaria Mazur

                                        51.3k1362130




                                        51.3k1362130





















                                            0












                                            $begingroup$

                                            If it's not obvious, an examination of the question quickly reveals the trick. Say



                                            $$P(x)=x^n$$



                                            Then begin long division by $Q(x)$:



                                            $$x^n-x^n-x^n-1-x^n-2-x^n-3-x^n-4$$
                                            $$x^n-5$$
                                            $$dots$$
                                            $$x^n-5k$$



                                            While it may not be obvious just by looking at the question, anyone who attempts the naive solution has (at least) a reasonable chance of running across a way of solving it.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$

















                                              0












                                              $begingroup$

                                              If it's not obvious, an examination of the question quickly reveals the trick. Say



                                              $$P(x)=x^n$$



                                              Then begin long division by $Q(x)$:



                                              $$x^n-x^n-x^n-1-x^n-2-x^n-3-x^n-4$$
                                              $$x^n-5$$
                                              $$dots$$
                                              $$x^n-5k$$



                                              While it may not be obvious just by looking at the question, anyone who attempts the naive solution has (at least) a reasonable chance of running across a way of solving it.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$















                                                0












                                                0








                                                0





                                                $begingroup$

                                                If it's not obvious, an examination of the question quickly reveals the trick. Say



                                                $$P(x)=x^n$$



                                                Then begin long division by $Q(x)$:



                                                $$x^n-x^n-x^n-1-x^n-2-x^n-3-x^n-4$$
                                                $$x^n-5$$
                                                $$dots$$
                                                $$x^n-5k$$



                                                While it may not be obvious just by looking at the question, anyone who attempts the naive solution has (at least) a reasonable chance of running across a way of solving it.






                                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                                $endgroup$



                                                If it's not obvious, an examination of the question quickly reveals the trick. Say



                                                $$P(x)=x^n$$



                                                Then begin long division by $Q(x)$:



                                                $$x^n-x^n-x^n-1-x^n-2-x^n-3-x^n-4$$
                                                $$x^n-5$$
                                                $$dots$$
                                                $$x^n-5k$$



                                                While it may not be obvious just by looking at the question, anyone who attempts the naive solution has (at least) a reasonable chance of running across a way of solving it.







                                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                                answered 1 hour ago









                                                SpitemasterSpitemaster

                                                1362




                                                1362



























                                                    draft saved

                                                    draft discarded
















































                                                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid


                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function ()
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3224765%2fpolynomial-division-is-this-trick-obvious%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest















                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    Siegen Nawigatsjuun

                                                    Log på Navigationsmenu

                                                    Log på Navigationsmenu