Why didn't the Avengers use this object earlier?Why don't Black Widow and Hawkeye have their own movie?In The Avengers (2012), How did they communicate at the climax without any ear device even though the inner ear technology was created in 2013?Why did Steve Rogers stop using guns?Would the Ancient One have defended the Earth from a Chitauri invasion in the Avengers absence?Did the UN Council have to approve Iron Man's actions in Spider-Man: Homecoming?Why did the Ultron bots flee?How could this character be mortally wounded?Is Thanos immortal?In Avengers: Infinity War, what did Dr. Strange need to do to ensure the outcome in Endgame?How fast can Captain Marvel travel in Endgame?

OSPF increase bandwidth with load-balancing

Is this possible when it comes to the relations of P, NP, NP-Hard and NP-Complete?

What information exactly does an instruction cache store?

Why didn't the Avengers use this object earlier?

Problem in downloading videos using youtube-dl from unsupported sites

Why can't I share a one use code with anyone else?

Extract the characters before last colon

Were any of the books mentioned in this scene from the movie Hackers real?

Alias for root of a polynomial

How do I adjust encounters to challenge my lycanthrope players without negating their cool new abilities?

Will the volt, ampere, ohm or other electrical units change on May 20th, 2019?

Formal Definition of Dot Product

Wireless headphones interfere with Wi-Fi signal on laptop

Why does the headset man not get on the tractor?

Find the unknown area, x

How to disable Two-factor authentication for Apple ID?

Biology of a Firestarter

Do Grothendieck universes matter for an algebraic geometer?

Polynomial division: Is this trick obvious?

What is this old US Air Force plane?

How to make a not so good looking person more appealing?

Acronyms in HDD specification

Why doesn't Iron Man's action affect this person in Endgame?

Segmentation fault when popping x86 stack



Why didn't the Avengers use this object earlier?


Why don't Black Widow and Hawkeye have their own movie?In The Avengers (2012), How did they communicate at the climax without any ear device even though the inner ear technology was created in 2013?Why did Steve Rogers stop using guns?Would the Ancient One have defended the Earth from a Chitauri invasion in the Avengers absence?Did the UN Council have to approve Iron Man's actions in Spider-Man: Homecoming?Why did the Ultron bots flee?How could this character be mortally wounded?Is Thanos immortal?In Avengers: Infinity War, what did Dr. Strange need to do to ensure the outcome in Endgame?How fast can Captain Marvel travel in Endgame?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11















In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?










share|improve this question









New contributor



chessprogrammer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 4





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    19 hours ago






  • 7





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    19 hours ago






  • 2





    Certainly you'd think someone would have tried. Tony did.

    – Adamant
    19 hours ago






  • 10





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    12 hours ago






  • 7





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    10 hours ago

















11















In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?










share|improve this question









New contributor



chessprogrammer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 4





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    19 hours ago






  • 7





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    19 hours ago






  • 2





    Certainly you'd think someone would have tried. Tony did.

    – Adamant
    19 hours ago






  • 10





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    12 hours ago






  • 7





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    10 hours ago













11












11








11








In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?










share|improve this question









New contributor



chessprogrammer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?







marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame






share|improve this question









New contributor



chessprogrammer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



chessprogrammer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









I N T E R E S T I N G

1,131431




1,131431






New contributor



chessprogrammer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 20 hours ago









chessprogrammerchessprogrammer

16514




16514




New contributor



chessprogrammer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




chessprogrammer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 4





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    19 hours ago






  • 7





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    19 hours ago






  • 2





    Certainly you'd think someone would have tried. Tony did.

    – Adamant
    19 hours ago






  • 10





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    12 hours ago






  • 7





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    10 hours ago












  • 4





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    19 hours ago






  • 7





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    19 hours ago






  • 2





    Certainly you'd think someone would have tried. Tony did.

    – Adamant
    19 hours ago






  • 10





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    12 hours ago






  • 7





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    10 hours ago







4




4





We don't trade lives.

– gowenfawr
19 hours ago





We don't trade lives.

– gowenfawr
19 hours ago




7




7





Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

– chessprogrammer
19 hours ago





Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

– chessprogrammer
19 hours ago




2




2





Certainly you'd think someone would have tried. Tony did.

– Adamant
19 hours ago





Certainly you'd think someone would have tried. Tony did.

– Adamant
19 hours ago




10




10





There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

– user
12 hours ago





There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

– user
12 hours ago




7




7





@user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

– TheLethalCarrot
10 hours ago





@user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

– TheLethalCarrot
10 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















37














Because that was never the plan



The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



Avengers: Endgame







share|improve this answer




















  • 9





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    10 hours ago











  • I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

    – Thunderforge
    7 hours ago











  • @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    7 hours ago











  • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    48 mins ago


















20














It didn't fit



The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



It didn't occur to them



It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



They didn't know that they could



Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






share|improve this answer




















  • 8





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    18 hours ago











  • I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    6 hours ago


















16














Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



  • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


  • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


  • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


  • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






share|improve this answer




















  • 7





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    15 hours ago











  • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    15 hours ago






  • 11





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    12 hours ago











  • @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    9 hours ago


















8















Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    8 hours ago











  • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    2 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






chessprogrammer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212300%2fwhy-didnt-the-avengers-use-this-object-earlier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









37














Because that was never the plan



The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



Avengers: Endgame







share|improve this answer




















  • 9





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    10 hours ago











  • I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

    – Thunderforge
    7 hours ago











  • @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    7 hours ago











  • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    48 mins ago















37














Because that was never the plan



The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



Avengers: Endgame







share|improve this answer




















  • 9





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    10 hours ago











  • I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

    – Thunderforge
    7 hours ago











  • @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    7 hours ago











  • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    48 mins ago













37












37








37







Because that was never the plan



The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



Avengers: Endgame







share|improve this answer















Because that was never the plan



The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



Avengers: Endgame








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago









Community

1




1










answered 13 hours ago









TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot

57.7k22355401




57.7k22355401







  • 9





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    10 hours ago











  • I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

    – Thunderforge
    7 hours ago











  • @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    7 hours ago











  • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    48 mins ago












  • 9





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    10 hours ago











  • I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

    – Thunderforge
    7 hours ago











  • @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    7 hours ago











  • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    48 mins ago







9




9





Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

– Matthieu M.
10 hours ago





Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

– Matthieu M.
10 hours ago













I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

– Thunderforge
7 hours ago





I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

– Thunderforge
7 hours ago













@Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

– TheLethalCarrot
7 hours ago





@Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

– TheLethalCarrot
7 hours ago













While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

– Jacob C.
48 mins ago





While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

– Jacob C.
48 mins ago













20














It didn't fit



The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



It didn't occur to them



It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



They didn't know that they could



Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






share|improve this answer




















  • 8





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    18 hours ago











  • I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    6 hours ago















20














It didn't fit



The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



It didn't occur to them



It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



They didn't know that they could



Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






share|improve this answer




















  • 8





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    18 hours ago











  • I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    6 hours ago













20












20








20







It didn't fit



The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



It didn't occur to them



It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



They didn't know that they could



Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






share|improve this answer















It didn't fit



The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



It didn't occur to them



It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



They didn't know that they could



Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 17 hours ago









Jenayah

24.6k8114154




24.6k8114154










answered 18 hours ago









Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

3,108926




3,108926







  • 8





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    18 hours ago











  • I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    6 hours ago












  • 8





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    18 hours ago











  • I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    6 hours ago







8




8





Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

– Nathan K.
18 hours ago





Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

– Nathan K.
18 hours ago













I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

– Moacir
6 hours ago





I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

– Moacir
6 hours ago











16














Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



  • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


  • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


  • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


  • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






share|improve this answer




















  • 7





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    15 hours ago











  • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    15 hours ago






  • 11





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    12 hours ago











  • @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    9 hours ago















16














Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



  • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


  • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


  • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


  • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






share|improve this answer




















  • 7





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    15 hours ago











  • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    15 hours ago






  • 11





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    12 hours ago











  • @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    9 hours ago













16












16








16







Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



  • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


  • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


  • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


  • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






share|improve this answer















Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



  • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


  • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


  • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


  • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 17 hours ago









Jenayah

24.6k8114154




24.6k8114154










answered 18 hours ago









Stark07Stark07

12.5k755106




12.5k755106







  • 7





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    15 hours ago











  • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    15 hours ago






  • 11





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    12 hours ago











  • @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    9 hours ago












  • 7





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    15 hours ago











  • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    15 hours ago






  • 11





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    12 hours ago











  • @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    9 hours ago







7




7





I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

– GordonBennett
15 hours ago





I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

– GordonBennett
15 hours ago













I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

– Stark07
15 hours ago





I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

– Stark07
15 hours ago




11




11





Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

– user
12 hours ago





Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

– user
12 hours ago













@user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

– Daniel R. Collins
9 hours ago





@user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

– Daniel R. Collins
9 hours ago











8















Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    8 hours ago











  • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    2 hours ago















8















Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    8 hours ago











  • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    2 hours ago













8












8








8








Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







share|improve this answer














Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 17 hours ago









JenayahJenayah

24.6k8114154




24.6k8114154







  • 3





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    8 hours ago











  • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    2 hours ago












  • 3





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    8 hours ago











  • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    2 hours ago







3




3





"you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

– TheLethalCarrot
8 hours ago





"you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

– TheLethalCarrot
8 hours ago













@TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

– Jenayah
8 hours ago





@TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

– Jenayah
8 hours ago




1




1





Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

– Nolimon
3 hours ago





Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

– Nolimon
3 hours ago




1




1





@Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

– Jenayah
3 hours ago





@Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

– Jenayah
3 hours ago




1




1





The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

– Nolimon
2 hours ago





The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

– Nolimon
2 hours ago










chessprogrammer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















chessprogrammer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












chessprogrammer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











chessprogrammer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212300%2fwhy-didnt-the-avengers-use-this-object-earlier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Siegen Nawigatsjuun

Log på Navigationsmenu

Log på Navigationsmenu